When exactly did we start to think that the point of humans was to be productive, instead of thinking that the point of productivity was to take care of humans?
@ainmosni When elites started taking any surplus for themselves.
@junesim63 @ainmosni for me is since ever, just last periods that is more noticeable cause of the development of tech. Higher technology-more power for single individuals. Its going to getting worse, and that scares me.

@ainmosni

Hit home with me when my youngest daughters school started talking about our children being assets in the global economy. She's home educated now.

@ainmosni when "productivity" was thought to be the software category of office suites, perhaps...
@ainmosni just before someone built the first proto-palace in one of the first cities.
@ainmosni As soon as one human controlled the result of other humans' productivity.
@ainmosni Ehm, so your question is basically when did capitalism take hold right?
@ainmosni I reckon the big inflection point in that came when most of us stopped farming for survival.
@ainmosni it became more ubiquitous and less cloaked in other evil narratives in the early 20th century I'm p sure

@ainmosni

When was capitalism established as the only "valid" system?

@seism0saurus @ainmosni

When they enclosed the commons and made it all but impossible for people to survive outside their control. That's when.

@seism0saurus @ainmosni

It took a while. It took things like the enclosure acts and the displacement of the agricultural peasantry for it really to take root in the British context

@ainmosni @cstross with John Calvin perhaps?

@ainmosni

Neolithic Revolution.

@ainmosni Not long after agriculture was invented, I'd say. 🙃
@ainmosni when the first human made other humans work for him

@ainmosni

It's more about security, whether that be food or energy security, or security from a neighbour seeking those for themselves.

The nation that neglects its own security in order to be kind tends to be one that is colonised by a nation which doesn't.

@ainmosni Right around 20,000 BC.
@ainmosni I love this dually: as a rhetorical question, but also how Mastodon gives various serious and probable answers
@SonjaS @ainmosni
Maybe it's like asking "When did this exponential process really take off?" Everybody sees a different inflection point depending on how they crop and zoom the graph.
@ainmosni capitalism, etc, the fertile crescent, colonizers, Henry Ford, just all of it. Garbage. hahaha
@ainmosni
Depends on your country I think - here it was roughly the start of this century, give or take a decade, when economic growth became goal instead of means for providing for people.
@ainmosni sometime around the building of the pyramids.
@ainmosni It started when someone said 'I am more important than you, so you do as I say and that is work the field and hand in your crops to me'.
@ainmosni @fabienmarry
Daaamn! Thank you from framing this perfect punchline!
🙏

@ainmosni Well, that's an easy one. First, the Guild system had to collapse, so the "productivity to take care of humans" part is no longer looked after.

Then the steam engine had to be developed enough, so that it is more wasteful to stop the engine than to produce a surplus. It takes an enormous amount of time and fuel to start a steam engine, while mills can be stopped at any time. So since the steam engine was used for the productivity, we started to produce first, and then tried to sell our products, which was enormously stupid when al the work was still craftsmanship by hand or driven with wind or water.

Our whole economy still runs on the ideas of the steam age, even if all power is electric or diesel these days, and can be started and stopped without penalty.

@ainmosni pretty sure that was around the time of the invention of agriculture. It takes violence to get a hunter gatherer society, with the associated leisure time, to build settlements.
@ainmosni When the exploiting class figured out they could be an exploiting class.
@ainmosni England, roughly 1750–1780 - the Parliamentary Enclosure Acts.
@ainmosni when societies imposed obligations due to the commons on its members
@ainmosni at the time of the Industrial Revolution. 1760–1840.
@ainmosni with the advent of the super rich and unbounded capitalism. 19/18th century. Before we thought humans purpose was to feed and serve the so-called, never was, nobles and predators of churches, so-called holy men. Neither nobels nor holy men ever existed.
@ainmosni if you’re sincerely asking for a date, rather than making a rhetorical point, the earliest I could concretely cite would be Cotton Mather’s 1701 sermon “A Christian At His Calling.”

@dougwade @ainmosni I would think that he was influenced by the Reformation. Most factions – but especially Calvinists – started emphasizing labour as a way to prove one's worth in the eyes of God (See e.g. Weber: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism).

So to answer your rhetorical question: roughly 16th century.

@ainmosni
"At the end of the day, we are human *beings*, not human *doings*" a quote from a rabbi that I read somewhere in a newspaper.

@ainmosni

When the ‘Protestant sects’ (in Max Weber's sense) appeared on the scene.

(Thanks for nothing.)

@ainmosni the protestant reformation
@ainmosni I'm going to say when John Calvin took over Geneva. Early Calvinism had the idea that God would bless and reward the righteous while still alive, and one of those blessings was wealth. Since work can, in some instances, lead to wealth, this gave rise ot the idea that work itself is inherently righteous, rather than a means to an end. The heresy that wealth == righteousness appeals to wealthy people who get to impose that idea on everybody.

@ainmosni "point of productivity...to take care of humans"

humans ... while everything else beautiful and self-sustaining by way of its complexity and frugality is obliterated

before interjecting I just did a page search for any terms relevant to anything living other than the [default] rape-ape species. Not in this thread... but elsewhere in the followed timeline, this from @jackofalltrades, 2nd para of which fits: https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/116125048598041523

#biosphere #productivity

@ainmosni it can actually be traced back to early biblical times, and the story of Adam and Eve

https://shows.acast.com/the-ancients/episodes/adam-and-eve

Adam and Eve | The Ancients

@ainmosni Greed and envy being rewarded and not controlled. There’s always been people who want to take rather than give or share. For some reason this is encouraged.

@ainmosni

The formation of the first civilization.

@ainmosni When money became more important than human lives. Amazing how it works.
@ainmosni Don't know when that other thing historically started, but now is always the best time to use productivity for taking care of any humans we can
I don't know, but it's at least since WWII.
@ainmosni The day when we invented trade.
@ainmosni
I saw a sticker on someone's car that said "busy is not your purpose" which struck me as funny...then horrifying when I thought about just how brain-hacked we are, our own existential confusion used against us by the those that benefit from us believing our jobs are the center of our identity and success is measured in dollars instead of happiness.
@ainmosni about Reagan/Thatcher/Mulroney

@ainmosni I don't know that question but I can confirm I have never got that wrong. it has been obvious to me since I was a child, learning the definition of productivity, that it is a tool with the singular purpose of making life better for the living and the still to come.

I can't imagine the trauma a brain would need to sustain in order to get those two things around the wrong way like that.

but did you meet someone who had?
what help do they need to get better?

@ainmosni been a few millennia, unfortunately

@ainmosni wow, some of these comments are full of….assumptions. Depends on who "we" is.

THOUSANDS of cultures lived (and still do) without exploiting people. Ya just haven't heard of them because they don't fit the narratives that colonizing cultures tend to want people to focus on...

and that might be because well, Western Civ WANTS to normalize its ways of being as "normal"

even when the ways are and have been just disgustingly exploitative -when compared to others.

@ainmosni For nobility and royalty, that's pretty much always been the case. Capitalism, though, convinced the lower classes to think like nobles and royals and to not consider themselves lower class.
@ainmosni "…the defenders of free markets forget that what we really want is free men." - Mark Crawford
@ainmosni
How else can the rich sacrifice you to the God of Capital?