@sancla but instead of investing in the maintainers of OpenSource projects, so they can work on security, instead of focusing on building more resilient infrastructure, the capital made available to improve security will be put into deploying AI-driven endpoint security and DLP tools and to hire "security experts" whose sole skill is tokenmaxxing and role-playing as cyberdefense-pro!
@eliasp @malwaretech
Most like yes, but either way focus is getting stronger on supply chains.
Hopefully, it’ll get companies depending on open source scratching their heads abut this and get them more involved into open source.
Then again, corporate involvement may not always be the best influence for open source, time will tell and fingers crossed…
@malwaretech Not to mention that this isn't new...LLMs have been able to do this since day one. And small models found the same vulnerabilities in FreeBSD ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Also, from what I understand Mythos couldn't actually make an exploit for that bug, sooooooo big marketing stink imho.
@malwaretech
You don't need mythos if your employees (or politicians) click shady links in their messaging apps
@malwaretech I liked the days when we were panicking about China listening in on all our telephone calls / scooping up our mobile data.
Now we just talk directly to some American company's AI and ask them to diagnose our medical problems that we're too embarrassed to see a real doctor for.
@ErikBussink @gsuberland @floe @malwaretech
"We're being scanned, Captain."
"Shut it down. Shut it all down."
🫡 🖖
Indeed, all us fossils live here on Mastodon, it's the only social media we can still stand.
@darwinwoodka @nav @malwaretech
Indeed, 'tis true.
@jakobtougaard @darwinwoodka @nav @malwaretech
High tech!
And it was actually "portable" unlike those that they installed in cars. I wonder what these gizmos cost back then and also wonder how much the monthly bills were.
So retro!
@darwinwoodka @nav @malwaretech With the only algorithm that matter: chronological, with its slight implicit bias towards your own waking hours.
It's bliss.
"Using encryption on the Internet is the equivalent of arranging an armored car to deliver credit card information from someone living in a cardboard box to someone living on a park bench"
(Gene Spafford)
@malwaretech not to mention that thousands of vulnerable fuel pumps directly connected to the internet.
https://www.darkreading.com/ics-ot-security/fuel-tank-monitoring-systems-vulnerable-disruption
Well only hijack / hack mobile connection when it's really necessary like when your princess has escaped and you want to kidnap her back.
Do not blame people clicking on links! That is what links are for.
Blame people like me, computer programmers, who built insecure systems
cybersecurity is a kobayashi maru simulation.
i threw in the towel six months ago.
now i drive a bus.
@malwaretech excellent point.
A lot of infrastructure runs outdated software.
But thankfully, most of these systems are not connected to the internet.
A long long way from the truth.
A fault tolerant packet switching network that can survive a lot of disruption.
We have the early engineers of the IETF to thank.
@T2R @malwaretech The Internet requires none of those things to function.
It may seem pedantic, but the IP protocol, and the TCP protocol on top of that are below the level of DNS etcetera.
The Web and the Internet are different. The Web runs on the Internet, and is less reliable (though not crippled by) those things you mention
Fair to say most people, now, see the Internet through phone apps that introduce new classes of risk and failure
Fuck Mythos and marketing bullshit, but AI that immensely reduces time-to-exploit is real. Companies are not prepared for it.