What Is a Supply Chain Attack? Lessons from Recent Incidents

924 words, 5 minutes read time.

I’ve been in computer programming with a vested interest in Cybersecurity long enough to know that your most dangerous threats rarely come through the obvious channels. It’s not always a hacker pounding at your firewall or a phishing email landing in an inbox. Sometimes, the breach comes quietly through the vendors, service providers, and software updates you rely on every day. That’s the harsh reality of supply chain attacks. These incidents exploit trust, infiltrating organizations by targeting upstream partners or seemingly benign components. They’re not theoretical—they’re real, costly, and increasingly sophisticated. In this article, I’m going to break down what supply chain attacks are, examine lessons from high-profile incidents, and share actionable insights for SOC analysts, CISOs, and anyone responsible for protecting enterprise assets.

Understanding Supply Chain Attacks: How Trusted Vendors Can Be Threat Vectors

A supply chain attack occurs when a threat actor compromises an organization through a third party, whether that’s a software vendor, cloud provider, managed service provider, or even a hardware supplier. The key distinction from conventional attacks is that the adversary leverages trust relationships. Your defenses often treat trusted partners as safe zones, which makes these attacks particularly insidious. The infamous SolarWinds breach in 2020 is a perfect example. Hackers injected malicious code into an update of the Orion platform, and thousands of organizations unknowingly installed the compromised software. From the perspective of a SOC analyst, it’s a nightmare scenario: alerts may look normal, endpoints behave according to expectation, and yet an attacker has already bypassed perimeter defenses. Supply chain compromises come in many forms: software updates carrying hidden malware, tampered firmware or hardware, and cloud or SaaS services used as stepping stones for broader attacks. The lesson here is brutal but simple: every external dependency is a potential attack vector, and assuming trust without verification is a vulnerability in itself.

Lessons from Real-World Supply Chain Attacks

History has provided some of the most instructive lessons in this area, and the pain was often widespread. The NotPetya attack in 2017 masqueraded as a routine software update for a Ukrainian accounting package but quickly spread globally, leaving a trail of destruction across multiple sectors. It was not a random incident—it was a strategic strike exploiting the implicit trust organizations placed in a single provider. Then came Kaseya in 2021, where attackers leveraged a managed service provider to distribute ransomware to hundreds of businesses in a single stroke. The compromise of one MSP cascaded through client systems, illustrating that upstream vulnerabilities can multiply downstream consequences exponentially. Even smaller incidents, such as a compromised open-source library or a misconfigured cloud service, can serve as a launchpad for attackers. What these incidents have in common is efficiency, stealth, and scale. Attackers increasingly prefer the supply chain route because it requires fewer direct compromises while yielding enormous operational impact. For anyone working in a SOC, these cases underscore the need to monitor not just your environment but the upstream components that support it, as blind trust can be fatal.

Mitigating Supply Chain Risk: Visibility, Zero Trust, and Preparedness

Mitigating supply chain risk requires a proactive, multifaceted approach. The first step is visibility—knowing exactly what software, services, and hardware your organization depends on. You cannot defend what you cannot see. Mapping these dependencies allows you to understand which systems are critical and which could serve as entry points for attackers. Second, you need to enforce Zero Trust principles. Even trusted vendors should have segmented access and stringent authentication. Multi-factor authentication, network segmentation, and least-privilege policies reduce the potential blast radius if a compromise occurs. Threat hunting also becomes crucial, as anomalies from trusted sources are often the first signs of a breach. Beyond technical controls, preparation is equally important. Tabletop exercises, updated incident response plans, and comprehensive logging equip teams to react swiftly when compromise is detected. For CISOs, it also means communicating supply chain risk clearly to executives and boards. Stakeholders must understand that absolute prevention is impossible, and resilience—rapid detection, containment, and recovery—is the only realistic safeguard.

The Strategic Imperative: Assume Breach and Build Resilience

The reality of supply chain attacks is unavoidable: organizations are connected in complex webs, and attackers exploit these dependencies with increasing sophistication. The lessons are clear: maintain visibility over your entire ecosystem, enforce Zero Trust rigorously, hunt for subtle anomalies, and prepare incident response plans that include upstream components. These attacks are not hypothetical scenarios—they are the evolving face of cybersecurity threats, capable of causing widespread disruption. Supply chain security is not a checkbox or a one-time audit; it is a mindset that prioritizes vigilance, resilience, and strategic thinking. By assuming breach, questioning trust, and actively monitoring both internal and upstream environments, security teams can turn potential vulnerabilities into manageable risks. The stakes are high, but so are the rewards for those who approach supply chain security with discipline, foresight, and a relentless commitment to defense.

Call to Action

If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.

D. Bryan King

Sources

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.

#anomalyDetection #attackVector #breachDetection #breachResponse #CISO #cloudSecurity #cyberattackLessons #cybersecurity #cybersecurityGovernance #cybersecurityIncident #cybersecurityMindset #cybersecurityPreparedness #cybersecurityResilience #cybersecurityStrategy #EndpointSecurity #enterpriseRiskManagement #enterpriseSecurity #hardwareCompromise #hardwareSecurity #incidentResponse #incidentResponsePlan #ITRiskManagement #ITSecurityPosture #ITSecurityStrategy #Kaseya #maliciousUpdate #MFASecurity #MSPSecurity #networkSegmentation #NotPetya #organizationalSecurity #perimeterBypass #ransomware #riskAssessment #SaaSRisk #securityAudit #securityControls #SOCAnalyst #SOCBestPractices #SOCOperations #softwareSecurity #softwareSupplyChain #softwareUpdateThreat #SolarWinds #supplyChainAttack #supplyChainMitigation #supplyChainRisk #supplyChainSecurityFramework #supplyChainVulnerabilities #thirdPartyCompromise #threatHunting #threatLandscape #trustedVendorAttack #upstreamCompromise #upstreamMonitoring #vendorDependency #vendorRiskManagement #vendorSecurity #vendorTrust #zeroTrust

Vulnerability Assessment: A Strategic Approach to Strengthening Cybersecurity

Enhance your cybersecurity with a strategic Vulnerability Assessment approach that identifies risks, strengthens defenses, and protects your organization.

Check the blog - https://telegra.ph/Vulnerability-Assessment-A-Strategic-Approach-to-Strengthening-Cybersecurity-12-11

#VulnerabilityAssessment #Cybersecurity #CyberSecurityStrategy #RiskManagement #TechSafety #SecureYourBusiness #CybersecurityAwareness #TechProtection #DigitalSafety #ECSInfotech #ECS

Zero Trust Security Model Explained: Is It Right for Your Organization?

1,135 words, 6 minutes read time.

When I first walked into a SOC that proudly claimed it had “implemented Zero Trust,” I expected to see a modern, frictionless security environment. What I found instead was a network still anchored to perimeter defenses, VPNs, and a false sense of invincibility. That’s the brutal truth about Zero Trust: it isn’t a single product or an off-the-shelf solution. It’s a philosophy, a mindset, a commitment to questioning every assumption about trust in your organization. For those of us in the trenches—SOC analysts, incident responders, and CISOs alike—the question isn’t whether Zero Trust is a buzzword. The real question is whether your organization has the discipline, visibility, and operational maturity to adopt it effectively.

Zero Trust starts with a principle that sounds simple but is often the hardest to implement: never trust, always verify. Every access request, every data transaction, and every network connection is treated as untrusted until explicitly validated. Identity is the new perimeter, and every user, device, and service must prove its legitimacy continuously. This approach is grounded in lessons learned from incidents like the SolarWinds supply chain compromise, where attackers leveraged trusted internal credentials to breach multiple organizations, or the Colonial Pipeline attack, which exploited a single VPN credential. In a Zero Trust environment, those scenarios would have been mitigated by enforcing strict access policies, continuous monitoring, and segmented network architecture. Zero Trust is less about walls and more about a web of checks and validations that constantly challenge assumptions about trust.

Identity and Access Management: The First Line of Defense

Identity and access management (IAM) is where Zero Trust begins its work, and it’s arguably the most important pillar for any organization. Multi-factor authentication, adaptive access controls, and strict adherence to least-privilege principles aren’t optional—they’re foundational. I’ve spent countless nights in incident response chasing lateral movement across networks where MFA was inconsistently applied, watching attackers move as if the organization had handed them the keys. Beyond authentication, modern IAM frameworks incorporate behavioral analytics to detect anomalies in real time, flagging suspicious logins, unusual access patterns, or attempts to elevate privileges. In practice, this means treating every login attempt as a potential threat, continuously evaluating risk, and denying implicit trust even to high-ranking executives. Identity management in Zero Trust isn’t just about logging in securely; it’s about embedding vigilance into the culture of your organization.

Implementing IAM effectively goes beyond deploying technology—it requires integrating identity controls with real operational processes. Automated workflows, incident triggers, and granular policy enforcement are all part of the ecosystem. I’ve advised organizations that initially underestimated the complexity of this pillar, only to discover months later that a single misconfigured policy left sensitive systems exposed. Zero Trust forces organizations to reimagine how users and machines interact with critical assets. It’s not convenient, and it’s certainly not fast, but it’s the difference between containing a breach at the door or chasing it across the network like a shadowy game of cat and mouse.

Device Security: Closing the Endpoint Gap

The next pillar, device security, is where Zero Trust really earns its reputation as a relentless defender. In a world where employees connect from laptops, mobile devices, and IoT sensors, every endpoint is a potential vector for compromise. I’ve seen attackers exploit a single unmanaged device to pivot through an entire network, bypassing perimeter defenses entirely. Zero Trust counters this by continuously evaluating device posture, enforcing compliance checks, and integrating endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions into the access chain. A device that fails a health check is denied access, and its behavior is logged for forensic analysis.

Device security in a Zero Trust model isn’t just reactive—it’s proactive. Threat intelligence feeds, real-time monitoring, and automated responses allow organizations to identify compromised endpoints before they become a gateway for further exploitation. In my experience, organizations that ignore endpoint rigor often suffer from lateral movement and data exfiltration that could have been prevented. Zero Trust doesn’t assume that being inside the network makes a device safe; it enforces continuous verification and ensures that trust is earned and maintained at every stage. This approach dramatically reduces the likelihood of stealthy intrusions and gives security teams actionable intelligence to respond quickly.

Micro-Segmentation and Continuous Monitoring: Containing Threats Before They Spread

Finally, Zero Trust relies on micro-segmentation and continuous monitoring to limit the blast radius of any potential compromise. Networks can no longer be treated as monolithic entities where attackers move laterally with ease. By segmenting traffic into isolated zones and applying strict access policies between them, organizations create friction that slows or stops attackers in their tracks. I’ve seen environments where a single compromised credential could have spread malware across the network, but segmentation contained the incident to a single zone, giving the SOC time to respond without a full-scale outage.

Continuous monitoring complements segmentation by providing visibility into every action and transaction. Behavioral analytics, SIEM integration, and proactive threat hunting are essential for detecting anomalies that might indicate a breach. In practice, this means SOC teams aren’t just reacting to alerts—they’re anticipating threats, understanding patterns, and applying context-driven controls. Micro-segmentation and monitoring together transform Zero Trust from a static set of rules into a living, adaptive security posture. Organizations that master this pillar not only protect themselves from known threats but gain resilience against unknown attacks, effectively turning uncertainty into an operational advantage.

Conclusion: Zero Trust as a Philosophy, Not a Product

Zero Trust is not a checkbox, a software package, or a single deployment. It is a security philosophy that forces organizations to challenge assumptions, scrutinize trust, and adopt a mindset of continuous verification. Identity, devices, and network behavior form the pillars of this approach, each demanding diligence, integration, and cultural buy-in. For organizations willing to embrace these principles, the rewards are tangible: reduced attack surface, limited lateral movement, and a proactive, anticipatory security posture. For those unwilling or unprepared to change, claiming “Zero Trust” is little more than window dressing, a label that offers the illusion of safety while leaving vulnerabilities unchecked. The choice is stark: treat trust as a vulnerability and defend accordingly, or risk becoming the next cautionary tale in an increasingly hostile digital landscape.

Call to Action

If this breakdown helped you think a little clearer about the threats out there, don’t just click away. Subscribe for more no-nonsense security insights, drop a comment with your thoughts or questions, or reach out if there’s a topic you want me to tackle next. Stay sharp out there.

D. Bryan King

Sources

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.

#accessManagement #adaptiveSecurity #attackSurfaceReduction #behavioralAnalytics #breachPrevention #byodSecurity #ciso #cloudSecurity #cloudFirstSecurity #colonialPipeline #complianceEnforcement #continuousMonitoring #cyberResilience #cybersecurityAwareness #cybersecurityCulture #cybersecurityReadiness #cybersecurityStrategy #deviceSecurity #digitalDefense #edr #endpointSecurity #enterpriseSecurity #iam #identityVerification #incidentResponse #internalThreats #iotSecurity #lateralMovement #leastPrivilege #mfa #microSegmentation #mitreAttck #multiFactorAuthentication #networkSecurity #networkSegmentation #networkVisibility #nistSp800207 #perimeterSecurity #privilegedAccessManagement #proactiveMonitoring #proactiveSecurity #ransomwarePrevention #riskManagement #secureAccess #securityAutomation #securityBestPractices2 #securityFramework #securityMindset #securityOperations #securityPhilosophy #siem #socAnalyst #solarwindsBreach #threatDetection #threatHunting #threatIntelligence #zeroTrust #zeroTrustArchitecture #zeroTrustImplementation #zeroTrustModel #zeroTrustSecurity

Red and blue teams breaking down their silos and working in real time—imagine a cybersecurity defense that evolves with every simulated threat. Curious how continuous purple teaming is rewriting the playbook?

https://thedefendopsdiaries.com/continuous-purple-teaming-a-collaborative-approach-to-modern-cyber-defense/

#purpleteaming
#cyberdefense
#breachandattacksimulation
#mitreattack
#redteam
#blueteam
#securityautomation
#continuousvalidation
#cybersecuritystrategy

Continuous Purple Teaming: A Collaborative Approach to Modern Cyber Defense

Explore continuous purple teaming—a collaborative, automated approach that unites red and blue teams for agile, real-time cyber defense and improvement.

The DefendOps Diaries
The CISO role is expanding beyond just technical security. This CSO study confirms what many of us are feeling: we're now expected to manage AI risk, simplify complex tech stacks, and report to the board far more often. That 95% board engagement figure is a huge jump. It's not just about defense anymore, it's about strategy and difficult budget realities.
TL;DR
🔑 Priorities: Protecting data (48%) and securing the cloud (45%) are still at the top, but "simplifying IT" (39%) is right behind. Consolidation is a real need.
🤖 The AI dilemma: Everyone's looking at AI tools for threat detection, but they're just as worried about AI-enabled attacks like ransomware and vulnerability hunting.
💰 Budgets vs. Needs: Most budgets are flat (55%), so the pressure is on to "do more with what we have." This explains the push for platform consolidation.
📈 Board Visibility: 95% of CISOs now engage with their board, and 70% of boards have someone with direct cyber oversight. A massive shift in accountability.
https://www.csoonline.com/article/4074969/cisos-security-priorities-reveal-an-augmented-cyber-agenda.html
#CISO #CybersecurityStrategy #AI #RiskManagement #security #privacy #cloud #infosec
CISOs’ security priorities reveal an augmented cyber agenda

Tasked with increasing responsibilities and oversight, CISOs are seeking ways to expand cyber capabilities with AI, while piloting new tools, enlisting more partners, and finding ways to stretch their budgets further, according to CSO’s Security Priorities Study.

CSO Online

Japan’s largest brewer just faced a cyberattack that froze production and disrupted its entire supply chain. How did one breach trigger a $50M cybersecurity pivot? Read on for the inside story!

https://thedefendopsdiaries.com/cyberattack-on-asahi-group-holdings-operational-financial-and-strategic-impacts/

#cyberattack
#asahigroup
#supplychaindisruption
#cybersecuritystrategy
#businessresilience

Cyberattack on Asahi Group Holdings: Operational, Financial, and Strategic Impacts

Explore how a cyberattack on Asahi Group disrupted operations, supply chains, and finances, prompting major cybersecurity investments and strategy shifts.

The DefendOps Diaries

The Hidden Dangers of Cybercrime-as-a-Service: Protect Yourself Now!

1,404 words, 7 minutes read time.

In today’s digital age, the internet offers convenience and connectivity like never before. However, with this digital transformation comes an alarming rise in cybercrime, particularly the evolving phenomenon of Cybercrime-as-a-Service (CaaS). Just as legitimate businesses have embraced subscription-based models, so too have cybercriminals. They now offer sophisticated tools and services that allow virtually anyone—regardless of technical expertise—to commit serious crimes online. Whether you’re an individual or a business, understanding the dangers of CaaS is essential for your digital safety. This document will explore what CaaS is, why it’s growing at such an alarming rate, and most importantly, how you can protect yourself against these threats.

Understanding Cybercrime-as-a-Service (CaaS)

At its core, Cybercrime-as-a-Service (CaaS) is exactly what it sounds like: a marketplace where cybercriminals sell or rent tools, malware, and expertise to other criminals, enabling them to launch cyberattacks. In many cases, these services are remarkably easy to access. You don’t need to be a hacker or have any advanced knowledge of cybercrime to take advantage of CaaS—just a willingness to pay for the tools or services offered.

Cybercrime-as-a-Service has become an extremely lucrative industry because it allows criminals to specialize in one area of cybercrime, while outsourcing other aspects to others. For example, one group might specialize in developing malicious software like ransomware, while another group might focus on distributing it to a larger audience. Some services even offer “affiliates”—individuals who can promote malware to a larger user base in exchange for a cut of the profits, creating an ecosystem that thrives on the exploitation of others.

In many ways, CaaS mirrors legitimate business models. Subscriptions can range from paying for a one-time malware tool, to long-term rentals, or even access to a fully managed attack service. And just like with any other business, CaaS providers offer customer support to help “clients” successfully launch their cyberattacks.

According to Field Effect, “The rise of Cybercrime-as-a-Service has made it easier for virtually anyone to engage in cybercrime, even if they lack the skills traditionally needed to carry out such attacks.” This has not only increased the frequency of cyberattacks but also democratized access to cybercrime, allowing individuals from all walks of life to participate.

The Escalating Threat Landscape

The expansion of Cybercrime-as-a-Service has contributed to a dramatic increase in cyberattacks around the world. In fact, cybersecurity firm Varonis reports that the average cost of a data breach in 2024 was $4.88 million. These breaches can occur at any scale, from small businesses to massive multinational corporations, and have severe financial consequences.

Additionally, the increasing sophistication of CaaS has led to more targeted and destructive attacks. Ransomware attacks, for example, which are often enabled by CaaS, have evolved from simple, disruptive events into highly organized, devastating campaigns. One notorious example is the 2020 attack on the healthcare sector, which saw multiple hospitals and health providers held hostage by ransomware groups. This attack exemplified how cybercrime-as-a-service can be used to disrupt essential services, putting lives at risk.

The rise of CaaS has also resulted in an alarming increase in attacks on critical infrastructure. According to Thales Group, “Cybercrime-as-a-Service is being used to target everything from energy grids to financial institutions, making it a real concern for national security.”

The increased availability of these cybercrime tools has lowered the entry barrier for aspiring criminals, resulting in a broader range of cyberattacks. Today, these attacks are not limited to large organizations. In fact, small and medium-sized businesses are often seen as low-hanging fruit by cybercriminals using CaaS tools.

Real-World Impacts of Cybercrime-as-a-Service

As mentioned earlier, the financial impact of cyberattacks facilitated by CaaS is staggering. The Cybersecurity Ventures report suggests that global cybercrime costs will reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025. These costs include direct financial losses from theft and fraud, as well as the broader economic impact of disrupted services, data breaches, and reputation damage. Organizations across sectors are feeling the strain of increased cybercrime activities, and they are struggling to keep up with evolving threats.

The healthcare industry, in particular, has been a primary target. According to a report by NordLayer, “The healthcare sector has witnessed a significant uptick in cyberattacks, primarily driven by the accessibility of CaaS tools.” Ransomware attacks targeting health providers not only result in huge financial losses but can also cause life-threatening delays in treatment for patients.

But it’s not just large organizations that are impacted. Individuals are equally at risk. Phishing attacks, identity theft, and data breaches are just a few of the ways cybercriminals take advantage of unsuspecting users. With the help of CaaS, cybercriminals can easily harvest sensitive information from individuals, sell it on the dark web, or use it for further criminal activities.

For instance, tools that allow hackers to impersonate legitimate institutions or create fake login pages are commonly offered as services. These tools make it difficult for even the most cautious individuals to discern what is real from what is fake. The result is an increasing number of people falling victim to online fraud, with often devastating consequences.

How to Protect Yourself from Cybercrime-as-a-Service

Understanding the threats posed by Cybercrime-as-a-Service is only half the battle. Protecting yourself from these dangers requires vigilance, awareness, and the implementation of robust cybersecurity measures.

One of the most basic yet effective steps you can take is ensuring that your online passwords are strong and unique. The use of multi-factor authentication (MFA) is another critical layer of defense, which makes it significantly harder for cybercriminals to gain unauthorized access to your accounts, even if they have obtained your password.

Additionally, regular software updates are essential. Keeping your operating system and applications up to date ensures that security vulnerabilities are patched, making it much more difficult for malware to infiltrate your system. According to CISA, “Failure to regularly update software creates a prime opportunity for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities.”

In terms of specific measures, it’s vital to become aware of the various forms of social engineering and phishing attacks commonly used by cybercriminals. Many individuals are lured into clicking on malicious links or downloading harmful attachments through cleverly disguised emails or social media messages. Learning to spot these threats can save you from becoming another victim of CaaS-enabled attacks.

Staying informed is another key aspect of defense. Cybercrime is an ever-evolving threat, and so is the CaaS landscape. Keeping up to date with emerging threats will help you stay ahead of cybercriminals. Resources like Kaspersky and KnowBe4 offer regular updates on the latest cybersecurity trends and provide valuable insights on how to protect your personal and professional data.

Conclusion

Cybercrime-as-a-Service is a rapidly growing threat that has made cybercrime more accessible than ever before. From ransomware to data breaches, the impact of CaaS on individuals, businesses, and even entire industries is far-reaching and increasingly dangerous. However, by understanding these threats and taking proactive steps to protect yourself—such as using strong passwords, enabling multi-factor authentication, and staying informed about emerging cybersecurity risks—you can safeguard your personal and business data from malicious actors.

In conclusion, while Cybercrime-as-a-Service presents significant challenges, the good news is that we can fight back. With the right knowledge and tools, everyone has the power to reduce the risk of falling victim to cybercriminals. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and most importantly, take action today to protect your digital life.

Join the conversation! What are your thoughts on the growing threat of CaaS? Share your experiences or tips for staying safe online by leaving a comment below. And don’t forget to subscribe to our newsletter for more cybersecurity insights and tips!

D. Bryan King

Sources

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author. The information provided is based on personal research, experience, and understanding of the subject matter at the time of writing. Readers should consult relevant experts or authorities for specific guidance related to their unique situations.

Related Posts

#AIAndCybersecurity #attackPrevention #CaaS #CaaSExplained #CaaSMarket #CaaSTools #cyberThreats #cyberattackPrevention #cybercrime #cybercrimeAsAService #cybercrimePrevention #cybercrimePreventionTips #cybercrimeResources #cybercrimeStatistics #cybercrimeTools #cybersecurityAwareness #cybersecurityBestPractices #cybersecurityForBusinesses #cybersecurityForIndividuals #cybersecurityNews #cybersecuritySolutions #cybersecurityStrategy #cybersecurityThreats #cybersecurityThreats2024 #cybersecurityTrends #DarkWeb #dataBreachStatistics #dataBreaches #dataProtection #digitalProtection #digitalSecurity #hackerTools #identityTheft #internetPrivacy #internetSafety #maliciousSoftware #malwareAsAService #multiFactorAuthentication #onlineFraud #onlineFraudPrevention #onlineSecurityThreats #onlineSecurityTips #personalCybersecurity #phishingAttacks #phishingPrevention #protectYourAccounts #protectYourBusinessOnline #protectYourData #protectYourselfOnline #ransomware #ransomwareAttacks #risingCybercrime #secureBrowsing #secureYourDevices

🍲 Daemon Soup: The Cybersecurity Tiers of Small Businesses

The soup is hot, the ingredients are boiling—only those with the right recipe can avoid the inevitable burn. In the quiet corners of the digital landscape, small businesses sit unprotected, unaware…

Tom's IT Cafe