🧵
> ... Whether we are concerned with commodity bundles consumed by individuals or weights signifying the relative importance of different individual's opinions, more than just the bundles and weights matter. The process by which bundles are selected and the process by which weights are chosen matter in societies of conscious agents. Who chooses under what circumstances matters as well as what gets chosen. It is because we are conscious agents that one cannot separate ends from means.
https://znetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/zbooks/htdocs/books/5/5.htm
#AlbertAndHahnel
#WelfareEconomics
Chapter 5 - A new welfare paradigm (A Quiet Revolution In Welfare Economics)

A new welfare paradigm that emphasizes human development, human sociality, and the structuring of individual choice by economic institutions.

The Petitio Principii Fallacy in the Kaldor-Hicks Principle, Law & Economics, and Cost-Benefit Analysis:

A prime example of intellectual conformity (a.k.a. cowardice) in conventional Economics

PolyMathy Musings / David Ellerman

After doing very sophisticated* web searching, it seems that it is not uncommon typo, and I could not find a definition.

So, there seems to be an opening for introducing a new term. Maybe outside #Statistics, shall we talk about a #Likeligood Function in #WelfareEconomics?
Or does it describe a new equilibrium in #GameTheory, the one that is likely good?

#Likelihood

* 😂 😂 😅

My half-baked deep thought of the weekend:

Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem should be renamed Arrow's Context-Sensitivity Theorem, and re-interpreted as saying a social choice function that neglects context leads to dictators.

I say this because the axiom of independence from irrelevant alternatives--one of the assumptions behind the theorem--states that a social choice function should be such that the relationship between A and B is not changed once a new alternative C is introduced. Unpacked, this means the choice function should be insensitive to any context C might bring with it.

Arrow's theorem essentially says that a social choice function satisfying this and a couple other axioms leads to dictators (meaning, one individual's preferences dictate the social choice function's preferences, overruling everyone else involved in the choice who might disagree). Hence the re-interpretation: neglecting context in social choice leads to dictators.

#economics #SocialWelfare #SocialChoice #WelfareEconomics #DecisionTheory #ArrowsTheorem
Marc Fleurbaey critiques GDP and profit metrics, advocating for welfare economics and stakeholder value to prioritize human and planetary well-being in a sustainable future #GDP #capitalism #forprofit #economics #environment #welfareeconomics https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/solution_spaces/blog/a-path-beyond-gdp-and-shareholder-value/?utm_source=Global
A Path Beyond GDP and Shareholder Value - Global Solutions Initiative | Global Solutions Summit

Marc Fleurbaey critiques GDP and profit metrics, advocating for welfare economics and stakeholder value to prioritize human and planetary well-being in a sustainable future.

Global Solutions Initiative | Global Solutions Summit

On a fallacy in the Kaldor-Hicks efficiency-equity analysis

"This paper shows that implicit assumptions about the numeraire good in the #KaldorHicks efficiency-equity analysis involve a “same-yardstick” fallacy (a fallacy pointed out by #PaulSamuelson in another context). These results have negative implications for cost-benefit analysis, the wealth-maximization (e.g., “Chicago”) approach to law and #economics, and other parts of applied #WelfareEconomics"

https://www.ellerman.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Kaldor-Hicks-FallacyReprint.pdf

#econ

Business Stuff doesn't make any sense till I remember the principle (maxim? another vile maxim?) of the "Invisible Foot" explained by E.K. Hunt.
> .. The "invisible foot" ensures us that in a free-market ... economy each person pursuing only his own good will automatically, and most efficiently, do his part in maximizing the general public misery.
- https://mstdn.jp/@bsmall2/108195742682747173
- https://znetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/zbooks/www/books/3/3.htm#3.2.1
#EKHunt #InvisibleFoot #BusinessStuff #WelfareEconomics #NeoLiberalEconomics #DismalProfession
bs2 (@[email protected])

> .. The "invisible foot" ensures us that in a free-market ... economy each person pursuing only his own good will automatically, and most efficiently, do his part in maximizing the general public misery. https://zcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/zbooks/www/books/3/3.htm#3.2.1 #InvisibleFoot #PublicMisery #FreeMarkets #RobertDArge #EKHunt

mstdn.jp

2/2

If you assume that equality is "order" and thus a antonym for "disorder", then you may believe - Sen even calls it a "fact" - that the #TheilCoefficient is computed from an "#ArbitraryFormula".

However, there is no contradiction: The Theil index is a #redundancy, where the actual redundancy (ISO/IEC 2382-16) of a system is computed as the #MaximumEntropy of that system minus the actual entropy of that system. That is the answer to Sen's objection!

#GiniIndex #KolmIndex #WelfareEconomics