Third and final post in my series about mental models during a polycrisis.

This ones about why some organisations manage to rethink their shared mental models, and others stay stuck with yesterday’s assumptions.

https://blog.dougbelshaw.com/mental-models-polycrisis-3/

#MentalModels #Polycrisis #systemsThinking #Sensemaking

Why some organisations learn to be less wrong (and others don't)

Many of our institutions resemble buildings designed for a different shoreline.

Open Thinkering
Workplaces are open systems: they exchange people, information, emotion, and meaning with the world outside their walls.
I wrote an essay about what happens when societal tension enters the workplace—and how leaders can respond with structure (project management), empathy (design thinking), and awareness of feedback loops (systems thinking).
https://open.substack.com/pub/carlosraulmuozjr/p/from-the-streets-to-the-office-navigating
#Leadership #SystemsThinking #WorkplaceCulture #ChangeManagement #PsychologicalSafety
From the Streets to the Office: Navigating Societal Tensions in the Workplace

How Leadership and Teams Adapt When Politics Can’t Be Left at the Door

ThinkSystem: Navigating Project & Business Innovation

@foolishowl

The Epstein connection network graph is a large subnet of the global oligarchy network.

@HeavenlyPossum

#systemsThinking #socialSystems

CODE-CREDO-RIGHTS model: successful constitutions balance structural integrity (Form), contextual values (Position) and robust freedoms (Action). USA (0.79), Switzerland (0.82). Failing states: under U-Score 0.618. More: https://osf.io/74xgr/files/osfstorage #UModel #SystemsThinking #Complexity #Science
OSF

Constitutions need more than just laws. A stable nation requires a balance of Code, Credo, and Rights. Neglecting any pillar leads to systemic instability, as proven by the U-Model's analysis of 15+ constitutions. #UModel #SystemsThinking #Science
U-Score insights: Theranos: U=cbrt(0.2*1*1)=0.58. Quibi: U=cbrt(1*0.3*1)=0.67. WeWork: U=cbrt(1*1*0.3)=0.67. Threshold: 0.618. U-Model predicts these failures. Explore the U-Model: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/74XGR #UModel #SystemsThinking #Science
OSF

A (Action): Execution flaws are fatal. WeWork: Uncontrolled expansion, unsustainable practices (A=0.3). Action without discipline destroys. Dynamics must align with strategy. Process determines survival. #UModel #SystemsThinking #Complexity
P (Position): Timing is everything. Quibi: Short-form video, wrong moment (P=0.3). Bad Position makes even good ideas irrelevant. Context matters: environment, market, resources. Right product, wrong time: failure. #UModel #SystemsThinking #Complexity
F (Form): Identity crisis kills. Theranos: revolutionary blood tests never materialized (F=0.2). Flawed Form dooms systems. Structural integrity is non-negotiable. A startup's core value must be solid and deliverable. #UModel #SystemsThinking #Complexity
Why do 90% of startups fail? U-Model reveals a triadic trap: Form, Position, and Action. Each pillar must exceed 0.618 for stability. Miss one, and the venture crumbles. Let's diagnose failures through the U-Model lens. #UModel #SystemsThinking #Science