@justbob @cmccullough no, it will not make it into the kernel.
It's for the distros to decide.
I'd put money on Ubuntu being the first but Debian, not so much. (Even though Ubuntu is a copy of Debian)
@justbob @cmccullough I believe Ubuntu is based on Debian.
But yeah, since Ubuntu is more directed towards the casual user I would expect it to adopt AI first. And the devs have been known to stick with decisions many don't like.
@cmccullough
> Anthropic donates <some specs>, OpenAI donates <other specs>
> no actual code
IMO nothing to worry about.
FUCK This!
@TheLastOfHisName This has nothing to do with Linux besides just being a project formed by the Linux Foundation.
Its projects are the Model Context Protocol, goose AI agent and AGENTS.md, all useful stuff IMO, but not necessarily related to the Linux kernel.
"The Agentic #AI Foundation aims for a neutral, open foundation to ensure agentic AI evolves transparently and collaboratively."
and:
"Platinum Members of the new Agentic AI Foundation include #Amazon Web Services, #Anthropic, Block, Bloomberg, Cloudflare, #Google, #Microsoft, and #OpenAI."
is all we need to know... 💩
@cmccullough MCP, goose, AGENTS.md, all good things I would say.
I'm no big AI fan, but I've been interested in MCP for a while to have a nice integration with a self-hosted LLM in specific tools, and I've heard of AGENTS.md, but not of goose, although it's described as an 'open source, extensibile AI agent' which sounds good.
None of this is related to Linux itself, it's just the Linux Foundation that formed this "neutral, open foundation" that evolves AI "transparently, collaboratively" with...famously open-source companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and many other members including SUSE and Zed Industries.
We'll see how this goes.
"The ... "AAIF" has been formed with Anthropic contributing the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Block's goose, and OpenAI contributing their AGENTS.md ..."
#MichaelLarabel, 2025
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Foundation-Agentic-AI
Why so worried @cmccullough? This is standard practice for the LF. Which was formed by corporations to push their agendas into GNU/Linux, and sideline the FSF/GNU Project's role in its development.
(1/2)
What this article reports is;
* new legal sub-entity in Linux Foundation
* sponsored by corporations, like everything LF do
* some copyrights, etc, handed over to the sub-entity, as a neutral ground where a group of corporations can share work on them
This is neither good nor bad news. It's just business administrativia news.
(2/2)