ah ah! J'ai enfin (re)trouvé une référence où est expliquée la dépendance du capitalisme à la croissance, via la création monétaire et la dette encourue lors d'un prêt (non, je n'ai pas lu Graeber, pas le temps)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdy9tKCAe_s&t=1245s

la totalité du video vaut la peine: Nate énumère ses réalisations personnelles et non pas des découvertes humaines au travers de l'histoire.

#NateHagens #capitalism #FractionalReserveBankingSystem #moneyCreation #macroeconomic

11 Discoveries That Changed My Worldview | Frankly 113

YouTube
🧠#Macroeconomic income inequality, brain structure & function, and mental health." Income inequality doesn’t just shape society — it shapes the brain. Children growing up in more unequal U.S. states had thinner cortex, smaller surface area, and altered #brain connectivity https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-025-00508-1

US, Europe maintain cautious optimism as Japan faces hawkish outlook

Home > Investment > US, Europe maintain cautious optimism as Japan faces hawkish outlook Both the US and European economies are practicing “cautious op…
#Japan #JP #JapanNews #BankofJapan #economy #Europeancentralbank #FranklinTempleton #inflation #interestrates #JapanTopics #macroeconomic #news #unitedstates #USFederalReserve
https://www.alojapan.com/1380319/us-europe-maintain-cautious-optimism-as-japan-faces-hawkish-outlook/

https://www.alojapan.com/1380319/us-europe-maintain-cautious-optimism-as-japan-faces-hawkish-outlook/ US, Europe maintain cautious optimism as Japan faces hawkish outlook #BankOfJapan #economy #EuropeanCentralBank #FranklinTempleton #inflation #InterestRates #Japan #JapanNews #JapanTopics #macroeconomic #news #UnitedStates #USFederalReserve Home > Investment > US, Europe maintain cautious optimism as Japan faces hawkish outlook Both the US and European economies are practicing “cautious optimism” given favourable conditions for monetary polic

“why are today's consoles staying so stubbornly resistant to historic price-drop trends?

Higher-than-normal #inflation in recent years explains some of the nominal price inflexibility, but nothing close to all of it.

In fact, even when you adjust for inflation, some current #consoles like the Xbox Series S and PS5 Pro are more expensive on a real basis today than they were on launch day.”

“Amid all those #macroeconomic factors, the slowdown in #MooresLaw, specifically, seems like a likely candidate for today's stubborn console pricing.

As we've discussed in depth recently, the rate of advancement in #microchip #manufacturing has slowed in recent years, making it harder than it was in the past to develop #cheaper and/or #smaller versions of #ConsoleHardware.”

#arstechnica / #KyleOrland <https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2025/08/todays-game-consoles-are-historically-overpriced/>

Preliminary Estimates of #Macroeconomic Costs of Cutting Federal Funding for #Science
• Budget cuts to public R&D would significantly hurt #economy in the long run
• A 25% cut to public R&D spending would reduce #GDP by approximately 3.8%
in long run. This effect is comparable to the decline in GDP during the #GreatRecession
• Cutting annual public R&D spending in half would decrease GDP by approximately 7.6%, making the average #American approximately $10,000 poorer
https://aura.american.edu/articles/report/Preliminary_Estimates_of_the_Macroeconomic_Costs_of_Cutting_Federal_Funding_for_Scientific_Research/28746446?file=53480237
Preliminary Estimates of the Macroeconomic Costs of Cutting Federal Funding for Scientific Research

Federal agencies such as NIH and NSF are critical sources of funding for basic and applied scientific research. Recently, many of these agencies have seen their research operations frozen or downsized. This brief describes a new analysis of the macroeconomic costs of cutting federal funding for scientific R&D. The brief finds that budget cuts to public R&D would significantly hurt the economy in the long run, with large negative effects on GDP, investment, and government revenue. A 25 percent cut to public R&D spending would reduce GDP by an amount comparable to the decline in GDP during the Great Recession. Cutting annual public R&D spending in half would making the average American approximately $10,000 poorer (in today’s dollars) than the value implied by the historical trend in GDP. Cutting public R&D would also shrink federal government revenue. A 25 percent cut in R&D would decrease revenue by approximately 4.3 percent annually, while a 50 percent cut would decrease it by 8.6 percent annually.

figshare
Intel posts flat year-over-year earnings and bleak outlook, warns about macroeconomic pressures

Tariffs yet have to impact Intel.

Tom's Hardware
2 “ … such as #iPhones, #Windows, #Facebook, and #largelanguagemodels. In addition, a depreciating #dollar puts upward pressure on #inflation and the #term #premium, which can create new #macroeconomic challenges.” 🧵
Bluesky

Bluesky Social
3 BMO: Rising #tariffs have muted profit guidance this #earningsseason, with many #firms continuing to point to the heightened #uncertainty around the #macroeconomic outlook. #markets
Bluesky

Bluesky Social

@OutOfSpace

🤷‍♀️ 🤔❓️ I don't have an answer to that. Only a personal opinion.

I believe that the #Trump #Junta wants to put the "bottom" 90% of the #US population into economic pain. For a variety of reasons. Some are outright #evil, some more connected to the general #macroeconomic situation of the #USA.

What they WANT is a managed #recession they can handle.

What (at least as I project this) they are instead GOING TO GET is a #FreeFall off a cliff.

I think they miscalculated badly here.

🙂‍↕️