Dietmar Kammerer

@dietmarkammerer@openbiblio.social
195 Followers
226 Following
655 Posts
Kulturwissenschaftler. Medienwissenschaftler. Referent für Forschungsdaten am Weizenbaum-Institut Berlin. Publiziert zu Open Science, Surveillance, FDM, wissenschaftlicher Infrastruktur. Views are my own.
ORCiDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7150-0107
GitHubhttps://github.com/dietmarkammerer/
Weizenbaum Instituthttps://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/portrait/p/dietmar-kammerer/
Repositoriumhttps://www.weizenbaum-library.de/
Dietmar Kammerer9h ago
Richard "RichiH" Hartmann12h ago

I see a lot of Mastodon activity around @creativecommons ill-guided #CreativeCommons #CCSignals attempt to introduce "Ai" (sic!) compatible opt-in-only licenses.

I see very little feedback on https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/discussions/categories/open-feedback-suggestions-and-ideas or https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/issues

I have created https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/issues/15 with my own thoughts. Feel free to add your support and/or your own thoughts.

Retoots of something actually actionable appreciated.

creativecommons cc-signals Open Feedback Suggestions And Ideas · Discussions

Explore the GitHub Discussions forum for creativecommons cc-signals in the Open Feedback Suggestions And Ideas category.

GitHub
Dietmar Kammerer1d ago
Stefan Schulte1d ago

Auf der Suche nach einem #Masterstudium? Für Studierende der #Geisteswissenschafte und #Sozialwissenschaften biete ich wieder Info-Veranstaltungen zum MA #Cultural #Data #Studies an: 4.7., 10 Uhr und 7.7. 13 Uhr. Alles weitere findet ihr hier: https://www.uni-marburg.de/de/mcdci/aktuelles/termine/2025/informationsveranstaltung-ma-cultural-data-studies

schaut auch gerne in unser neues Studiengangsvideo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SVrPA48t1M

#DH #DigitalHumanities #ComputationalSocialSciences #Digitalisierung #KI

Informationsveranstaltung: MA Cultural Data Studies

Philipps-Universität Marburg
Dietmar Kammerer2d ago
Greenpeace International3d ago

You spill someone’s drink, you buy them another.

You break a window, you pay for it.

Let’s make that true for oil and gas corporations.

Sign the Polluters Pay Pact today 👉 https://act.gp/3FccTES

#MakePollutersPay

Dietmar Kammerer2d ago
Jannik Balint2d ago

»Es ist bekannt, dass der tatsächliche finanzielle Schaden durch Sozialbetrug minimal ist.

Wer systemischen Missbrauch sucht, sollte bei Cum-Ex und Steuervermeidung anfangen – nicht bei Alleinerziehenden, die auf Essen verzichten, damit ihre Kinder satt werden.

Der politische und gesellschaftliche Schaden durch den aktuellen Diskurs ist aber enorm: Er schürt Misstrauen, rechtfertigt Kürzungen und delegitimiert ganze Menschengruppen.« - @helenasteinhaus

https://www.freitag.de/autoren/helena-steinhaus/buergergeld-studie-sanktionsfrei-54-verzichten-zugunsten-der-kinder-auf-essen/6962e1b8-a0b6-473b-bf43-387f8c81deac

Bürgergeld-Studie Sanktionsfrei: 54% verzichten zugunsten der Kinder auf Essen

Seit zwei Jahren gibt es das Bürgergeld, die CDU will es verschärfen. Eine Studie zeigt, warum die Debatte über Leistungsmissbrauch völlig fehlgeleitet ist

der Freitag
Dietmar Kammerer3d ago
Karl Dezeti5d ago

Bitte teilen 📣und mitzeichnen ✏️ !

"Schutz von Radfahrern   auf Straßen außerhalb geschlossener Ortschaften"

https://epetitionen.bundestag.de/petitionen/_2025/_05/_23/Petition_181621.$$$.a.u.html

#fahrrad #ebike #pedelec #stvo #verkehrswende #autokorrektur #natenom

Dietmar Kammerer3d ago
Milagros Miceli3d ago

🚨 Attention Berlin!

Next Monday, June 30th, I am thrilled to welcome @alex to the @Weizenbaum_Institut for a conversation about her book, THE AI CON (co-authored with Prof. Emily M. Bender).

Don't miss it! Register here to attend: https://tickets.weizenbaum-institut.de/sgvbf/

Book presentation "THE AI CON: How to Fight Big Tech's Hype and Create the Future We Want"

Mon, June 30th, 2025

Dietmar Kammerer3d ago
Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf4d ago
»Wer soll das alles bezahlen?« ist bis heute wohl eines der beliebtesten Gegenargumente, um Klimaschutzmaßnahmen zu verschleppen.
Wer heute noch an dieses Strohmann-Argument glaubt, sollte einen Blick in den neuen Bericht des Industrieländerverbandes OECD werfen.
https://perspective-daily.de/article/3771-kluger-klimaschutz-lohnt-sich-fuer-alle-sagt-eine-neue-studie/EULkUI7f
Kluger Klimaschutz lohnt sich. Für alle – sagt eine neue Studie

Perspective Daily
Dietmar Kammerer3d ago
Christian Stöcker4d ago

Noch mal für die Freunde der Atomkraft zum Ausdrucken.

ES GIBT KEINE RENAISSANCE DER ATOMKRAFT. DAS IST DESINFORMATION.

Erneuerbare und Speicher sind konkurrenzlos billig und SICHER.
Deshalb waren

2022 80%,
2023 86% und
2024 92,5%

des globalen Zubaus erneuerbar. Q.e.d.

Dietmar Kammerer4d ago
giardino4d ago

Die Universitätsbibliothek in Aberdeen ist sensationell. Einer der schönsten Orte zum Lernen, die ich je gesehen habe.

#scotland

Dietmar Kammerer4d ago
ploum5d ago

Did you know that there’s a premium version of Whatsapp which :

- Has no advertising
- Has no mandatory AI integration
- Has no tracking and does not gather your personnal data
- Has increased privacy and stronger encryption
- Is exclusive and allows you to chat with other premium members

Best of all ? It is currently free to join!

Go now to your app store and install it before it is too late!

It is called "Signal"

https://ploum.net/2025-05-23-chats-digital-clutter.html

Reducing the digital clutter of chats

Reducing the digital clutter of chats par Ploum - Lionel Dricot.

×
Greenpeace International3d ago

You spill someone’s drink, you buy them another.

You break a window, you pay for it.

Let’s make that true for oil and gas corporations.

Sign the Polluters Pay Pact today 👉 https://act.gp/3FccTES

#MakePollutersPay

Show threadAustrian3d ago
@greenpeace Bad logic. Corporations produce oil and gas for consumers, not for themselves. If people refuse to buy these goods, oil and gas will not be produced. It is people who wreck the climate.
Show threadAndreas K3d ago
@praustrian @greenpeace Besides, if you break a window, you don't pay for fixing the window, you lawyer up. Especially if the window would ruin your business model.
Show threadAndreas K3d ago

@praustrian @greenpeace Besides, even if you restrict it directly to oil and gas exploration and production that's an industry that has a daily revenue of over $11b. Even a tiny part of that buys a surprising number of politicians and media.

If you add all the associated industries that live from fossil energy, that number doubles.

Show threadWhy We Went Extinct3d ago

@praustrian @greenpeace that is also a model of responsibility. To me it implies that everyone has equal 'guilt' and feels the consequences equally.

However, most consumers of oil/gas have no incentive to buy less:
- big users have the most to gain and the least to lose.
- they are not well informed of the consequences.
- 'if my neighbor does it, why shouldn't I?' -> 'I only will use less if everyone is using less' -> uniform laws / penalties (which to me you seem to not be in support of)

Show threadWhy We Went Extinct3d ago

@praustrian @greenpeace on the other hand, letting big companies pay seems appropriate:

it is fair: a big part of their profit comes from letting others pay (tax payers who need to pay to clean up / climate and drilling victims) for the consequences.

It is effective:
- it will reduce their profits, which reduces the incentive to invest in them
- and/or increases the price of oil/gas which is an incentive to buy less
- it taxes a multinational so it might have cross border impact

Show threadAustrian3d ago
@why_we_went_extinct
A minority cannot force/punish a majority. But even if a minority becomes a majority, it has no right to force a minority. Only persuasion. The climate problem, frankly speaking, has no solution.
@greenpeace
Show threadWhy We Went Extinct3d ago

@praustrian @greenpeace I think that sentence is too complicated for me. I see the words, but the meaning goes over my head.

But in the off-chance that it implies that a minority is pushing for climate action:

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2024-06-20-80-percent-people-globally-want-stronger-climate-action-governments-according-new

Science seems to say something else.

Also minorities can force/punish majorities. I think history has plenty examples, historically the people with power have been a minority. If you say that they shouldn't, I do agree.

Show threadAylin3d ago
@praustrian @greenpeace It is not for consumers companies produce, but for profit for their shareholders. So if they do not have to take environmental costs into account they offer us only unsustainable products and we have no choice but to use them or go without. What's more we pay through taxes for the environmental costs the companies incurred.
Show threadAustrian3d ago
@AAae
Production exists for consumption. Profit is just a tool to ensure that production goes in the right direction. And you don't understand the problem: the impact of people on nature will always be greater than what they can spend on protecting the environment.
@greenpeace
Show threadAylin3d ago
@praustrian @greenpeace I'm not sure I agree, a lot of clothes end up in landfills never been worn. It's not because people needed those, but the business model that offers cheap clothes in bulk stimulates overconsumption even if the side effect is waste. You can argue that people buy those clothes, but that demand was created by those companies and it was possible because they didn't have to bear the cost of environmental effects.
Show threadAustrian3d ago
@AAae For humanity, a pure free market is the best economic system. For nature, humanity, whether it has a free market or not, is a mortal danger.
Show threadAylin3d ago
@praustrian Again I do not agree unless your definition of the best for humanity is purely materialistic. Also I don't believe a pure free market can exist. It is a utopia. Companies tend to become bigger and become monopolies, unless the state intervenes. In both cases it's not a pure free market.
Show threadAustrian3d ago
@AAae Your economcs is bad. Monopoly prices cannot exist in a pure free market. (In short, a pure free market means that the state, the government, does not interfere in the economy. PFM is not a utopia, but a concept. There is no ideal in human life.)
Show threadtrusty falxter 🧠3d ago
@praustrian @greenpeace Yes, the solution proposed by the oil companies: shift the responsibility onto the consumer. Has that ever worked before? What are the alternatives for the consumer, apart from ceasing their own existence? In so-called developed countries, you can hardly get below 4-5 tons of CO2 equivalents per year if you have a roof over your head and eat.
Show threadFeyter3d ago

@praustrian @greenpeace No that's actually bad logic, because the corporations don't produce for the consumers. Corporations produce for their own profit from sales.

If my company breaks other people's windows in the process of production (especially if it's because I refused to switch to a less window breaking production pipeline) I have to pay for it. Unless I somehow got permission from the government to break other people's windows because of lobbying.

Show threadAustrian3d ago
@feyter Any production exist only for consumption. Profit (and loss!) is just a tool to ensure that production goes in right direction.
Show threadFeyter3d ago

@praustrian whatever, still corporation have to pay if they break things that they don't own.

If they want they can raise their prices to compensate for it.

Show threadAustrian3d ago
@feyter Producers always want to raise their prices. But consumers don't give them that chance.
Show threadFeyter3d ago
@praustrian because they buy at a different company instead that produces with less climate damage and therefore has to pay less for the damage and can keep prices low, right?
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian @greenpeace In #Economics it's called #TragedyOfTheCommons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
Tragedy of the commons - Wikipedia

Show threadAustrian3d ago
@_9CL7T9k8cjnD_ The best solution for humanity is a pure free market. But even that cannot solve the problem of the survival of nature as we know it and in which we are only able to live.
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian It depends on your definitions of "Best" and "Success"
Show threadAustrian3d ago
@_9CL7T9k8cjnD_ There is not a single country in the world today that has a truly free market. Because, first of all, they all have their own central banks. A central bank is a government agency whose goal is to interfere with the market. This is #statism.
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian You are partially right.
Show threadAustrian3d ago
@_9CL7T9k8cjnD_ I think that I completely right, not just partly. Read Mises and Rothbard if you want to know true economics.
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian I have. You are like my cousins. I call them #InchDeepLibertarians
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian They have skimmed two books and think they know shit.
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian They wear Libertarian as a brand like golf buddies wear LaCoste alligators in the clubhouse.
Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@praustrian I used to be a Libertarian when I was young and had never lived outside the #BubbleOfPrivilege.
Show thread🐧DaveNull🐧 ☣️pResident Evil☣2d ago

@_9CL7T9k8cjnD_ WTF?

In capitalism societies, people litteraly die from poverty, lack of health care and shit food because big companies don't give a flying fuck about contaminated food and still sell it… Not to mention "silicon valley innovation" is the same polluting planned obsolescence and targeted ads surveillance shit

Then capitalism promoters dare to pretend capitalism "reduces poverty and pollution", is "merit-based", and complain about the FDA "preventing innovation"…

@praustrian

Show thread-0--1-2d ago
@devnull @praustrian Have you lived in a 3rd World Country? Have you ever lived outside of #TheBubbleOfPrivilege?
Show thread🐧DaveNull🐧 ☣️pResident Evil☣2d ago

@_9CL7T9k8cjnD_ Wow, amazing…

First you claim capitalism is good in areas where it's doing considerable damage
Then you attack me with without knowing shit about me so you cam claim you care about countries that has mostly been colonized and robbed or destroyed by capitalist countries, implying that their problems are because « they're not capitalist countries »… Not mention the use of racist term "3rd world country"

Typical arrogant rightard troll. You're blocked…

@praustrian

Show threadJBrickelt963 (φ)3d ago

@greenpeace c'était pas la maxime de notre ancien 1er Ministre #GabrielAttal avec son "respect de l'ordre" à l'école xD ?

Faudrait déjà que les macroniste et tous les autres suivent leurs propres conseils avant de les donner aux autrees !

Show threadAral Balkan3d ago
@greenpeace @trending_bot Wait a minute… if we made the polluters pay, it would no longer be profitable for them to be in business… oh.
Show threadOx1de3d ago
@greenpeace let's not be so narrow minded to just target gas companies, there's a lot of blame to go around
Show threadDaughter of Discord3d ago

@greenpeace

How do they pay back the lives that have been lost due to climate change?

I'm from New Orleans. I lost some friends to Katrina. One drowned and two more committed suicide because they lost hope after losing everything.

How does BP pay that back?

Show thread-0--1-3d ago
@greenpeace #MakePollutersPay https://makepolluterspay.net/
Make Polluters Pay

It’s time to make polluters pay for the damage they’ve done.

Make Polluters Pay
Show threadEthicalProfessor3d ago

@greenpeace

With.

Your.

Life.

Not a nice way to think of it, but given the trend in climate change...

Show threadSharon McCarthy3d ago

@greenpeace https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRun-tlGhho

Janelle Monáe says it well -
at 1:22 - "You fuck up the kitchen - then you should do the dishes."

Turntables (from the Amazon Original Movie "All In: The Fight for Democracy")

YouTube
Show threadMichael Slattery2d ago
@greenpeace We could add that if you destroy someone's city you build them another (Gaza)
Show threadGODOT. 🐾2d ago
@greenpeace 🤝✅✊