@rameshgupta @lena @jens @siderea @Bam @pauliehedron
Tell me you don't run your own mailserver without telling me you don't run your own mailserver... 🙄
*Setting up* an email server is not hard these days, it's just mildly complex. Jumping through all the DMARC/DKIM/SPF hoops is moderately difficult, but well documented. Neither of these are the problem.
Getting Gmail not to keep arbitrarily filing my inbound mails to their users in spam, with no explanation or recourse, despite me jumping through every one of their documented hoops, is *fucking impossible*. That's not a fear or a concern, it's a fact.
This is why I believe Threads is a threat to the Mastodon ecosystem. What is there to stop Meta from attempting a similar death-by-a-thousand-papercuts to get people to leave Mastodon for Threads?
(I'm not on Facebook or Threads. I accepted long ago that I wouldn't get to fully participate in my less-technical friends' and family's online lives because of it. But I'm not Meta's target demographic here - the Twitter refugees who came to Mastodon only after Twitter became an ad-laden Nazi cesspool are. And, by extension, any of their friends who *are* willing to make the access/surveillance&monetization tradeoff...)