This is HUGE.

"The National Labor Relations Board ruled Tuesday that employers can no longer demand laid-off employees avoid publicly disparaging the company as part of their severance agreements, nor can they stop affected employees from disclosing the terms of their exit packages. Doing so, the federal agency determined, would be a violation of the laid-off employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act."

https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy7a7x/companies-cant-ask-you-to-shut-up-to-receive-severance-nlrb-rules

Companies Can’t Ask You to Shut up to Receive Severance, NLRB Rules

The board reverses two previous decisions that held that such severance agreements were lawful. Limits on free speech have become increasingly common aspect of many severance agreements.

"With the exception of railroads and airlines, US business employers are subject to the NLRB’s authority.

While the labor board’s ruling this week could be appealed, the ruling is effective immediately. That means employers must review — and, if necessary, revise — their severance agreements to ensure they don’t include overly broad language that would restrict workers’ rights in the two ways the board ruling indicates.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/success/severance-agreements-rule-change-from-nlrb/index.html

This lawyer points out the limits, and thinks it’s unlikely to survive in the courts. Sigh

https://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/2023/02/nlrb-bans-non-disclosure-and.html

NLRB bans non-disparagement and confidentiality covenants in severance agreements. What now?

A blog for employers about workplace law. Written by the master of workplace Schadenfreude, Jon Hyman.

@unicorndeburgh Given the High Court's antipathy to anything that might favor people over companies, or successful regulation by government, that prediction does have entirely too firm ground to stand on.
@unicorndeburgh There’s nothing to stop others who see that to decide they’d rather not work with someone who does this. They don’t want to be the next target. That’s just common sense.
@unicorndeburgh @swizzlevixen I wonder if that applies retroactively
@unicorndeburgh @ernie boy do I wish I had this when [REDACTED]
@unicorndeburgh glad to see this good news. Thanks for sharing!
@unicorndeburgh @spikepoint When I got laid off, I had to sign some kind of NDA in order to get my severance. I just quietly signed; needed the money and COBRA too much.
@wx1g
This is the real reason why we can't get single payer health care...
@unicorndeburgh @spikepoint
@unicorndeburgh
Seems like angels were summoned on this occasion especially if you have been laid off by no fault of your own

@unicorndeburgh

Cool!

T. Rowe Price sucks!!!!

(Been holding that in since 2014).

@unicorndeburgh this needs to go on linkedin
@usul I posted it there, too.
@unicorndeburgh care to share the URL ?
@usul I just took the article link and shared it on LinkedIn. You can do the same. I'm hesitant to share my LinkedIn profile here (though it's trivial to find).

@unicorndeburgh

It's pretty wild that they could do that before.

@unicorndeburgh It’s pretty silly to let someone control your speech.
@heafnerj
Silly? If you need the severance pay to support your family, you do what you have to do.
@unicorndeburgh I bet this is in UK
@BroGle
This is a ruling in the United States.
@unicorndeburgh it’s great, but still it may be a double sided sword in the long run
@unicorndeburgh Great! Now it's national, not just law in singular states like California.

@unicorndeburgh I'm curious what employment law profs think about this.

As a non-expert, I can't help but think of my former boss who did this kind of thing ALL the time.

#LawProfs

@design_law @unicorndeburgh I'm also non-expert and curious whether the fact that these employees were part of a union limits this decision or whether it has broader reach.

@brianwc @design_law

Good questions!

@brianwc @design_law

"With the exception of railroads and airlines, US business employers are subject to the NLRB’s authority.

While the labor board’s ruling this week could be appealed, the ruling is effective immediately. That means employers must review — and, if necessary, revise — their severance agreements to ensure they don’t include overly broad language that would restrict workers’ rights in the two ways the board ruling indicates."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/success/severance-agreements-rule-change-from-nlrb/index.html

@unicorndeburgh OK now do forcing them to train their replacements

@unicorndeburgh

Just want to remind everyone that this is a direct result of Biden firing the trump appointed union busters at NLRB … on his first day in office.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/01/peter-robb-alice-stock-nlrb-fired.html

Biden Gave Trump’s Union Busters a Taste of Their Own Medicine

Peter Robb and Alice Stock experienced a fate that nonunionized Americans suffer every day.

Slate
@unicorndeburgh I'm glad this will be in effect for a few months before the Alito Court overturns it.
@unicorndeburgh any idea if it is retroactive?
@unicorndeburgh Ummmm... in a sane world, that should have been obvious from the beginning. The bonkers parts is that it even required a ruling.
@unicorndeburgh Hold on 2 your union hat. I predict this will get appealed 2 DC Circuit Court.
I have personal experience with the "disparagement" charge I was accused of & fired 4 "misconduct" as an organizer.
My union CWA 1701 fought 2 protect my right thru Section 8a of the NLRA. We won two NLRB decisions but the company filed an appeal with the DC Circuit court & we Lost the decision. My NLRB case was # 03-CA-024105 on NLRB.gov. This happened about 17-18 yrs ago.😒✊🏼👊🏼 #UnionYes
@unicorndeburgh I needed this article today
@unicorndeburgh @_L1vY_ Is this retroactive? I’ve had to sign multiple agreements like this.

@aburtch @unicorndeburgh @_L1vY_ ianal, but it was explained to me by a labor law smarty that such clauses are now unenforceable, whether signed today or in the misty past

Please confirm before taking action!

@unicorndeburgh the PE firm that bought my last company and sent all the quality assurance jobs overseas to save a buck can suck it!
@unicorndeburgh
Wow 🤨 , from an #European perspective, I'm a bit #dumbfounded that such a things needs to be settled while the US seemingly yells "free speech" all the time.
What am I not getting here? 🤔
#helpmeunderstand
@GeorgKrammer @unicorndeburgh the US has various constitutional rights that limit government power, but little that prevents individuals from "voluntarily" restricting themselves through contracts. Those scare quotes are there because this freedom ignores power imbalances; particularly in the case of capital.

@athas @unicorndeburgh

Thank you for providing the background! I was not aware of that.
Wow😮
So I can "voluntarily" waive consitutional rights in the US in favor or coporations? The wonders of the "self-regulating free market" at its peak 🤔
#weirdworld

@GeorgKrammer The first amendment to the US constitution protects speech from government restrictions. Very little protects individuals from corporations.

@unicorndeburgh So I guess the iconic #Bighead scene from #SiliconValley has become a thing of the past then?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiCJhcxW0WA&t=30s

Silicon Valley - Big Head Fired From Hooli

YouTube
Wish it was the case in Australia. I have a bunch of fun stories I can't tell without getting sued.
@unicorndeburgh In the UK it is common for an s111A agreement (where the employer and ex-employee agree a payment that avoids having to go to court - the theory is that both sides win because very little goes to lawyers) to include an NDA.

@unicorndeburgh I remember when I left a company after less-than-spectacular circumstances, a friend mentioned something I'd said about it while she was being harassed by the then-boss.

"She was told not to talk about her leaving," my former boss snarled.

My friend: "Well, she doesn't work here anymore, so she doesn't have to answer to you anymore, either."

About time that this decision came down. It's ridiculous to hold people hostage to places they no longer work.

@unicorndeburgh This is huge. I knew someone, a high level executive, who tried unsuccessfully to negotiate a mutual non-disparagement agreement separately from his severance package only to be told non-disparagement was a condition of receiving the severance they offered. My take away was this: negotiate the terms of separation at the same time you negotiate your employment contract.