Tribunal revisa amparo por archivos de la «Guerra Sucia» resguardados por la Sedena

Un tribunal federal analizará el amparo que busca la entrega de los archivos de la Guerra Sucia resguardados por la Sedena al Archivo General de la Nación.

Por Martín García | Reportero                                      

El Décimo Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Administrativa del Primer Circuito discutirá el amparo en revisión 43/2025 relacionado con los archivos de la llamada «Guerra Sucia» que permanecen bajo resguardo de la Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional (Sedena). El proyecto de resolución está a cargo de la magistrada Sandra Janet Hernández Chávez. La decisión podría definir el alcance de las obligaciones del Ejército respecto de la entrega de documentación histórica al Archivo General de la Nación (AGN).

El juicio fue promovido por Alicia de los Ríos Merino, con el acompañamiento de ARTICLE 19 y el Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez (Centro Prodh). Las organizaciones sostienen que el caso involucra el derecho a la verdad de las víctimas de graves violaciones a los derechos humanos ocurridas entre 1965 y 1990.

Los promoventes recordaron que en febrero de 2019 se publicó en el Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) un decreto presidencial que ordenó a las dependencias federales transferir al AGN los archivos históricos relacionados con violaciones graves a derechos humanos y persecuciones políticas, disposición que incluye a la Sedena.

Señalan incumplimiento del decreto

De acuerdo con el Centro Prodh, los documentos ordenados en el decreto aún no han sido entregados al AGN. La organización señaló que esta situación ha impedido el acceso a información considerada relevante para el esclarecimiento de hechos ocurridos durante la Guerra Sucia.

También recordó que el Mecanismo para la Verdad y el Esclarecimiento Histórico (MEVH) informó en octubre de 2023 haber encontrado documentación inédita durante consultas realizadas en archivos militares. Según el informe del mecanismo, posteriormente se presentaron obstáculos para continuar la revisión de esos expedientes.

Con base en esos antecedentes, Alicia de los Ríos Merino promovió un juicio de amparo en noviembre de 2023 para solicitar la preservación de los documentos y exigir el cumplimiento del decreto presidencial sobre la transferencia de archivos históricos. –sn–

Militares

¡Conéctate con Sociedad Noticias! Suscríbete a nuestro canal de YouTube y activa las notificaciones, o bien, síguenos en las redes sociales: FacebookTwitter e Instagram.

También, te invitamos a que te sumes a nuestro canal de información en tiempo real a través de Telegram.

#NoticiasMX #PeriodismoParaTi #PeriodismoParaTiSociedadNoticias #AGN #AliciaDeLosRíosMerino #Amparo #archivoGeneralDeLaNación #Article19 #Cdmx #CentroProdh #DerechosHumanos #GuerraSucia #Información #InformaciónMéxico #México #MEVH #Morena #noticia #noticias #NoticiasMéxico #NoticiasSociedad #Sedena #SN #Sociedad #SociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom #sociedadNoticias #SociedadNoticiasCom

il manifesto: «Il clima cambia anche i menù: a fine secolo avremo piatti diversi»

Faremo l’amatriciana con l’ocra al posto del guanciale, mangeremo i carciofi a Natale invece che a Pasqua, gli gnocchi avranno la manioca nell’impasto, mentre la vignarola no, quella non si […]
The post «Il clima cambia anche i menù: a fine secolo avremo piatti diversi» first appeared on il manifesto.

Decrees on Safety, the criminalization of rights: a report denounces the crackdown on ecological dissent.

“Right is not crime.” The title of the report produced by the Network in Defense of and by the Observatory for Repression, published in May 2026 within the P.E.A.C.E. project co-financed by CLIDEF and Civitates, is already a thesis and clear: defending the environment and territories is a constitutional right, and those who exercise it today are treated as criminals. The second edition of the report measures three years of “shock legislation” against ecological dissent and returns a picture in which the criminalization of conflict has become a declared government program.

Law 22 January 2024 n. 6, the so-called Sangiuliano law, inaugurated the cycle. For those who damage or deteriorate cultural assets, a fine of €20,000 to €60,000 is introduced, punishable directly by the prefect. On February 13, 2024, two weeks after the entry into force, an activist from Ultima Generazione who had glued photographs of the Campi Bisenzio flood onto the frame of the Venus at the Uffizi was sent a fine of €20,000.

Fifteen months later arrives Law Decree No. 48 of April 11, 2025, converted into Law No. 80 of June 9, 2025: 14 new crimes, 9 aggravating factors. Article 14 transforms the blockade of roads with one’s body from an administrative offense into a criminal offense, up to one month of imprisonment for the individual, from six months to two years if more than one person is gathered. Article 19 aggravates the penalty for resisting public officials “in order to prevent the realization of infrastructure intended to supply energy, transportation services, and telecommunications.” Article 26 introduces the crime of riot in a penitentiary institution, including “passive resistance conduct.”

Decreti Sicurezza (Security Decrees), the architecture of control. On the ground, repression operates on three parallel tracks. The first is criminal: public prosecutors contest the interruption of a public service (art. 340 c.p.), defacing, violation of a passage order, which the Caivano decree of September 2023 has multiplied by six in the minimum, bringing it from one to six months. The second is administrative: mandatory passage orders, urban bans, special surveillance, and sanctions issued by the Carabinieri based on presumed social danger.

Ultima Generazione has received 399 passage orders since 2021, and Extinction Rebellion records dozens being issued in Rome, Bologna, Brescia, Venice, and Padua. The third is patrimonial: criminal fines up to €10,000 for damage in public squares, and the million-euro compensation claims in the so-called “Sovrano” No Tav process, in which the government took part as a civil party, requesting the costs of police overtime.

A authoritarian turn under international scrutiny. On December 16, 2024, the Council of Europe’s Human Rights Commissioner Michael O’Flaherty wrote to Italian Senate President Ignazio La Russa requesting that he not approve the text unless substantially modified. La Russa, in turn, dismissed the letter as “unacceptable interference.” Six days before, on December 14, 100,000 people with 200 organizations passed through Rome against the measure. The Council of Europe’s observations add to those of UN Special Rapporteur Mary Lawlor and those of UN Special Rapporteur for the Environment Michel Forst, who in its November 2025 guidelines explicitly recommended that Italy refrain from criminalizing peaceful environmental protests. The government remained deaf to it.

On March 22 and 23, 2026, the “no” to the referendum on career separation was passed with 53.75% against 46.25%: a vote that closes the chapter on the restrictive laws. However, the apparatus that that chapter built remains intact. A judiciary that continues to acquit for minor offenses and disapplies passage orders without justification is mitigating the trend case by case, sentence by sentence. Someone should raise the political brake.

#CLIDEF #Civitates #second #UltimaGenerazione #theCampiBisenzio #Venus #Uffizi #Article14 #Article19 #Article26 #DecretiSicurezza #first #Carabinieri #ExtinctionRebellion #Bologna #Brescia #Venice #Padua #third #MichaelO’Flaherty #Italian #Senate #IgnazioLaRussa #LaRussa #UNSpecialRapporteur #MaryLawlor #MichelForst #Italy #5375% #4625%

https://www.lanotiziagiornale.it/decreti-sicurezza-la-criminalizzazione-dei-diritti-un-report-denuncia-la-stretta-sul-dissenso-ecologista/

Decreti Sicurezza, la criminalizzazione dei diritti:

Decreti sicurezza: il report misura tre anni di criminalizzazione del dissenso ecologico e delle lotte territoriali

LA NOTIZIA

Malaysia presents itself as "Truly Asia," but the reality is a dystopia built on exploitation and unfair federalism. The new repressive amendments to the CMA 1998 are designed to silence those who expose how the wealth of the elites is stolen from the people.

https://www.article19.org/resources/repressive-amendments-communications-multimedia-act/

#Malaysia #TrulyAsia #Dystopia #CMA1998 #Article19 #FreedomOfExpression #Censorship #Madani #Reformasi #DigitalRights #Sabah #Sarawak #Exploitation #Activism #MCMC #HumanRights #Law #Politics #Freedom

Once, the #internet was a decentralized, free, Independent network of networks.
Now, the world depends on basically 4 companies: #Cisco, #Amazon, #Microsoft, #Google.

“Dr Corinne Cath-Speth, the head of digital at human rights organisation #ARTICLE19, said the
outage underlined the dangers of placing too much digital infrastructure in a small number of hands. She said: “We urgently need diversification in #cloud computing. The infrastructure underpinning democratic discourse, independent journalism, and secure communications cannot be dependent on a handful of companies.”

…2

#Article19 condena campaña de desprestigio contra #periodista que denunció presunta #corrupción | Proceso

#Article19 condena campaña de desprestigio contra #periodista que denunció presunta #corrupción | Proceso

Efraín Martínez Figueroa | EMF Consultoría Política
Learn how the internet REALLY works with this comic book-style guide by ARTICLE 19! 🌐🐱 "How the Internet Really Works" breaks down complex topics like protocols, privacy, & governance with fun illustrations. A must-read for digital citizens! 👉 https://catnip.article19.org/ #DigitalRights #InternetLiteracy #Privacy #ARTICLE19
How the internet really works - An illustrated guide to protocols, privacy, censorship, and governance

A comic book-like guide to how the internet works, designed to give people a basic understanding of the technical aspects of the Internet that they need to advocate for digital rights. Available in English, German, Polish, and French, the book is part of Github's Arctic Code Vault.

How the internet really works

Breton: stop politicising the Digital Services Act
PUBLISHED: 19 AUG2024

#accessnow #article19 and Electronic Frontier Foundation (#EFF ) are calling on the EU Commissioner Thierry Breton to stop politicising the enforcement of the Digital Services Act (#DSA). The joint civil society statement is in response to Commissioner Breton’s recent letter to X on the far-right riots in the UK and the live-streamed conversation between the U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk.