Norbert Heger

@noheger@wien.rocks
87 Followers
129 Following
294 Posts

Menu item icons in macOS 26 reduce usability – should be optional

Please copy-paste the report as a new report in Feedback Assistant if you agree.

https://github.com/feedback-assistant/reports/issues/685

FB18692873: Menu item icons in macOS 26 reduce usability – should be optional · Issue #685 · feedback-assistant/reports

Submission Date 2025-07-08 Status Open Area Menu Bar Operating System Version macOS 26 Type Incorrect/Unexpected Behavior Description macOS 26 introduces icons for all menu items. This change adds ...

GitHub

I’ve got better things to do than write about Liquid Glass (again), and yet, here I am.

🔗 https://lmnt.me/blog/ive-got-better-things-to-do-than-this-and-yet.html

I’ve Got Better Things To Do Than This, and Yet

Technotes - Gibberish and Stuff

A few months ago, I posted this image on Mastodon, because the Apple documentation website sometimes feel… err, underwhelming. Many people have already pointed this out, so I won't repeat their...

After a week seeing the new #LiquidGlass now, what is your stance on the new designs?

Boosts for reach appreciated ✌️

Love it as it is
5.7%
Like it, if they tweak contrasts
47.2%
Don’t like it
37.7%
Don’t care about it
9.4%
Poll ended at .

Saw this on my kitchen counter today and thought „hmm, ‚Solid Porcelain‘ might be a cool design language, actually.“

Can do the same 3d effects, nice highlights / reflections, and easier to read on than the transparency of #LiquidGlass. Plus, stuff sticking out of the icon is always fun. #iOS #MacOS #WWDC25

Omg yes this, ffs 😩 via @mindaugasrudokas.com #wwdc25

Mockup time! What could be a reasonable "middle ground" between the Mac OS design that we have today and the radical Liquid Glass design we saw this week from #WWDC25?

Disclaimer: this does not attempt to solve all the issues of modern Mac OS design, such as cramped toolbars caused by full-height sidebars and combining the toolbar with the title bar. I feel like the Apple of today is too far gone to do anything about those.

Read on to see what I actually tried to address.

They needed a study to find that out?
https://orf.at/stories/3396532/
Something cool about _the new way_, is Apple are kind enough to include their SVGs in asset catalogs. You can reassemble icons in Icon Composer and re-colour them. *fixed*.
Liquid Glass feels like that earliest reveal of Aqua — flashy, and completely over the top and needing twelve months of refinement and public feedback to get the balance quite right. The problem is, Apple's yearly schedule doesn't allow for that kind of iteration before release; we have about a week or two to get our feedback in, but this plane's going to land in September regardless
×

Mockup time! What could be a reasonable "middle ground" between the Mac OS design that we have today and the radical Liquid Glass design we saw this week from #WWDC25?

Disclaimer: this does not attempt to solve all the issues of modern Mac OS design, such as cramped toolbars caused by full-height sidebars and combining the toolbar with the title bar. I feel like the Apple of today is too far gone to do anything about those.

Read on to see what I actually tried to address.

Several people have said having the sidebar float over the window feels weird, and I agree. Here I effectively reversed the visual hierarchy: the sidebar extends from "underneath" the window like a drawer. We gain back the pixels from the left of the sidebar and we don't have to figure out how to extend the content behind the sidebar.

Conceptually, in most cases, the sidebar is not the most important part of your window, it's there to show/change the context of what's happening on the right.

The next obvious thing is what's happening in the toolbar. I think the progressive blur from Liquid Glass is cool, but for legibility and clear separation of UI vs. content, I went for the "classic" look. The toolbar is also more compact, so we can actually benefit from the space savings afforded by the combined titlebar.

And of course, the humongous drop shadows have been pulled back, now just serving to highlight the capsules. The spacing of the capsules and icons in them were also adjusted.

Overall, I just tried to bring back a bit of definition in places where it was lacking, such as the icon size slider thumb at the bottom right, which was almost impossible to see, even on the super crisp and nice MacBook Pro display.

I'm meh on the huge rounded corners on windows. It's the style of today so I kept them, but the smaller toolbar let me shrink them a bit. The size of the "traffic lights" also matches present Mac OS. Not all things in the Mac UI should grow in perpetuity.

@tuomas_h @marioguzman This looks a LOT better.

I still don’t like the corner radius being so comically large, but I guess you have to pick your battles.

@jeff @tuomas_h @marioguzman especially when my screens do NOT have rounded corners. This “match the physical device” stuff is bunk for macOS.
@woolie @jeff @tuomas_h @marioguzman When the screens don't have rounded corners *yet*
@colincornaby @woolie @jeff @tuomas_h @marioguzman really looks out of place with CarPlay where many screens will always be squared off.
@tuomas_h this is a significant improvement
@tuomas_h this is a huge improvement.
@tuomas_h @siracusa It feels so good here to have an unambiguously bounded area that clearly defines the content and its inherent whitespace, instead of a wider one where the translucent floating sidebar implies that the content actually has a big left margin. If the chrome (or glass) wants to get out of the way of the content, it needs to respect the content’s designed bounds.
@siracusa This directly connects to your distaste for floating bottom-row controls. Hard agree.
@FormerlyStC @siracusa Figma, in their recent-ish redesign, introduced similar floating sidebars to big fanfare, but reversed course very soon – turns out designers actually hated them.
@tuomas_h Looks great, and now I want an actual drawer at the bottom of the window with this style
@tuomas_h This is infinitely better! 👏
@tuomas_h I like how it’s gone full circle to left side drawers. Haha. I still don’t love the stoplights being attached to the tab bar. I wish we could just have a solid title bar again where you could predictably drag the window, but there’s no way to do that with their stated design and material goals.
@tuomas_h MacOS hasn't been reasonable for about 25 years now ~Chara
@tuomas_h I'd make you Vice President of Human Interfaces at Apple today.
@tuomas_h Please send this design as feedback to Apple. I love it.

@tuomas_h it’s not like visionOS at all. In visionOS the app chrome takes on the colors of the background “environment”, much like how current Mac side panels take on the desktop colors. Instead they inset everything and it takes color from the content. visionOS also has totally detached side panels while bottom toolbars float partially over content they modify.

I think a lot of the changes derive from iPad’s hybrid tab bar/side panel. I get why Apple wants to keep the two on the same plane.

@tuomas_h Would still go back to Snow Leopard in a heartbeat.
@metaning You and me both.
@tuomas_h The more I use modern macOS - I went from High Sierra to Ventura, I miss proper narrow title bars, with the full-width button bar as a separate thing below (and tear-off inspectors). Everything in the new style feels clumsy, like trying to run waist deep in water. Whatever vertical space is “gained” by combining the title and tool bar, is lost with the huge padding on the dock, etc.
@tuomas_h First question from me as a "user" would be: Can i scroll?
@seiz Yeah, this is one of those usability issues that I didn’t try to address. I also look back fondly to the beautiful Aqua scroll bars, but we’ve been living with transient scroll bars for a long time, since Mac OS X 10.7. Not ideal but not a disaster in my book.
@tuomas_h Oops. I compared it to my current finder Window but forgot, that i had changed the default setting to "always show scrollbars".
@tuomas_h I like this, but I would prefer a fade effect where the content page fades into the glass sidebar. But that brings up issue of defining the separator for resizing, but maybe a small colored water drop could be that?
@tuomas_h that makes total sense—I really could imagine using that.
@tuomas_h Outstanding. Much much better.
@tuomas_h Very nice work. If the new design actually looked like this, I would be happy to adopt it in my Mac app, instead of dreading it like I am now.
@tuomas_h This looks sooooo much better!
@tuomas_h this is really nice. The toolbar buttons look like they're part of the window instead of floating a foot above like in os26. And I love the sidebar.
@tuomas_h ah… some sanity. I feel much calmer looking at this.
@tuomas_h I wish the entire left sidebar was a single section so I could mix and rearrange the icons exactly as I see fit. I don’t want it separated into Favourites and Locations. That’s not how I think about things.
@lo_fye Yeah I loved this aspect in Panther & Tiger, also that the icons grew and shrunk as space allowed. I think in the recent Mac OS versions they’ve made it a bit more flexible what can be in which category but it’s not freeform. What I do appreciate about the current design is that I know where things like removable storage or servers will appear when I connect them, but I don’t think it was ever a problem before the categories.
@tuomas_h this looks way better. I’d love to see the toolbars also demoted in the z hierarchy
@tuomas_h I absolutely love the sidebar-under-the-window concept. I wonder about implementing it as an open source package, and trying to promote adoption amongst indie apps!

@tuomas_h This looks really good. I particularly appreciate that you left out all progressive blur. Please get hired by Apple 🙏

You kept all the good parts, button borders, clearer structure and actual concentricity ✅

@tuomas_h @joesteel Vast improvement! Great work!

@tuomas_h considering hierarchy I’d argue that the top bar needs to cover the whole top so the traffic lights are on there too.

Otherwise it’s great. Love the „traditional“ sidebar.

@flogehring Yeah I love me some full-length toolbar, but as I said in the post, I think Apple have pretty much moved on from that 🥲
@flogehring @tuomas_h Agreed! Team Full Width Toolbar! Down with full height sidebars
@flogehring @tuomas_h With the floating inset sidebars, theoretically we could just…shrink em down vertically, right? My rapid fire photoshop for reference
@tuomas_h This is endlessly better, especially the sidebar.
@tuomas_h agree! I might be one of the "several people": https://iosdev.space/@alpennec/114669269359905656
Axel Le Pennec (@alpennec@iosdev.space)

Attached: 4 images Hot take: Sidebars in #macOS Tahoe look off. Why do they float above the app? They are visually heavy: too much shadow, glass, corner radius, padding — they steal focus and distract (unless you're Apple Maps). Inspectors feel way cleaner (see Icon Composer attached). (Apple Maps and Apple Podcasts screenshots are from @stroughtonsmith@mastodon.social) #WWDC25

iOS Dev Space

@tuomas_h Honestly, if Steve Jobs saw the Apple of today and what macOS Big Sur and onward looked like, he would fire nearly every person in charge of that team.

Like, the icons looked like crap, the padding was enormous, and the settings app in Ventura looks like an iOS app ported badly from the iPad or iPhone.

@tuomas_h I'd be curious to hear how you think iPad fits (or doesn't fit!) into the design thinking here.

The new sidebars seem to stem the desire for consistent treatment across macOS and iPadOS (where the constrained width of the display makes floating sidebars feel more natural as the sidebar collapses and expands over the content). Do you think that's a worthwhile goal here?

@cdoncarroll That’s a very good question. I don’t immediately see why this couldn’t work for iPad too, especially in the “sidebar open” mode. You’re right in the sense that the floating sidebar feels more at home on iPad because it can transition into a tab bar, but I think the fact that pixels are “lost” around the sidebar hurts even more on such a small display. I’m sure there is some kind of a solution for the tab bar that makes it feel like a natural counterpart for the “drawer” sidebar.
@tuomas_h I definitely don't disagree with your second point. I felt a very similar discomfort when Figma introduced floating panels.

@tuomas_h In this case however, I think crucial point to consider is what happens to the window as the sidebar moves about. The visual of your mock leads me to think that sidebar expansion would modify the size of the content window itself (even if the resulting container window footprint isn't any different).

I wonder if 's goal is for the container window size feel like it remains constant.

@cdoncarroll Yeah true, if the sidebar really is just a transient overlay, then the floating design makes a ton of sense. I don’t spend that much time on iPad so I forgot this case exists 😅
@tuomas_h WeHaveToGoBack.gif
@tuomas_h that's a lot better already. Maybe making the entire toolbar Liquid Glass and the buttons colored areas? Like they suggest with the no glass on glass rule?
@stairjoke This style actually adheres to their guidelines. In one of the sessions they show how the Finder looks like with a list view and they basically do exactly this, because the progressive blur won’t work work with list headers.