#wikipedia #regavim
Today, the Hebrew #Wikipedia functions as settler-colonial propaganda, naturalizing ethnic cleansing through environmental and legal frameworks.
Hebrew edition (translation):
[…] “Regavim is a right-wing Israeli movement and organization established in 2006 with the goal of establishing ‘a Jewish and Zionist agenda for the State of Israel in land and environmental aspects,’ for the purpose of ‘protecting the lands of the Jewish people and the natural and landscape treasures of the Land of Israel.’”
Problems:
1. Uses neutral-to-positive framing: “movement,” “protecting,” “treasures”
2. Emphasizes environmental protection discourse
3. No mention of (illegal) settler connections in opening (implied when mentioning founders like Smotrich or the term “green line”)
4. Uses biblical terminology “Land of Israel” (ארץ ישראל) instead of occupied territories (a term used nowhere in the Hebrew Wikipedia as far as I know)
The Hebrew version omits/minimizes the following:
1. Forced displacement of Palestinians - never uses terms like “ethnic cleansing” or “forcible transfer”
2. Violence against Palestinians - no mention of how Regavim’s legal actions facilitate settler violence
3. International condemnation - no mention of US Congressional calls for sanctions
4. Academic characterization as “settler-colonial” - absent, duh 🧐
5. The Khan al-Ahmar case - minimal coverage despite being emblematic
6. School demolitions - not mentioned (e.g., Bat Zuwaydin Secondary School near Hebron where “members of Regavim posted leaflets on the walls…calling for the school’s destruction”)
But it gets worse. Neither version adequately conveys that Israel’s permit system in Area C makes it virtually impossible for Palestinians to build legally (Palestinian permit approval rates are approximately 1-2%). According to UN Secretary-General reports, this permit denial system combined with demolitions creates “a coercive environment that contributes to displacement that may amount to forcible transfer, which is a grave breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention”.
The Wikipedia is clearly not a neutral encyclopedia. While the Hebrew version shows how Israeli civil society narratives naturalize occupation, the English version shows how even international “critical” discourse still employs colonial frameworks.
Example: the phrasing “lacking Israeli permits” in the English edition treats Israeli military permit system as legitimate “law”.
A #decolonized language might be something like this:
“Regavim monitors and reports Palestinian construction to Israeli military authorities for demolition, exploiting a permit system designed to make Palestinian building virtually impossible”
And yes, Regavim’s expansion into #Gaza (naming of #Rafah checkpoint) must be understood within this genocidal context.
See:
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/2/2/regavim-israels-new-rafah-border-site-carries-coded-annexation-message
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2611354/middle-east
#wikipedia #regavim #decolonized #gaza #rafah #palestine #zionism #SettlerViolence #israel #gazagenocide #dromoelimination #ethniccleansing