Ceratitis open peer review
I reviewed a paper last year about the embryonic development of Ceratitis capitata, the Mediterranean fruit fly (or medfly).
The authors used time-lapse recordings of whole embryos made with lightsheet microscopy to create a comprehensive staging system for the embryogenesis of the species.
Figure 1 from Strobl et al. (2024). doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0316391It was one of the first reviews that I signed (disclosed my identity) from the beginning—and it felt right. As much as I understand the advantages of anonymity against power abuse from influential people, signing a review brings accountability and connection among peers.
The authors opted to publish the peer review history along with the paper, so now everyone can read it.
References
Strobl, F., Schmitz, A., Schetelig, M. F. and Stelzer, E. H. K. (2024). A two-level staging system for the embryonic morphogenesis of the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly) Ceratitis capitata. PLoS One 19, e0316391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316391
Strobl, F., Schetelig, M. F. and Stelzer, E. H. K. (2022). In toto light sheet fluorescence microscopy live imaging datasets of Ceratitis capitata embryonic development. Sci. Data 9, 340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01443-x
—
URL: https://brunovellutini.com/posts/ceratitis-open-peer-review/
#ceratitisCapitata #diptera #embryo #evoDevo #lightsheet #microscopy #review