@obscurestar ... you've chosen to put this into your own feed by playing reply guy and whatabouting about local effects in a thread about climate effects... So go ahead and hit the block button yourself if that makes you feel better.
Else, rest assured, I wish death to America and its Epstein class oiligarchs as much as the Iranians.
It's just that... All oil burning is contributing to the atmospheric weapon of mass destruction, there is no such thing as clean fossil fuels, and never will be. Pretending it's only bad for climate when somebody you don't like is responsible and the immediate side effects are visible and then pivoting to the (also fairly universal, whenever things go wrong in the industry) terrible toxic effects of fossil burning on locals normalizes the continued everyday fossil fuel madness. Multiple things can be bad at the same time and this persona of mine supports clarity on why something is bad. And while war usually is very bad for the climate this one might be a net positive on that front, assuming the pumps and refineries destroyed across the region are not rebuilt immediately & the ultra fossil fuel dependend US military gear proves to be useless for winning... Who knows, maybe the dying empire does pivot to electrowarfare eventually. Unfortunately the time has passed where peaceful and democratic deconstruction of fossil infrastructure was a viable way to climate stability.