They stole my voice with AI
Elecrow—an electronics company that makes Pi and ESP accessories—used an AI voice for multiple tutorial series which sounds _almost exactly_ like me.
I never consented to have my voice used to promote Elecrow's products.
They stole my voice with AI
Elecrow—an electronics company that makes Pi and ESP accessories—used an AI voice for multiple tutorial series which sounds _almost exactly_ like me.
I never consented to have my voice used to promote Elecrow's products.
Update: The CEO of Elecrow responded to my email about the unauthorized voice cloning early this morning.
I will be posting a video with more details and my reaction either tomorrow or Wednesday, but here's a snippet of the email.

@davep
Honestly, I also read it as such.
That and "OMG, he said the magic word" (aka "lawyer"), "let's get ahead of this before he actually sues us".
Especially because you really only need a judge to say you can't use an LLM to generate someone's voice without their consent once for that whole thing to start collapsing.
@geerlingguy
@geerlingguy they should not put all the blame of the boots on the ground. Bad management leads to bad stuff. Look to the top to find point the finger.
I feel very sorry for the person at the bottom getting the blame. Where was the manager in all of this, where was the director?
@geerlingguy This is a solid response. The fact that they offered compensation tells me they are a decent org and likely the scenario described is the truth.
I can totally see it - in tech the marketing peeps need to be kept on a short leash in order to keep them from over promising and doing stupid sh!t to get visibility.
Richard@elecrow - guessing you thought this was sorted in the past - you and your tech managers can't take your eyes off them! o7 Bt/dt
@geerlingguy Wait, wait, wait.
Using AI voice is now so normalized in marketing that they just do it without even thinking twice, asking management or anything?
@geerlingguy I’m pretty sure this is the YouTuber equivalent of a Weird Al parody—a sign you’ve made it—except there’s nothing to laugh about.
Bummed you’re dealing with this.
@clusterfcku @geerlingguy
In addition is protecting brand trustworthiness, having your voice cloned by AI without your consent is personally distressing, even for those whose voice has become a national treasure
@geerlingguy the “three dots for more“ icon on a playlist opens a menu including a “Report playlist“ option.
And there are “report“ and “dislike“ icons on every video. Instructions on the net for reporting a channel appear to be outdated and don‘t work any more, still looking around.
Users of YouTube have the option to report them, dislike them, and leave comments on their videos saying that you‘ve done so, and that you will boycott their products and hope for their bankruptcy.
@geerlingguy Every person who is at least semi-public should know that in 2024 voice cloning is a very easy process and can be done in realtime on a powerful graphics card.
If you are posting your voice anywhere, you should be aware of this fact and take according measures. Probable request a video takedown for impersonation or something like that.
And for that we need regulations…
@geerlingguy A stolen voice eh. Wasn't that the power move of some famous villainess within a kids cartoon that involved a mermaid...
I suppose they don't even feel like they are the bad guys. What interesting times we live in.
@geerlingguy Hmm. Since the legal system is too slow and expensive you should weaponize the youtube rules: do a lip-sync version of a section of their videos, post them as a 'song', and then claim copyright infringement on their version?
It might be more fun than talking to lawyers.
Any youtube rules weaponization experts out there?