#๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜†๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ - ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต: ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
๐˜–๐˜š๐˜”-๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜“๐˜œ๐˜“๐˜Š ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ of ๐˜’๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ 2021๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ

Satellite imagery shows how our landscapes evolve. In the LaVerDi project, HeiGIT and @BKG combine OSM data with Copernicus Sentinel-2 imagery to make land-use and land-cover monitoring across Germany more precise and responsive.

๐Ÿ” More about LaVerDi: https://heigit.org/laverdi/

#OpenStreetMap #OpenData #LULC #Karlsruhe

Here is a quick land-cover breakdown for the Carpathian National Nature Park (Ivano-Frankivsk region, Ukraine), based on Copernicus Global Land Service remote-sensing data.

The results show that closed evergreen needle-leaf forest dominates the territory (almost 60%), followed by mixed and deciduous forests. Urban areas, shrubs, and agricultural lands occupy only a tiny fraction of the park.

This is part of my long-term project of analysing protected areas using open satellite datasets and reproducible geospatial workflows.

#RemoteSensing #EarthObservation #Copernicus #LandCover #GIS
#RStats #Rspatial #Conservation #Carpathians #Ukraine #Biodiversity
#NationalParks #OpenData #EnvironmentalScience #LULC

A few years ago, I carried out a personal initiative project while working at UkrGazVydobuvannya (Oil&Gas).

In 2019โ€“2020, I performed a full land-cover analysis for all company license areas using openly available Copernicus Global Land Cover data.

I built two variants of the analysis based on FAO UN land-cover classifications and calculated Shannon diversity indices for each license area.
Later, I expanded the work and produced detailed plots and spatial summaries for every site.

These analytics were used by both field personnel and upper management โ€” for general environmental understanding and for environmental impact assessment (EIA) related to the companyโ€™s production activities.

Everything was done using open data and the R language.

#LandCover #Copernicus #RStats #OpenData #EnvironmentalScience #GIS #ShannonIndex #RemoteSensing #Ukraine #FOSS #DataScience #LULC #LandCover #CopernicusLandCover #Energy #UGV

My experiment with land-cover classification for Calgary using satellite imagery and with a machine-learning model trained on data from another continent.

The results turned out surprisingly good โ€” most classes transferred almost perfectly.
The only noticeable shift was the Forest class: tree and shrub vegetation in the source region differs from Calgaryโ€™s, so the model mapped it conservatively here.

Still, the general structure of the landscape was captured very well, and community-level land-cover profiles look consistent.

#Rstats #RemoteSensing #GIS #MachineLearning #LandCover #Calgary #EarthObservation #LULC #GreennessOfCalgary #QGIS #UrbanHealth #Alberta #Canada #Sentinel #Copernicus #CopernicusSentinel #Sentinel1 #Sentinel2 #ESA #DataScience #FOSS #UrbanEcology #UrbanNature

๐ŸŒณ Random Forests and Living Trees

English translation of my earlier article on applying satellite imagery and machine learning to map urban land cover.

What started as a local research project in Kryvyi Rih turned into something much larger โ€” the results sparked a heated discussion among residents, officials, and industry representatives about the real condition of green buffers around large industrial sites.

The methodology developed during that work is still being used today โ€” adapted for new environmental and urban projects.

๐Ÿ”— https://www.datastory.org.ua/random-forests-and-living-trees/

#RemoteSensing #MachineLearning #LandCoverMapping #UrbanEcology #EnvironmentalMonitoring #RandomForest #GeospatialAnalysis #GIS #RStats #SAGAGIS #QGIS #IndependentResearch #OpenSource #EnvironmentalDataScience #KryvyiRih #LULC

๐—Ÿ๐—จ๐—Ÿ๐—– ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ: ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ

With the ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ, you can calculate high-resolution estimates of emissions caused by #LULC changes.
This makes it easier to plan locally targeted climate mitigation measures.

๐Ÿ“‘ Read more: https://heigit.org/unveiling-the-heigit-climate-action-navigator-part-4-land-use-and-land-cover-change-emissions/
๐Ÿ“Š Try it out: https://climate-action.heigit.org/

#EarthOvershootDay #MoveTheDate

Artificial area and croplands have increased by 133% and 6% between 1992 and 2020, respectively. If global land use continues to change at historical rates, global GHG emissions would increase to 76โ€‰ยฑโ€‰8 Gt CO2eq in 2050.

However, #ecosystem conservation and restoration can be effective strategies to partially offset GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion.๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ๐Ÿšซ

#LandUse #ClimateChange #LULC

Reference: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17604

#30DayMapChallenge Day 6 (Raster):

๐ŸกLand Use & Carbon Emissions๐Ÿก

With our plugin for Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Change Emissions Estimation, we can quantify carbon emissions resulting from changes in the land use or land cover within a selected area and time period.

๐Ÿ”Ž This map shows how #LULC changes impacted #CarbonEmissions in Heidelberg between 2017 and 2024.

๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Data by #OpenStreetMap/#Esri. Map by Satvik Parashar, modified according to Ulrich et al. (2024, in submission)

๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ A new paper "scikit-eo: A Python package for Remote Sensing Data Analysis" on a tool for #LULC analysis with various machine learning and neural networks algorithms.๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ

Article: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06692
Software: https://yotarazona.github.io/scikit-eo/

#geopython #remotesensing #landcover #spatialml

scikit-eo: A Python package for Remote Sensing Data Analysis

Tarazona et al., (2024). scikit-eo: A Python package for Remote Sensing Data Analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 9(99), 6692, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06692

Journal of Open Source Software