@DoomsdaysCW "alternative energy sources struggle to match the energy density and scalability of conventional petroleum-based systems"
I have my doubts about this sentence. It's mixed up with peak oil arguments, and they're not credible today.
At scale, electricity generation can become largely renewable fairly quickly, and this is happening in much of the world. Sure, there is significant investment needed to balance supply and demand, but it's doable, at least for the first 95% or so.
However later on it talks about "transition costs". Which is absolutely right.
In other areas, electrification is harder. Even long range shipping is possible if batteries are cheap enough, and we already see electric heavy plant for mining etc, so some of the usual peak oil arguments are problematic.
But replacing every single car with an EV would require a horrific amount of mining, which affects both ecosystems and humans in a big way. Practically speaking, without major state intervention, and an expansion of public transport, it will take far too long, at least from a climate change perspective.
And the situation with heating is even worse: heat pumps might slightly out-compete gas boilers depending on how the somewhat arbitrary electricity market is set up, but the payback time is *long*, unless there's a dramatic, sustained increase in gas prices.
Both problems are solvable provided there is substantial state investment and, in transport, a reduction in demand by the expansion of public transport. Which can happen remarkably quickly; 23% of buses globally are electric today, for instance.
Which is when we run into 1) austerity politics driven by neoliberal assumptions justified by "growth" (e.g. low taxes on rich people) and 2) the importance of the car industry to "growth", regardless of the enormous harms it causes, many of which are not solved by electrification.
It is far from clear to me whether the gradually increasing difficulty in extraction will prevent the move to electric vehicles. I haven't seen convincing data either way, and the usual assumptions about mining are fairly long term.
But certainly there are "economic bottlenecks", such as the need to replace absolutely every car, including those owned by drivers who rely on on-street parking (implying much more expensive charging) and who only buy cheap fourth-hand "old bangers" ...
This is primarily a climate issue. Unfortunately we have enough oil, coal, and gas to destroy ourselves many times over; I don't believe peak oil arguments are credible given where we are technologically today. Sure, if right wing governments make it harder, there may be a steeper cliff, but still, there's likely to be less demand for oil in the near future.
And I'm not even convinced we'll run out of lithium. But the impact of the "green growth" agenda is that 1) it takes far too long, resulting in higher short term emissions, and 2) it causes enormous harm to people and ecosystems.