Una de mis actividades es ser editor de la revista Annals of Hepatology, y como cada año, la publicación del factor de impacto determina el resultado de mucho trabajo. Este año nos fue muy bien, por lo que creo que se debe cuestionar esa métrica que tantos dolores de cabeza nos ocasiona. Escribí este editorial que espero publicar en la revista, pero no me mando solo :-( Mientras tanto lo comparto con el fediverso (lamento que sea en inglés)

#science #clarivate #ScientificPublishing #ResearchAssessment #ImpactFactor #OpenScience #AcademicPublishing #ImpactFactor #ResearchIntegrity #BeyondMetrics #Metrics

Anacrónico

AI can help researchers write, code, search and check results. But it can also hallucinate sources, obscure processes and challenge scientific trust. 🔍
At the RC Trust Graduate School, @JohannesBreuer discussed what this means for research in the social and behavioral sciences.
https://rc-trust.ai/news/news-detail/when-the-production-of-science-speeds-up-means-for-ensuring-trust-must-catch-up
#TrustworthyAI #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #GraduateSchool #RCTrust

A nice surprise: the CUNY AI Lab has launched an AI Use Disclosure tool based on the GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy) framework.

👉 https://tools.ailab.gc.cuny.edu/ai-disclosure/

Researchers can now generate publication-ready, structured disclosures of how generative #AI was used across different stages of the research workflow: from idea generation and literature review to data management and writing.

#OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #GenAI #AcademicPublishing #GAIDeT #MITLicense

Did you know that ReproducibiliTea journal clubs can contribute to post-publication reviews?

With support from the steering committee, participating journal clubs have access to suggested review targets, peer review guidance, publication venues for commentaries, and funding opportunities.

Interested in getting involved?

Email [email protected] to receive resources and learn more.

See our blog post for more information about the project.

https://reproducibilitea.org/jc/2025/11/07/post-publication-reviewing

#ReproducubiliTea #OpenScience #Reproducibility #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

Post-publication reviewing by ReproducibiliTea journal clubs

Our ReproducibiliTea community consists of journal clubs organised and joined mainly by early career researchers who discuss journal articles on a regular basis, sometimes even resembling the act of post-publication reviewing. The content of these discussions is, however, typically kept private. We think that this is a missed opportunity to share ideas with the wider community, learn from each other, and contribute to the scholarly discourse. At the same time, we believe that ReproducibiliTea journal clubs that focus mainly on topics related to improving research practices, could also incorporate peer review training into their programmes.

ReproducibiliTea

My latest article has been published in Research Integrity and Peer Review. The paper examines how scientific misconduct, questionable research practices, research climate, and supervision are studied across disciplines & research systems.

 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-026-00214-1

One key takeaway: research integrity risks are shaped not only by individual behaviour, but also by research environments, supervision, evaluation systems.

#ResearchIntegrity #AcademicIntegrity #MetaResearch #SciencePolicy

How do you know if your research is truly as open as possible?

🎥 Watch the CHORUS Forum recording on Research Data Management – OSMI Chair Laetitia Bracco introduces the #OSMIPrinciples: the first international consensus on monitoring open science.

👉 https://www.chorusaccess.org/events/chorus-forum-research-data-management/

#OpenScience #RDM #OpenData #FAIR #ResearchIntegrity #CHORUS

CHORUS Forum: Research Data Management - CHORUS

    CHORUS Forum: Research Data management 20 May 2026 – Free online meeting 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM EDT #CHORUSForum Research Data Management (RDM) and Open Data compliance have become core requirements of the global research ecosystem, driven by funder mandates, publisher policies, regulatory frameworks, and expectations around research integrity and reproducibility. With major public […]

CHORUS

Is difficult peer review a hidden signal of high-impact science?

Data from Nature Communications suggests that stronger reviewer criticism correlates with more influential papers later on.

🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01615-4

#Science #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #Alanalysis #Knowledge

Tough peer-review process? Your paper might end up being more highly cited

An AI-led analysis of publicly available peer-review reports links requests for major revisions with papers that end up having high impact.

Researchers and journalists are sometimes seen as opponents, but they may be strongest as partners.

In a Nature commentary, science sleuth Lonni Besançon reflects on how both communities can work together to safeguard research.

🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00824-1

#ScienceCommunication #ResearchIntegrity #Journalism #PeerReview #OpenScience

A conference taught me that scientists and journalists must work together to protect research

Science sleuth Lonni Besançon realizes that he has sometimes misunderstood what the media want from him and his researcher colleagues.

AI-enabled paper mills and fabricated citations now threaten the integrity of biomedical literature, risking patient safety and undermining trust in evidence-based medicine. The challenge is structural, urgent, and demands cross-sector reforms.
Discover more at https://smarterarticles.co.uk/phantom-citations-and-paper-mills-how-ai-fraud-reaches-patients?pk_campaign=rss-feed
#HumanInTheLoop #AIinHealthcare #ResearchIntegrity #ScientificMisconduct
Phantom Citations and Paper Mills: How AI Fraud Reaches Patients

Somewhere in a hospital pharmacy in Birmingham, a clinical pharmacist is reading a draft protocol for an off-label oncology treatment. ...

SmarterArticles