#Extremeheat reduces and reshapes #urbanmobility | #PNAS Nexus | #OxfordAcademic
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/5/4/pgag078/8651395?login=false

Extreme heat is a problem in Southern European countries & cities, aggravated by rising temperatures & aging populations. Research on mobility during extreme heat remains limited to small samples & geographic contexts, leaving gaps in our systematic understanding of how populations adjust their day-to-day mobility patterns & how these adaptations vary across social groups.

Évolution de "tests" nucléaires de 1945
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2604165123?ref=404media.co
The #Trinity nuclear test of July 16, 1945, generated extreme transient conditions that produced trinitite, a silicate glass containing rare metallic phases.
À lire sur #PNAS

İlk atom bombasının küllerinden doğan gizem, PNAS’da yayımlandı. 25k ton TNT patlaması sonrası atomlar yeni düzenler kuruyor. ✨🔬

🚩 #Bilim #Nükleer #PNAS #Araştırma #BilimHaberleri #Fizik

An opinion piece in #PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) suggests that to help the overwhelmed #PeerReview system in #science, a transparent universal credit system should be established to incentivize peer review: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2506681123.

Nah. Peer reviewers need to be paid #income for their work! And one associate professor says, in a comment on Bluesky, that for-profit #publishers should pay peer reviewers.

La rivista #Pnas ha ritirato uno studio che annunciava la regressione completa del tumore al pancreas in 45 topi, risultato che aveva acceso forti aspettative e raccolto 3,6 milioni di euro in donazioni.

Indovina indovina? Conflitto di interessi: il ricercatore è lo stesso cofondatore della società che produce le molecole testate.

Top.

@salute #medicina #ricerca #tumore #tumorepancreas

🐱👶 Researchers from #Cornell and #Washington University used #3D imaging to show how artificial selection pushes #cats and #dogs toward similar "baby-faced" skull shapes.

The study indicates that flat-faced breeds share more traits with each other than with their own wild ancestors.

👉 https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a71137856/similarities-cats-dogs-evolution-babies/

#biology #evolution #science #genetics #research #pnas #pets #nature

Oops, Dogs and Cats Are Evolving to Look Like Human Babies

At first it was cute. Now it’s kinda creepy.

Popular Mechanics

Considering that there is nothing new in this paper I was thinking that it could be a great #PNAS paper.

It is a PNAS paper.

#peoplesworld:
"
Safety meltdown: Trump’s weakening of nuclear reactor regulations sparks opposition
"
".. attorneys general from several states .. announced they’ve formed a coalition to oppose the Trump administration’s new rules slashing security and environmental requirements for experimental nuclear reactors."

".. creation of “much more nuclear waste.”"

https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/safety-meltdown-trumps-weakening-of-nuclear-reactor-regulations-sparks-opposition/

10.3.2026

#Atomkraft #Atommüll #DOE #Kernenergie #NEPA #NuclearSafety #NuclearWaste #PNAS #Reactor #UCS #USA

Safety meltdown: Trump’s weakening of nuclear reactor regulations sparks opposition

On March 4, attorneys general from several states across the country announced they’ve formed a coalition to oppose the Trump administration’s new rules slashing security and environmental requirements for experimental nuclear reactors.

People's World

Edit: so the direct submission is just normal, and the journal also has a "contributed submissions" but it seems that's also peer-reviewed:
https://www.pnas.org/author-center/member-contributed-submissions
Maybe my info was just outdated 🤔

Edit 2: actually, it looks like the authors in that contributed submission case can choose their reviewers 🤔🤔

"Contributed submissions must include the names of at least two experts in relevant subject areas (particularly for multidisciplinary studies) who have agreed to review the manuscript."

-- original post --
Question about direct submissions in the journal #PNAS to anyone who might know:

Some of the articles there are noted as "direct submissions" - does this mean that these manuscripts do not go through peer-review before being published?
Isn't that strange?
Shouldn't these papers be considered similar to preprints?
Why would anyone want to do this instead of going through the peer-review process or posting as a preprint?

Example: Volitional learning promotes theta phase coding in the human hippocampus