🇬🇧 What Liberalism Requires: The Very Victorian Marriage of J. S. Mill and Harriet Hardy Taylor

"There was much unhappiness in this threesome. Doubt, anger, loneliness, and jealousy plagued each of them at one point or another. They pushed the limits of marriage as an institution in a moment when the difficulty of obtaining a divorce and coverture invited it."

Tusan, M.E. (2026) ‘What Liberalism Requires: The Very Victorian Marriage of J. S. Mill and Harriet Hardy Taylor’, Journal of British Studies, 65, p. e10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2025.10186.

#OpenAccess #OA #History #Histodons #UK #UnitedKingdom #Britain #Marriage #Liberalism #Victorian

What Liberalism Requires: The Very Victorian Marriage of J. S. Mill and Harriet Hardy Taylor | Journal of British Studies | Cambridge Core

What Liberalism Requires: The Very Victorian Marriage of J. S. Mill and Harriet Hardy Taylor - Volume 65

Cambridge Core

Canadian Politics Debate Statement of the Day

— The Liberal Party of Canada stopped being a chiefly progressive party after Pierre Trudeau’s ministry —

Preface your reply with “FOR:” or “AGAINST:”

Please feel free to post replies/statements that argue for or against the statement without addressing me, or any other person in the replies.

Include one or two justifications for your argument.
#canpoli #cdnpoli #canada #liberalism #neoliberalism #conservatism #cpc #lpc #ndp #politicaldebate

It seems like to me what all the major reactionary illiberal movements of the 21st century share in common. Whether it's Dugin's 4th political theory or the neoreactionaries within the US. All share in common the idea that the entirety of the enlightenment is a failure and the only alternative is to return to what preceded it.

It seems like to me they have essentially taken the liberal end of History that all alternatives have been tried and failed one step further. By concluding that liberalism is also a failure and the only alternative is to return to what came before liberalism. To tradition.

Honestly I genuinely think the liberal end of History that was declared at the end of the Cold war was one of the worst messages that could have been delivered on the global scale. Since it was a fundamentally conservative message that killed off any radical imagination. Any imagination of achieving a post scarcity future beyond capitalism.

What we need to do is revive the future. To show the possibility that we can achieve a post scarcity civilization beyond capitalism. If liberalism represents the present and reactionary illiberalism represents the past we must represent the future.

#liberalism #illiberalism #postscarcity #futurism #reactionaries

Illinois Governor Pritzker's Demand Letter to Trump

https://sh.itjust.works/post/55743614

Global Shift: Liberalism's Core Ideas Reimagined in Political Discourse

Liberal political ideas are changing. People are talking about them in new ways to solve today's problems. See how.

#Liberalism, #Politics, #SocialChange, #Democracy, #NewIdeas

https://newsletter.tf/liberal-ideas-changing-politics/

Liberal Ideas Changing in How People Talk About Them

Liberal political ideas are changing. People are talking about them in new ways to solve today's problems. See how.

The main ideas of liberalism are being looked at again. Some think the problem is how we use these ideas, not the ideas themselves. Others focus on how groups tried to change liberalism for politics and the economy.

#Liberalism, #Politics, #SocialChange, #Democracy, #NewIdeas

https://newsletter.tf/liberal-ideas-changing-politics/

Liberal Ideas Changing in How People Talk About Them

Liberal political ideas are changing. People are talking about them in new ways to solve today's problems. See how.

Europeans understand "liberalism" better than do Americans. It's the one word in American English whose misuse vexes me more than any other political lexeme. Like the Europeans, I view the "liber" part as meaning "free to work and live one's life without government interference, except to defend those freedoms". All the public-good "liberals" would do well to start calling themselves what they are: progressives.

#liberalism #classicalLiberalism #modernLiberalism #progressivism #socialLiberalism

It wasn't that long ago that women didn't have these rights.

It was 1974 when women were first legally allowed to get a credit card in their own name. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act was passed in 1974 and it allowed women to get credit, buy a car, and buy a house without a male co-signer.

#EqualRights #credit #liberalism

The truth is in the 21st century there's only two major ideologies that exist. That being liberalism and reactionary illiberalism. The battle between the eternal present and the revolt against modernity. With Russia, the PRC and the neoreactionary faction of the Republican party within the US representing reactionary illiberalism. While the European Union and the Democratic party of the US representing liberalism.

That both online tankies and fascists are both slices of reactionary illiberalism. Since they are both funded by Russia and repeat the same Russian propaganda. The problem with this is that liberalism cannot be the only opposition to reactionary illiberalism. Because liberalism is not purely progressive and because of that it's cracks and flaws make it easy for reactionary illiberals to point to and turn people away from it.

What is needed to defeat the rising tide of reactionary illiberalism is a revolutionary progressivism. Something that is purely progressive. The problem with this is that currently there is no ideology that's purely progressive. The closest thing there is anarchism. Since anarchism's opposition to hierarchy makes it immune to social and systematic conservatism.

But it's one blind spot is on forms of oppression outside of hierarchy such as natural constraints. Which is where you get conservative forms of anarchism like primitivism. I think what we need is an ideology that goes beyond just opposing hierarchy but all constraints including natural ones. We need a radical left transhumanism that opposes all constraints including natural ones. To fight for the freedom of the individual to do and be anything. Including changing and modifying their form to their true selves.

#liberalism #illiberalism #reactionary #neoreaction #anarchism #fascism #tankies #Russia #morphologicalfreedom #Transhumanism

#CfA / #CfP: Utopias of #Work

Are you working on how #labor is related to the good life? On #Utopia and labor in #liberalism, #feminism or #socialism? How philosophers and political economists from Plato to Gandhi saw the rational or democratic organization of firms, #unions, and labor markets as means of advancing #justice, #freedom, and virtue at work?

Then submit your abstract for the 2026 "Utopias of Work" #conference in #Groningen. https://philevents.org/event/show/145617

#philosophy #politicaltheory

Utopias of Work: Historical Perspectives

Recent changes in the world of work – changes such as growing precarity in people’s access to the goods of work, the rise of platform work, the resurgent popularity of the ideal of productive self-sufficiency, and the unequal impact of automation and AI – have renewed interest in how work might be valued, compensated, and organized differently. The moral issues raised by these changes are not new, however, and we would benefit from revisiting the long history of thinking about ideals of work and its place in the good life. This conference turns to the history of philosophy and political economy for utopian and radical perspectives on work. We will explore how philosophers and political economists from Plato to Gandhi saw the rational or democratic organization of firms, unions, and labor markets as means of advancing justice, freedom, and virtue at work. In particular, we are interested in insights from these figures that might help to address today’s injustices surrounding work. The conference will conclude with a panel on the overall relevance of returning to utopian and revolutionary thinkers from our past. What (if anything) can we learn from them for the 21st century?  Submission Guidelines Each talk will be allotted a total of 40 minutes (approx. 25 minute presentation, 15 minute Q&A) Please send abstracts of no more than 300 words to t.c.re@rug.nl by April 15, 2026. We will respond with decisions by May 20th, 2026.  Keynote Speakers:  Michelle C. Smith(English, Clemson) David Leopold(Political Theory, Oxford) Laurence Davis(Government and Politics, University College Cork) The conference will focus on three major themes:  Worker rights and worker control  Critiques of domestic labor and domestic servitude  The duty to work from a utopian perspective  We welcome submissions on any utopian or radical historical figure or movement that addresses one or more of these themes. That could include: Labor, the good life, and the just society in ancient philosophy, for example: the division of labor in Plato’s Republic; Aristotle on work, politics, and leisure; Aristophanes’ Assemblywomen  Utopian socialism in the 19th century, including Babeuf, Saint Simon, Owen, Fourier, etc.  Feminist proposals for rethinking domestic labor, or the place of social reproduction in the rational society more generally, such as in Kollontai and Tristan  Russian radicals and utopians, such as: Nikolay Chernyshevsky, Peter Kropotkin, Alexander Bogdanov  Labor utopias in literature, for instance those of Le Guin and Callenbach Labor utopias in Anarchist thought  Marx’s vision of unalienated labor and communism  We will also accept a limited number of proposals on the final, meta-theoretical panel topic: ought we revisit these utopian and revolutionary proposals from history for thinking about labor justice today, and what can we learn from them. This event is part of the Ammodo project "The political philosophy of work - expanding our vision" and is organized by Lisa M. Herzog (l.m.herzog@rug.nl) and Tyler C. Re (t.c.re@rug.nl) at the University of Groningen, Philosophy Faculty. For more information about the project, please visit: https://www.rug.nl/staff/l.m.herzog/project-description.pdf