Christian group defending LGBTQ+ conversion therapy at SCOTUS accused of using 'false evidence'

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.advocate.com/politics/conversion-therapy-supreme-court-evidence

Supreme Court Marks End of Pride Month

SCOTUS marks end of pride by letting shops ‘express’ disapproval for Gay people

Balls and Strikes
Curious about the ramifications of the recent #303CreativevElenis #SCOTUS decision. Does it mean that I, as an atheist website designer, can refuse to create wedding websites with religious references? (This would not be based on the actual religion of the partners, only the content of the site.) Or what if I want to create websites for only same-sex couples? Must I have a sincerely-held religious belief to this effect or can I simply exercise my #FirstAmendment #1A right to not speak in certain situations?
#NeilGorsuch, for the majority, writes “It is difficult to read the dissent and conclude [the majority and the dissent] are looking at the same case.” Gorsuch attributes this reaction to the dissent wildly misreading the facts and the law. I also have the reaction, though not because I agree #SoniaSotomayor, author of the dissent, is misguided, confused, or wrong about anything. 2/ #303CreativevElenis #LawFedi
Another day, another #SupremeCourt decision I have now read with care and will try to shed some light on. This time it is #303CreativevElenis, available at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf. By a 6-3 majority, the Court holds that a business that holds itself open to the public may deny its services to LGBTQ people if the business’s activities are “expressive”. A thread. 1/ #LawFedi