Hit home with me when my youngest daughters school started talking about our children being assets in the global economy. She's home educated now.
When was capitalism established as the only "valid" system?
When they enclosed the commons and made it all but impossible for people to survive outside their control. That's when.
It took a while. It took things like the enclosure acts and the displacement of the agricultural peasantry for it really to take root in the British context
Neolithic Revolution.
It's more about security, whether that be food or energy security, or security from a neighbour seeking those for themselves.
The nation that neglects its own security in order to be kind tends to be one that is colonised by a nation which doesn't.
@ainmosni Well, that's an easy one. First, the Guild system had to collapse, so the "productivity to take care of humans" part is no longer looked after.
Then the steam engine had to be developed enough, so that it is more wasteful to stop the engine than to produce a surplus. It takes an enormous amount of time and fuel to start a steam engine, while mills can be stopped at any time. So since the steam engine was used for the productivity, we started to produce first, and then tried to sell our products, which was enormously stupid when al the work was still craftsmanship by hand or driven with wind or water.
Our whole economy still runs on the ideas of the steam age, even if all power is electric or diesel these days, and can be started and stopped without penalty.
@dougwade @ainmosni I would think that he was influenced by the Reformation. Most factions – but especially Calvinists – started emphasizing labour as a way to prove one's worth in the eyes of God (See e.g. Weber: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism).
So to answer your rhetorical question: roughly 16th century.
When the ‘Protestant sects’ (in Max Weber's sense) appeared on the scene.
(Thanks for nothing.)
@ainmosni "point of productivity...to take care of humans"
humans ... while everything else beautiful and self-sustaining by way of its complexity and frugality is obliterated
before interjecting I just did a page search for any terms relevant to anything living other than the [default] rape-ape species. Not in this thread... but elsewhere in the followed timeline, this from @jackofalltrades, 2nd para of which fits: https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/116125048598041523
It is the anthropocentric perspective:
@ainmosni it can actually be traced back to early biblical times, and the story of Adam and Eve

The formation of the first civilization.
@ainmosni I don't know that question but I can confirm I have never got that wrong. it has been obvious to me since I was a child, learning the definition of productivity, that it is a tool with the singular purpose of making life better for the living and the still to come.
I can't imagine the trauma a brain would need to sustain in order to get those two things around the wrong way like that.
but did you meet someone who had?
what help do they need to get better?
@ainmosni wow, some of these comments are full of….assumptions. Depends on who "we" is.
THOUSANDS of cultures lived (and still do) without exploiting people. Ya just haven't heard of them because they don't fit the narratives that colonizing cultures tend to want people to focus on...
and that might be because well, Western Civ WANTS to normalize its ways of being as "normal"
even when the ways are and have been just disgustingly exploitative -when compared to others.