chatgpt take:

I understand that having a sandboxed version of Chrome for ChromeOS would be beneficial for maintaining data segregation and avoiding the tight integration with Google services and Android apps. Here's a more polished version of your reasoning:

Fictional Observer: Why should Google officially support a sandboxed version of the Chrome browser on top of ChromeOS, in addition to the regular version?

Me: For me, it's important because on my userB setup, I want to log in to my userA Chrome profile. I want to do this without using the default ChromeOS Chrome browser because I don't want my userA data to mix with the ChromeOS environment, which is tightly integrated with Google services and potentially with Android apps like Google Photos. Having the Linux version of Chrome on ChromeOS would allow me to keep my data separate and more secure. The sandboxing policy for the Linux version provides better isolation from the OS than Lacros.

Fictional Observer: What do you mean by "policy"?

Me: By "policy," I mean the way the Linux version of Chrome is sandboxed and isolated from the OS. This separation ensures that the browser operates independently, without unnecessary data integration with the underlying ChromeOS and its associated Google services.

Fictional Observer: Why do you care about this separation?

Me: As I mentioned, I care because it allows me to maintain clear boundaries between my user profiles and their associated data. This way, I can manage my accounts more effectively and avoid unintended data sharing or integration, enhancing both privacy and organization.

#chromebook
#windows11
#comeongoogle
#google
#lacros
#linux
#chromebooklinux
#ChromeOS
#Privacy
#DataSecurity
#Tech
#GoogleServices
#ChromeBrowser
#TechPolicy