Peter Attia Resigns as CBS News Contributor Following Release of Epstein-Related Emails

📰 Original title: Celebrity doctor Peter Attia steps down from CBS over Epstein links

🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Usuarios: It's clickbait ⚠️

View full AI summary: https://killbait.com/posts/post/fe255dc0-5d22-4243-ba7d-089b926517c0

#society #peterattia #jeffreyepstein #cbsnews

KillBait - News highlights delivered clearly and responsibly—no clickbait, no sensationalism.

KillBait is a news aggregator developed by students and professionals in journalism and web development. Our focus is on providing readers with clear and relevant summaries of each news story.

#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt

https://youtu.be/IvlKY7wREQU

Peter Attia's Ties With Epstein EXPOSED

YouTube
A newly released trove of documents from the #Epsteinfiles, #PeterAttia and the convicted sex offender exchanged lewd and personal messages with each other For example, Attia wrote in 2016, “Pussy is, indeed, low-carb. Still awaiting results on gluten content.though” www.cnn.com/2026/02/23/b...

Peter Attia resigns from CBS N...
Peter Attia resigns from CBS News following Epstein backlash

Celebrity doctor Peter Attia has resigned from his new contributor position at CBS News following new revelations about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

CNN
Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Gig After Epstein Files Disclosure

The health influencer had been among a slate of new contributors announced for the network.

Deadline

Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia

https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/dr-peter-attia-exits-cbs-news-contributor-paramount-warner-1236670513/

Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact

Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein Ties

Variety
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke

We’ve noted how Bari Weiss’ tenure at CBS (or what’s left of it) isn’t really going very well. Hired by Trump-allied billionaire Larry Ellison to turn what’s left of C…

Techdirt
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit

The Justice Department’s drip-drip-drip of documents in the sex trafficker's case have helped complete the map of his industry connections.

The Hollywood Reporter

So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files

Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

Representative Jamie Raskin reported what he saw in the Justice Department’s unredacted files on Jeffrey Epstein.

The New Republic