63 Followers
101 Following
2.2K Posts
Just here for the OSINT gathering to defend my networks.

‘Perfect Storm’: How Trump's Aid Cuts Are Fueling the Ebola Outbreak

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.wired.com/story/how-trumps-aid-cuts-are-fueling-the-ebola-outbreak/

LARGEST THEFT IN AMERICAN HISTORY!

Trump's DOJ announces $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' as part of Trump IRS lawsuit settlement

The fund will COMPENSATE Trump, Trump family, and Trump supporters who say they were wrongly targeted under Biden.

The funds will be controlled by Trump's personal appointees!

Trump has just stolen $1.7B from the American taxpayer!

THEFT. IN. BROAD. DAYLIGHT.
#AureFreePress #BreakingNews #Breaking #TrumpRegime #uspol #Politics

https://abcnews.com/US/trump-court-filings-plans-drop-10b-lawsuit-irs/story?id=133066043

DOJ announces $1.7B 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' as part of Trump IRS lawsuit settlement

The DOJ has announced that as part of the settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS, the AG is establishing a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund."

ABC News
What a clown. Jim Jordan literally does not acknowledge what he said just moments before.
They protected rich pedophiles while retraumatizing victims. Think about that.
Trump’s rollback of toxic gas rules limits EPA’s authority to protect public health, analysis says

Ethylene oxide (EtO) is about 60 times more carcinogenic than believed in 2006, research finds

The Guardian
The new GUARD Act is narrower than the original, but still threatens privacy and online speech. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/congress-narrowed-guard-act-serious-problems-remain
Congress Narrowed the GUARD Act, But Serious Problems Remain

The concerns driving this bill are real. Some AI systems have engaged in troubling interactions with vulnerable users, including minors. But the right answer to that is targeted enforcement against bad actors, and privacy laws that protect us all.

Electronic Frontier Foundation

“A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication. The journal publisher, Springer Nature, cited “discrepancies” in the analysis and a lack of confidence in the conclusions—but not before the paper racked up hundreds of citations and made the rounds on social media.”

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/influential-study-touting-chatgpt-in-education-retracted-over-red-flags/

Influential study touting ChatGPT in education retracted over red flags

The retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times.

Ars Technica
We should listen a lot more to experts, scientists, engineers and teachers instead of politicians