As someone who works in higher-ed and also has taught middle school and high school aged kids, my opinion is not that LLM use is exploding among students because they're lazy or stupid or anything else

it's because our educational system has prioritized a very transactional "do this bullshit, and you get the credentials you need to have a life" approach for

well

maybe forever, really

and no one should be surprised that adversarial approaches by teachers and administrators are being met with an adversarial approach by students

@left_adjoint As someone who recently got their bachelor: Everything i did was just to get the credit points, then forget everything to make space for the next.

Im sure there is leftover understanding in my brain but thats the thing that is encouraged.

@EinsPossum @left_adjoint

I really have to get students to unlearn this during our internship to allow them to become good professionals.

@EinsPossum @left_adjoint

This is an example of the Welcome slides I provide at the start of the internship.

https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/WEHI_RCP_Internship_Program_Welcome/28503338

#students #interns

WEHI RCP Internship Program Welcome

The Research Computing Platform (RCP) is a collaborative, multi-disciplinary lab that supports and advocates for researchers and their computational research needs at WEHI.RCP has established a student internship program with subjects provided at the University of Melbourne. We did this to leverage the experience we have in the RCP of working with student software interns by collaborating with labs.​This is the generic introduction presentation to explain the culture and expectations.Internal designation RCP#0026

figshare

@rowlandm @EinsPossum @left_adjoint

Well done! Very nice visuals to make a point. I will link/quote that, if I ever am asked to work with a student or apprentice.

@zlasha @EinsPossum @left_adjoint

Thank you :)

It is a pity that many students are indoctrinated and so this doesn't register with them until week 8, 9, or 10 (sometimes more!)

@rowlandm @EinsPossum @left_adjoint awesome work! I am going to use this... hard.

@Jenkins @EinsPossum @left_adjoint

Thanks!

Let me know how you go.

I'll be updating this in the next couple of weeks as I get ready for the next intake.

@left_adjoint This. It is educational institutions that have been lazy, by failing to motivate their requirements beyond "do this because you have to".

I have always tried to go beyond, but reached only a small fraction of students, because I was working against years of conditioning. Now even that fraction is at risk.

@plragde
Is it laziness? Or is the system working as intended? The education system was created to achieve two goals: getting the kids out of the way so that the parents can work, and creating obedient, interchangable drones.

To me it looks to be very successful.
@left_adjoint

@Mux @left_adjoint If those are in fact its hidden goals, then it's not doing particularly well at them, either.

@left_adjoint The commingling of education and screening really is the tragedy of schools and universities. While education is obviously (part of) their mission, it's much less obvious whether screening also should be. As Zach Weinersmith puts it, "Universities basically provide a free vetting system for companies now".

https://bsky.app/profile/zachweinersmith.bsky.social/post/3lpc3q5l6sk2t

Zach Weinersmith (@zachweinersmith.bsky.social)

Addendum: my personal view is that there's no way to unfuck the system. Universities basically provide a free vetting system for companies now. Companies get data on potential employees for free, and students pay universities to collect that data.

Bluesky Social
@glocq oh, huh, I don't actually agree with zach on a lot of things but yeah we're pretty much aligned on this one
@left_adjoint One thing I’ve been thinking about is how we never talk explicitly with our students about what the *purpose*/social function of writing is…
@jonmsterling @left_adjoint Trying to explain to my bosses that writing a first draft is how i figure out what i actually think about a topic.
@left_adjoint I've always thought it was ironic that students were encouraged to study for a test. All that does is test their ability to study, not their actual knowledge or problem solving skills.
@soviut and even worse timed exams are sometimes just a test of their ability to overcome anxiety and not even of their ability to study!

@left_adjoint @soviut My 12yo, who has ADHD, just finished 6th grade here in Oklahoma. I can say unequivocally that the only things her tests demonstrate is how well she takes tests and/or navigates on a computer (because *all* of her tests are on the computer).

I know one parent who occasionally does her child's school work--and I can't blame her, because the system has taught this family that what's important is getting correct assignments turned in on time. That 12yo's actual learning...
1/2

@left_adjoint @soviut ...isn't the priority & the schools have conditioned her parents to think that.

It would be laughably easy for me to do most if not all of my own child's work, because I can access all of her school work from home. If kid & I coordinated, I could even take her tests for her from home during class hours. The only reason I don't is that I want her to have the *knowledge*. In the meantime, we take a penalty in lower scores on her report card & try not to stress about it.
2/2

@courtcan @left_adjoint I don't mind test taking on a computer. I just think tests shouldn't be studied for; they're meant to be a measurement, not a goal.
@soviut @left_adjoint I'm kind of okay with them being on the computer and kind of not. The action of writing by hand, especially in cursive, has been proven to increase electrical activity in the brain and activate neutral pathways that typing doesn't. It also improves motor control, spelling, and memory. So, although I see the benefit of testing on the computer (if only to streamline the grading process for teachers), I feel that our kids are really missing out on growing their brains.

@courtcan @left_adjoint I am incredibly dubious about cursive writing having any affect on their brains. That would mean that anyone writing in non-latin languages isn't getting the same stimulus.

Kids write, draw and colour constantly. Taking a test on a computer isn't going to affect that.

In fact, kids aren't spending nearly enough time on keyboards. We've got a whole generation of people entering the workforce who can't touch type and have to look at the keys.

@left_adjoint if you haven't already read it, Susan Blum's _Schoolishness_ is a fantastic read on this topic. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501774188/schoolishness/ IMHO it would be a great thing if LLMs pushed education away from "writing alone" kinds of activities and towards "doing together" ones. (edit: *would* be a great thing)
Schoolishness by Susan D. Blum | Hardcover | Cornell University Press

In Schoolishness, Susan D. Blum continues her journey as an anthropologist and educator. The author defines "schoolishness" as educational practices that emphasize packaged "learning," unimaginative...

Cornell University Press
@left_adjoint Agreed, huge :pikachu-surprise: to anyone who expected any different from gatekeeping-credentialist complex. I know plenty of great educators at all levels who will never really have trouble from LLMs wrt knowing is the students are learning...
@left_adjoint yes, this, and yes, it is always been like that.
In defence, this doesn't happen in rare countries where student is priority, not cheapest education.

@left_adjoint

Kids aren’t stupid, they recognize how the system really works and they adapt to it. If we don’t like it, maybe we shouldn’t build that system.

@left_adjoint @jlink Returning to in-room written exams with no digital tools would also erect a barrier that forces learning. Not sure if educators are down with returning to "the old ways" but if you have to rely on your brain you better learn! The system might not want that though.
@donald_brady @left_adjoint @jlink I teach high school, and this is the trending approach teachers are adopting.
@donald_brady @left_adjoint Abandoning exams and other incentives for faking knowledge seems to be the only way forward. Without some kind of intrinsic motivation no learning is possible anymore.

@donald_brady @left_adjoint @jlink Also in-room tutorials where you're asked to talk through your work.

The problem is that the number of educators needed for that approach will cut down on profitability…

@left_adjoint

Bingo.

The #LLM are not the problem in #education, it's how and what we teach is.
If you think #AI is "cheating", you are actively disabling your students for a world that will already be hard for humans to survive in.

@n_dimension

How is forbidding the use of AI “disabling” my students?

@left_adjoint

@magitweeter @left_adjoint

While the elites are waiting for the "AI bubble to burst"
There is going to be a world out there, run by corporations, doing what the corporations always did. Replacing humans with machines.

If you churn out students unprepared to be competitive in that world you are disabling them.

Sure, they can develop their own social economy, giving each other hugs, painting and going to each other's recitals. But I don't think that's what mum and dad had in mind sending the kid to an #educational institutions to give them advantage.

@n_dimension You make several questionable assumptions, but let's take them at face value for the sake of argument. Still, how is letting AI do their homework for them going to make them more competitive, rather than less?

@magitweeter

Q: How is #AI going to make students more competitive?

A: Because 95% of the general population and 99.9% of the #Luddites are unable to use AI effectively. Just like googling, the quality of response is directly proportional to the quality of the query.

The old computer axiom "Bullshit in, bullshit out" holds true still.

@n_dimension Not if the skill to use AI effectively is developed at the expense of the critical thinking skills that would be developed if the student faced the assignment without AI.

@magitweeter

...and therefore this weighty responsibility to strike the balance lies on your shoulders.

@n_dimension Right. And i strike the balance by forbidding the use of AI and requiring my students to think for themselves. Critical thinkers can decide on their own time whether AI offers them anything of value, and how to make effective use of it if so.

@left_adjoint

Also helps one understand our whole economy and consumer environment feeling much the same.

@left_adjoint Yup, a dictatorial instead of a collaborative approach is certainly not the best education can offer to make students flourish.
@left_adjoint I was in education and the whole premise was based on contempt. We can't have high standards or demand anything from students as that is cruel. Students could do much better but they have been told that the slightest effort on their part is 'amazing'. It is sad to see young people who could excel left weak and hampered.
@left_adjoint this is similar to applying for a job

@left_adjoint There are also time constraints. I'd like to read this whole 5000 word article on a subject that interests me, but I have to scan it to answer these essay questions and then move on.

And yes, I will do the minimum if it doesn't interest me.

@left_adjoint

This college prof agrees very strongly.

@left_adjoint It doesn't surprise me that, while taking what are effectively business administration classes, I've had professors who are enthusiastically pro-AI. This is Capitalism Class, of course everything is viewed through the most transactional and boring lens possible!

The nice things have come from the other teachers, who know and care about the actual skills of managing a project and coordinating a team.

@left_adjoint exactly, they are interacting with the system exactly as they have been taught to. school is not for education, hasn't been for ages. school is just another thing you do to get something else, in this case a job. in any transaction, you want to put in as little, and get as much out as possible. profit is all that matters. it's a damn shame as it is bad for literally everyone directly involved in the process, from the syllabus designers to the students. shit, it's bad for the business the students will go on to work for.

in the long term, it's bad for everyone, but that doesn't matter because profit is quarterly. long term doesn't exist.

@left_adjoint the schools themselves are an obstacle to learning and opportunity; the LLMs may diminish learning further, but they may also help with the opportunity, and potentially save time that can then be used for more effective learning and/or other pursuits.

It would be great if this leads to changing schools to actually nurture learning and skill-building. Unfortunately I think it will lead to graduates who have less of certain skills right when LLMs become expensive to use

@left_adjoint I guess “cheating tool” wasn’t the best description when it’s used as a gatekeeper-satisfier

(like how some people who come off as weird can get much better responses to applications and whatnot by running their writing through an LLM which generates output more likely to be recognized as in-group by the people who evaluate submissions)

But it’s still dangerous as a tool for the owners to extract control of real resources

https://mastodon.social/@ShadSterling/114509639472268342

@left_adjoint

“do this bullshit, and you get the credentials you need to have a life”

If an LLM is good at a task, chances are the task is bullshit

@left_adjoint why can't schools radicalize and have individual AI to train students. kids could exceed in 2 hours a week of personal attention and tailored education.
@left_adjoint mutually assured destruction?
@left_adjoint yes. it’s the new Cliff Notes