#GrahamPlatner #scotus
https://wjla.com/news/nation-world/maine-progressive-graham-platner-renews-call-to-remove-conservative-supreme-court-justices-clarence-thomas-samuel-alito

#SCOTUS: Alito, Cavanagh and Thomas (!) join liberals is ruling that federal district courts cannot review or overturn state‑court judgments even while those judgments are still being appealed in the state system, leaving that authority solely to the U.S. Supreme Court. https://www.newsweek.com/alito-kavanaugh-and-thomas-join-2-liberals-in-unusual-supreme-court-split-12091918

Title : "Scandal hits Trump"
what scandal ?
🤣
every day there is a new one...
a new theft, a new scam, a new crime...
#Trump doesn't care... #SCOTUS has made Trump 'above the law'
and.... the 'cherry on the cake'
Trump 'sells' Presidential Pardons to other criminals
...
What new 'scandal' are we talking about today? 😂

The Judicial Demise of Categorical Disarmament: United States v. Hemani and the Constitutional Viability of Section 922(g)(1):
The conceptual core of the Hemani decision—that the government cannot categorically label a broad group of people as "dangerous" to strip them of their Second Amendment rights without an individualized judicial finding of dangerousness—has immediate, devastating implications for the federal felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Section 922(g)(1) is the most frequently prosecuted federal firearms offense in the United States, operating as a strict, lifetime, blanket ban on firearm possession for any individual convicted of any crime punishable by more than one year of imprisonment, regardless of whether the predicate offense involved a single act of violence. 
Under Hemani, the government's standard defense of § 922(g)(1) faces a profound constitutional challenge. Historically, federal prosecutors defended the permanent disarmament of all felons by arguing that the legislature has the categorical authority to deem anyone who commits a felony as "unfit" or "dangerous". However, the Hemani majority explicitly adopted the core principle articulated by then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett in her dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019): that the founding-era tradition of disarmament focuses strictly on "dangerousness, not status". #uspol #hemani #scotus #maga #2a #secondamendment #firearm