Australia trade deal brings back Macron’s Mercosur nightmare

France’s trade minister tells POLITICO that the EU-Australia deal is “balanced” despite mounting opposition from farmers.

POLITICO

Protectionism in the US heading in an interesting direction as The US bans foreign made internet routers

Which is particularly interesting because there aren't any US made internet routers really, certainly nothing like the number required for keeping all Americans online.

Routers are mostly insecure due to company negligence with updates and bugs which has nothing to do with nationality of course. American companies are just as likely to fail to spot a buffer overflow or abandon customers when they discontinue a product.

American companies aren't even less likely to want to spy on you and steal all your data and then be forced to give it up to government if they ask.

Hard to see how this goes well for anyone. Except many the people certifying products that evade the ban.

#routers #law #protectionism

The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US

The FCC has added all foreign-made consumer routers to its Covered List, which effectively bans all future ones from import into the US.

The Verge
The word „Drumstick“ for meat should be forbidden, since it is a tool for hitting drums and mostly made from wood and very #veggie #EU #meat #politics #lobby #protectionism

Lobbying efforts are going insane with fear that #3DPrinting will replace big box hardware chains like #HomeDepot and #Lowe's. They're trying anything to stop the technology, including direct #Protectionism and bizarre arguments about national security. 

#TechnologyNews #GovernmentOverreach #PublicPolicy #Disruption

https://reason.com/2026/02/25/politicians-consider-soviet-style-controls-on-3d-printers

Politicians consider Soviet-style controls on 3D printers

U.S. politicians' attempts to ban or control 3D printed guns will be just as unsuccessful as Soviet attempts to restrict photocopiers.

Reason.com

"A large literature anticipated substantial long‑run costs of leaving the EU Single Market and Customs Union (HM Treasury 2016, IMF 2016, Van Reenen et al 2016). Early ex‑post work using macro data also pointed to a sizeable hit to UK GDP and trade (Born et al. 2019, Dhingra and Sampson 2022, Springford 2022, Haskel and Martin 2023, Freeman et al. 2025). VoxEU has been an important forum for this research and debate. Our contribution is to revisit the question now that almost a decade has passed since the referendum, bringing together macro and micro evidence in a single framework and comparing actual outcomes to the profession’s pre‑referendum forecasts.

In a new paper (Bloom et al. 2025), we combine micro data collected through the Decision Maker Panel (DMP), a survey of UK firms, with publicly available macro data to estimate the impact of Brexit. Our three main findings are:

- Brexit has had a large and persistent effect on the UK economy. By 2025, we estimate that UK GDP per capita was 6–8% lower than it would have been without Brexit. Investment was 12–18% lower, employment 3–4% lower, and productivity 3–4% lower.

- These losses emerged gradually. The impact was hard to see in 2017–18, but accumulated steadily over the subsequent decade as uncertainty persisted, trade barriers rose, and firms diverted resources away from productive activity.

- Economists were roughly right on the magnitude of the impact, but wrong on the timing. The consensus pre‑referendum forecast of a 4% long‑run GDP loss turned out to be close to the actual loss after five years, but too optimistic about the longer run."

https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/brexits-slow-burn-hit-uk-economy

#UK #Brexit #EU #Protectionism #Tariffs #TradeBarriers

Brexit’s slow‑burn hit to the UK economy

The UK is once again debating why its economy has grown slowly since the mid‑2010s. This column examines the impact of the decision to leave the European Union in 2016. Using almost a decade of data since the referendum, the authors combine simulations based on macro data with estimates derived from micro data. These estimates suggest that by 2025, Brexit had reduced UK GDP by 6% to 8%, with the impact accumulating gradually over time. Investment, employment, and productivity were all affected, reflecting a combination of elevated uncertainty, reduced demand, diverted management time, and increased misallocation of resources.

CEPR

**The Argentine Stockholm Syndrome**

Argentina suffers from a collective Stockholm Syndrome. The government and a few "industrialists" have held the market hostage for decades, forcing us to pay double for outdated tech. Yet, many people defend their captors, terrified that "jobs will be lost" if we stop subsidizing billionaire oligarchs. We are literally paying for the ropes they use to tie our hands.

#StockholmSyndrome #Argentina #EconomicCrisis #Protectionism #MentalChains

The mastermind behind this mess was General Alejandro Lanusse, a military dictator who signed Law 19.640 in 1972. The excuse was "geopolitics"—occupying the empty south to prevent a Chilean invasion. Fifty years later, the military is gone, but the law remains as a fossilized scam that forces 46 million people to subsidize a handful of "screwing-bolt" factories.

#History #Argentina #DictatorshipLegacy #Protectionism #TierraDelFuego

They say tech factories are in the freezing south because of the climate. It is a lie. Modern electronics need stable, air-conditioned clean rooms, not dry Antarctic cold that creates static electricity—a chip’s worst enemy. It is just a tax-haven excuse to force us to pay double for old technology.

#TechScam #Argentina #Economy #Protectionism #SiliconIsland

For 70 years, industrial growth has been held hostage by the Tierra del Fuego bureaucracy—a tax haven for 'fake' local assembly. Not one president has dared to scrap these protectionist regulations that force us to pay double for tech. Pure incompetence.

#Argentina #FreeTrade #TechPrices #Protectionism #Economy

"Governments worldwide face mounting pressure to simultaneously expand domestic clean energy industries and accelerate decarbonisation. Recent policies combine subsidies for clean technology with various protectionist measures, including domestic content requirements and tariffs on imports. Yet, evidence from the solar sector suggests tariffs undermine rather than support climate objectives.

Since 2012, the US has imposed substantial tariffs on solar panels imported from China. The EU erected related trade barriers on solar panels before lifting them in 2018. More recently, the US and EU have imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. These actions illustrate a policy tension: even as governments commit to rapid decarbonisation, protectionist measures raise the cost of deploying the clean technologies needed to achieve climate goals. Recent research helps illuminate this conflict and points toward better policy approaches."

https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/beyond-tariffs-better-approach-green-industrial-policy

#USA #China #GreenTransition #GreenIndustrialPolicy #Tariffs #TradeWar #Protectionism #BigOil #Decarbonization #FossilFuels

Beyond tariffs: A better approach to green industrial policy

Governments impose tariffs to protect domestic clean-energy industries and accelerate decarbonisation, but tariffs can increase the costs of deploying clean technologies. This column analyses the effect of tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese solar panel imports since 2012. In response, Chinese firms relocated production to countries not subject to the tariffs. The result was higher solar panel prices in the US and a decline in employment and wages in the US solar industry. The authors suggest that subsidies would be more effective in supporting domestic industries and climate action, correcting market failures rather than simply redistributing rents.

CEPR