The Petitio Principii Fallacy in the Kaldor-Hicks Principle, Law & Economics, and Cost-Benefit Analysis:

A prime example of intellectual conformity (a.k.a. cowardice) in conventional Economics

PolyMathy Musings / David Ellerman

@jlou

Because your decision to include this rule came from the consequences of not including it (the paradox arising) it could be said that it is a rule-utilitarian rule.

This is a problem because the paper talked about how carving out exceptions still leads to the paradox in the section titled "Attempts to include undecidable cases in the theory to avoid them"

#Ethics #Consequentialism

@jlou Well yes but is seems arbitrary, couldn't you say that you're making that decision based on the consequences of not doing so, making it more of a rule-utilitarian position.

#Consequentialism #Utilitarianism #Ethics

@jlou I agree with the point that consequentialism is a knowledge based framework and that there are necessarily limits to that knowledge such as explicit predictive knowledge on the workings of other minds that could lead to concrete Trickster Element paradoxes.

I was also reminded of Godels Incompleteness Theorum and of course the existence of that doesn't make all math pointless

I have a feeling that considering this from a panpsychist angle will change it somewhat but I still have more to think about

#Ethics #Panpsychism #Consequentialism #Math

@wouldinotcallmyselfahumanbeing Preference utilitarianism also prevents interpersonal comparisons necessary to even notice that inequality is worth solving. The recognition of freedom as a fundamental moral value allows interpersonal comparisons between the rich and the poor, which justify wealth and income redistribution.

Thanks for the compliment. I appreciate your pushing back, and have also enjoyed the conversation.

@sz_duras

#philosophy #utilitarianism #consequentialism

RE: https://mastodon.social/@jlou/115970177564955152

@ArthurI what do you think of this resolution I came up with to the consequentialist judgement paradox you came up with?

#philosophy #ethics #Consequentialism #utilitarian #utilitarianism #consequentialist #deontology #deontological

A moral philosophy paper recently written by me, presenting a new liar paradox-like argument about contradictions within consequentialism:

https://philpapers.org/rec/IONCJP

#philosophy #ethic #consequentialism #deontology #metaethics #morality #paradox #research

Virtue Ethics is Bad Political Ideology

So, I need to flesh this idea out a bit more. but I wanted to get it out there, because I think this concept is kind of central to developing a robust political framework.

If I could name one big factor responsible for political failure, it would be the implementation of virtue ethics as political policy. Politics needs to be concerned with practicality, and regardless of
what principles a given set of virtue ethics contains, it is going to be utterly impractical to implement, both due to the existence of competing ideologies and human inconsistency. This is not even getting into situations where different values in a given system may conflict with each other. Politics has to be concerned with consequences--too much focus on virtue (for just about any given value of the term) will be the downfall of any political system.

Though I must note that I think the most well known form of consequentialism, utilitarianism, is also fundamentally flawed.

β€œUtilitarianism asks: greatest happiness for the greatest number. Does the majority always know what’s best?”

#Utilitarianism #Ethics #Consequentialism

CAN PHILOSOPHY SAVE HUMANITY IF AI->AGI? While not one mention of "AI" in this paper, there are certain implications that may be worth an β˜• of contemplation. #philosophy #ai #ethics #agi #law #order #judgement #systems #consequentialism #metaethics #errtling www.researchgate.net/publication/...

(PDF) Consequentialist Judgmen...