"Many of the loudest Open Science advocates are deeply embedded in the very systems they critique such as traditional publishing, prestige-driven academia and grant-dependent research cultures. They speak the language of reform while continuing to “play the game” remarkably well. Researchers who sit on advisory boards talk about preprints but then celebrate publishing their latest Nature paper"

https://www.themodernpeer.com/people-the-problem-in-open-science/

#OpenScience #OpenData #ScienceReform #Metascience #ResearchEvaluation #UniversityRankings #PublishOrPerish

People; the problem in Open Science?

If only we fixed the publishing system. If only we fixed the incentives, rewards and recognition. Open Science (OS) likes to position itself as a systems problem. And whilst these things do matter, decades of the same conversations and limited change is unveiling an uncomfortable truth: The biggest barrier to

the modern peer

Also I am looking forward to seeing more modelling of photons emitted by different materials. #generalizability of simulation techniques is important

#physics #research #science #sciencereform

Neurosurgery on...Saturn?!

Academic publishing continues to have some dodgy failure modes 🫠

#Academia #Science #Metascience #ScienceReform #Research #ResearchIntegrity

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210261224009209

Practice of neurosurgery on Saturn

The practice of neurosurgery on Saturn is almost identical to the one practiced on Earth. Because the art of practice of Medicine was transferred by h…

I enjoyed the "Open Science and its enemies" episodes of The Error Bar (https://theerrorbar.com?e=40). The description of certain parts of the open science/reform movement as "populist" is IMHO spot on. It is also funny how "read the fu&$ing paper" is actually a radical thing to do when evaluating research.

#OpenScience #academia #podcast #ScienceReform

the error bar

We kind of knew that if preregistration became valued in science, people will use prereg mindlessly as a signal without really checking whether prereg was meaningful and adhered to. The surprising part is that this can be demonstrated so soon and on a paper co-authored by some of the stars of the reform movement, which actually investigates prereg. Thx Devezer and Bak-Coleman for pointing this out https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/5u3kj #OpenScience #ScienceReform #PreRegistration
OSF

How do we improve peer review?

David Stuart at Research Information spoke to Chris Graf of Springer Nature and Coromoto Power Febres of Emerald, who is one of our volunteer advisers.

https://www.researchinformation.info/feature/how-do-we-improve-peer-review

#PeerReview #ScienceReform #ResearchInformation

How do we improve peer review? | Research Information

David Stuart speaks to experts in research integrity about some of the challenges facing peer review

New blog post! There's a version of this on Psychology Today, but I got some weird edits, so I wanted to have a "version of record" here.

This one is about how the President of Stanford allegedly falsified Alzheimer's research, has been called out on it for over 2 decades, and continues to "fail up."

Comments here are welcome.

@socialpsych
@cognition
@neuroscience

https://danvers.substack.com/p/failing-up-in-research

#ScienceReform #Alzheimers #ResearchFraud #Stanford

Failing Up in Research

Stanford’s President May Have Falsified Alzheimer’s Results. What does that say about mental health research?

Deep Dish Psychology
2023 Unconference on Open Scholarship Practices in Education Research

Hey #OpenScience and #ScienceReform folks, are there good papers out there discussing "salami slicing" of studies? Also, does anyone know the original paper to cite the term?

Holy absolute crap.

I have never before encountered this in all of my research career. Here is an article from a *freelance journalist* that appeared in the British medical journal under "external peer review". She has a number of articles in that journal. They contain COVID misinformation. This profoundly unethical practice led to students sharing COVID misinformation in class.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://scholar.archive.org/work/mah52fcwzfa3xjlgwa23spmoky/access/wayback/https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/373/bmj.n1397.full.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bbOLY_jNEY70mgG3m7KgDQ&scisig=AAGBfm2zj5w1f0lhKAomhUcPlsxJr2VurA&oi=scholarr

#researchethics
#openscience
#sciencereform

@academicchatter
@socialwork