This sketch shows the arrangement of #dentils in the classic variation of the #IonicEntablature. It shows the full layout, but most of the top is obscured by the top portion of the #cornice. Only the outside square shapes are actually visible. Each #dentil has a square "footprint" that is 4 parts by 4 parts (32*32 units) and is 6 parts (48 units) tall. The spacing between each dentil is 2 parts (16 units). Dentils project 4 parts (or 32 units) from the face of the #fascia on which they rest. Each face of the fascia has 7 dentils with the middle dentil laterally centered and directly in front of the column axis. The 2 side dentils are on side faces, and that is apparent in the darker shading in the sketch at https://pixelfed.social/i/web/post/790782316675150160. Take the time to reconcile this with the numbers listed in #Scarlata's #PracticalArchitecture. The 3D reconstruction from the #primaryProfileCurves is very similar to that of the #IonicPedestal, with #extrusion, #mitering, #joining, and #capping planar holes as described in https://pixelfed.social/i/web/post/790645054230337543 — just set the dentils aside, for now. Once you have capped the #planarHoles to get a solid, analyze the edges of the solid in the #CAD program for #nakedEdges and #nonManifoldEdges. Then, extrude the dentils outline (in the top view) to a height of 48 units (in the front view). Now perform a #booleanUnion of the two solid shapes to get the complete #entablature. Finally, check the edges of the solid in the #CAD program AGAIN for #nakedEdges and #nonManifoldEdges. With this, we have finished two of the three main components of the #IonicOrder. There's a modern version of the Ionic entablature with #modillions, which I will describe later. Next, we move on to the biggest, most conspicuous part of the order — the #IonicColumn.
Side View of a #Peripteral (#Sexastyle) #Colonnade with #IonicColumns arranged in #Eustyle #intercolumniation. In my previous post at https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/803076419096100108, I mentioned that the consensus sweet spot for inter-column spacing was 2.25 diameters (4.5µ) between column shafts at the bottom (6.5µ axis-to-axis), except for the two middle columns where the spacing was 3 column diameters (8µ from axis-to-axis). This variable intercolumniation is only for #colonnades in the front and back. The spacing between columns on the sides is uniform as shown in the image here. Something worth noting in this image is the number of columns on each side. In a peripteral (sexastyle) building, there are 6 columns in the front (and back) with 5 intercolumniations between them. On the sides, it is an error to double the number of columns on the sides. Instead, the number of intercolumniations is doubled — in this case from 5 to 10, giving us 11 columns. So, the number of columns is always even in the front, and always odd on the sides (one less than twice the number of columns in the front). On the topic of even and odd, also note that the number of steps leading up to the base of the colonnade is always odd. #Vitruvious suggested keeping the rise between 9" - 12" and the run twice that, or between 18" - 24". Note that these measurements are in physical units — a marked departure from the abstract µ = 144 units we have been using all along. The rules for intercolumniation presented so far are known as #simpleIntercolumniation. When the Romans introduced #arches and combined them with #halfColumns to produce #arcades, the rules were adapted for the new design. Because the arches distributed the load from the beams above, it allowed for wider intercolumniation. With the addition of #pedestals, the gap was made even wider still, and the look of the complete edifice is just majestic! With half-columns and arches, we will see some new architectural elements.
The bottom 1/3 of the #columnShaft for an #IonicColumn is a perfect cylinder. So the line below point B is a straight line. In https://pixelfed.social/p/Splines/791723063470910081, we blended the bottom end of the 60° arc and the top end of the long interpolated curve between points J and K. Now blend the bottom end of the interpolated curve and the top end of the straight line between points B and C to obtain the 3rd and final #NURBS segment for the #primaryProfileCurve of the shaft. Just like there's a #cavetto and #fillet near the #neck of the shaft, there is a fillet and cavetto near the foot of the shaft. However, there is a subtle difference between the two. The cavetto near the neck is tangential to the blended #NURBS curve that is not a straight line. The profile curve for the cavetto near the foot is tangential to a straight line. There is a special name for a cavetto that is tangential to a straight line or flat surface, like the two cavetto moldings in the #dado of the #pedestal. It's called a #conge. Another alternate name for the cavetto molding is #cove, which is evocative of "cave" because of its concave profile curve. Above the neck is a fillet 8 units tall and an #astragal 16 units tall that #Scarlata puts in braces in the column shaft section within his tables of #VignolaProportions, with a note saying they are not counted as part of the shaft but are accounted for as part of the #capital. I decided to include the top fillet as part of the shaft and keep the astragal with the capital. It does not change the design or alter the proportions in any way, but the inclusion of the fillet makes it more practical for #3DPrinting and #CNCMilling of the neck. This concludes the profile curve for the shaft with a height of 291 parts or 2328 units + 8 for fillet. The column shaft is tapered in the upper 2/3 due to #entasis whose purpose is to make optical corrections to the shape of the column which, without correction, appeared concave near the top.
There are two variations of the #IonicEntablature. The classic variation has #dentils, which are teeth-like structures shown here above the #frieze. The modern version has #modillions, which are projecting brackets under the #corona of the #cornice. Well, "modern" is a relative term. For designs that are more than 2000 years old, even an alteration 1000 years ago would qualify as modern. Although the sketch shows the #entablature with a square footprint, in practice, it runs the entire length of a #colonnade (multiple columns) or an #arcade (multiple arches). #CAD construction of the entablature is very similar to that of a #pedestal. The first step is to consult #Vignola's #RegolaArchitettura for the visual appearance, and then consult #Scarlata's #PracticalArchitecture for #VignolaProportions in tabular form. It is convenient to create a spreadsheet to convert the measurements given in Scarlata's book from module "parts" to your own model units based on your choice of value for the module parameter µ. Armed with these measurements, it is time to plot the points and draw the #primaryProfileCurves on our standard 2D grid with minor grid lines 8 units apart and major grid lines 32 units apart. In the first pass, skip the dentils and draw the profile curves for the rest of the moldings. Just as with the pedestal, I will show the macro-level plan as well as the detail plan. So, you don't have to go to Scarlata's book, but you know it's there if you want to. I will show the dentil arrangement in a subsequent post. Based on µ = 144, the classic Ionic entablature is 648 units (36 parts, or 4.5*µ) tall. Of this, the #architrave at the bottom is 180 units (10 parts, or 1.25*µ) tall, the frieze in the middle is 216 units (12 parts, or 1.5*µ) tall, and the cornice at the top is 252 units (14 parts, or 1.75*µ) tall.
This is a sketch of the complete #IonicOrder, excluding #intercolumniation and #arches, which came later. Different people have different abilities and different levels of mathematical knowledge. I make few assumptions about the minimum knowledge one must possess to follow my posts. At a minimum, one must understand ratio, proportion, similar, congruent triangles, Pythagoras, and basic properties of circles, including radius, diameter, circumference, tangents, secants, and chords. No trigonometry or calculus is assumed, but people who have a knowledge of differentiable continuity, maxima, minima, and inflection points will have increased appreciation of the nuances of some designs featuring smooth curves and surfaces. I start with first principles, even if it might be a little boring for people with advanced skills. The most basic requirement is that one must be able to mark points on a 3D grid, draw a straight line between two points, and draw a circle or arc from the center. The CAD tools should help with the rest, for example, to find a point of tangency, draw a circle through three arbitrary points, or tangential to three curves (if possible). There are three components in the #Ionic order. Starting at the bottom is the #pedestal (which is optional), the #column, and the #entablature. Each of these three components has three subcomponents: — Pedestal has #basement, #dado, and #cap. — Column has #base, #shaft, and #capital. — Entablature has #architrave, #frieze, and #cornice. The pedestal, column, and entablature are always in 4:12:3 ratio. If all components are present, the total order height is divisible by 19. If there's no pedestal, the total height is divisible by 15. The entire order is parameterized by a SINGLE parameter — the radius of the column at its base. #Vitruvius called the radius a "module" (µ) — an abstract unit of measure independent of physical units. Components of Ionic column and entablature also have classic and modern variations.
⬆️ @Carlbovis
Convince me that classical #architecture and #design were not influenced by #nature.
For context, compare the picture of #ChaffinchWings and tail in the previous post to the #volute and the #frieze in the sketch below which shows the classical #Entablature, #Capital, and neck of the #ColumnShaft in the #IonicOrder.