Interesting case in which the usual issues surrounding the retraction of a journal article are further complicated by a NY state law criminalizing the distribution of information that endangers health.
https://retractionwatch.com/2026/04/02/judge-lawsuit-controversial-adolescents-paxil-study-329/

PS: Apart from the specific issues raised by this case (whether a certain antidepressant is safe and effective for teenagers), I'm interested in this more general question: Do US journals have a #FirstAmendment right not to retract articles, regardless of the circumstances, for example, even when the articles have been shown to be false and harmful and even when local law prohibits the distribution of such information? Is "forced retraction" a kind of #censorship prohibited by the Constitution?

Before you comment, note that this cases raises a lot of important questions about our tolerance for harm. But I'm trying to raise a slightly different question about the interaction of scholarly norms and public law.

#Law #Retractions #USLaw

Judge tosses lawsuit over controversial Paxil ‘Study 329’

A judge has dismissed a legal challenge aimed at forcing Elsevier to retract a long-criticized study that concluded the antidepressant Paxil was safe and effective for teens. The 2001 paper, publis…

Retraction Watch
"Judges have cited attacks on the press by Mr. Trump and his appointees when ruling against the government in at least three court cases involving news organizations. The latest came on Tuesday, when a federal judge invoked Mr. Trump’s attacks on #NPR and #PBS while ruling that the president’s executive order to cut funding to the organizations was unconstitutional":
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/business/media/trump-media-courts.html
#FirstAmendment #PublicBroadcasting #justice #politics
Trump’s Media-Bashing Is Coming Back to Bite Him in Court

Judges have cited attacks on the press by the president and his appointees when ruling against the government in at least three court cases.

The New York Times

Silencing free speech kills democracy.

They are trying hard!

We cannot allow conservative media companies with a disinformation agenda like Sinclair and Nexstar to dominate our public discourse

#BrendanCarr #FCC #MediaConsolidation #Sinclair #Nexstar #FirstAmendment #USPol

#Trump defunding of #NPR and #PBS blocked by judge, but damage is already done

A federal judge ruled that President Trump's executive order defunding NPR and PBS violated the #FirstAmendment and issued a permanent injunction stating that executive branch agencies cannot enforce it.
#rights #maga #eo #executiveorder

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/trump-defunding-of-npr-and-pbs-blocked-by-judge-but-damage-is-already-done/

Trump defunding of NPR and PBS blocked by judge, but damage is already done

Judge invalidates Trump executive order, but Congress also cut off all funding.

Ars Technica
The Satanic Temple Wins Historic Baphomet v 10 Commandments Monument Case in Arkansas

In a 148 page ruling issued late 31 March 2026, Chief United States District Judge Kristine G.

Lucien Greaves on Substack
A #federaljudge #blocked #Trump’s order to end federal funding for #NPR and #PBS, citing #FirstAmendment rights. The judge ruled the order unlawful, stating it targeted viewpoints the President disapproved of. While the decision is a victory for press freedom, the impact remains unclear due to ongoing appeals and previous damage to the public broadcasting system. https://apnews.com/article/trump-npr-pbs-funding-executive-order-fbd9500e5f7400deab84ead188c35694?eicker.media #media #socialmedia
Judge blocks Trump order to end funding for NPR and PBS

A federal judge has agreed to permanently block the Trump administration from implementing a presidential directive to end federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service. The two are media entities that the White House has said are counterproductive to American priorities. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss cited the First Amendment in his decision. The impact was not immediately clear — both because it will likely be appealed and because too much damage to the public-broadcasting system has already been done, both by the president and Congress.

AP News

JUDGE REJECTS PENTAGON'S GRIP ON PRESS ACCESS

A judge ruled the Pentagon's new policy on journalist access violates constitutional rights. This affects major news outlets like The New York Times and CBS News.

#PentagonPressAccess, #FirstAmendment, #NYTimes, #JudgeRuling, #JournalismRights

https://newsletter.tf/judge-blocks-pentagon-press-access-dec-10/

A federal judge blocked the Pentagon's new rules for journalists, saying they broke the law. This is a big change for news reporting from the Pentagon.

#PentagonPressAccess, #FirstAmendment, #NYTimes, #JudgeRuling, #JournalismRights
https://newsletter.tf/judge-blocks-pentagon-press-access-dec-10/

Judge Blocks Pentagon Policy Limiting Journalist Access on December 10

A judge ruled the Pentagon's new policy on journalist access violates constitutional rights. This affects major news outlets like The New York Times and CBS News.

NewsletterTF

Judge says Trump violated free speech when he ordered defunding of NPR : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2026/03/31/nx-s1-5768399/npr-pbs-trump-federal-funding

#NPR #PublicRadio #FirstAmendment #Radio

Citing #FirstAmendment, federal judge blocks Trump order to end funding for #NPR and #PBS

By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN
Updated 4:37 PM EDT, March 31, 2026
Leer en español
Comments 241

WASHINGTON (AP) — "Citing the First Amendment, a federal judge on Tuesday agreed to permanently block the Trump administration from implementing a presidential directive to end federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, two media entities that the White House has said are counterproductive to American priorities.

"The operational impact of U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss’ decision was not immediately clear — both because it will likely be appealed and because too much damage to the public-broadcasting system has already been done, both by the president and Congress.

"Moss ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order to cease funding for NPR and PBS is unlawful and unenforceable. The judge said the First Amendment right to free speech 'does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.' "

Read more:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-npr-pbs-funding-executive-order-fbd9500e5f7400deab84ead188c35694

Fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (#CPB), not #CBP! #DefundICE #FundPBS
#USPol

Judge blocks Trump order to end funding for NPR and PBS

A federal judge has agreed to permanently block the Trump administration from implementing a presidential directive to end federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service. The two are media entities that the White House has said are counterproductive to American priorities. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss cited the First Amendment in his decision. The impact was not immediately clear — both because it will likely be appealed and because too much damage to the public-broadcasting system has already been done, both by the president and Congress.

AP News