Big shock of 2026: #MarkCarney declaring the end of the old order.
#Carney is the archetypal #neoliberal #globalist, the purest #DavosMan. Former governor of not one #G7 #centralBank, but two.
Now the expensively-suited smooth technocrat PM of #Canada has declared the end of the system that created him and which he sustained. The man who made #TonyBlair look radical now makes #ZackPolanski look cautious. And European leaders look lost.
Placed with no commentary.
"#Conspiracy theorist #CandaceOwens is being roasted online over her quick effort to blame a familiar boogeyman for the #UnitedStates’ capture of erstwhile #Venezuelan dictator #NicolásMaduro.
“#Venezuela has been ‘liberated’ like #Syria, #Afghanistan, and #Iraq were ‘liberated,'” wrote #Owens in a quote-tweet of a video of #TuckerCarlson defending #Maduro and excoriating #Jewish-#American commentator #BenShapiro.
“The #CIA has staged another hostile takeover of a country at the behest of a #globalist psychopaths. That’s it. That’s what is happening, always, everywhere,” she continued. “#Zionists cheer every regime change. There has never been a single regime change that Zionists have not applauded because it means they get to steal land, oil and other resources. Hope this helps.”
Few were surprised by Owens’s commentary.
“That was quick, already blaming the #Jews,” observed #Jewish Insider’s Lahav Harkov."
The #craftbeer scene in #Oulu #Finland is bubbling with creativity (starts at 45:00)
#monocle #globalist #brew #beer
https://monocle.com/radio/shows/the-globalist/3688/
No borders
No nations
Just people
Sikorski Deserved To Be Put In His Place By Musk And Rubio
Sikorski Deserved To Be Put In His Place By Musk And Rubio
Sikorski arguably sought to provoke a fake scandal with the unfriendly aim of further worsening the US’ already tense ties with the EU and NATO in advance of his ruling party’s liberal-globalist agenda.
Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski lent credence to rumours that Elon Musk might cut Ukraine off from Starlink by threatening that his country, which pays $50 million a year for its neighbour’s use of this indispensable military communication service, will look for other suppliers if needed. That provoked Musk to tell him, “Be quiet, small man. You pay a tiny fraction of the cost. And there is no substitute for Starlink”, after which Secretary of State Marco Rubio then jumped into the fray.
America’s top diplomat told his Polish counterpart, “Just making things up. No one has made any threats about cutting Ukraine off from Starlink And say thank you because without Starlink Ukraine would have lost this war long ago and Russians would be on the border with Poland right now.” Sikorski meekly responded by posting, “Thank you, Marco, for confirming that the brave soldiers of Ukraine can count on the vital internet service provided jointly by the US and Poland.”
He added that, “Together, Europe and the United States can help Ukraine to achieve a just peace.” This spat could have ended there but then Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote on Monday that “True leadership means respect for partners and allies. Even for the smaller and weaker ones. Never arrogance. Dear friends, think about it.” This was an obvious swipe at Trump 2.0, particularly Musk and Rubio, for putting Sikorski in his place even though he deserved it.
Sikorski behaved undiplomatically by breathing life into those rumours when he should have first checked with Rubio before publicly addressing them, thus suggesting that he either reacted emotionally without thinking this through or he deliberately wanted to create a scandal. He, Tusk, and their ilk previously made defamatory statements about Trump prior to last year’s election by smearing him as a “proto-fascist” and even a “Russian spy”, which were documented here and analysed here.
It therefore can’t be ruled out that Sikorski did indeed intend to discredit Trump’s pragmatic approach to Ukraine, particularly his decision to cut off its military and intelligence aid, by taking for granted that the rumours about Musk plotting to do the same with Starlink were true and publicly reacting accordingly. His motivation might have been to signal to Poland’s peers with whom it’s competing for leadership of post-conflict Europe that the ruling liberal-globalist coalition will stand up to the US in support of Ukraine.
Sikorski and Tusk, who are respectively Anglophiles and Germanophiles, prioritize relations with the UK and the German-led EU over their country’s strategic partnership with the US. This is in spite of Poland being poised to become the US’ top partner in Europe if it plays its cards right, which is still possible with the ruling liberal-globalists even if they win May’s presidential election but much more likely if the conservative or populist candidate wins instead. This insight places Sikorski’s post into context.
He arguably wanted to make it seem like the US is unilaterally reneging on a commercial contract of national security significance for Ukraine as a favour to Russia, thus casting more doubts about its reliability as an ally and consequently worsening the transatlantic rift. Musk and Rubio therefore swiftly put Sikorski in his place so as to deter other Foreign Ministers from doing anything similar in the future with the unfriendly aim of further worsening the US’ already tense ties with the EU and NATO.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Voice of East.
Under international capitalism, every Oligarch and Kleptocrat is a #globalist, they just want you to be a #nationalist so you feel so special about the location of your birth that you don't notice they've got their hand in your pocket, too.
The Oligarchs weren't satisfied with the number of 3rd World Countries, so they've decided to create more -- there's no more land to colonize, only hearts and minds & the continuing genocides will take care of that.
My 1st job as a virtual assistant way back 2013 was admin liaison for an Australian-based Filipino writing company in Canberra...
This "note taking & research assistant powered by AI API" would have been a great help (lack of sleep due to task overload).
I wasn't hired as a writer since my write-ups are a bit awkward but today it would have been easy with the help of AI models.
🫡 To all Filipino content & snippet writers.
"You are not the king" Content is my King!
"The Case for Christian Nationalism"
is a 2022 book by Stephen Wolfe.
The book argues for #Christian #nationalism based on cultural and ethnic affinity from a Christian perspective,
and a retrieval of traditional Christian political thought
Summary
Stephen Wolfe approaches nationalism as becoming conscious of, and "being for", one's own "#people-#group".
He argues that #homogeneity within each people-group allows it to more properly pursue the good
by ordering earthly life toward heavenly life,
and that while a principal image of heavenly life can be found in Christian worship,
💥only a Christian nation can provide a complete image.
Wolfe argues for homogeneity by constructing a theological anthropology,
positing that humans would have formed separate, culturally distinct communities,
even if the fall of man had not occurred.
In addition, he argues that this should be accomplished through a "measured #theocratic #Caesarism",
Wolfe follows early Reformed thinkers, such as Francis Turretin, in
🧨 assigning the government a role in suppressing outward displays of "false religion",
-- but not a power to coerce the conscience or inward religion.
The civil magistrate is tasked with wielding "formal civil power" for the public good.
He also argues that Christian nationalism is compatible with the tradition of the American founding.
Reception:
In a review, Kevin DeYoung of The Gospel Coalition gave the book one star out of five, stating,
"I understand and sympathize with the desire for something like Christian Nationalism,
but if this book represents the best of that ism,
then ➡️ Christian Nationalism is not the answer the church or our nation needs."
Paul Matzko of Reason magazine called the book "#segregationist",
stating,
"Wolfe's ethnicized vision of Christian nationalism is a reminder that, in a post-liberal vacuum,
➡️ fearful American Christians have become easy targets for people whispering to take up the sword of the state and smite their foes."
James Clark of The North American Anglican wrote that "Wolfe's account of revolution could be stronger"
but he has nevertheless "written something important here,
something that deserves to be read and contemplated."
Owen Strachan suggests that ⚠️the New Testament is largely missing from "Wolfe's Thomistic project of political philosophy."
The book's epilogue has a looser tone and structure from the preceding chapters.
Reviewers have called it a "#rant" that attacks many cultural and political issues,
including "#gynocracy"
(rule by women),
#sexual #deviancy,
and the "#globalist American #empire",
and which calls for banishing or #executing #heretics.
Reviewers have said that the book calls for #blood-#and-#soil nationalism
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_for_Christian_Nationalism
Claire McNab
דער קערפער פֿון השם
Wif Stenger
Maskugatiger a.k.a Cybernetwalker
Jasper Fox 
Voice of East
Emperor Rhizic the MoreWrong
Denney Obregon
Chuck Darwin
aparatorul