Given the horrifying nature of the DOGE (you have no idea how much I loathe typing that) cuts by which Musk is effectively conduction a rolling shutdown of the US government, the Trump administration's attempts to either take control of, or bankrupt prominent American universities for blatantly ideological reasons, and news that Trump intends to sign an executive order to shut down the Department of Education, there's a conversation we have to start having now that I've run out of time to avoid.

I don't know how to say this without sounding like I'm employing conspiratorial hyperbole to at least some portion of the people reading this, but there really are a whole bunch of obscenely wealthy, mostly-white, mostly-Anglo nazis working together to transform our world into a dystopian fascist hellscape to increase their own power over us and preserve their way of life in the face of anticipated uprisings. And a lot of these guys, particularly those concentrated in the American tech sector, are extremely weird Bond movie villain types with horrifying ideas about how to run a society, but enough money to give them a try anyway. I get that to some of you that sounds exactly like a conspiracy theory, but let me assure you that these are all established facts, discussed sporadically in mainstream media outlets; even if those outlets are rarely willing to criticize rich people, or use the word "fascism" in order to explain what those facts mean.

These guys meet in the open to talk about shaping the future of our species in places like Davos and Aspen, they buy elections on live television, and then they go on podcasts to openly admit they want to end democratic rights, destroy regulatory authority over their activities, and transform the places we live into various types of dictatorships run by guys like them. I get that this is a lot to take in, but I should hope that watching a weird little nazi freak like Elon Musk spend $300M to elect Trump, immediately join the government, and start taking a chainsaw to every department that isn't the military or the fascist police state, might make it easier to consider the evidence in retrospect.

Look, this is a big subject; in my studies I've found the overt, direct influence of ideologically reactionary billionaires with fascist, dystopian, and religious agendas intersecting with topics like climate catastrophe, mass surveillance, reproductive rights and the natalism movement, what I would describe as a literal fucking cult for rich people in the TESCREAL movement, the anti-trans pogrom, the carceral state and forced labor, the assault on protest rights in the Pig Empire, climate change denialism, fascist internet influencers and "independent" media sources on the right, and of course elections and fascist political parties in the Pig Empire - that list is by no means exhaustive, these rich freaks have a lotta fingers in a lotta pies. If you want to understand what's going on with the Trump regime right now, why they're destroying what the right calls "the administrative state," why they're seizing control of higher education, and expanding the powers of the fascist police state in case you get any ideas about stopping them however, then the conversation about weird fascist billionaires with horrible tech-nazi plans has to start somewhere. Let's start with the 2024 election, and the specific group of fascist tech bro billionaires that got Trump into power, and how their stated agendas line up perfectly with Project 2025 and match what we've seen the Trump regime do so far in disturbing ways.

This thirty minute video is a few months old now, and was produced after Trump was elected, but before Der Führer took office. The video is fast paced, and informative; focusing on the activities and recorded statements of hyper-reactionary tech billionaires in the Trump regime's immediate orbit, and how those actions and stated intentions are expressed in Trump's fascist agenda. The presenter names names too, including Trump, JD Vance, Peter Thiel, Marc Andresson, Elon Musk, David Sacks, Brian Armstrong, Ben Horowitz, Balaji Srivisan, and an absolute freak named Curtis Yarvin, who extremely online folks may know as Mencius Moldbug. What the producer of the video couldn't possibly have known, but we know now, is how much of Trump's destructive, authoritarian, and quite frankly illegal attempts to reshape America into his personal fascist autocracy would align perfectly with a plan written by Peter Thiel's pet fascist "philosopher" and a man these right wing extremist, weirdo billionaires literally call "the prophet." No, I am not making that up. Like I said, it's a big conversation and one we're going to keep having on an ongoing basis now that Trump appears to be speedrunning Yarvin's how to build a dictatorship checklist. This should get you started:

Dark Gothic MAGA: How Tech Billionaires Plan to Destroy America by Blonde Politics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RpPTRcz1no

DARK GOTHIC MAGA: How Tech Billionaires Plan to Destroy America

YouTube

This late February article in The New Yorker briefly covers some of the same ground as the video above in terms of the Silicon Valley fascist influence in US politics, the close ties between the Trump regime and billionaire Yarvinites, and why rich tech nazis may see Trump's election as a vehicle to further their long-term efforts to establish private dictatorships by breaking the US administrative state and replacing it themselves. As such we can use it as supporting evidence for the Dark Gothic MAGA video, and to expand our starting point for discussions about the prominent role of billionaire fascists (of various types) in America and the larger Pig Empire's turn towards overt fascism and autocratic political forms. Furthermore, the author examines similar historical examples when technocrats with authoritarian political and organizational views merged with, and the case of Imperial Japan, subsumed fascist political orders.

https://archive.is/eZy6v

Techno-Fascism Comes to America

"For a time, digital platforms seemed to support democratic government as a kind of communal megaphone; but now, a decade later, technology seems to be supplanting the established authority of the government. “There is a crisis of the state,” McElroy said, and Silicon Valley may be “trying to corrode state power” in order to more quickly replace it.

Silicon Valley is premised on the idea that its founders and engineers know better than anyone else: they can do better at disseminating information, at designing an office, at developing satellites and advancing space travel. By the same logic, they must be able to govern better than politicians and federal employees. Voguish concepts in Silicon Valley such as seasteading and “network states” feature independent, self-contained societies running on tech principles. Efforts to create such entities have either failed or remained confined to the realm of brand-building, as in the startup Praxis, a hypothetical plan for a new tech-driven city on the Mediterranean. Under the new Trump White House, though, the U.S. government is being offered up as a guinea pig, McElroy said. “Now that we’ve got Musk running the state, I don’t know if they need their little offshore bubbles as much as they thought they did before.”

Given Elon Musk's position at the head of DOGE and thus his role as the de facto exchequer of what Trump considers his personal empire, but most still call the American government, I have no qualms with the way this article focuses on Elon as a representation of the creepy tech elites behind Downmarket Mussolini. In fact, the author's note that Musk's use of so-called AI to carry out the purges all of these nazis desire (for various reasons) might represent an opportunity to refine automated systems of repression and control for billionaire tech fascists looking to run their own neo-monarchal states in the future, probably goes a long way towards explaining why Musk in particular is so keen to run point on this whole project for Trump. After all, it's not a secret in tech circles that Musk has been looking for a way to become the leading figure in the "AI" industry, and what better way to do that than pioneering the use case for the "fascism machine" I've been telling you these rich nazis always meant "AI" to be?

I would however, caution against reading as much into the split between the tech-fascists (as represented by Musk) and the faux-populist MAGA movement (as represented by Steve Bannon) as Chayka does here. On a long enough timeline, it's possible that the billionaire tech-fascists, the Christian Nationalist right, the Bannonite "populists," and other patchwork constituencies that form the larger Trump movement may be torn apart by divergent priorities and ideas about who really runs Bartertown; but given that they all agree on methods of operation, and they're all pushing towards some type of fascist order, I think we're a long way away from irresolvable differences tearing Trumpism apart. Besides, the fact that it's Elon Musk standing next to Trump and waving around a chainsaw, not Steve Bannon, tells you all you need to know about who won that particular power struggle in the short term.

Frankly, I think the easiest way to understand the network of relationships, methods, and objectives of the various fascist power blocs in the movement behind Trump, is to imagine a minivan full of cartoonishly-evil nazis who're used to getting their way, all trying to control the activities of the driver, who may or may not be paying attention at any given moment. In this scenario the various groups of fascists vying for control of the vehicle Trump is driving are all on the same road, they all broadly agree on how to progress on their journey, but each of them intend to end up in different places by the time the drive is finished and they don't need the car anymore.

#Fascism #Trump #Musk #USPol #History #TechnoFascism #SiliconValley #DOGE #PeterThiel #CurtisYarvin

This is a half hour Majority Report interview with journalist Gil Duran, that originally aired February 11th, 2025. Duran, who is by no means a fringe figure in American media circles, writes a lot about the fascist ideologies and movie villain plans being openly adopted by these same autocratic billionaire nazis, including the American tech moguls we see surrounding Trump.

As you'll see right from the beginning of the interview, Duran is also convinced that we're watching a Trump regime and its richest benefactor (Elon Musk) enacting strategies to transform American into an autocratic dictatorship that almost identically match the ideas presented by Curtis Yarvin, and his obscenely wealthy disciples; guys like Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, and of course Elon Musk. Furthermore, like me, Duran believes the intentions and ambitions of these billionaire tech-fascists extends far beyond America to reach global proportions, and a plan to replace nation states and democracies with autocratic forms of governance ruled completely by guys like them.

From the Majority Report YouTube channel:

"Gil Duran then joins, diving right into the concept of the Network State – an idea advanced by Big Tech’s thought leader Curtis Yarvin and his billionaire buddies (Thiel, Andreessen, Musk, etc) that Tech CEOs should take advantage of the collapse of Nation States and democracy in favor of establishing corporate, CEO-run dictatorship, either by gutting and replacing existing governments or purchasing sovereign territories – as Duran unpacks his first introduction to this ideology with Silicon Valley’s attempt to hijack San Francisco’s political institutions, before parsing a little deeper through the recent, much more public discussions of this theory advanced by the likes of Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, and Curtis Yarvin. After expanding on how we are already seeing the blueprint for a Network State in action, with Trump serving as a figurehead to a Tech CEO’s gutting of our administrative and democratic institutions in favor of sycophants and centralized power, Duran looks to how this came to be the active ideology of the GOP so quickly, unpacking how the collapse of the Biden campaign and naming of JD Vance as Trump’s VP opened up an opportunity for the Big Tech to step in, starting with Elon’s massive public $300m investment and culminating in Yarvin’s Reboot conference in San Francisco last September, exploring the obvious parallels between Big Tech’s dictator obsession and the GOP’s white nationalism and parsing through their unified scapegoating of “woke” and “DEI” in the leadup to the election to the point of completely dominating both mainstream and social media (bolstered by the financial leverage and ownership Big Tech has over those institutions). "

The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder: Tech Bro Supervillains Confess World Takeover Plan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFVgGamrWLg

#Fascism #BigTech #ElonMusk #CurtivsYarvin #MarcAndreessen #PeterThiel #TechFascism #Trump #MajorityReport #GilDuran

Tech Bro Supervillains Confess World Takeover Plan

YouTube

So last night I stumbled across this twenty-five minute interview with Guardian reporter Chris McGreal on Democracy Now!" Most of the conversation centers around the Musk family's longtime connections with Nazism (like literally the Third Reich) and neo-nazi movements, as well as how growing up in Apartheid South Africa shaped Elon Musk's worldview. Interestingly however, this is probably the first time I've ever seen anyone who works in corporate media mention that Peter Thiel, and David Sacks also have deep connections to apartheid societies in Africa. As you're likely aware, all three men have intimate connections with, and have financially supported, Trump and the larger fascist movement that's built around his cult of personality.

I'm sharing it here at least in part because McGreal is very firmly a mainstream media source, and until very recently this type of background information on the billionaire nazis ruining our society as we speak, really didn't get a lot of play in the mainstream media. This kind of critical background information wasn't necessarily a "secret," but corporate media has always been far too fawning towards tech billionaires to bring up "inconvenient truths" like the reality that the richest guy in the world, who is currently helping to enact a white nationalist agenda in America, comes from a family full of cracker nazis.

Edit: to be clear, I'm not saying that nobody ever rises above a reactionary upbringing here; I grew up in just such an environment myself and I think I've done a pretty good job of not turning out to be a nazi. If however, someone, let's just say a handful of the richest guys on earth, spends a lot of time promoting fascist, white supremacist ideology, and helping fascists and white supremacists win elections, and then directly influences policy decisions that affect entire countries (if not the world) in a way that promotes fascist, white supremacist hierarchies, the fact that they were raised in an Apartheid environment surrounded by people who love nazis, is probably relevant. Sorry for the edit; I forgot we live on the dumbest timeline and thus you have to explain things like this to avoid disingenuous muppetry.

Democracy Now: Elon Musk's Family History in South Africa Reveals Ties to Apartheid & Neo-Nazi Movements

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahv3IKzMdHA

#Trump #Fascism #Musk #SouthAfrica #WhiteNationalism #Billionaires #Apartheid #PaypalMafia #DavidSacks #PeterThiel #ChrisMcGreal

Elon Musk's Family History in South Africa Reveals Ties to Apartheid & Neo-Nazi Movements

YouTube

If you want to understand the horrifying future these tech billionaire nazis have in store for humanity, it helps to understand what parts of our "glorious past" as a species they're looking to recreate. This interview with University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign information sciences and media studies professor Anita Say Chan talks a bit about the history of data and eugenics, what it means that guys like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel (along with most of Silicon Valley's movers and shakers) are devout believers in eugenicist philosophies, and how that's reflected in their efforts to reshape society in horrifying, and objectively fascist ways. In terms of our discussion about the uber rich fascists who heavily influence the Trump regime they bought and paid for, I'm mostly including this here to point out that these guys have gone on record in support of a lot of openly fascist shit and for the most part, your media pretends we don't already know these guys are nazis; it's not a secret, it's just not "worth mentioning" when media orgs are fawning over technofascist billionaires destroying our planet and our lives.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/01/eugenics-isnt-dead-its-thriving-in-tech/

Eugenics Isn’t Dead—It’s Thriving in Tech

"Big Tech successors like Musk and PayPal billionaire-turned-arms dealer Peter Thiel have overtly promoted fraudulent race science, with Musk amplifying users on X who argue that people of European descent are biologically superior. In response to another user’s deleted post suggesting that students at historically Black institutions have lower IQs, Musk posted, “It will take an airplane crashing and killing hundreds of people for them to change this crazy policy of DIE”—diversity, equity, and inclusion, misspelled. In 2016, Thiel buddied up to a prominent white nationalist, and, the same year, was said by a Stanford dorm-mate to have complimented South Africa’s “economically sound” system of racial apartheid."

#Fascism #Trump #Musk #PeterThiel #SouthAfrica #Nazis #Eugenics #SiliconValley #BigTech #BigData #Billionaires #Ableism #WhiteNationalism #Dystopia #Eliminationism #Technofascism

Eugenics isn't dead—it's thriving in tech

A new book takes on the throughline from the rise of 20th-century eugenics to Silicon Valley.

Mother Jones

For the past several years, I've been arguing with AI advocates about the purpose of the technology they're enamored with. I mean don't get me wrong, I'm aware that there are use cases for so-called AI programs that aren't inherently evil, but when you take a look at the nazi billionaires who're behind the projects to force widespread adoption, their long term plans to establish city-state dictatorships out of the hollowed out core of the nation-state era, and what these guys ultimately do with it, it's pretty clear AI is a fascism machine; just as much as IBM's punch card computers were a genocide machine for the Nazis. It doesn't have to be this way, but this is the way it is.

As such, I can't say I'm shocked that after Elon Musk bought himself a president, the first thing he started doing is using AI purge his political enemies as well as their ideas, sort surveillance data to identify targets for a white nationalist regime, and now spy on federal workers in search of those with insufficient loyalty to God Emperor Trump, the regime, and Musk himself.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/musks-doge-using-ai-snoop-us-federal-workers-sources-say-2025-04-08/

Exclusive: Musk's DOGE using AI to snoop on U.S. federal workers, sources say

"Reuters’ interviews with nearly 20 people with knowledge of DOGE’s operations – and an examination of hundreds of pages of court documents from lawsuits challenging DOGE's access to data – highlight its unorthodox usage of AI and other technology in federal government operations.

At the Environmental Protection Agency, for instance, some EPA managers were told by Trump appointees that Musk’s team is rolling out AI to monitor workers, including looking for language in communications considered hostile to Trump or Musk, the two people said.

The EPA, which enforces laws such as the Clean Air Act and works to protect the environment, has come under intense scrutiny by the Trump administration. Since January, it has put nearly 600 employees on leave and said it will eliminate 65% of its budget, which could require further staffing reductions.

Trump-appointed officials who had taken up EPA posts told managers that DOGE was using AI to monitor communication apps and software, including Microsoft Teams, which is widely used for virtual calls and chats, said the two sources familiar with these comments. “We have been told they are looking for anti-Trump or anti-Musk language,” a third source familiar with the EPA said. Reuters could not independently confirm if the AI was being implemented.

The Trump officials said DOGE would be looking for people whose work did not align with the administration's mission, the first two sources said. “Be careful what you say, what you type and what you do,” a manager said, according to one of the sources."

Naturally the regime and DOGE have denied that they're using AI to conduct "thought" policing inside the federal workforce, but I think given how readily the Trump administration has engaged in clear ideological warfare and suppression against its perceived political enemies, that denial sound a lot like a hollow lie. Speaking broadly however, I can't say I'm surprised at all that this is where a technology like AI and the billionaire nazis who're pushing it, have lead us as a society. There are a near infinite number of things "AI" technology is terrible at, but one thing it does really well is sort through the vast amounts of data and metadata collected as part of our already existing police state panopticon society; in fact, without automation we really wouldn't be able to sift through that amount of data at all with human eyes. AI doesn't have morals, it doesn't have humanity, it doesn't have any sense of what's right and wrong; it presumes the world it's programmed to presume, and engages in the tasks it's purposed to engage in - and billionaire nazi cultists who want to build their own technofeudalist dicatorships are the guys in charge of the coding and tasking of this technology. Whether it's picking out targets for extermination by the IDF during a genocide in Gaza, hunting down student protestors in vast seas of education and immigration data, or spying on federal workers for anti-Musk sentiments, the fact is fascist oppression and violence *can* be automated - particularly if you don't give a fuck about false positives because you're a soulless nazi murderbot.

#Fascism #Trump #ElonMusk #DOGE #AI #LLM #FascismMachine #Panopticon #DigitalSurveillance #Grok #BigTech #Billionaires #Dystopia #Eliminationism #TechnoFascism #SiliconValley #TechnoFeudalism

I've made no secret of the fact that I think the nazi "broligarch" cultists who brought Trump to power, and support the creation of monarchal, technofeudalist city states under a variety of names (Network States, and Freedom Cities most prominently) are working on a larger, dystopian plan for literal authoritarian global domination; a plan that encompasses and revolves around the destruction of democratic structures, the implementation of digital fascist surveillance and repression via AI technology, the adoption of quasi-religious beliefs about our future as exemplified by the TESCREAL movement, and even the fascist plan to remake America into a type of dictatorship under Trump proposed by "neo-reactionary scholar" Curtis Yarvin, also known as The Butterfly Revolution. Taken together, the proponents of these ideas, who are often quite wealthy and influential people in our society and in particular the tech industry, have dubbed their ideology "Dark Enlightenment" which should give you at least some idea of both how obnoxious these rich fascists are, but also how far-reaching their plans ultimately go.

Furthermore, I am certain that this isn't just some weird conspiracy theory for three key reasons. First, the billionaire fascists have more or less told us their plans in the open. Secondly, since buying themselves a president, a small group of hyper-reactionary billionaires led by the world's richest nazi, Elon Musk, have more or less guided the Trump regime to act in countless ways that directly facilitate their obscene visions for the future of humanity.

Finally of course, there are quantifiable structural reasons why what these nazi cultist billionaires are proposing represents one of the only possible futures in which most of the planet maintains capitalism and free market fundamentalist ideology. After all, the planet is on fire, billions of people's lives are at stake if we don't act collectively to address climate crisis, and capitalism is the culprit causing both our impending destruction and our refusal to act; either capitalism and free market fundamentalism go to their graves, or billions of everyday people do, and these billionaire nazis know that. Folks aren't going to keep supporting a capitalist order that's killing them as the bodies pile up, so if you're going to keep doing capitalism for the benefit of an increasingly smaller ruling class, even as it leads to genocides all around us, you're going to need a political system that provides the necessary degree of surveillance, repression, and applied force to maintain control even as society disintegrates in real time - and that political system is going to look a lot like fascism, no matter what they choose to call it.

Despite their rhetoric about "the future" and their love of technology, the truth is the ideas and plans folks like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Marc Andreessen (to name a few) are proposing to accomplish their goals, are old, decrepit, and often utterly disproven. As a species, we have already learned the horrible outcomes of adopting repugnant ideas like eugenics, feudalism, and fascism as enforced policy; and yet here today these ideas are being repackaged and renamed as the only hope for our future, by a billionaire nazi ruling class determined to rewind our society into the darkest days of our collective past. Down that road leads subjugation, violence, and death; which is probably why it appeals to rich nazis who value "artificial minds" (and labor) over human beings, and are preparing for a world where billions of people are "surplus" to their requirements as techno-feudalist overlords.

To demonstrate this last point, let's look at a piece by J.J. Anselmi writing in The New Republic that identifies a new (old) way to look at the Network States/Freedom cities plan being pushed by Balaji Srinivasan and his ultra wealthy backers; as the author notes, at its core a "Network State" or "Freedom City" is really just a big company town:

https://archive.is/9B2ZI

Trump’s “Freedom Cities” Are a Devious Scam

"Tech bros love to repackage old ideas as innovation. We’ve all seen it. But their latest foray into disruption no one else wants, the so-called “network state” and its constellation of start-up cities, deserves our attention. This notion has been embraced by President Donald Trump, who has rechristened them “freedom cities.” In reality, the scheme is a techno-fascist vision of the future that’s been quietly but persistently pushed and funded by billionaires such as Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, Brian Armstrong, and Sam Altman for years. Despite the shiny marketing materials for places like Próspera and California Forever, which make outlandish promises of futuristic utopias, the start-up city as a concept is a modern, ketamine-infused repackaging of something that flopped into obsolescence long ago: the company town."

#Fascism #Trump #Dystopia #Billionaires #Musk #NetworkState #FreedomCities #CompanyTown #AI #BigTech

I don't want to spend a lot of time focusing on tabloid-adjacent coverage of what an absolute piece of human dogshit Elon Musk is in his personal life, but in this case I think a recent story about Musk's obsession with creating an army of mini-Elon children, pronatalism, fearmongering about collapsing birthrates in "the West," and attitudes toward children in the developing world goes a long way towards explaining why Apartheid Space Karen is doing the things he's doing in his official capacity as Trump's "chainsaw" guy in the US government.

https://archive.ph/BR4Y8

The Tactics Elon Musk Uses to Manage His ‘Legion’ of Babies—and Their Mothers

"Musk has warned that “civilization is going to crumble” if people don’t start having more children, a view popularized as pronatalism in right-wing circles. The pronatalism movement is composed of people concerned about the birthrate and eager to implement policy and cultural solutions to the problem.

Martin Varsavsky, a friend of Musk’s who founded a large chain of in vitro fertilization clinics in the U.S., said he has spoken with Musk about the risks of falling birthrates.

“Without babies there’s no future, every problem becomes secondary to the problem of not having people on the planet,” said Varsavsky. “Elon believes that a country is not the geography, a country is the people.”

Speaking to an audience at an investment conference in Saudi Arabia last year, Musk laid out the urgency of the matter. “I think for most countries, they should view the birthrate as the single biggest problem they need to solve. If you don’t make new humans, there’s no humanity, and all the policies in the world don’t matter,” Musk told the crowd over a live video.

When the interviewer joked that Musk was doing his part to address the issue, the billionaire agreed. “Yes. I am. I mean, you know, you’ve got to walk the talk. So, I do have a lot of kids, and I encourage others to have lots of kids.”

Separately, Musk has said he is concerned about what he called Third World countries having higher birthrates than the U.S. and Europe, a person familiar with the conversation said.

One of the most important ways to change these dynamics, he has repeatedly told people close to him, is for educated people to have more children."

Look, if you want to read the salacious details about what a domineering, misogynist supervillain freak Musk is to the women he convinces to have his children, I promise not to rat you out; if nothing else it speaks to the core patriarchal, reactionary, delusional sci-fi obsessive values by which the richest man in the world leads his extremely divorced life. Laughing at Musk is so much fun it would be our national sport if we weren't in the middle of a fascist takeover in America.

What interests me however is Musk's open articulation of the white supremacist, eugenicist, "race war" ideology that seemingly influences his decisions. Folks, I've had the misfortune of encountering a fair number of nazis and assorted other kinds of fascists in my life, and I can say without question that the freaks who obsess over racialized birth rates and raw demographics are by far the worst human beings, and some of the most dangerous of these odious shitlords. When a billionaire nazi who grew up under the apartheid system in South Africa starts talking about higher birthrates in "the Third World" and the need for "educated people" to have more babies, it doesn't take a psychic to realize that he's really talking about a perceived fascist need for white people to literally out breed non-white people as part of some implied racialized struggle for "the future of human civilization." He can dress it up with nonsense about going to Mars and preserving "civilization" and the human race, but it's very clear what "civilization" he's hoping to save, and what kind of humans he's hoping to "preserve" here; this is bog standard nazi shit.

All of which brings us to Musk's role as the head of the fascist Department of Government Efficiency and what Elon's beliefs can tell us about his actions in that role. DOGE hasn't touched the imperialist military, the police state, or government subsidies for corporations and the fossil fuel industry. Instead, under Musk's leadership DOGE has targeted global health programs, famine reduction efforts, and now has its eyes set on anything that helps America's poor; who I shouldn't have to remind you, are a segment of society where nonwhite people are overrepresented due to our long history of white supremacist capitalist and theft of generational wealth. Maybe the reason Elon Musk doesn't mind killing poor, mostly brown people is because he's a nazi freak who thinks we're in the middle of a race war to survive the apocalypse? And just maybe, that's news worth reporting to an American public being gutted by his department's "efficiency" cuts as we speak.

#Fascism #Musk #DOGE #Trump #WhiteNationalism #Billionaires #Nazi #DarkEnlightenment

When TechBro billionaire oligarchs were the darlings of "liberal" capitalist society, their homages to sci-fi literature were considered "quirky." Today, on the verge of what some call a "techno-feudalist" dictatorship in America, paid for by many of those same TechBro billionaires, a recent opinion piece in The Guardian raises an important question; was society ignoring the warning signs that these rich megalomaniacs took the wrong lessons from the stories we all grew up loving?

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/apr/14/the-big-idea-will-sci-fi-end-up-destroying-the-world

The Big Idea: Will Sci-Fi End Up Destroying the World?

"We can see this most clearly in the way the dystopian settings of so much cyberpunk fiction are seen by today’s tech leaders as prophetic visions of a world they need to try to escape – whether by colonising Mars, building metaverses or, in the case of Vance’s billionaire patron Peter Thiel, backing efforts to create new city states by buying land in developing countries. In the original novels it tended to be people like them responsible for creating the dystopias in the first place, but they’ve somehow projected the blame on to the masses.

In Snow Crash there’s something called “the Raft” – a collection of boats filled with infected, mind-controlled refugees headed for America’s west coast. It’s an image that recalls the viciously racist 1973 French sci-fi novel The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail, in which a huge fleet of Indian refugees destroy western civilisation. It’s had a far-right fandom ever since and has been referenced by former Donald Trump campaign manager Steve Bannon. It’s a particular favourite of Stephen Miller, Trump’s lead policy adviser and close friend of Musk (Miller’s wife, Katie, is the Doge spokeswoman).

It’s not much of a jump to see the actions of Thiel and Musk, and many of those around them, as an attempt to forestall this fate, linking, as they do, the racial obsessions of the far right with their odd brand of tech-utopianism. When Thiel writes that “I no longer believe freedom and democracy are compatible”, or when Musk makes up wild stories about the Democrats using benefit fraud to import migrants, they are unabashedly expressing this fear of being overrun. The greatest irony of all is that in their desperation to build escape routes, they risk creating the very dystopias they fear."

To answer our question above, yes society did ignore the warning signs that these TechBro billionaires were reactionary freaks with terrible ideas and increasingly, enough money power to try and make those ideas a reality; but not necessarily for the reasons the author implies in this article. I think at this point it's pretty uncontroversial to say that guys like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and even Jeff Bezos are deeply unserious thinkers whose wealth allows them to surround themselves with actual scientists, engineers, and inventors who can turn their pulp fiction fantasies into reality; so it's not really a surprise that these rich dilettante get their ideas from mass market sci-fi novels. What I think is far more instructional however, is to look at *which* science fiction ideas these folks gravitate towards; specifically the hyper-capitalist, racist, fascist, and authoritarian ideas commonly found in the sci-fi novels they grew up with.

I'm not a psychic of course, but I don't think it's an accident that billionaire TechBros who buy whole governments and seem intent on installing a technologically-enhanced form of fascism in America, gravitate towards stories and ideas about power, superiority, and the apocalypse that many critics have rightfully described as fascist in nature; nor do I think its a coincidence that these would-be "Masters of the Universe" have that in common with fascist propagandists like Curtis Yarvin, or even the Trump regime that Musk has bought outright control of. When you factor in that almost all of these same people are also interested in things like eugenics, neo-fascist corporate dictatorships, and racialized birth rates on a global scale, it becomes pretty clear that the origin story here is about powerful people looking for ideas that support their reactionary, supremacist, authoritarian beliefs; not a fascination with literary fiction.

In the end, I think that's the handle many people are missing when they're trying to understand the so-called "Dark Enlightenment." These folks don't believe in fascist ideology because they think they're right; these rich bastards are folks who have been presented with the problem of how to maintain their wealth and power on a boiling planet, even as the capitalism that grants them everything is going to kill billions, and fascist ideas are the only way they can square that circle, so they're always on the lookout for more of them. Sci-Fi stories aren't going to destroy the world; but the fascism that was so easily hidden inside many of them just might.

#Fascism #TechBro #BigTech #ElonMusk #PeterThiel #CurtisYavin #Trump #Vance #StephenMiller #SciFi #Dystopia

The big idea: will sci-fi end up destroying the world?

Skewed interpretations of classic works are feeding the dark visions of tech moguls, from Musk to Thiel

The Guardian

Over the past eight or so years, I've been asked on numerous occasions how I could be so certain that Trumpworld and the right wing authoritarian tech billionaires that are funding the movement were literally fascists. The simple answer to that question is because I know where the ideas that motivate them and animate their movement come from. As openly fascistic as the Trump regime's exercise of power has been so far, if you peel back a single layer to look at the people providing the ideological framework for those activities, you almost always find literal nazis.

Take for example the Trump regime's frequently self-identified "war on woke." On its face, the collection of policies and activities used to wage the "war on woke" so far have been fundamentally Christian Nationalist, white supremacist, patriarchal, and eliminationist in nature. If however you peel back the top surface of this "war" you find three major ideological propagandists driving the entire agenda: specifically Peter Boghossian, Christopher Rufo, and Richard Hanania; whose frankly odious ideas have had a huge influence on the Republican Party, and the Trump administration. These three have waged a war on higher education, diversity, and the very concept of racial or gender equality, that is expressly endorsed by most of the same far right billionaires who paid to make Trump president; including Marc Andressen, Peter Thiel, David Sacks, and Vivek Ramaswamy. So what happens if you peel back another layer of this fascist onion to find out who is funding and promoting guys like Hanania, Rufo, and Boghossian? You find a rich cracker tech bro, and a eugenicist running a recently rebranded foundation that supports white supremacists, promotes scientific racism, and was literally founded by Nazis. No, really:

https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/27/trumps-war-on-woke-and-dei-incubated-by-a-nazi-eugenics-foundation/

Trump’s War on ‘Woke’ and DEI: Incubated by a Nazi Eugenics Foundation

"The ‘war on woke’ did not suddenly appear. It is an idea deeply rooted in a form of scientific racism that has been laundered into the mainstream over decades by the Pioneer Fund and right-wing activists connected with this group.

This nexus of ties to Pioneer Fund entities and ideology throws new light on how the Trump administration’s attacks on DEI are the fruit of a broader white supremacist endeavour inspired by Nazi-aligned ideology.

It also suggests that the increasing normalisation of the Nazi salute by Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, and others is not an accident either – but a signal; one we would do well not to ignore."

Unfortunately this article is a long read, and it's easy to get bogged down in the idea that the problem here is the "ancient" history of the Human Diversity Foundation/Pioneer Diveristy fund, but if you keep reading the author is very clear that the politics and priorities of the foundation, haven't changed much in the modern era.

"But last year, Hope Not Hate revealed that a network of white supremacist activists was secretly rehabilitating the Pioneer Fund under the new Human Diversity Foundation brand identity.

The aim has been to normalise the Pioneer Fund’s Nazi-aligned scientific racism in the mainstream through the notion of open debate and ‘free’ inquiry. Scientific racism has been rebranded as the story of ‘human biodiversity’.

The key funder supporting this initiative was revealed to be American technology entrepreneur Andrew Conru, who donated $1.3 million to the HDF. Around the same time, Conru was also funding the most influential conservative voices attacking DEI and ‘critical race theory’ – Christopher Rufo, Peter Boghossian, and Richard Hanania.

HDF’s magazine, Aporia, was founded by British far-right activist Matthew Frost. Conru’s donation provided him with a 15% stake in the group. It has defended Richard Lynn’s pseudoscientific racism, published an interview with Nazi sympathiser Jared Taylor, and in 2024 claimed that racial stereotypes are “reasonably accurate”.

Hope Not Hate’s undercover reporting recorded far-right activists associated with the HDF calling for “remigration” – the ‘mass removal of ethnic minorities’.

Kirkegaard is the long-time editor of the Pioneer Fund-backed eugenics journal Mankind Quarterly, a founding board member of which was Nazi eugenicist Otmar von Verscheur – who taught and mentored Josef Mengele, the notorious Nazi SS officer known as the ‘Angel of Death’ for performing medical experiments at Auschwitz.

In 2023, both Kirkegaard and Frost attended a notorious neo-Nazi gathering known as the “Scandza Forum” in Estonia, hosted by Scandinavian neo-Nazi Fróði Midjord. The conference was that year renamed ‘Guide to Kulchur’ after a book by Nazi sympathiser and Holocaust supporter Ezra Pound.

Kirkegaard inherited the assets of the Pioneer Fund from its former long-time president Richard Lynn before he died in July 2023."

#Fascism #Trump #Nazis #WarOnWoke #Eugenics #Rufo #Hanania #Boghossian #HDF #PioneerFund #Kirkegaard #Conru #Broligarchs #GOP #Thiel #DEI

Trump’s War on 'Woke’ and DEI: Incubated by a Nazi Eugenics Foundation

Mainstream American conservative icons Christopher Rufo, Peter Boghossian, and Richard Hanania – who inspired Trump’s assault on diversity – were bankrolled by the funder of a Nazi eugenics foundation

Byline Times

Because my understanding of the billionaire nazi plot to install fascism in the Pig Empire originated through my studies of climate crisis, money in politics, and the funding behind fascist movements in the Pig Empire, my focus in writing about the fascist broligarch global takeover is on the material actions these rich freaks take to bring about the future they desire; more or less against the collective will of the human species. As I began to dig deeper into the subject however, reading the work of analysts like Émile P. Torres, Timnit Gebru, Gil Duran, and Douglas Rushkoff, I came to realize that many rich fascists, particularly at the center of the broligarch counterrevolutionary alliance in Silicon Valley, were also essentially in an emerging anti-human death cult. I know a lot of scholars, myself included, will metaphorically compare all fascist movements, which are dependent on an ever-shrinking circle of "us," and and ever widening circle of "them" to function, to a death cult due to the corrosive, ouroboros-like effect this has on fascist societies and the body counts they produce over time, but that description is still ultimately a metaphor. When I say Silicon Valley billionaire nazis who have bought our political systems are in an apocalyptic, anti-human death cult I'm speaking quite literally here; the billionaires trying to push this quasi-religious ideology used to promote it as "effective altruism" and "longtermism," some folks call it "the mindset," Torres and Gebru describe is as TESCREALism, but regardless of what you call it, its sure looks like a fascist cult for billionaire edgelord nazis to me.

Is it important to understand what fascist broligarchs like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Peter Thiel, and the rest of the Yarvinate tech-fascist billionaires believe? In my opinion, not really; why they do the fascist shit they do to achieve their long term objectives isn't as important to understand as what those objectives are and by what methodology they're trying to achieve them. Unfortunately however the activities of a billionaire ruling class dominated by tech fascists who intend to run the human species off the ecological cliff to preserve their wealth and power on a boiling planet, are often so horrible that many people *need* to understand the belief structure that allows this genocidal behavior, in order to simply rationalize and accept what is happening around us. For whatever reason, it is not enough for them to hear "well they're nazis, and this is what nazis do" or "either capitalism goes or a planet that can support 8 billion people does; the billionaires are picking capitalism" and so for those folks I'd like to share this Torres piece that examines the belief structure of this anti-humanist death cult, through the lens of Rushkoff's analysis of "the mindset."

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-endgame-of-edgelord-eschatology/

The Endgame of Edgelord Eschatology

"The central claim of my argument so far is that Silicon Valley is gripped by a descriptive eschatology: the belief that our future will be digital rather than biological, and that this is inevitable in the coming decades — whether we like it or not. Just about everyone in the Valley believes this because, it seems, nearly everyone accepts by default a “techno-deterministic” view according to which scientific and technological “progress” is a juggernaut that simply cannot be stopped. As one of the leading prophets of The Mindset, Nick Bostrom, writes: “If scientific and technological development efforts do not effectively cease, then all important basic capabilities that could be obtained through some possible technology will be obtained.” He calls this the “Technological Completion Conjecture.”

What’s even more frightening is that many people in Silicon Valley accept the additional normative claim that we should try to bring about a new world of digital beings to supplant this current one. It’s not just Page who says this would be desirable. The “revolt against humanity,” to quote the literary critic Adam Kirsch, is rapidly growing within the tech world."

Yeah, I wasn't ready to hear that some of the richest, most powerful nazis in the world literally believe AI will create god, and humanity has no value except in however the species can assist in creating that god, either. The amazing part is this is only one aspect of the TESCREAL rabbit hole; rich fascists believe a whole bunch of other weird supervillain shit too.

Do all the billionaires believe this? Probably not; but many of the richest most politically-active among them at least appear to. Ultimately I think the difference between belief and motivation for Silicon Valley nazis doesn't exist; whether they believe these things to justify their actions, or act according to these beliefs is unknowable, and largely irrelevant as far as I can tell. The point here is they're preparing for the apocalypse they themselves are creating, and they regard the rest of humanity as surplus to their requirements.

The Endgame of Edgelord Eschatology - Truthdig

Powerful figures in Silicon Valley advocate a new-age religion that sees humanity as a transitional species — one whose time is almost up.

Truthdig

Do you remember that shadowy network of white supremacist "race science" and eugenics revivalists running a rebranded Pioneer Fund that we talked about being behind the ideologues fueling Trump's "War on Woke" back in late April? Well noted "enlightened centrist" dipshit intellectual Steven Pinker just turned up on a podcast for the (now renamed to) Human Diversity Foundation's magazine Aporia, and to the surprise of no one who has been paying attention to Pinker's career for any length of time, cited Douglas Murray and helped normalize garbage pro-"scientific racism" propaganda.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jun/07/harvard-steven-pinker-aporia-podcast

Harvard author Steven Pinker appears on podcast linked to scientific racism

"During the podcast, Pinker expressed agreement with claims made by Charles Murray, the author of The Bell Curve, a prominent figure in the “human biodiversity” movement that seeks to promote race-based theories of intelligence, and like Pinker a one-time participant in a human biodiversity email list convened by Steve Sailer.

When Carl cited “evidence collected by sociologists like Charles Murray suggesting that part of the family breakdown in some communities in America seems to be attributable to the state taking over the traditional function of the father”, Pinker responded: “I think that is a problem.” He added: “It is a huge class-differentiated phenomenon, as Murray and others write it out.”

Reporting last October in the Guardian revealed that Aporia operates within a broader network of groups and individuals seeking to mainstream racial pseudoscience.

The initiative had been secretly funded by US tech entrepreneur Andrew Conru until he was contacted for comment on the reporting, and Aporia’s editors are connected to far-right extremists, including Erik Ahrens, whom German authorities have designated a “rightwing extremist” posing an “extremely high” danger.

The investigation also found that Aporia was owned by the Human Diversity Foundation, a Wyoming LLC founded in 2022 by Emil Kirkegaard, a Danish self-described eugenicist and race scientist who has spent years attempting to access genetic datasets, and maintaining publishing platforms including OpenPsych and Mankind Quarterly that serve a network of race-science researchers."

As one of Pinker's many longtime critics in left wing discourse, part of the reason I'm sharing this story is a giant middle finger to all the "Very Serious People TM" in our society who kept insisting it was unreasonable to say that vapid fraud was promoting a foundationally colonialist, white supremacist view of society, human development, and the world at large; we told you folks he was basically Niall Ferguson for "centrists" and this is absolutely where Pinker's career was always headed. Yet another celebrity intellectual who barfs up platitudes about the status quo that affluent white Americans love, turns out to be not just "asking questions" but the full blown cracker supremacist scholars on the left warned you he was. Maybe the gatekeepers of our larger discourse should stop showering praise on folks who kiss the ruling class's asses if they also think Charles Murray had some valid ideas worth exploring? Who can say.

The other reason I'm sharing this story however, is that The Guardian, one of the few outlets who actually covered the international network of race science activists behind the Human Diversity Foundation and the US techbro nazi who was funding the project at the time, is kind of minimizing how odious and career-ending what Pinker just did should be. Formerly named the Pioneer fund, the organization behind this podcast was originally founded to spread Nazi ideology in America for the actual Third Reich, and the folks running it now are literally hardcore neo-nazis and white supremacists who actively promote bunk "race science," eugenicist ideology, and argue for the mass expulsion of nonwhite people from the Imperial Core. This isn't like the dumber Cuomo brother having Steve Bannon on his show to disseminate Trump's lies, this is a lot more like letting Andrew Anglin interview you for a Daily Stormer podcast. In a Pig Empire that wasn't already drunk on fascist ideology, this should absolutely be career-ending for Steven Pinker; whether it will be in the really real world we live in where lots of nazis are still welcome and celebrated in our public discourse, is a lot harder to predict.

#Fascism #RaceScience #StevenPinker #Aporia #HumanDiversityFoundation #PioneerFund #Nazis #Media #DouglasMurray #WhiteSupremacy #Eugenics

Harvard author Steven Pinker appears on podcast linked to scientific racism

Psychologist and writer’s appearance on Aporia condemned for helping to normalise ‘dangerous, discredited ideas’

The Guardian

Warning: this is gonna be a little Live Journal.

I confess I've avoided writing about the re-emergence of the Jeff Epstein child sexual assault/elite pedophile ring scandal, even as it appears to be crashing down on President Trump's head; I'll try to explain why later on in this post. Crucially however, I don't want anyone to think the reason I'm not writing about it, is because I don't think there's anything to the scandal, or Der Leader is not involved. On the contrary, as someone who began investigating the larger Jeffrey Epstein elite pedophile ring roughly a decade ago, and has continued to follow the unfolding evidence as it pertains to Trump himself, I am quite certain it's both the most damning scandal in US political history, and that the President is guilty of things that go beyond even sexually assaulting minors and veer into something that more closely resembles human trafficking.

As I've noted on the other account - considering the preponderance of publicly available evidence, witness testimony, and a wide variety of published stories in credible mainstream media outlets, I believe and have no problem saying:

1) That President Donald Trump is both a pedophile, and a rapist. I believe he directly engaged in these hobbies with Jeff Epstein, as well as Prince Andrew; there is victim testimony to that effect available on the record. Epstein had many other famous clients, but I am unsure how many of them Trump did teen rapes with.

2) Additionally I believe Trump engaged in a trafficking operation to help supply Epstein's pedophile sex slaver ring with underage victims as young as 13 years old; this was accomplished both through his Mar-A-Lago club, and a sham modeling agency he created for this purpose. Trump wasn't the *only* billionaire to do this, but we're talking about him now and this scandal is so big we'd be here for days if I listed every suspect.

3) I believe Trump is, and has been, working to cover up his involvement with the scandal; first as a rich private citizen, and then during each of his terms as President. I don't think that's even a controversial opinion anymore after Bondi's "move along, nothing to see here" statement, but it was true before now too.

4) Finally, and this will be a controversial point, I believe that Epstein's suicide is fishy enough, full of enough alarming coincidences, and questionable enough under the laws of physics, to be virtually impossible. Furthermore, while I do not have evidence the President killed him, if I were a fed trying to figure out who did do the deed, Trump would be my prime suspect - given his deep involvement with the Epstein minor sex trafficking ring, his prior efforts to cover up that involvement, the mysterious circumstances of Epstein's death, and his unique power as President to arrange for that kind of convenient suicide inside of a federal detention facility.

Naturally, some of you will be reaching for the close browser button at this point, and I confess that's probably part of why I'm not covering the story. The truth is I think points 1-3 at least can be easily demonstrated by referencing public mainstream reporting on the scandal, or even just perusing Epstein's Wikipedia page and following links. We'll come back to that point, but in the meantime as a show of good faith, please allow me to share two videos by credible left-leaning journalists who are absolutely not nazi conspiracy theorists - Mehdi Hasan, and Kyle Kulinksi. The first video touches on Trump's intimate relationship with Epstein, and the second video delves into the human trafficking operation I think Trump engaged in to supply "models" for Epstein's pedo rape parties.

Mehdi Breaks Down the Trump-Epstein Friendship, With All the Receipts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAE4si7CoNk

Trump's Darkest Epstein Secret Revealed | The Kyle Kulinski Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqER8naYogA

Please keep in mind that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and there's more evidence that Trump is every bit the monster he appears to be in this story. Which brings me back to why I really don't want to write about Der Leader's "Epstein Scandal" even if it's the first time I've legitimately seen him on the defensive in this second presidency.

The truth is there are no real secrets in the entire Epstein scandal; a lot of it is even on Wikipedia. Everything you need to know to bring down lawyers, billionaires, CEOs, political figures, multiple former and current world leaders including Trump, perhaps whole intelligence agencies has been publicly reported, and purposely ignored by a bipartisan ruling class that protects the powerful and would lose friends and allies if the guilty ever came to justice for all this monstrous bullshit.

I don't think I'd survive staring into that abyss again, knowing that nobody will ever be held accountable for the obvious reason that this has all been publicly reported and nobody has done anything at all about it. I can't.

I'm sorry.

#Trump #Epstein #USPol #CSA

Mehdi Breaks Down the Trump-Epstein Friendship, With All the Receipts

YouTube

I think I'm still pretty much out on covering the twists and turns of Trump's re-emerging Epstein scandal; despite, as I noted above being certain the President is guilty of far more than child sexual assault. Rather I believe in addition to being a pedophile rapist, Trump was actually part of the trafficking operation that supplied young girls for Epstein to victimize. However, I remain very skeptical that anyone rich or powerful is going to be held accountable for atrocious crimes against minors as young as thirteen years old; given that a solid 95% of the scandal, including names of powerful pedophiles and folks who covered up the rape island guy's operation, has been in the public sphere for years and literally nobody has gotten into a significant amount of hot water for it except Epstein himself, and his former-girlfriend turned partner in (child sex) crime(s) Ghislaine Maxwell.

Something very interesting happened last night however, that has the potential to change my mind about where this story ends. While noted fundie fascist freak Mike Johnson was literally trying to end the congressional session just to avoid a vote on releasing the "Epstein files," Democrats serving on a subcommittee that's part of the House Oversight Committee ambushed their Republican counterparts with a motion to subpoena the Epstein files; all of them, with names of victims redacted. Astonishingly, three GOP members of the subcommittee then voted with them to pass the motion.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ap-us-epstein-congress_n_688158b4e4b0d55a3f191b25

House Subcommittee Votes To Subpoena Justice Department For Epstein Files

"Meanwhile, Democrats on a subcommittee of the powerful House Oversight Committee made a motion for the subpoena Wednesday afternoon. Three Republicans on the panel voted with Democrats for the subpoena, sending it through on an 8-2 vote tally.

The Republican subcommittee chairman, Rep. Clay Higgins of Louisiana, said that work was beginning to draft the subpoena but did not give a timeline for when it would be issued.

“I’ve never handled a subpoena like this. This is some fascinating stuff,” said Higgins, who voted against the motion.

Democrats cheered the action as proof that their push for disclosures in the Epstein investigation was growing stronger. The committee agreed to redact information on victims, yet Democrats successfully blocked a push by Republicans to only subpoena information that was deemed to be “credible” — language that Trump has also used when discussing what he would support releasing."

So, let me start by saying that I have no idea if this means anything at all. Given the behavior of the fascist Trumpenreich, and the lengths the Swine Emperor's minions have already gone to try and hide criminal activities by various members of the executive branch, including of course Trump, I strongly suspect Bondi has a minion somewhere shredding files as we speak. Furthermore, and speaking of Bondi, I actually have no idea if the Trump regime is going to honor a subpoena at all; none of the folks working for the Justice Department are immune to consequences for ignoring a Congressional subpoena, but I have a hard time imaging Trump won't do whatever it takes to protect anyone close to him, who could also leak what they know about his double life as a pedo rapist human trafficker.

That having been said, for once Democrats actually sealed the deal and meaningfully targeted our fascist would-be Furher in the White House. The subpoena is on record, and if the government spits back obscenely redacted material, or refuses to obey Congress's order, the President and his sick nazi fuckhead enablers are going to have to explain why. I'm still not sure what hope there is for justice when an elite pedo sex ring with over a thousand (that is not a typo, I said "a thousand") victims is more or less totally exposed and not only does nobody particularly rich or powerful involved go to jail, but the US government tries to cut a sweetheart deal with the pedo rapist human trafficking blackmailer running the whole operation, just to cover it up. This shit goes deep, and it touches on so many powerful people and even institutions in our society that the ruling class establishment seems to regard it as "too big to prosecute" at best.

But I will tip my hat to Democrats for at least trying to expose the coverup, even if only to hinder our fascist president; I sure wish they felt like playing hardball this way to stop an anti-trans pogrom in progress, and our ongoing ethnic cleansing operation (now with bespoke concentration camps!). I'm too jaded for hope, but the dream of, after all these years, seeing rich and powerful people who brazenly destroyed the lives of so many girls, literal children, suffer consequences for what they have done, is not quite dead yet.

#Fascism #Trump #Epstein #USPol #DemocraticParty #GOP #MikeJohnson #EpsteinFiles #HouseOversightCommittee #CSA #Rapist #ChildAbuser #Pedophile

House Subcommittee Votes To Subpoena Justice Department For Epstein Files

Three Republicans on the panel voted with Democrats for the subpoena, defying President Donald Trump and GOP leadership.

HuffPost

When I last left this thread, I made it clear that I had no desire to write about the Epstein billionaire pedophile rapist influence peddling ring, which includes Trump as a co-conspirator, and operational partner, not a victim - remember, Trump is "the dog that hasn't barked." I didn't want to touch the story again because after years of dealing with the case, knowing the horrible shit I know about what was actually going on in Epstein's world, and watching precisely nobody go down for it except Epstein and Maxwell (even though we know the DoJ originally identified at least 10 co-conspirators and there were over a thousand victims; even Jeff Epstein can't rape minors 24 hours a day, so clearly he's not the only guilty party) wasn't good for my mental health.

Six months later, it's clear that I made a mistake, both tactically, and in terms of how much worse what the FBI had on the Epstein ring was, than what had been publicly reported - which is astounding, because as I noted above, what had been publicly reported and could be hunted down on Jeff Epstein's Wikipedia page is pretty horrifying and incriminating for our ruling classes, already. In particular the sheer scale of the influence peddling operation Epstein was engaged in likely makes this the story of the century - and that's without factoring in that one of the members of the ring, would go on to become the most corrupt President in American history (twice, so far), almost certainly had Jeff Epstein murdered, and has had access to an entire decade-long Department of Justice investigation into all the people Epstein was colluding with or blackmailing. All of which probably goes a long way towards explaining why Trump appears to be running half the planet despite only being president of one country. I believe that in some respects, after killing Epstein, Trump became Epstein - or at least has been able to heavily influence the behavior of the billionaires, CEOs, royal family members, spies, political leaders, entertainment figures, intellectuals and celebrities in the files.

And that, I think is the handle that most people are only just now coming to grasp. What the Epstein files Trump's crooked DoJ has been willing to show us expose, isn't just a pedophile ring, but a vast influence trading operation that used blackmail as only one part of a larger plan to reshape the entire Pig Empire, and with it, the world, according to the whims of clearly unhinged, decadent, and reactionary rich people. In some ways, what the files that have been released so far show is that Epstein was the Little Finger of a Pig Empire (and beyond) billionaire ruling class; the guy pulling the strings on some truly unbelievable plots to control our society, and connecting the experts to transform the world for the benefit of obscenely wealthy capitalists, entire intelligence agencies (at least three that we know of) and political leaders all over the Pig Empire "West" and its subsidiaries. I think the overall goals of both Epstein, and the larger ring which Trump was definitely a valued member of, can best be understood by one June 2016 email chain between Epstein and billionaire nazi tech bro Peter Thiel. Epstein first tells Thiel that Brexit is "just the beginning." Thiel asks, "of what?" Epstein replied:

"Return to tribalism. Counter to globalization. Amazing new alliances. You and I both agreed zero interest rates were too high, and as I said in your office. Finding things on their way to collapse was much easier than finding the next bargain.”

Which might on the surface sound like a boast, but throughout the files the US DoJ has released so far, there's a great deal of evidence that Epstein was up in every right wing, tech bro, billionaire nazi plot to destroy the liberal democratic order (don't get me started on why that sucks too), profit from its demise, and replace it with a Pig Empire-wide fascist order run by billionaire nazis - to my eyes, it genuinely looks like the entirety of right wing/fascist politics, activism, and plots to overthrow even faux democratic electoral processes over the past 15 are rooted in Epstein's plots, along with actors like Steve Bannon, but also guys like Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Peter Thiel, and other aligned power brokers we'll get into as we go forward.

In other words, and as alarming as this sounds - this isn't just a pedophile ring full of sadists and murderers, it isn't just a blackmail operation, it isn't just human trafficking and sex parties with billionaire guests, it isn't just an intelligence honeypot, it's all of those things as well as a working group for billionaire nazi cultists trying to take over the world, and to a frightening degree succeeding. We are through the looking glass now, and over the next little while I intend to prove it in this thread - if only so that anyone reading can look at the mind-blowing scope of it all with clear eyes, and brave hearts.

#Epstein #Trump #PeterThiel

I confess that I have somewhere around 300 tabs open, at least half of them are about the Epstein ring, and I'm overwhelmed with where to start. I guess the first thing we need to talk about is what we mean by "the Epstein scandal" because the reality here is that this story is way more than one scandal - it's more or less a Russian nesting doll of scandals, and each of those scandals and the released information about them, has their own web of obfuscations, denials, cover ups, and limited hang outs.

Part of what makes tracking the Epstein story so difficult, is the way details have emerged in multiple distinct phases - both Epstein's network of rich friends, and his pedophile sex parties were being alluded to in New York gossip columns, Vanity Fair, and Florida papers years before he was even arrested in 2005. That arrest and Epstein's 2008 conviction, produced another huge pile of revelations, despite the best efforts of DoJ officials (including future Trump labor secretary Alex Acosta) to keep them secret, over the next several years. Presidential runs by Trump produced another flurry of revelations in 2015-2016, and 2019-2020. The reality is that what we call the "Epstein files" have been a late addition to the body of facts we know about the Epstein ring, and even those releases have been broken up enough that when you refer to the "Epstein files" we could be talking about any one of three releases made by the DoJ (two intentional, one by accident.) Furthermore, at each stage of the process, everyone implicated in the Epstein ring has issued categorical denials, reached settlements with victims, or agreed to unconscionable immunity agreements with US prosecutors while more or less sneering at the public that "you can't prove anything." And corporate media outlets, who could not be better at helping cover all this up if they were trying, have dutifully shrugged and memory-holed each new release of information until the next time the scandal(s) leak out to the public - rarely, if ever connecting the previous denials by powerful people, to the emerging evidence that they were always lying.

The cumulative effect here is to turn the "Epstein scandal" into a massive, but disconnected debris field of evidence that looks like scraps of trash from the ground level in the moment, but would clearly form the outline of an airplane if you could just get a top down view of the whole situation. As we'll discuss later, I don't think this is an accident - but whether it's intentional or not, the effect has been to allow people intimately involved in the scandal(s) to hide behind a wall of denial for years, if not decades.

For example, after the most recent release of over 3.5M files US President Donald Trump boasted to the media that the release "exonerated him." Even setting aside the fact that it most certainly did not, and Trump is conflating "exonerated" with "didn't directly implicate him THIS time" his statement (purposely) ignores two important realities. First, Trump controls the Department of Justice deciding which files get released and which don't, as well as which names get redacted - so Trump is effectively saying Trump exonerated Trump, because Trump decided which files to release, and we should all take Trump's word for it that he's not hiding anything in the at least 2.5M files Trump chose not to release. Uh, sure Gramps, whatever you say. Furthermore however, Trump is also ignoring that a metric fuckton of evidence that the president is a child rapist, human trafficker, and active participant in the Epstein influence peddling ring has already been released over the past fifteen years, long before this latest 3.5M document dump by the DoJ. And yet, despite this, the American political and media classes have more or less run with the story as if it's an opportunity to debunk Trump's lies using only files in the 3.5M just released, instead of pointing out that the President is obviously covering up his own crimes in real time - ostensibly because they don't want Trump to sue them, even if that would open up discovery which will only incriminate Trump further. Another example of how this works might be reporting that Elon Musk lied about trying to visit Epstein Island, but not drawing any conclusions about what it means when, in 2012, years after Epstein's convictions, the now richest man in the world tells the most famous pedophile blackmailer in the world that he wants to attend Epstein's "wildest party" and "let loose." Musk might as well be asking for an invitation to the Eyes Wide Shut rape party, but you won't see too many people in a corporate media outlet prepared to say as much.

The fact is that the Epstein scandal, isn't one release of files, or one news story from the Miami Herald in 2018. It's the entire saga, from the day Bill Barr's dad hired Epstein as a teacher in 1974, all the way up until this very moment. And the guilty parties WANT you to forget that.

#Epstein #Trump #ElonMusk

Okay, let's start with the most basic provable accusation that should result in the collapse of the Trump administration, but won't because rich people aren't held to account in America under any circumstances.

The Department of Justice is still, to this day, running a massive cover up operation to hide the Epstein ring and Trump's involvement with it, and as such we have to consider the release of the "Epstein Files" themselves, even as incriminating and horrifying as they are, a form of limited hang out.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/02/new-epstein-files-democrats-call-cover-up

Democrats vow to fight ‘full-blown cover-up’ after release of Epstein files

“We are witnessing a full-blown cover-up,” the Democratic Maryland congressman Jamie Raskin told CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday.

“They’ve said there are 6m potentially responsive documents there. They’ve only released 3m with more than 10,000 redactions. What about the other 3m files? Remember, not only is there a subpoena to attorney general [Pam] Bondi to turn everything over to Congress, now there’s a federal law compelling them to turn it over, and yet, we’re just getting the dribs and drabs of information coming out, the stuff that they want us to see.”

The skinny is that the Trump-controlled DoJ has, after stalling for weeks before releasing roughly half of its Epstein investigation files, announced their work is done, and according to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche closed the entire investigation of the Epstein case, despite their legal obligation to release all the files, and explain the redactions that they've made. As Raskin points out, that means Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice are currently defying two separate orders to turn over all of the files, and thus breaking the law.

Elsewhere, Blanche said that the US govt is still holding back millions of files because they are all child sexual abuse materials from Epstein's private collection; an excuse that does nothing to answer why the DoJ remains in flagrant violation of a subpoena from Congress, and a law signed by President Trump himself. Furthermore, I can say with confidence that Blanche is lying because AG Pam Bondi said the exact same thing about her intention to release absolutely NONE of the Epstein files, before Congress forced Trump's hand by passing a law. We now know that millions of these files are incriminating for both the President as well as countless powerful people spread across the Pig Empire, and not Epstein's private CSAM stash - which means Bondi lied to our faces on live TV. Why should anyone believe the very same lie out of Todd Blanche's mouth?

Like every Epstein story however, this is all a Russian nesting doll of obfuscation and fuckery, because as Raskin also points out, the Trump administration has full control over both what gets redacted, and what gets held back entirely.

"But Raskin said Blanche’s insistence that “we have nothing to hide. We never did,” in his own comments to CNN, was not plausible given that only 3m of more than 6m documents were released.

“It’s close to nothing when they’re deciding which documents are coming out,” he said."

I want to focus in on the redactions for a moment because the Trump administration has repeatedly tried to claim a power to protect the identities of Epstein associates and conspirators that they simply do not have. They are only allowed to redact information that would protect the identities of victims of the Epstein pedo rapist ring. Which raises an obvious question; why did the DoJ take forever to do redactions that still exposed numerous Epstein victims in its release, while redacting the names and identities of most of the people associating with, conspiring with, and partying with Jeff Epstein?

"Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who partnered with Massie to author the Epstein Files Transparency Act, told CNN he believed the justice department had “released at best half the documents”.

He said: “It’s frankly one of the largest scandals in my view in our country’s history. And there is a demand for elite accountability. But the survivors’ lawyers that I’ve talked to have said that the survivors are still upset. They’re upset that many of their names accidentally came out without redaction. And they want to make sure the rest of the files come out.”

As GOP Congressman Thomas Massie notes, this is neither a partisan political fishing expedition, nor a scandal the lackeys at Trump's Department of Justice can declare over because they're tired of defending their pedophile nazi boss.

"A separate post by Massie on Sunday included a video clip of him speaking in the House in defense of the Epstein law. “How will we know if this bill has been successful? We will know when rich men are being perp walked in handcuffs to the jail. Until then, this is still a cover-up,” he said."

So we have a cover up, so big it would torpedo the entire Trump administration by itself in a functioning democracy, going on in broad daylight.

Democrats vow to fight ‘full-blown cover-up’ after release of Epstein files

Democrats and one Republican demanding release of millions more pages they insist are still being deliberately withheld

The Guardian

Okay so let's take a moment to understand the gravity of what we talked about in the post above. The US Department of Justice, which has already demonstrated absolute loyalty to Trump, is flagrantly violating the law to engage in an active coverup to protect the identities of rich and powerful Epstein associates, including the President of the United States. They are transparently lying to do so, despite literally everyone who is half paying attention knowing they're lying to do it; including in that one article alone, three congressmen representing both major US political parties, who're on record saying as much. I hate to show my age by bringing up the Watergate scandal that brought down Nixon, but this is basically nazi pedophile Watergate on steroids; except we have more evidence than they used to impeach a president. And that's without factoring in that Trump is a member of the Epstein ring. I'm literally just talking about the DoJ's handling of the Epstein case, and its mandated release of the files, which like Watergate, traces directly back to the President, then Richard Nixon, and today Donald Trump.

Ask yourself if the society around you, including its ruling class and the corporate media minions they own, are responding as if the Trump administration just got caught doing a super-Watergate, to cover up for the rich associates of the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer? No, they are not; but as you'll see going forward, this misalignment of tone in the coverage surrounding the Epstein ring, the famous and powerful people involved in it, as well as the influence peddling operation these folks were conducting in Epstein's email box, and the severity of what was actually just exposed, seems to be a feature, not a bug of the establishment response to all things Epstein.

As outrageous as the cover up is however, it ultimately pales in comparison to the fact that Trump, Bondi, Blanche, Kash Patel and the FBI want you to believe they have insufficient evidence to investigate literally anyone for involvement in Epstein's crimes, which include human trafficking, and the sexual assault of minors. As mentioned above, the Justice Department has declared the case closed.

There's just one problem; both prior disclosures about the Epstein ring, and the DoJ's own most recent release, make it clear they're all lying.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/02/epstein-files-new-batch

New Epstein files reveal he may have trafficked girls to others despite official denials

"The disclosure of more than 3m files related to Jeffrey Epstein suggests that other men were involved in his sexual abuse, prompting questions about officials’ contentions that there isn’t evidence to investigate third parties for potential involvement in the late financier’s crimes.

Some newly released documents contain allegations that Epstein provided victims to other men. Documents released in prior disclosures, as well as court documents, also point to others’ possible criminal involvement with Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell."

As the article goes on to note, the DoJ Epstein files release, include direct allegations from women and girls victimized by Epstein, that he trafficked them to other powerful men, including media mogul Harvey Weinstein, and financier Leon Black; neither of whom have been charged, and I guess they never will be according to Todd Blanche and the Trump Justice Department. As the article explains, this is in addition to prior disclosures revealing Epstein's association with the (now dead) accused pedophile human trafficker Jean-Luc Brunel, and the very much still alive former Prince, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Naturally of course everyone listed here denies (or denied) any involvement whatsoever, but friends of a rapist pedophile who themselves have been accused of sexual assault or human trafficking by victims of Jeff Epstein, probably shouldn't be taken at their word.

Again, please keep in mind that we're not talking about rumors here; these accusations spring out of witness testimony, from Epstein's victims, to the freaking FBI and thus the DoJ; Trump's FBI and Justice Department in many cases - who ultimately decided there was nothing to see here in both his first, and second terms as president.

"And Spencer Kuvin of Goldlaw, who has represented numerous Epstein victims, said: “We know for certain from direct testimony of victims that Epstein provided girls to other famous and notable people. Usually these were favors with the hope that he would get something in return from these people.”

“The recent documents only confirm what the victims have been saying all along,” he also said. “The absence of a formal ‘client list’ is not the same thing as proof that no third parties participated.”

Quite frankly, the Guardian is barely scratching the surface here; but even this, is more than enough to prove the Trump regime is both lying, and protecting rich people directly accused of horrifying crimes.

#Trump #Epstein #DoJ

New Epstein files reveal he may have trafficked girls to others despite official denials

Allegations prompt questions about officials’ contentions that there isn’t evidence to investigate third parties

The Guardian

Frankly speaking, I simply don't have the time to go deep on every aspect of the Epstein scandal, and the various rich maggot abusers involved in it. As numerous observers speaking about the Epstein scandal have noted however, just because the Department of Justice refuses to provide a formal list of Epstein associates accused of sexual abuse and various other crimes, doesn't mean we can't make one ourselves from the men (and some women) in the Epstein disclosures. So, as we go along, I'm going to throw out some background articles about the folks who are definitely "on the Epstein list" even if Pam Bondi never complied that list in the first place.

Let's start with American private equity investor, Leon Black - a man who apparently gave Jeff Epstein 158M dollars because he was just that amazing of a financial advisor, or so Black has asked us to believe.

https://hyperallergic.com/epstein-files-detail-gruesome-allegations-against-leon-black/

Epstein Files Detail Gruesome Allegations Against Leon Black

"The latest tranche of Epstein files released by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) last week includes detailed and gruesome descriptions of alleged abuse by private equity billionaire and Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) trustee Leon Black.

The trove of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein includes scanned pages of an apparent diary containing first-person accounts of alleged abuse as well as emails describing accusations against Black.

Certain details expressed in the spiral-bound notebook, including the year, location, and perpetrators of the alleged abuse, correspond to a 2023 lawsuit alleging that the billionaire raped a 16-year-old girl who has autism and a rare form of Down Syndrome in Epstein’s Manhattan residence in 2002. According to court filings, at the time, the girl’s developmental age was estimated to be 12 years old. The lawsuit is ongoing, and the woman, known as Jane Doe, recently fired her attorney."

Look, for both our sanity I'm not going to get into the gory details, but Black stands accused of both assaulting, and raping, minor victims who were provided to him by Jeff Epstein, the guy he paid $158M too. As is typical in these cases, Black's attorneys have denied everything but given the similarity of witness testimony, I personally see no reason to believe them. These are however once again, not rumors - these allegations emerged from a US Department of Justice investigation, and multiple lawsuits against Black by Epstein victims.

As always, I recommend hitting up the Wikipedia page of pretty much everyone listed in the Epstein files, for more information - you'd be surprised at how much dirt is already in the wind, on guys like Leon Black.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Black

#Epstein #EpsteinFiles #LeonBlack #Classwar #InTheFiles #EpsteinList

Epstein Files Detail Gruesome Allegations Against Leon Black

Emails and apparent diary entries accuse the billionaire and MoMA trustee of biting and abusing alleged victims.

Hyperallergic

I think perhaps the most insulting aspect of deputy attorney general Todd Blanche's announcement that the Department of Justice was closing its investigation into Jeff Epstein and hadn't found enough evidence to investigate even one other person in connection with Epstein and Maxwell's crimes, is that leaked evidence had already proven Blanche was lying, even before the Department of Justice dumped 3.5M disingenuously (and illegally) redacted documents on the public.

A little over six weeks ago, the FBI accidentally leaked roughly 11,000 partially, and at times poorly redacted files from the DoJ investigation. These files have since been officially released, but at the time popular Youtuber Coffeezilla, worked with Drop Site News and something called JMail to grant the public access to these files. Coffeezilla then published a short (11:23) video on his personal channel, going over precisely what folks like Attorney General Pam Bondi, deputy AG Todd Blanche, and even FBI Director Kash Patel (under oath) have told you doesn't exist - evidence that back in 2019, the FBI, including its Crimes Against Children Human Trafficking Unit, was investigating and making contact with 10 separate people they considered *co-conspirators* in Epstein and Maxwell's crimes. Thanks to poor redaction work by a DoJ then already in violation of the law (more on this in a moment) we even have two names, the previously mentioned Jean-Luc Brunel, and former Victoria's Secret CEO Les Wexner - a very prominent figure in the entire Epstein saga who I'm sure we'll discuss more at some point later.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7i9KdVTFR4

As Coffeezilla points out in this video, these redactions themselves are evidence of the Trump administration's criminality, because the only redactions they're legally allowed to make are those that protect Epstein's victims, and yet the DoJ is blotting out the names of powerful people the FBI considered Epstein's co-conspirators, as recently as six or seven years ago. Co-conspirators, are by definition, not victims. Rounding out the video, Coffeezilla talks a little bit about what a lying slime-ball Todd Blanche is, his extremely suspicious decision to move Maxwell to a more comfortable "Club Fed" prison, and Trump's openly stated obsession with protecting not Epstein's victims, but the rich and powerful men who associated with him long after he'd been exposed as a pedophile rapist and human trafficker.

Please let me assure you that as far as I can tell, literally nothing about the Trump administration's Epstein files redaction policies has changed between this accidental leak, and their recent 3.5M file Epstein files dump. In other words, the Trump regime Department of Justice was already guilty of a crime, and engaging in an obvious coverup before they even released this last batch of files, and it is categorically impossible for the release of more files, also illegally curated and redacted as part of a massive coverup for what certainly appear to be wealthy and powerful pedophile rapists, to exonerate either the President or his corrupt as hell Justice Department. They're criminals, they're engaging in an open coverup, and the President's entire administration is protecting not only wealthy friends of Jeff Epstein, but folks who helped him carry out his heinous crimes against trafficked women and children.

#Epstein #Trump #ToddBlanche #DepartmentOfJustice #DoJ #LesWexner #Coffeezilla #FBI #KashPatel #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #trumpadministration

they accidentally leaked new epstein files, and it's really bad...

YouTube

Keeping in mind that we're trying to prove as many of these claims as we possibly can before my fingers fall off, here's a very short Raw Story article that FBI Director Kash Patel lied to cover up the Department of Justice's Epstein cover up (I told you this stuff was Russian nesting dolls of fuckery) under oath a few months ago.

https://www.rawstory.com/kash-patel-2675065877/

Allegations fly as FBI head's past comments haunt him: 'Kash is part of a massive coverup'

"After the DOJ released millions more Epstein files ahead of the weekend, political analysts and observers began circulating an earlier Patel quote that they see as contradictory to the facts.

Under oath, Patel said, "There’s no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked minors."

But ex-Obama staffer Tommy Vietor claims that statement means Patel must be in on a cover-up.

"It is impossible to square the information in the latest Epstein files release with these comments by Kash Patel," Vietor wrote. "Kash is part of a massive coverup."

Quite frankly this is cowardly, and even somewhat incompetent reporting by Raw Story. The fact that Kash Patel perjured himself under oath before Congress isn't just "a thing some people are saying" - there's a video included in the article of Patel doing exactly that during his testimony. He said there is no evidence Epstein trafficked minors, and in the very files the DoJ released we have reams of witness testimony from Epstein victims that he did in fact, traffic minors. Testimony is evidence, that's literally how the law works. Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche lie just to breathe on TV about the Epstein case, but Patel was the guy they sent out there to do it under oath; because he's an neophyte dipshit who has no idea that now makes him legally liable. There's also an embarrassing typo in the story, when the author says Kash made this statement in 2015, rather than 2025 (a few months ago) like he actually did.

Which brings up another obvious question - if any random person with a search bar and a minute to watch Patel talk, can prove the Director of the FBI lied under oath, and the only purpose for that would be to protect Epstein associates and literal co-conspirators in his pedophile human trafficking operation, why isn't that front page news?

And that my friends, is what I mean about the tone of our society's response, lead by our ruling classes and the influencers they control, not matching the severity of literally anything about the Epstein case. The FBI director lying his ass off under oath would be news even if it were about parking tickets, but since it's about protecting rich people who have either done sexual assault crimes (including against minors) or happily conspire with such, it's absolutely mind blowing that more people in our media don't care about this. In fact, it's a little suspicious.

More importantly, all of this is just another brick in the wall of evidence demonstrating that Trump, his Justice Department, and indeed his entire administration is engaging in a criminal conspiracy to cover up actual crimes revealed in the Epstein files. In addition to all the shady influence pedaling and reputation washing going on in there.

#Epstein #Trump #FBI #Congress #DepartmentOfJustice #EpsteinFiles #KashPatel #CoverUp

Allegations fly as FBI head's past comments haunt him: 'Kash is part of a massive coverup'

FBI Director Kash Patel's own words came back to haunt him this weekend in the wake of a new release of files on deceased child abuser Jeffrey Epstein.After the DOJ released millions more Epstein files ahead of the weekend, political analysts and observers began circulating an earlier Patel quote th...

Raw Story

I guess while I'm proving damning allegations I made in the thread above, we should take a quick look at some of Elon Musk's correspondence with noted pedophile human trafficker Jeff Epstein. In my head, I've been kind of keeping a distinction between people who are "in the files" plotting with Epstein, and people who would be on a hypothetical "Epstein list" of co-conspirators in criminal activities like sexual assault, pedophilia, kidnapping, human trafficking, violent abuse, maybe murder, but also financial crimes to hide the transactions involved in all the monstrous shit Epstein and friends were up to; the kinda stuff you're supposed to go to jail for. As you'll see below, Elon Musk is the man in between those two categories because even though I can't really prove he raped anybody, his sheer thirst to party with a known pedophile blackmailer, on his pedophile island where all the pedophile and other rapey shit happened, brings up some awkward questions.

https://futurism.com/future-society/elon-musk-jeffrey-epstein-island

Elon Musk Emailed Extensively With Jeffrey Epstein, Asking to Visit His Notorious Island

"Even more damningly in December 2012, Musk sent an email practically begging Epstein for an invitation to some debauchery.

“Do you have any parties planned? I’ve been working to the edge of sanity this year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose,” Musk wrote. He added that “a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I’m looking for.”

Now look, I'm sure Musk's lawyers can come up with a million completely innocent reasons why the above email doesn't meant anything, and legally speaking, they're probably right. By that same measure however, I'm not an idiot. Epstein was first convicted for pedo rapey stuff in 2008, long after rumors and allegations of such were being published in semi-mainstream media sources. By 2012, everyone knew that Epstein Island was the place where the pedo rapey sex parties happened, and Musk isn't very good at subtlety. I'm not telling anyone what to think, but I think comments like "let loose," and “a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I’m looking for" clearly imply Musk wanted to attend an Epstein party, and Epstein parties were even then infamous for pedo rapey shit. I certainly can't prove it, but Musk can't sue me for having an opinion.

As the article notes, Musk spent multiple Decembers, trying to get an invite to Epstein Island, or otherwise meet with the again, infamous pedophile rapist human trafficker and blackmailer, Jeff Epstein. Musk emailed again in 2013, and Epstein apparently schedule something for Musk with his secretary for January 2nd, 2014. But their plans fell through at the last minute. This recorded desire to meet however, was apparently mutual, as in emails from both 2012, and 2013, it was Epstein extending the invitation to Musk, albeit with far less self incriminating language.

"Those were far from the only times the pair made plans. In April 2013, Epstein asked Musk if he’d be around to have “dinner with woody allen and crowd at my house,” referring to the influential filmmaker and actor who’s also been accused of child sex abuse. Musk replied that he “might be in town.”

Epstein also invited Musk to his island in September 2012, recommending he “bring your friend or friends.”

“Sounds good,” Musk wrote, “I will try to make it.”

Finally, while it's not definitive, circumstantial evidence from other Epstein files mentioning Elon Musk, at least strongly imply the pair did in fact get together, likely on Epstein Island or very near it, at some point - likely Christmas 2013, and possibly even again in December 2014.

"And at least one email suggests the two had actually gotten together at one point. In September 2014, Epstein asked Elon, “are=you planning to do st barth again for xmas?” (St. Barth is Saint Barthélemy, where Musk has reportedly vacationed in the past.)

In December 2014, a Google Calendar alert titled “ELON MUSK TO ISLAND DEC. 6TH” appeared in the inbox of Groff, Epstein’s assistant."

As you'll see later on in this ongoing discussion, many analysts looking at the Epstein file releases, seem to believe that Elon Musk wasn't really one of the cool kids in the Epstein billionaire influence pedaling ring; that Epstein saw Musk as a means to gain access to other billionaire tech bro shitlords, more than as a peer. We also don't have any evidence he was one of the Epstein/Maxwell 10 criminal co-conspirators the FBI was tracking down in 2019. What I think we do know however, is that Elon certainly wanted to be one of the cool kids, and that desire extended as far as wanting to attend an Epstein Island party - for purely relaxational and not at all molestery purposes, I'm sure.

Finally, please keep in mind that due to his involvement with DOGE, Musk is indeed also another Trump regime official in the Epstein files.

#Epstein #Trump #Musk #InTheFiles #EpsteinFiles

Elon Musk Emailed Extensively With Jeffrey Epstein, Asking to Visit His Notorious Island

Newly released documents show how Elon Musk extensively communicated with Jeffrey Epstein to plan parties and trips to his island.

Futurism

Okay, I would very briefly like to talk about the 10,000 or so Epstein files Coffeezilla and Drop Site News released early back in late December, and the 10 Epstein ring co-conspirators the Trump-controlled Department of Justice, and thus the Trump-controlled FBI, were working on contacting, and appeared focused on eventually prosecuting. Both the fact that Trump was President, employing Bill Barr as Attorney General when Epstein was arrested again in 2019, and the FBI's clear intent to develop a prosecutable case against these individuals as demonstrated by their efforts to obtain search warrants and documents asking if government lawyers could refer to them as "co-conspirators" at trial (see the above Coffeezilla video), are going to be extremely important facts later on in this thread, so keep it in your mind.

This rambling article from ABC talks about a variety of things revealed across the whole 10,000 file release, including more information about co-conspirators the FBI was developing a case against, but I've quoted out the most relevant part to us below:

https://abc30.com/post/epstein-files-justice-department-releases-additional-documents-jeffrey/18309116/ (archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20260130233803/https://abc30.com/post/epstein-files-justice-department-releases-additional-documents-jeffrey/18309116/)

Latest Epstein release details investigation into possible co-conspirators

"In another email exchange, dated July 9, 2019, a member of the FBI's Crimes Against Children Human Trafficking Unit received an update on the 10 alleged co-conspirators.

"3 have been located in FL and served GJ subpoenas; 1 in Boston, 1 in NYC, and 1 in CT were located and served," the email said. "4 of the 10 are outstanding with attempts having been made. 1 is a wealthy business man in Ohio, a lead is being sent to CV; the remaining 3 are currently out of pocket."

The email added that teams of special agents and prosecutors were shortly flying out to "various locations" in Florida "to interview approximately 25 victims."

About month later, Epstein would be found dead by suicide in his New York jail cell. But his death did not halt investigations into his associates, according to the files.

In September 2019, prosecutors exchanging updates noted the investigation into Epstein's alleged co-conspirators was "ongoing," and that they had had conversations with several people who would cooperate in the investigation. Prosecutors later detailed a seven-page "memo on co-conspirators we could potentially charge" as well as a 86-page "co-conspirator update memo," according to the files."

Okay, so we can establish that the 10 co-conspirators, and 86 pages of the FBI's investigation notes, including those from the Crimes Against Children Human Trafficking Unit, all existed in the public sphere, without having to rely on freeze frames from a YouTube video; you'll see why this is also important in our next post.

Finally, before we move on I'd like to once again note that while the file release was widely reported on by US corporate media once the government made it official after accidentally leaking them, the specific contents regarding these 10 co-conspirators, including the two individuals effectively named (the late Jean-Luc Brunel, and the very much alive Les Wexner), were not. Which not only seems like suspiciously convenient journalistic malpractice given the contents of those leaks, but is also going to look even more suspicious when you find out what the current Trump administration just removed from the Epstein Files releases, in our next post.

#Epstein #Trump #FBI #EpsteinFiles #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #Billionaires #10Coconspirators #SexualAssault #HumanTrafficking

Latest Epstein release details investigation into possible co-conspirators

The Justice Department on Monday released additional documents from its files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Yes, that is correct, the US Department of Justice, which has made its ultimate and absolute loyalty to Donald Trump clear even in violation of the law, just removed the 86 page Department of Justice prosecution memo, containing the FBI and its Crimes Against Children Human Trafficking Unit notes about the 10 co-conspirators the Bureau was developing a case against in 2019 before Epstein was even arrested again, from its Epstein Files releases. That would be the very same Department of Justice memo that exposes FBI Director Kash Patel as a liar who perjured himself under oath. That would also be the same 86 page DoJ memo that effectively proves Trump, his Attorney General Pam Bondi, and her deputy AG Todd Blanche (along with many other people in the Trump administration) are engaging in a criminal conspiracy to protect rich and powerful child rapists, including it would appear, Donald Trump himself.

https://www.msn.com/en-nz/politics/government/doj-epstein-prosecution-memo-vanishes-after-press-inquiry/ar-AA1VTdVU (archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20260208202041/https://www.msn.com/en-nz/politics/government/doj-epstein-prosecution-memo-vanishes-after-press-inquiry/ar-AA1VTdVU )

DOJ Epstein prosecution memo vanishes after press inquiry

"An 86-page Justice Department prosecution memo that included details on “potential co-conspirators” of Jeffrey Epstein “mysteriously disappeared” from the DOJ’s website after the agency was asked about the document by the Miami Herald, investigative reporter Julie Brown revealed Saturday.

“Contrary to what the FBI and DOJ have said over the past year, it turns out there really is an FBI list of other people suspected of possible wrongdoing in connection with Jeffrey Epstein,” Brown, who writes for the Herald, wrote on her Substack Saturday.

“One of the documents that outlines the DOJ investigation into ‘potential co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein’ – the DOJ’s 86-page prosecution memo – mysteriously disappeared from the Government’s website this week after we asked the DOJ about it.”

The Herald published a report earlier on Saturday about the prosecution memo, which it noted had since been removed from the DOJ’s website at the time of publication. A copy of the memo, however, was preserved by Brown before its removal and contains details about potential co-conspirators of Epstein, albeit with their names redacted."

Frankly, I'm not going to waste my time ruminating on whether or not the Trump administration understands the internet is forever, or how the Streisand effect works, especially given the absolutely complicit behavior of US corporate media throughout the coverage of the entire Epstein scandal, all the way back to at least his first arrest. The fact is Trump's administration is full of bootlicking nazis, complicit cronies, and guys who post white nationalist rants in the comments section under anonymized handles. These aren't smart people, but quite frankly they don't have to be in a media environment where every new lie by the Trump administration is treated as if it might be true, and even when they're exposed as lies, rarely get brought up again in those same outlets.

The fact is the Trump administration just took down the key document that proves the entire Justice Department, and the President of the United States, are violating the law to cover up for a billionaire pedophile ring, for a reason - and no, it is not possible that reason is innocent. This is another story that should be front page news tomorrow, but might not be because the 86 page memo that should take down the entire Trump administration at this point, wasn't front page news in the first place.

You can feel how you want to feel, but that seems pretty suspicious to me; I guess pedophile blackmailers, billionaires, and the media outlets they own, gotta stick together.

Shoutout to @clintruin for bringing this story to my attention earlier today.

#Epstein #Trump #FBI #EpsteinFiles
#DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup
#Billionaires #10Coconspirators #PamBondi #ToddBlanche

MSN

Okay, I need to slide some older source documents into this thread as we go along, so it doesn't break up the organization flow we've established throughout this thread the past few days. This is a simple timeline of criminal cases brought by the US government against Jeff Epstein, and events surrounding those cases - published by NPR back in July 2025, when public demand to release the Epstein files was growing by the day.

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5478620/jeffrey-epstein-crimes-timeline-legal-case

Jeffrey Epstein files: Tracing the legal cases that led to sex-trafficking charges

"In a process spanning decades, criminal cases against Epstein culminated in charges that he operated a sex-trafficking ring preying on young women and underage girls. Prosecutors say he was aided by Ghislaine Maxwell, his long-time associate who is currently in prison."

I think this record mostly speaks for itself, and its worth taking the time to skim the entire thing. For the purposes of our ongoing discussion however, I feel like there's three important things we want to take away here.

1) Police in Palm Beach Florida first began investigating Epstein in 2005, for sexual abuse of underage girls federal authorities would later say went as far back as 2002. Witness testimonies were collected, Epstein was indicted in Florida in 2006 for solicitation of prostitution, but the case was referred to the FBI with a note saying the charge doesn't reflect "the totality of Epstein's conduct." Which might be the understatement of the century.

2) A year later In 2007, despite the FBI having produced a case it felt would lead to at least 60 criminal charges against Epstein, future Trump labor secretary and then US District Attorney Alex Acosta, let Jeff Epstein off the hook for no reason that has ever been properly explained despite Acosta's many attempts to deflect responsibility.

"2007 May: An assistant U.S. attorney — who has been working with two FBI agents to find more victims — submits a draft indictment outlining 60 criminal counts against Epstein, along with a memo summarizing the evidence assembled against him.

July: Epstein's attorneys meet with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The top prosecutor was then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta (who in 2017 would become President Trump's Labor Secretary). The U.S. Attorney's Office offers to end its investigation if Epstein pleads guilty to two state charges and agrees to accept a prison term, register as a sexual offender, and set up a way for his victims to obtain monetary damages.

The much-criticized deal includes a controversial nonprosecution agreement, or NPA, in which the federal prosecutor's office grants immunity to Epstein, four co-conspirators, and "any potential co-conspirators," the Justice Department says. Prosecutors agree not to tell Epstein's victims about the NPA, which is filed under seal."

This ultimately leads to Epstein serving a mere 13 months in jail, under extremely favorable (for the pedophile rapist) conditions. Not only does this free Epstein up to assault more women and girls, it also allows him to continue plotting with other rich sociopaths to reshape our politics, and indeed significant aspects of Pig Empire society. Jeff Epstein would not be arrested again until July 6th, 2019, despite the obvious crookedness of the plea deal and the crimes he then continued to commit.

3) Epstein probably *would* have continued to get away with it all, if the Miami Herald hadn't started compiling the evidence and bringing the horrible crimes he committed back into the public consciousness, in late 2018.

"Nov. 28: The Miami Herald publishes a series of investigative reports into Epstein and the role of then-U.S. Attorney Acosta in Epstein's plea deal. The reports spark intense interest in Epstein's actions, including the notion that powerful people might have known about or been involved in his illegal actions."

Although this article doesn't discuss it, the timeline of when the Epstein case burst back into the public discourse despite the best efforts of the US Department of Justice across multiple administrations to cover it up is *very* interesting when you lay it over top of Trump's cabinet appointments for Attorney General in his first term - as I noted on the other account:

"Trump forced out AG Jeff Sessions on November 7th 2018, and nominated Barr in December 2018. The Miami Herald reports that brought Epstein down again, were published November 28th, 2018 and I think it's safe to say Trump and people in his orbit would have been contacted by the Herald, for comment on the stories about Epstein and the Acosta plea deal they were developing. Epstein gets arrested in July 2019. And Barr, loosely connected to Epstein at least twice, takes the case. Wow."

I'm pretty sure we're going to talk more about former Trump AG Bill Barr later on in this thread, but for now just note the timeline we're working with here.

#Epstein #DepartmentOfJustice #Trump #BillBarr #AlexAcosta #Coverup

At this point, if you're a rational person, you're probably wondering why multiple US Justice Departments under at least four different presidents, seemed to be at best content to let sleeping dogs lie on the Epstein case, or at worst (as in the case of both Trump administrations and the Bush DoJ) actively granting immunity to Epstein accomplices and breaking the law to cover up for a pedophile human trafficking ring. Well, in addition to the fact that numerous people who worked with, plotted with, or "partied" with Jeff Epstein would go on to serve in both Trump regimes, the simple truth is that long after Jeff Epstein was outed as a pedophile rapist human trafficker, he had a lot of friends in very high places. And while not all of those people can be connected to child sexual assaults, and billionaire sex crime parties, I think most people would still be VERY surprised to learn about all the Lex Luthor, supervillain bullshit Epstein and his powerful friends got up to - some of which is still illegal, and some of which isn't, but probably should be.

Without leaving the current Trump DoJ's massive and illegal coverup operation, or the 10 co-conspirators in Epstein's crimes even the Trump-controlled FBI identified back in 2019 behind us, let's start to untangle a little bit of the pedophile blackmailer's shadowy world of billionaire plots, influence pedaling, and Epstein's inexplicable and inexcusable relationships with some of the most powerful people on earth, long after his crimes had become public knowledge.

This half hour Majority Report segment features Emma Vigeland, Brandon Sutton, Matt Binder, and Matt Lech sharing and providing context for two audio recordings from 2013; so, years after Epstein's first conviction and exposure as a pedophile rapist, human trafficker, and strongly suspected blackmailer. The first audio clip features former Prime Minster (and then Minister of Defense) of Israel Ehud Barak, former Clinton Treasury Secretary (and longtime economic policy powerhouse) Larry Summers, and the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer Jeffrey Epstein, having a decidedly ethno-nationalist conversation about the future demographics of the apartheid state of Israel. The second audio clip features Epstein, suggesting to the soon-to-be retiring Barak that he look into obtaining a no-show advisor position with nazi, Trump-aligned, tech bro cultist billionaire Peter Thiel's (then) emerging evilcorp outfit, Palantir - you know, the same Palantir fueling the current genocide in Gaza, ICE's mass deportation agenda in America, and Trump's openly planned suppression and surveillance of anyone left of Bismarck domestically. During this second conversation, Epstein drops that Larry Summers has a similar no-show advisor position at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz; a firm founded in part by unhinged tech bro fascist supervillain and Trump donor Marc Andreessen. As you'll learn over time, the incestuous crossover between Epstein's personal circle, and folks deeply involved in getting Trump elected for their own political and economic purposes is a pretty consistent pattern in all things Epstein related.

Leaked Recording Reveals Dark Truth About Epstein And Israel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kI3dbP5DidU

So why the fuck is the world's most infamous pedophile blackmailer chatting up the former chief economist for the World Bank (and US Treasury Secretary, and President of Harvard) about Israel's demographic difficulties in maintaining an apartheid state, and tipping off high level Israeli politicians about up and coming surveillance capital moguls like Thiel and Andreessen? That's a very good question that not one single goddamn person involved in any of the larger Epstein scandals has ever provided a coherent answer to, whatsoever.

Look, the plain truth is that these two recorded conversations are merely the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Epstein's influence network, and the high level schemes he was involved in, or conducting, to shape politics all across the Pig Empire. From European Royalty, to American billionaire nazi cultists, Epstein's network of friends encompassed a who's who of Pig Empire powerbrokers, and that's even before we get into his weird relationship with Israeli, American, and even Russian intelligence, or his work with Steve Bannon to nurture MAGA-clone fascist movements and political parties all across Europe. Thanks to decades of willful media ignorance, I have to work to tell the stories of the pedophile trafficking ring, the coverup of Epstein's crimes, and the massive network of billionaire supervillains working through his inbox all at once. This certainly won't be the last example of Epstein plotting with state actors and international money wizards as we go along, so consider this an interesting appetizer; I promise you the main courses will blow your mind.

#Epstein #LarrySummers #EhudBarak #TMR #EpsteinFiles #Neofeudalism #Fascism #PeterThiel #MarcAndreesen #Palantir

Leaked Recording Reveals Dark Truth About Epstein And Israel

YouTube

Well, that certainly escalated. After months of stalling, the Trump's Department of Justice finally allowed (sort of) members of Congress to review what were supposed to be its full, unredacted (more on this later) "Epstein Files." And within a matter of hours, all hell broke loose in American politics and among our increasingly repugnant ruling class.

We'll be talking in more detail about what the Congressional representatives found in the files as this story evolves, but the big picture view is: the pedo trafficking ring is real, the Justice Department is still covering up for wealthy men who raped and abused women and girls as young as nine, Donald Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the DoJ's investigation files, and the Trump administration is still refusing to un-redact huge portions of the documents, even for restricted private viewing by members of Congress. The coverup is simultaneously ongoing, and completely in the open now.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/epstein-files-unredacted-viewed

‘There’s a Bunch of Sick F*cks’: Lawmakers in Both Parties Stunned and Disgusted After Viewing Unredacted Epstein Files

"The FBI closed its investigation into Epstein in July, concluding that while the financier himself abused several underage girls, along with his partner Ghislane Maxwell—who is currently serving 20 years in prison—he was not running a sex-trafficking ring that included other powerful figures.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said the files he and other lawmakers reviewed yesterday told a much different story.

“It’s disgusting,” he said. “There are lots of names, lots of co-conspirators, and they’re trafficking girls all across the world.”

Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) put it more succinctly when a Drop Site News reporter caught her on the way back from the DOJ office and asked what she learned from viewing the files.

“There’s a bunch of sick fucks,” she said."

There is a lot going on in this article, which talks about the reality that Pam Bondi and the DoJ are still withholding at least 3M files, that in less than two hours of browsing Congressmen Massie and Khanna had turned up the names of 6 prominent, ultra wealthy businessmen credibly accused of committing prosecutable crimes against women and girls, and a series of brazen redactions revealing that Trump lied about kicking Epstein out of his club Mar-a-Lago.

The focal point of this piece however, is the clear and obvious evidence that both through intentionally restricting access to the files, and willfully redacting them in violation of the law, the Department of Justice is still engaging in an illegal coverup to protect President Trump and billionaire rapist pedophiles in the Epstein circle.

First up, the Trump regime has made it effectively impossible to see all the unredacted files:

"They are required to sift through the files in a tightly-secured DOJ office and are barred from making copies available to the public, though they are allowed to take notes.

"Raskin said that the office contains only four computers, making the process of sorting through more than 3 million files agonizingly slow.

“Working 40 hours a week on nothing else but this, it would take more than seven years for the 217 members who signed the House discharge petition to read just the documents they’ve decided to release,” he wrote in a post on social media."

Additionally, numerous elected officials including Congressmen Massie, Khanna, and Raskin made it clear that even though the DoJ is only legally allowed to redact the names of victims, they were willfully protecting Epstein associates and indeed people who committed crimes against women and girls with him.

“We didn’t want there to be a cover-up, and yet, what I saw today was that there were lots of examples of people’s names being redacted when they were not victims,” Raskin told CNN. “There are thousands and thousands of pages replete with redactions. There are entire pages in memos where you can’t see anything.”

Finally, as Congressman Ro Khanna noted during multiple interviews this week, the reality is even the supposedly unredacted "Epstein Files" the members were (barely) allowed to see by the DoJ, were already previously redacted back in March to protect Trump, and haven't been unredacted since.

"Donald Trump had the FBI scrub those files in March,” he said. “And the documents we saw already had the redactions of the FBI from March. So we still have not seen the vast majority of documents unredacted that have the survivor statements of the rich and powerful men who committed these crimes.”

Folks, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, there's a pretty good chance you're just looking at a duck. We know without a question of a doubt that Trump's Department of Justice is engaging in an illegal coverup, and given Trump's vast web of connections to Epstein, we can all guess why. The Pedophile President must fall.

#Epstein #Trump #CoverUp #JusticeDepartment #PamBondi #Raskin #Khanna

‘There’s a Bunch of Sick F*cks’: Lawmakers in Both Parties Stunned and Disgusted After Viewing Unredacted Epstein Files | Common Dreams

“Initially my reaction to all this was, I don’t care, I don’t know what the big deal is," the Trump-supporting Sen. Cynthia Lummis said. "But now I see what the big deal is."

Common Dreams

So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files

Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

Representative Jamie Raskin reported what he saw in the Justice Department’s unredacted files on Jeffrey Epstein.

The New Republic

Alright, I think we've established that the Trump-controlled Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and FBI Director Kash Patel, is actively breaking the law to protect US President Donald Trump. Frankly, I think you can go a lot further than that, but for now I just want to focus on the Swine Emperor, because if the Justice Department is willing to break the law to protect Trump, the question becomes - from what, are minions like Bondi and Blanche actually protecting the president?

Well, thanks to the roughly one million (that is not a typo) times the Department of Justice has redacted Donald Trump's name from the files, we cannot as of yet catalogue the full extent of the evidence against Downmarket Mussolini. But even in the 3.5M *redacted* files the Justice Department released this month (while still holding back somewhere around 3M files illegally) we can find some highly-incriminating, if not utterly damning evidence that the President of the United States is a pedophile rapist who did a lot more than party with Jeff Epstein.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-epstein-2675065475/

Witness told FBI Trump threatened to ‘disappear’ girl and have her ‘whole family killed’

"Under penalty of perjury, a witness told the FBI back in 2016 that they had “personally witnessed” President Donald Trump threaten to “disappear” a girl and have her entire family killed, according to a document released by the Justice Department on Friday.

Released as part of the DOJ’s publication of around 3.5 million files on Jeffrey Epstein, the FBI tip was submitted by an individual using the pseudonym “Tiffany Doe,” and includes details of an alleged threat Trump made to a plaintiff in a lawsuit.

“I personally witnessed Defendant Trump telling Plaintiff that she shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like the 12-year-old female [redacted], and that he was capable of having her whole family killed,” the FBI tip reads, signed under penalty of perjury on June 18, 2016."

Okay, pay close attention now because there's some fuckery afoot. First, Raw Story is being coy here because based on the dates provided, we know the sworn account in this document comes out of the Katie Johnson lawsuit against Trump. Johnson, as you might remember, was the woman suing Trump back in 2016, who provided graphic testimony accusing both Donald Trump, and Jeff Epstein of sexually assaulting her as part of a pedophile human trafficking ring when she was 13 years old. This then means that far from being just a tipster, Tiffany Doe is the same anonymous witness who corroborated the testimony Johnson herself provided in her sworn affidavit (and as you'll see later on in this thread, a recorded witness interview). As you may recall, Johnson dropped her suit before the 2016 election after her lawyer said she'd received threats and was too scared to proceed; hardly an outrageous position given we have two people saying in sworn testimony that Trump threatened to murder her and her whole family if she ever talked - and he was now on the verge of becoming President.

Which then brings us to the fact that in addition to underselling the Katie Johnson lawsuit this document comes out of, Raw Story also buried the lede.

“I was personally threatened by Mr. Epstein that I would be killed and my family killed as well if I ever disclosed any of the physical and sexual abuse of minor females that I had personally witnessed by Mr. Epstein or any of his guests,” the FBI tip reads.

“I am coming forward to swear to the truthfulness of the physical and sexual abuse that I personally witnessed of minor females at the hands of Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein, including the Plaintiff, during the time of my employment from the years of 1990-2000 for Mr. Epstein.”

So, you caught that right? Tiffany Doe just told the FBI under penalty of perjury, that she personally witnessed both Trump and Epstein sexually abuse underage girls while working for Epstein. In addition to the death threats. Please keep in mind this is the very same release of Department of Justice files, Trump himself declared "completely exonerated" him.

Finally, you may notice this specific file has been removed from the DoJ records available to the public, but I assure you it was there and it's just one of the many incriminating documents Trump's crooked Injustice Department removed after the media noticed them. As for why they thought it would be fine to release in the first place, I can't say, but I suspect Trump and his minions believe they already beat Katie Johnson's accusations. And they're largely right; because American corporate media ignored the sworn testimony of two women prepared to go to jail if they're lying, and assumed a future GOP Presidential Nominee raping a 13 year old girl wasn't a believable story. I wonder if they still feel that way now, millions of Epstein files later?

#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #FBI #KatieJohnson #EpsteinFiles

Witness told FBI Trump threatened to ‘disappear’ girl and have her ‘whole family killed’

Under penalty of perjury, a witness told the FBI back in 2016 that they had “personally witnessed” President Donald Trump threaten to “disappear” a girl and have her entire family killed, according to a document released by the Justice Department on Friday.Released as part of the DOJ’s publication o...

Raw Story

As I mentioned above, after viewing a tiny fraction the supposedly unredacted, but still heavily redacted "Epstein Files," Congressman Ro Khanna read the names of six prominent businessmen redacted from the Justice Department's releases that definitely do not comply with the Epstein Act law. Furthermore, while many outlets reporting on this are going out of their way to remind you that being in the files doesn't mean these six men are guilty of any crimes, Khanna, the man who actually saw the unredacted files, said they were "likely incriminated."

Given that one of the key themes that allowed Epstein and his billionaire buddies to keep abusing women and girls for so long is society-wide refusal to name names, I appreciate Khanna's efforts to expose at least *some* of the rich monsters the Department of Justice is protecting, and we should absolutely name those names here in this thread as well.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/khanna-names-epstein-list-men

Khanna Names 6 Men ‘Likely Incriminated’ by Epstein Files That ‘DOJ Hid for No Apparent Reason’

“Yesterday, Congressman [Thomas] Massie [R-Ky.] and I went to the Department of Justice to read the unredacted Epstein files,” Khanna (Calif.) said. “We spent about two hours there, and we learned that 70 to 80% of the files are still redacted.”

“In fact, there were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason,” the congressman continued. “When Congressman Massie and I pointed this out to the DOJ, they acknowledged their mistake, and now they have revealed the identity of these six powerful men.”

“These men are: Salvatore Nuara; Zurab Mikeladze; Leonic Leonov; Nicola Caputo; Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, CEO of Dubai Ports World; and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner, who was labeled as a ‘co-conspirator,’ by the FBI.” Khanna said.

“Now my question is: Why did it take Thomas Massie and me going to the Justice Department to get these six men’s identities to become public?” Khanna asked. “And if we found six men that they were hiding in two hours, imagine how many men they are covering up for in those three million files.”

Personally, I think Khanna is being far too charitable to call even these redactions by Trump's Injustice Department a mistake, especially given that the Congressman has already acknowledged we have clear evidence the DoJ is breaking the Epstein Act law to cover up the entire scandal and prominent individual's ties to it. More importantly, Khanna's question isn't political maneuvering but a relevant and disturbing quivery. If he found six men "likely incriminated" in two hours of highly restricted access, it's certain that there are a lot more wealthy and powerful people "likely incriminated" in the rest of the 3.5M files; which again, are just the ones Trump's lying minions at the Justice Department are willing to release. How many more names are they holding back in the 3M files they still refuse to publish despite being required by law?

As for the six men specifically named by Khanna on the House floor, we know who four of them are already.

https://newrepublic.com/post/206411/ro-khanna-reads-redacted-names-epstein-files-house-floor

Ro Khanna Reads Out Names of Six “Powerful Men” in Epstein Files

"Former Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner was revealed as a possible co-conspirator of sex predator Jeffrey Epstein in a 2019 FBI document, even as FBI Director Kash Patel claimed under oath last year that the agency had no knowledge of any other sex traffickers in the Epstein files. And the UAE’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem was identified as the recipient of the “I loved the torture video” email from Epstein. The sultan’s name was initially redacted.

As for the other men—Salvatore Nuara is rumored to be a former NYPD contact from Epstein’s black book. The most notable, Nicola Caputo, is a former European Parliament member. Little is publicly known about Mikeladze and Leonov."

Naturally, we have no idea how much effort Trump's first term Department of Justice put into investigating any of these men in the files, but as we'll discover later in the thread - there's no reason to believe a DoJ that hasn't even interviewed dozens of Epstein survivors who attended yesterday's oversight hearing on Capital Hill was putting its best foot forward to bring the Epstein ring to justice, even back in 2019 when Trump was also President.

Finally, I'd ask readers to note the part of Khanna's statements into the record that received very little attention compared to the six names he exposed.

“It’s time to begin with accountability for the Epstein class,” Khanna said during his remarks Tuesday. “Hold them in front of Congress, those people who visited the island or did business with Epstein after he was a convicted pedophile. Investigate them. Prosecute them. And let us return to democratic accountability in the United States of America.”

In other words: It is not the government's job, to protect rich child rapists OR their friends. Even if they happen to be President.

#Epstein #EpsteinFiles #InTheFiles #RoKhanna #DoJ #Coverup #GOP #Trump

Khanna Names 6 Men 'Likely Incriminated' by Epstein Files That 'DOJ Hid for No Apparent Reason' | Common Dreams

“The reality is that Donald Trump’s FBI scrubbed these files in March, long before Thomas Massie and I passed the Epstein Transparency Act," said the California progressive.

Common Dreams

By now regular readers will know that I never drop allegations without proof, so let's look at this short (18m) video by Coffeezilla for incontrovertible evidence that the very same Justice Department that just declared the Epstein case closed for lack of evidence to charge anyone, has actively avoided even interviewing Epstein ring survivors victimized and sexually assaulted by Epstein and or his associates; despite efforts by those survivors to tell their stories and help the DoJ bring their abusers to justice. I don't like sharing a lot of videos because most people can read faster than a YouTuber talks, but I think there's definitely some value in watching film of Pam Bondi and Kash Patel throwing temper tantrums while Epstein survivors, the actual victims in these horrible crimes, bravely risk public exposure to prove Trump's Justice Department is covering up for, and refusing to prosecute rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers. If you're in a rush, the part we're looking for starts at 4:06 in the video; but given its such a short presentation overall and Coffeezilla confirms a bunch of the shady and illegal things I've told you the Bondi and the Justice Department are doing to protect Trump in the rest of the video, it's probably worth watching the whole thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPy063-vd1Y

Is this a joke to them?

"It's astonishing to hear someone say, we have no credible evidence on other perpetrators, only to learn you never talked to the women who were allegedly trafficked." - Coffeezilla

If you only watched the clip from 4:06 forward, you will have seen at least nine different survivors and victims called to stand up and demonstrate by a show of hands how many of them have not been able to meet with Trump's Department of Justice to provide testimony and evidence, and how many of them have tried to offer to provide testimony in evidence. In footage from Pam Bondi's House Oversight hearing this week that is utterly damning, each and every single survivor indicated that they hadn't been able to meet with anyone from the DoJ, and they had all tried to do so to provide testimony and evidence. As Coffeezilla notes, this is the very same government and Department of Justice that wants you to believe they were tracking down every single lead in the Epstein case and just couldn't come up with enough evidence to charge anyone but Epstein or Maxwell; despite the fact that we know the Epstein ring had over a thousand victims, via the Justice Department's own press releases. While neither Coffeezilla, nor Congresswoman Jayapal went so far as it say it out loud, I think most people would agree that given all the other evidence Trump's Department of Justice (both of them) and FBI (both of them) were actively helping cover up all these heinous atrocities, the Injustice Department's *refusal* to meet with Epstein victims and survivors isn't incompetence, it's an intentional part of the ongoing coverup we're all watching in real time.

Which makes a nice little segue into the rest of the video, which is about how the Trump regime's coverup of the Epstein scandal is so half-assed and brazen, the regime might as well be laughing in our faces - like Trump commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, who not only brazenly lied about never associating with Epstein but can't stop chuckling like a hyena every time Epstein's name comes up. Other topics covered include the Justice Department's multiple waves of illegal redactions, a poll showing 94% of respondents believe Epstein was running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men even if the FBI is lying to say he wasn't, evidence in the files implicating former Barclays boss and former JP Morgan banker Jes Staley in activities that prove FBI Director Kash Patel perjured himself, Pam Bondi's meltdowns during the oversight hearings, and some more of the revelations coming out of the latest "Epstein Files" release that make it clear Epstein was more than just a child rapist. Including at least some evidence of Epstein's connection to the CIA.

#Epstein #Trump #PamBondi #DepartmentOfJustice #FBI #KashPatel #InTheFiles #JesStaley #EpsteinList #CIA #Coverup #GOP #HowardLutnick #PorkReich

is this a joke to them?

YouTube

Of course, maybe the reason Trump's bootlicking Department of Justice has no interest in hearing testimony and evidence from Epstein survivors, is because they're already working pretty hard to cover up the incriminating (for rich pedophiles) victim testimony from Epstein survivors they already have.

This is an article from January 30th, posted immediately after the Justice Department released over 3M new "Epstein Files" (while still, to this day, holding back roughly 3M more documents, despite their legal requirement to release all the documents they have) - you don't have to read it, I've quoted the relevant part below.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/ro-khanna-epstein-files

It’s a ‘Cover-Up,’ Says Khanna, If Official FBI Survivor Statements Not Included in Epstein File Dump

“What are we looking for? The FBI statements,” Khanna (D-Calif.) told MS NOW. “We need to see whether the 302 forms are being released. That’s where the survivors mention who the other rich and powerful men are who abused or raped them... and second, are the prosecution memos being released? This is the document that shows why these rich and powerful men weren’t prosecuted.

“If there’s no cover-up,” said the congressman, those files will be included."

If you were paying attention above when I talked about Pam Bondi and the DoJ removing the 86 page prosecution memo containing FBI (and its Crimes Against Children Human Trafficking Unit) notes about its investigation into 10 people they identified as potential co-conspirators in Epstein and Maxwell's crimes, from its already-published "Epstein Files" release, immediately after reporters started posting articles about it - you will not be surprised to learn that the Trump's Injustice Department has not included the 302 forms containing survivor testimony and accusations against named individuals. As I've noted, we *have* seen a very limited amount of DoJ and other prosecutor investigation notices and they're damning enough that the Trump regime is willing to (once again, illegally) try and re-hide them again after accidentally releasing them.

As Khanna notes, taken together these documents are likely to provide not only the names of powerful men who committed heinous crimes with and through Jeff Epstein, but also reams of evidence about when, and how the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer trafficked women and girls to these rich pedophiles and rapists. These women and the evidence they provided to investigators all over the country at various points in the revolting Epstein scandal, are the ones who name the names, and provide direct witness testimony about the crimes. As horrifying as everything we've learned from the files so far is, this is where the smoking gun(s) are; these documents are really what most Americans who demanded the release of the so-called "Epstein Files" wanted brought to light. Which is precisely why a corrupt and completely Trump-loyal Justice Department pretending Epstein and Maxwell raped or otherwise victimized over a thousand women and girls all by themselves, that there is no evidence whatsoever of an Epstein trafficking ring, doesn't want you to see them.

#Epstein #Trump #FBI #RoKhanna #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #GOP #EpsteinFiles

It's a 'Cover-Up,' Says Khanna, If Official FBI Survivor Statements Not Included in Epstein File Dump | Common Dreams

US DOJ releases 3 million more pages of Epstein files, but are they hiding the truth? Dems demand transparency, FBI statements, and prosecution memos to reveal powerful abusers.

Common Dreams

So, I'd like to burn a post to start what may become a regular feature in this thread, to talk about the rhetorical slides and mental gymnastics a significant portion of our Western establishment, its media, and other Very Serious PeopleTM in the discourse use to minimize, or justify dismissing the Epstein scandal, and news coming out of it that seems to implicate a whole spiderweb of rich and powerful people (mostly men) in the Pig Empire. More than ideas, these are arguments frequently seeded in this discourse by media outlets beholden to the same billionaire class being exposed in the so-called "Epstein Files" released by the Department of Justice, designed to discredit discussions about the crimes against women and girls billionaire abusers have committed, and drive attention away from the guilty parties - many of whom, unlike Epstein himself, still walk in sunshine on this green Earth.

For example, one idea frequently propagated either implicitly, or directly, is that if there was anything to the public belief that Epstein was running a billionaire pedophile trafficking ring, the proper authorities would have uncovered it and done something about it. This is a reasonable-sounding argument, but after half a thread of stories demonstrating that the Trump Departments of Justice (both of them) actively broke the law to hide the names and evidence collected surrounding the Epstein trafficking ring, I should hope you now understand why it isn't. I can assure you that then-US Attorney Alex Acosta, also moved heaven and earth to keep this all under wraps - ultimately letting Epstein go with a slap on the wrist after pleading to two reduced charges. The simple truth is that for reasons we can only speculate on (and none of that speculation looks good for our establishment btw) the people responsible for "doing something" have actively worked to hide Epstein's crimes, held almost no one accountable, and at every turn failed the victims of the Epstein ring entirely.

Which brings me to the second rhetorical slide deployed to minimize and obfuscate the accusations against powerful men emerging from the Epstein Files. Specifically the idea that direct witness testimony from women and girls victimized by Epstein and his associates, carries no more weight than anonymous tips, or hearsay reports. As any first year law student will tell you, this is nonsense, but by leveraging the fact that many victims have reached settlements with the Epstein estate, and organizations that facilitated those abuses, all of which contain non-disclosure agreements, apologists have tried to make it appear as if Epstein ring accusers are small in number, isolated, and not particularly trustworthy. This is of course absurd, because the DoJ itself has admitted it is aware of over a thousand Epstein victims; even while denying the existence of a trafficking ring. This effort to conflate survivor testimony with hearsay and rumors, is aided by the fact that many survivors of Epstein and his associates, choose to share their stories anonymously, out of (very reasonable, as we'll discuss later in this thread) fear of reprisals from the extremely wealthy and powerful men who abused them through Epstein's trafficking ring.

You know what isn't anonymous, and can't be subversively discredited by in pocket media minions? Nine figure settlements paid out by gigantic banks to Epstein survivors for their role in facilitating the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer's abuses.

JPMorgan's $290 million settlement with Epstein accusers approved by US judge: https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-judge-weigh-jpmorgans-290-million-settlement-with-epstein-accusers-2023-11-09/

As you'll discover if you Google a bit, JP Morgan isn't the only bank who settled with Epstein survivors (Deutsche Bank coughed up 75 million) nor is this the only expensive settlement JPM made. While neither institution admitted any wrongdoing, you clearly don't understand how capitalism works if you think these folks just forked over enough money to buy their own island because of "rumors." This is of course on top of the $121M in settlements the Epstein Estate paid out, and doesn't include any settlements Epstein paid out after his 2008 conviction either - some of which are just now coming to light. Were these settlements part of a coverup themselves? Some of Epstein's victims believe so:

Did Jeffrey Epstein’s Victims Fund Protect His Allies?: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/10/01/jeffrey-epstein-victim-fund-ken-feinberg-511829

Please keep in mind, these are only the payouts related to Epstein himself that we know about. Have other rich and powerful men reached settlements with Epstein survivors to hide their crimes? At least one infamous person in a position to know says yes they have:

Jeffrey Epstein Associate Ghislaine Maxwell Claims 25 Unnamed Men Made Secret Settlements to Victims: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jeffrey-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwell-152121790.html

Folks, people wouldn't be working this hard and bleeding out this much money to silence Epstein's victims, if their testimony didn't have value as evidence. Sometimes it really is as simple as "following the money."

Furthermore, we know how important the task of discrediting survivor testimony is to the Epstein class as a whole, because we saw it play out very publicly in 2017 with the #MeToo movement, and the organized backlash against it by abusive men with positions of power in our society. How would the world's most famous pedophile, and those in his orbit respond to a society-wide shift in the discourse encouraging us to "believe women" and survivors? Well, if his inbox is any indication, #Epstein himself helped organize the backlash to discredit the movement, at the prompting of Michael Wolff; who is being exposed as an enabler for Epstein's influence trading operation and image rehabilitation efforts, through these file releases.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/feb/06/epstein-files-metoo

Epstein said he was ‘asked everyday’ for advice on #MeToo: ‘So many guys reaching out to me’

"But when taken together, the emails, texts and other documents contained in the releases reveal Epstein’s engagement with the #MeToo movement and the men felled by it. In some cases, the convicted child sex offender and a coterie of elites strategized over how to blunt the power of the #MeToo movement and the women who fueled it.

“So many guys caught in the me too . reaching out to me. asking when does the madness stop,” Epstein wrote in December 2018 to a recipient whose identity is redacted."

Like every article about Epstein plotting with influential people, this piece is a hot mess that simultaneously drops too many bombshell revelations to keep track of, while also minimizing how deeply incriminating all of this is for literally anyone emailing the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer for advice on how to handle sexual assault, abuse, and harassment allegations against them or their rich friends. I guess if you know you're guilty, you turn to the guy who literally got away with a sex trafficking ring through networking and top flight public relations management, right?

If you want all the good dirt, you're going to have to read the whole article but let's put publicist #PeggySiegall, intellectual #NoamChomsky, and technologist #JoiIto on the "confirmed friends and confidants of Epstein who vented with him about #MeToo" list, "journalist" #RichardWolff, and scientist #LawrenceKrauss on the "strategized with Epstein about how to discredit survivor accusations and accounts in the wake of the #MeToo movement" list, and noted creep abusers outed during the #MeToo reckoning #StephenElliott and #LorinStein on standby because we don't have them talking to Epstein directly, but Richard Wolff sought out Epstein's advice on their behalf and it would appear that Elliot in particular acted on that advice.

And that is the part I want to focus on, because while I'm tempted to believe The Guardian buried the lede here, the reality that Epstein was deeply involved in developing a strategy to protect other powerful rich men accused of abusing their status to engage in sexual violence and harassment against women is exposed in the article - they just broke it up into two parts.

"Wolff wanted Epstein to support Stephen Elliott, a writer looking to sue the creator of the Shitty Media Men List, a crowd-sourced Google Doc that detailed anonymous allegations of misconduct against dozens of men who worked in the media industry.

“I have always thought that the way back from this climate is through specific instances of individuals successfully challenging their persecution,” Wolff wrote to Epstein, according to emails released in a tranche from the so-called Epstein files. “If his story is solid he might be worth supporting.”

Initially, Epstein was unmoved. In a single-word, no-punctuation email, the convicted sexual offender replied: “tough.”

“Give it some further thought, if you would,” wrote Wolff, who had originally received Elliott’s pitch through Lorin Stein, the former editor of the prestigious Paris Review and another name on the Shitty Media Men List. “I think there is an opening here. What you need is an excuse – or opportunity – to make the public argument.”

Epstein relented: “ill help anyway i can. if you like.”

Weeks later, Elliott sued Moira Donegan, the Shitty Media Men List’s creator."

Of course, we only have access to the Epstein emails already released, so all we know is that tons of influential people seemed to think Epstein was the go-to guy on #MeToo; which is incriminating in its own right. But as the Guardian slyly notes later, the proof of the plot is kind of in the pudding.

"Wolff’s apparent suggestion, that accused individuals file lawsuit proved prescient, since defamation lawsuits have become a major feature of the backlash to #MeToo. As of last year, nearly a fifth of the 400-plus cases supported by the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, a post-#MeToo organization that helps people who survived sexual harassment at work, were in defense of someone sued for defamation."

Folks the plot to erase "believe women" as an IDEA goes deep.

#EpsteinFiles

Epstein said he was ‘asked everyday’ for advice on #MeToo: ‘So many guys reaching out to me’

Files released by DoJ reveal the financier engaging in efforts to blunt the impact of the movement as it was gaining ground

The Guardian

Alright, so we finally have our first undeniable #EpsteinPlot post; I'm sorry it took us like twenty posts to get here but like I warned you way back when I first repurposed this thread to talk about Epstein, his powerful friends, and the incredibly massive coverup surrounding all of this, this is multi-decade crime against not only Epstein's victims, but our society as a whole. I can't walk you through it in three 5K character posts, even if I wish I could.

Of course, #Epstein plotting to discredit sexual assault survivors out of his own self interest with other powerful men accused of abuse during the #MeToo moment isn't the biggest conspiracy fact exposed in the Epstein Files, nor are his co-conspirators the most powerful people among Epstein's friends, confidants, plotters, and advisors. The people in the story I shared above are all scumbags and monsters, but they're pretty small fry compared to say, two US presidents (including the guy in office right now) and a former Israeli Prime Minister.

Despite this however, even this chain of plotting in Epstein's email box, directly corelates with macro decisions made by members of the #EpsteinClass that affect our society as a whole - in this case US President #DonaldTrump, who is not only #InTheFiles but I'm comfortable putting on the #EpsteinList of actual pedo rapists and likely human traffickers. To understand the connection between the micro and the macro, Let's turn to this recent piece by Joan Wallach Scott that talks about Trump's executive order on gender (the same one that says I, as a trans woman basically don't exist) and the growing, successful quest across the United States to eliminate gender studies courses, through the lens of an Epstein class chock full of extremely powerful abusers and more than willing enablers exposed in the US Justice Departments various (and still incomplete) #EpsteinFiles releases.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/13/gender-studies-trump-epstein

Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

"The move to cancel gender studies is explicitly justified as a way to comply with Donald Trump’s executive order of last year titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. That document makes “the biological reality of sex” a matter not of science but of law.

Until this week’s latest dump of the Epstein files by Trump’s justice department, I hadn’t seen the connection between the two. But now it’s as clear as day. The abolition of gender studies is a way of further guaranteeing impunity to the elite men whose contempt for and exploitation of women and girls apparently knew no bounds, whether they actually slept with the women on offer or simply shared Epstein’s fantasies in order to gain influence or funding."

Okay so first things first, lets put lets put former director of the Whitney Museum #DavidRoss "in the files" and on the "confirmed sick fucks" list even if he was bonding with Epstein over pedo shit, not necessarily committing rape crimes as far as we know, yet. What a revolting human being.

With that out of the way, I think the author's argument that Trump's attempt to enshrine biological gender determinism into law, and a fascist American right's weaponization of that law to eradicate critical studies programs that not only elevate women's voices but illuminate the structural causes behind the victimization of women and girls by powerful men and the existence of the Epstein ring itself, are a clear and obvious boon to abusers and confidants named in the Epstein files, is utterly unassailable. Re-marginalizing women's voices as a whole, further marginalizes women accusing powerful men of sexual assault; full stop.

So at that point, all that's left to argue about is whether or not this relationship between Epstein's plots to rewind time on the accusations against him, the larger Epstein circle of friends attempts to rewind time on #MeToo accusations, and noted Epstein associate and imo exposed ring member Donald Trump's attempts to rewind time on women having a voice to accuse men like him in the first place, is intentional. On that matter, the Epstein Files are as of yet silent, but as a rational observer I think the establishment world around us warping to Trump's whims and desires silence and further re-marginalize women and sexual violence victims, is singing quite loudly. I can't prove that Trump's executive order, or the decision by US Universities to end gender studies courses arose directly out of Jeff Epstein's plotting, but going forward I want you to pay attention to how often the things Trump and his fascist administration do to reshape our society, just happen to line up perfectly with the ideas and strategies being run through Jeff Epstein's inbox by some of the most powerful, influential, and quite frankly fucking disgusting people on Earth.

#Trump #GOP #JoanWallachScott #Patriarchy #GenderStudies

(repost after accidental deletion)

Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

Texas A&M University is the latest school to end women’s and gender studies programs and teaching race. We know why

The Guardian

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

"proved prescient" ... The Guardian is really lowering the bar on prescience if we allow instigators to be prescient of what they instigate...

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Plus the non-specific euphemisms. Specifically, "links", "ties", and "associations". For instance, 'She had to resign due to the extent of her associations in the Epstein files."

@mastodonmigration Oh for sure - it's wild how often they'll say "convicted for prostitution/soliciting in 2008" in reference to Epstein, and not say "OF A MINOR" too - just for one example. It's ubiquitous; to the point that the media has effectively discredited itself in advance.
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes and why are the names of the accused being redacted (even if settlements are made- they paid not to be prosecuted the doj didn’t sign a DND) when those of the victims have so often been accidentally(?) identified ?
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes This is an aside, but from an information architecture perspective, the fact that you can always reference back to your previous work so cleanly just impresses the hell out of me. The mind palace of my previous work is an amorphous blob of tentacles, drugs, and a refusal to remember. 🤷🏻‍♀️🤣. Before I engage with what you say, I just wanted to thank you for saying it, and all the labor that it involves. 🥰

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Am I missing something?

Am I being too simplistic?

Yes, Ro, it’s a cover-up. Uncover it. You’re a Lawyer. Take some depositions or some shit.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes ...the other obvious reason for the cover up is that members of congress and the "doj" are also in the files themselves...
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes Feeling a bit slow, but I think it makes sense to assume the unreleased files are filled with people who can still be effectively blackmailed, i.e. mostly foreign politicians?

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Well, here I'll just go further & say that the #DoJ release of #Epstein docs that wound up exposing UNREDACTED the names & private info, incl one driver's license, of victims & Jane Doe's, was no mistake.

It was ON PURPOSE to get victims vilified for calling for the release of files AND to get em to shut the ef up, stop calling for the release of files or more victims' names & personal info will be released.

And THAT would be in total keeping w/Trump & his thugs' M.O.

@ginaintheburg @AnarchoNinaAnalyzes But if will backfire, because they then become people with nothing left to lose.

@holdenweb @AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Maybe. But it seems to me it's the THREAT of being outed that will bring pressure not to release any more files.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes
>Personally, I think Khanna is being far too charitable to call even these redactions by Trump's Injustice Department a mistake,

I'd say this could also be a strategic choice. some combination of leading the public to a radical position without having to take such a position himself, and an implicit promise of leniency to some purpetrators if they help bring down co-conspirators?

But also it could just be Ro Khanna being reflexively charitable

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes Someone on Reddit noticed a curious anomaly in an email between Epstein and someone in Edmonton, AB. One redaction covers what, in context, is very obviously the word “don’t”. It doesn’t take a genius to guess how this particular redaction could have happened, giving further credence to reports that FBI agents were tasked with hastily redacting any possible mention of Don T from the files.

ETA: the email in question. https://www.reddit.com/r/Edmonton/s/RNmov04VOI

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Sometimes the closest you could get to justice is the man's head on a stick. We can hope.

Read Nina.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Just remembering Michael Cohen's alleged threat of "I'll do really horrible things to you".

Thinking Cohen may literally know about bodies burried.
And not have revealed this to the FBI.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

"At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead."

I mean, at that point we should maybe just start saying that Epstein appears in the Trump Files. Fucking crazy...

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

Epstein Act: legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials.

and from the article:

"The DOJ’s release of the files has been extremely contentious, as it redacted the names of multiple associates and potential co-conspirators of Epstein for no apparent reason, while revealing identifying information about the victims."

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes
They're actually doing the opposite of what they are legally bound to do.

Not that it matters a single iota.
#doomed #worsttimeline

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes No surprising. But thank you for sharing this.
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @clintruin There is no level these people will not sink to for the sake of covering their asses by covering Trump's.
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes i suppose it's possible he was the whiny little kid that desperately wanted to party with the cool kids but they wouldn't let him in the club — which at least would be funny.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I remember the Cool Zone Media folks in particular being really worried about such a blatant souless toady like Kash Patel being put in place as FBI director. with the fear FBI would be directly weaponized against political opponents.

I've come to think that appointing an open right-wing grift media hack as FBI director has been one of the bigger weaknesses of the regime. They're all too stupid and content-brained to understand the levers of power that allowed people like Epstein to get away with it for so long.

80+% of the criticism of the Pam Bondi DoJ has handled Epstein can be applied to the DoJ under Merrick Garland. If Joe Biden had the fucking stones to do it, he could have utterly destroyed the GOP winning any national election for a generation with only token sacrifices of a few Democratic bigwigs (assuming some level of strategic omission).

Its these kind of things that make me wonder how much of the total elite consolidation against Sanders in 2016 and 2020 was more about Epstein than anything else. I have problems with Sanders, but I doubt a Sanders cabinet would have avoided prosecution of political opponents in the ways it is defacto confirmed Biden and Garland omitted prosecution.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes The handy thing about rallying against elite impunity is that Trump, Epstein, and wage theft are all symptoms of that underlying cause, so there are multiple ways to get people on board.
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes Do you want or need some tips how to sift through large amounts of data?

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes It's an insane amount of data. It could keep 100 analysts dividing and conquering months to make a full narrative out of it.

Side note: I'm shocked at the number of people who come out and freely admit they're so illiterate that not only can't they read but block people who might expect them to.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I wonder if Trump has (unwittingly) blown the lid on this whole thing. He lacks the competence to maintain this thing he's now got control of. At the moment, people (by which I mean billionaire paedophile psychopaths) are still afraid and treating Trump like the 'big dog', but that's going to unravel. He isn't capable enough to hold this together and, as much damage as he can and will do, Epstein being dead is a real problem for these fuckers. That, at least, may be a ray of hope.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes

“after killing Epstein, Trump became Epstein”

HOLY FUCKING SHIT

@paninid @AnarchoNinaAnalyzes 😲 Suddenly, Trump had access to his address book and a lot of his blackmail materials. Trump didn't want to release the full Epstein Files not only because he was in them, but because *he was still using them*... 🤯

I mean hey, maybe not. But *maybe*...

@ZenHeathen @paninid @AnarchoNinaAnalyzes That’s why he can’t release them; he’d have to give back the money he extorted from the shitbags to have their names redacted.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I *am* reading all that.

Anyway, the little piggy cops of the Pig Empire aren't going to take down their big piggy troughmasters. No matter how much they shuffle papers and make noises, they won't *do* a damned thing. They didn't with the Paradise Papers and Panama Papers either.

Everyone needs to just pick one name--one within reach--and get to work.

@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes The stuff people six months ago were joking about Trump having to have done / covered up with Epstein to face accountability for is now the stuff we know all about. The only difference is the degree to which we are exhausted by overkill and the extent to which his apologists are willing to go in order to try to justify the completely unjustifiable.
@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes It's never a bad/poor/wrong decision to put your mental health first. If you hadn't, you might not be *able* at this point to put the proofs together. But you're coming back to it after putting on your own oxygen mask first, yadda yadda. (Cliché image, I know, but it's accurate!) And we appreciated you. ✌️🤘🖖
I would read all that, and watch all that, but I already agree with you. I'm already convinced. It's pretty obvious, even to a casual observer. But what do we do about it? Just glass the whole continental USA? What do I do about it? What do I ask other people to do about it? I'm not going to attend public protests I'm sorry it's just too dangerous.