@Polypompholyx At least they're better than the back-to-backs that were outlawed I think by the Victorians. "UK housing: not as shit as it could be!" etc.
The glazing is terrible though. Ours has been fitted rather piecemeal with double-glazing over the decades which is actually worse than the single-glazing it replaced. Astonishing.
@Polypompholyx "Our houses are built to cope with incessant dismal grey dreariness"
Maybe it's why so many people have been painting their houses grey.
You can look at it in this way - or you go and develop a chance to change both: Make houses suitable for summer AND for winter.
Retrofits are also possible...
In the UK:
@PassivhausTrust
@Polypompholyx yeah, I'm glad you put for 100 years. My 160 year old victorian stone terrace was built for not particularly well off people, and it has nice sized rooms and stays cool in summer and we have a proper fire in the winter.
Honestly, the victorians were awful at a LOT of things, especially to do with human rights and exploitation, but one thing they were good at was over-engineering. Bring back the principle of building things to last.
@ChrisWilms23 @albertcardona @Polypompholyx The moderate climate meant that houses didn't have to be super insulated for winter or super cooling in summer – and so they never were built that way. Prolonged cold weather wasn't a problem, just keep the fires going, just crank up the storage heater. All fine and dandy until we had price gouging of utilities.
The best we managed for decades was harling the outside of brick or stone for better rain protection.
In my long and distinguished career as a human being, I have lived in many houses, in several countries, and it seems to me we knew perfectly well how to build homes to fit regional climate requirements up to about 1925.
After that, I'm guessing builders figured it would be cheaper to just use more oil and electricity.
@Polypompholyx the majority of older housing was built for having a coal fire in each room for heating. Modern housing is better, but cutting building costs has an impact.
A hard reality is that you have to constantly maintain and upgrade your house. Insulation, replacing windows and doors, maintaining central heating. Not a lot of people can do that, or afford someone to come in and so only do it when it breaks.
@Polypompholyx EXACTLY:
If you look at houses from #Germany on a #thermal camera you wouldn't see if they're vacant or nor, but #UK houses shine brighter in thermal imaging than an overcrowded German Christmas market.
@Polypompholyx The thing is, houses were built to retain the heat that you put in from fires in the rooms. If you cannot afford to heat them, this does not help.
They are well built for the environment they are in, assuming you can afford to heat them. I am not saying it is efficient - although, of course, terraced/semi houses would help heat each other.
The core problem is energy prices and the lack of government investment in renewables.