"...researchers and clinicians still rely deeply on both BMI and race, in some cases at the same time. When screening for type 2 diabetes, for instance, race-sensitive BMI cutoffs identify more at-risk people than either factor alone. And however conflicted experts are over how to use that tool and others like it, finding alternatives comes with its own baggage."

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2026/05/bmi-race-sensitive/687054/

#healthcare #PublicHealth #BMI #obesity #overweight #screening #prevention #aapi #aanhpi

If BMI Is Flawed, Is Race-Sensitive BMI Better?

Sort of.

The Atlantic
Study with #overweight individuals: Cumulative energy demand decreased by 55% on a low-fat vegan diet, and total calculated GHG emissions decreased by 57%. A low-fat #vegan diet also outperformed the Mediterranean diet in improving both human and planetary health: doi.org/10.1136/bmjn... #health

doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph...
Environmental footprint of a low-fat vegan diet and Mediterranean diet: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial

Background Plant-based foods, compared with animal-based foods, have a smaller environmental impact.Objective This secondary analysis used a randomised, crossover trial to calculate and compare the environmental impact of two plant-forward diets: low-fat vegan and Mediterranean.Methods 62 overweight adults were randomly assigned to a low-fat vegan or Mediterranean diet for 16-week periods, separated by a 4-week washout. 3-day dietary records were analysed, and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and cumulative energy demand (CED) were calculated for completers of the study. The calculated GHGEs and CED relationship to changes in body weight were analysed.Results Total calculated GHGEs and CED were reduced on the low-fat vegan diet by 57%, or by −1451.7 g CO 2-eq/person-day (95% CI −1776.5 to −1126.9; p<0.0001), and 55%, or by −9306.7 kJ/person-day (95% CI −11022 to −7591.5; p<0.0001), respectively. Total calculated GHGEs in the Mediterranean diet reduced by 20%, or by −451.3 g CO2-eq/person-day (95% CI −859.7 to −42.8; p=0.03), and no change in calculated CED. In both treatment groups combined, changes in body weight correlated with changes in total CED (r=+0.41; p=0.004), even after adjustment for changes in energy intake (r=+0.34; p=0.02). The correlation between changes in body weight and changes in GHGEs did not reach statistical significance (r=+0.26; p=0.07).Conclusion Collectively, a low-fat vegan diet demonstrated statistically significant reductions in GHGEs, CED and weight loss compared with the non-plant-forward and Mediterranean diets, suggesting that a low-fat vegan diet can improve both human and planetary health.Trial registration number NCT03698955

BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health

The hardest part of losing weight is eating much smaller portions than you're used to. My greatest enemies are overeating and nighttime snacks.

#weightloss #overweight

I replaced #LooseIt with a #selfhosted #SparkyFitness.

A new fitness tool usually boosts my motivation to return to calorie counting and exercising. So today, a new attempt to lose weight has started. Usually, all my attempts are successful, but not permanent.

#selfhosting #selfhost #weightloss #overweight

Can a French diet be the key to a lower risk of obesity?

A recent study in the British Journal of Nutrition analyzed the French Eating Model and its relationship to overweight and obesity in French adults. Obesity …
#dining #cooking #diet #food #Frenchdiet #francais #france #French #frenchdiet #FrenchEatingModel #healthydiet #healthyeating #nutrition #obesity #obesityrisk #overweight #riskofobesity
https://www.diningandcooking.com/2577866/can-a-french-diet-be-the-key-to-a-lower-risk-of-obesity/

I have 30 days to get Fit…or it's Over

https://tube.blueben.net/w/ahJRtW68xu2r5TJ6MVtXCs

I have 30 days to get Fit…or it's Over

PeerTube

Person: I'm having health, social, and psychological problems from my condition. I've also read that it is a big risk factor for early death.

MD: Right you are! I'll be happy to prescribe effective treatment if you do some completely ineffective voodo-witchcraft-conman bullshit for a year, while you continue to suffer. If you don't do the bullshit well enough or long enough, I'm going to let you stay sick, get even sicker, then die. Then I'll pat myself on the back for being ethical.

(It took a while, but I made the post more succinct)

#MDs #bias #weightloss #overweight #treatment #culture

Just scrolled through some physician-focused subreddit discussions of GLP-1 drugs (e.g., #Ozempic). If you want to see anti-science biases driven by subculture norms...

Science is very clear about the effectiveness of behavioral #weightLoss treatments: It's absolutely awful. So low nobody should invest in any of them. If those success rates were applied to other medical issues, we'd be almost as angry about weight loss programs as we are about "pray the gay away" camps (not quite that angry... but close). There's also (IIRC) at least a little research on the standard MD "intervention" of just telling patients they need to eat less and exercise more (spoiler: even less effective than Weight Watchers).

The only treatments for being overweight with more than inconsistent and minimal success are surgery and drugs. That's it.

Now look at what MDs say to each other. They discuss how "unethical" it is to prescribe GLP-1 drugs for people who haven't shown behavioral evidence of "commitment" or "seriousness" about weight loss by following a strict diet/exercise regimen for a specific time period (usually a year or more, from what I've seen). So much patting each other on the back about the highly responsible action of refusing GLP-1 meds to people who either aren't overweight enough (i.e., they experience many health and other consequences, but the MD has a BMI line in their head the patient hasn't crossed, yet) or haven't done enough exercise or diet to convince the specific MD that they deserve the medications.

Please think about how ridiculous this is: thousands (or millions?) of medical professionals refusing to give tens or hundreds of millions of people a treatment that works until those people grind away at a treatment that doesn't work for a certain amount of time.

In case someone is going to show up and tell me "it's calories in/calories out!" Yes, of course it is. If it's so simple, why are literally billions of people struggling with that equation every day? You might as well tell people suffering from depression "it's just getting regular exercise, social interaction, and satisfying experiences every day" or someone with ADHD "It's just a matter of focusing more." Medical doctors might as well refuse to provide statins etc. to people with high blood pressure unless they show evidence of strict diet and exercise adherence for a year, first. Actually, that's not far from what they are saying with GLP-1s, and of course there are even some MDs who refuse to provide treatment for depression or ADHD until the people with those conditions "prove" they can beat the condition without any treatment.

The behavior is the problem: motivation is in your brain, which gets hijacked by fat cells and, basically, a million years of evolution. Sure, if you ignore behavior it's easy to solve behavioral issues. Everyone seems to recognize this until the behavioral issue gets too close to some programming from their childhood that touches issues of morality, responsibility, deservingness, goodness, etc. Then the science and rationality go out the window, except as a thin fig leaf for personal biases.

#bias #prejudice #fat #overweight #weightloss #glp1 #MD