@ricardoharvin
Unless that trying causes more harm than good.
Human activity has caused the climate crisis.
Accelerating that activity doesn't seem wise nor logical.
The activities of resource extraction for the materials to build all the green innovations is just as harmful as the extraction of fossil fuels.
Continuing the harmful practices of the past, with different goals in mind, isn't the panacea many want us to believe.
We could halve our energy use if we wanted to, but no world leader has called for that. All we hear is more "green energy" to satisfy an ever growing thirst for it.
When trying to get out of a hole, the first rule is to stop digging, literally.
As to tech miracles, it's a pipedream. Technology has created not only conveniences, but also a big part of every problem we now face, inadvertantly and otherwise.
A few are good, and feasible.
Meat manufactured in labs is one. Little resource extraction is needed, saves water, saves billions of animals from exploitation and slaughter, and frees up land for rewilding back to it's natural state.
Choosing which tech will be truly helpful is vital; not wasting time, resources and money on boondoggle schemes, of which we've already seen many.
Most tech will not save us, but it will make a lot of money for the charlatans pushing it, which is their goal - making money, the consequences be damned.
If we we're serious about addressing climate change we would halt exploration and exploitation of most all natural resources and ration what oil/gas is left, ban frivolous flying, make needed products fixable and to last rather than become obsolete after a year or two, and basically learn to live with what we have.
As sea change in our lifestyle?
Definitely.
Drastic actions?
Most definitely.
But we are facing drastic, extinction levels of most life on earth if we don't.
Hopium and unjustified optimism ensure a much more difficult future than it will already be.