@selkcip No, see, Big Metric has been shrinking our millimetres a little bit each year since the 1950s, so now you can fit a lot more into an inch.
(Edit: I mean, Big Metric has been growing our millimetres, I went the wrong direction with my math)
At least the "leagues to smoot" conversion seems to be working correctly.
@selkcip sure, it can't tell the difference between millimeters and meters any more, but at least the formula is still working.
The enshittification creeps onward.
@selkcip The vast chill slow intelligence that is Google the corporation thinks search is a revenue sink and sees no reason to spend the infinite money it would take to defend it from SEO, which is to say, Google's own advertising business.
When Google became an advertising company, it began a transition away from "build uniquely useful services" to being a malware company, thereby consigning the uniquely useful services to the pit.
Ads are malware. The _idea_ of ads is malware.
@selkcip When I did my annual casting about for search that doesn't suck this year, I signed up for a trial account with Kagi. Which appears to be a filtered front end for Bing with vague AI components and a frankly nonviable cost per search model, but it does what it says.
I had forgotten what good search results look like. Not 200k pages of garbage results but maybe 10 of actually relevant pages created by humans for humans.
I keep waffling on buying the cheapest tier of searches/month.
This is in desktop in the UK.
For me, "250mm in inches" works, "250mm to inches" is parsed incorrectly.
dunno. ppl are gonnal laugh but i use bing.. the main reason is that google gives me a bunch of impossible to solve captchas bc i'm on a VPN
@selkcip I recommend Qalculate for your everyday calculation and unit conversion needs!
❤️ https://qalculate.github.io/ ❤️
It can solve equations, too.
@selkcip it's mocking you for still using Imperial.
Rightly so too 😂
@selkcip to Google, search result quality is a cost centre / loss leader.
Search results compete with ads for user clicks. Google needs the search results to be good enough to make you use their service, but shitty enough that you'd rather click an ad.
@selkcip No idea—haven’t used #Google aside from rare exceptions in years.
#BraveSearch is stellar now, with smarter and more attributable #ai summaries than anyone else is doing, and now independent photo search, too. Can’t recommend switching to @brave enough.
@selkcip Looks like they're having trouble with the absence of the space between the '0' and 'mm'.
Dimensions are correctly written with a space in-between the number and the unit of measurement. But, this is no excuse for Google not being able to infer that.
I'm with ya, I too write it without the space.
@selkcip possibly it is a parsing issue.
“250 mm to inches” will return the correct answer.
Instead of inserting a “space” it is overwriting the first “m” with a “space”.
@SvenGeier @selkcip
I see. It calculates correctly for “251mm to inches”
Edit: so the error only comes up with numbers divisible by 10 starting with 230.
Somehow I’m expecting the error to start after 255.