Gruntwork and drafting monkeys

As an educator, I am biased towards seeing the potential of all my students. I like to think that I normally see people not for what they are but for what they could be. Unfortunately, seeing only potential can make us underestimate the developmental value of ordinary work..

As a society, I have recently come to think that we have slightly missed the point of work as of late. It’s not only about self-realization but rather on the usefulness of the individual to the collective. 

It reflects, normally, on the compensation we receive. And, speculatively, it can be the reason why many looking for a job don’t say “I’m not fulfilled” but “I feel without purpose”. Work serves higher social functions and ultimately allows full participation in the structure of society.

I understand that we normally speak about job displacement as part of the AI discussion, but I personally suspect the issue is much larger and may actually be a sign of an economy entering recession. I even wrote about it in What we have is a money problem – _BlnkTerminal. 

I suspect that, for investors, it is easier to accept that people are being laid off because of automation than to acknowledge that the economy is steadily compressing.

That being said, this piece is not about that, but rather about the value of work. Specifically, gruntwork. The one that makes me efficient enough to challenge AI.

I want to be clear that I am not advocating against individuals seeking fulfillment in their work, but rather that it is wrong to discard perfectly useful tasks as dehumanizing simply because they are not the most creative, or because we, as experts, have lost sight of what it took us to build our credentials.

When leadership brings in new talent, there is indeed a risk of overlooking the value and capabilities these individuals can contribute to an organization. 

But there is nothing riskier than solutions proposed without a clear understanding of the problems they are meant to solve. Unfortunately, that understanding is normally gained in production, not in the boardroom.

As a society, we might have to redefine—or at least remove some of the stigma surrounding—gruntwork. All types of work are useful, or they would not be paid for. And a true senior understands this, as in some instances these tasks provide a safety net for companies.

For example, as I was building my career, I spent countless hours checking mistakes in plans and applications. I also spent a great deal of time on projects with little glory attached to them (which it turns out is the vast majority). This type of work is so repetitive that the industry moniker for it is “drafting monkey.”

Had it not been for my “monkey work”, though, I would not have developed the capacity to spot on the fly mistakes that my students and senior quality assurance require. I got fed up, but became so good at it that it unknowingly established the foundation of my career.

As a now more senior architect, would I do grunt work, or even find it rewarding? Probably not. But the reason I can quote building regulations from the top of my head is the time I spent fixing the minor issues that my intellectual arrogance now dismisses.

It made me cautious, too, as my seniors were always kind enough to point out the many risks hidden behind my seemingly inconsequential choices. Maybe we should focus more on rewarding better the value people create today than on the unrealized potential we hope they may one day achieve.In the end, after a bit more reflection (and I know many will disagree with me here), we should remember the maxim: “work dignifies man”—not “creative work” or “extremely innovative work.” Simply work. Useful to someone else and contributing to the whole of society.

The Pocket AI Guide is out!

📙 Amazon US: https://a.co/d/gCHHDax
📗 In Europe Amazon Germany: https://amzn.eu/d/3cmlIqa
(Available in other stores Amazon stores too in Europe)

Check the free resources in this website!

#AIAndEmployment #apprenticeshipModel #architectureProfession #automationAndSkills #BIMProfessionals #careerDevelopment #expertiseAndAI #futureOfWork #gruntWork #institutionalKnowledge #juniorProfessionals #organizationalLearning #ProfessionalDevelopment #professionalTraining #workforceDevelopment

Basically, my thinking model of the Work-Feedback Loop is about one thing: Organizational Learning. If this is your area of interest, I look forward to your feedback!

https://no-bullshit-agile.com/wfl/

#OrganizationalLearning #Organization #Learning #Agile #WorkFeedbackLoop

Most organizations get faster and still don’t learn faster because production speed isn’t learning speed.

Today I’m publishing the Work–Feedback Loop (v1.0) - a diagnostic lens for organizational learning capability.

It asks one question: Can real-world effects change future work fast and safely?

Quick check: Which state best describes your system right now — Actionism, Frustration, Stagnation, or Learning?

https://no-bullshit-agile.com/wfl/

#OrganizationalLearning #SystemsThinking #Agile

#Agile

Work–Feedback Loop – Conceptual model for organizational learning ability

A conceptual model for analyzing organizational learning ability. Not about practices, but about structural feedback coupling between work and reality.

No Bullshit Agile
How can Organizational Learning Theory help local governments tackle recurring floods? Take a look at our new research article published by Kwame Asamoah & Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah. doi.org/10.1080/1753... #FloodGovernance #OrganizationalLearning #AdaptiveCapacity #UrbanResilience #UrbanGovernance

A 12-month roadmap is presented. Everyone nods. Later someone says quietly: “We both know the plan won’t hold, but our processes require it.”

This happens more often than we admit. The roadmap isn’t primarily a learning tool but often a budgeting tool.

Funding requires commitments, and commitments require structured plans. Once capital is allocated, deviation becomes friction.

A thread 🧵

#OrganizationalLearning #Strategy #SystemsThinking

(1/2)

Backlog order is not product strategy.

In many corporations, a new Product Owner starts by cleaning up the backlog. Stories are rewritten. Priorities are reshuffled. Transparency improves.

The decision architecture does not.

#OrganizationalLearning #ProductManagement #Flow

A Thread 🧵 (1/3)

🌟 Olena Bagatchenko on the Value of the LeSS Conference 🌟

_"When I decided to attend this conference, I expected to learn a lot of new things.

And I definitely did —
so many insights, so many useful ideas.

It’s been an incredibly valuable experience."_ — Olena Bagatchenko

Come for the learning. Stay for the inspiration.
📍 Amsterdam, 9–10 October
👉 Reserve your spot now: https://zurl.co/1uEzz

#LeSSConference #LeSSWorks #OrganizationalLearning #AgileAtScale #LeSSPractitioner

Check out the latest Leanpub Podcast Interview 🎙️ Feat. Max Guernsey, III, Co-Author of Ready: Why Most Software Projects Fail and How to Fix It

Watch here: https://youtu.be/k4lNcMzsehQ

#books #leanpublishing #SoftwareProjects #Agile #ProjectManagement #Leadership #SoftwareDevelopment #OrganizationalLearning #TeamSuccess #TechConsulting #LeanpubPodcast

Book Link: https://leanpub.com/ready

Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@leanpub

The Leanpub Podcast 🎙️ Feat. Max Guernsey, III, Co-Author of Ready: Why Most Software Projects Fail

YouTube

NEW! A Leanpub Podcast Interview 🎙️ Feat. Max Guernsey, III, Co-Author of Ready: Why Most Software Projects Fail and How to Fix It

Watch here: https://youtu.be/k4lNcMzsehQ

#books #leanpublishing #SoftwareProjects #Agile #ProjectManagement #Leadership #SoftwareDevelopment #OrganizationalLearning #TeamSuccess #TechConsulting #LeanpubPodcast

Book Link: https://leanpub.com/ready

Subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/@leanpub

The Leanpub Podcast 🎙️ Feat. Max Guernsey, III, Co-Author of Ready: Why Most Software Projects Fail

YouTube