@Yorgus @willoremus I feel like you’re making The Gambler argument, and I APPROVE.
You got to know when to hold 'em,
Know when to fold 'em,
Know when to walk away,
And know when to run.
Beats Dunning-Kruger EVERY time.
@Young_Gen_X That sounds exactly like one of the two scenarios I had in mind: thinking your smartness in one domain necessarily means smartness in other domains.
The other scenario I was thinking of: assuming that smartness in theoretical domains necessarily means smartness in practical applications. I love working with R&D folks b/c they have more brainpower than I could ever hope to have. But sometimes they resist the changes that have to occur to produce 1000x of their beautiful idea.
Paging Mr. Musk, paging Mr. Musk...
@willoremus you should remove the first ‘smart’ from this post and then it’s accurate.
People like Musk are only smart in certain domains and they are often incapable or incompetent in others. Further, their extreme wealth surrounds them with sychophants which just serve to reinforce their weaknesses and biases.
There is a distinction to be made between intelligence and wisdom.
@willoremus i mean one thing I’ve learned about being smart is that someone else will always be smarter than you in general, but when it comes to niche specialties it’s not easy to find someone smarter than those people who are actual delibrately researching that subject.
Also, how “smart” you are can change based on which lens/criterion the “smartness” is being evaluated against. There are many types of intelligence, not just logical and linguistic.
Even worse when an idiot does that.
Musk was never smart. He got where he is because he could preach & stupid men who can fake it often get into a position of leadership.
... eventually they ruin everything they touch. Some people get smarter while others still idolise them.
@willoremus Years ago, I read that humans have difficulty communicating with people who are not within 30 IQ points of their own. A very smart person will have have trouble communicating with or understanding more than 90% of the rest of the population. This is not an advantage.
One of the biggest problems of the very smart is that they truly don't understand how other people will think about things or react to what they are doing. So they do things that are completely inexplicable to other people at the same time expecting that their reasoning is obvious.
While it's true that some of them get an ego high off of being smarter, more of them are simply assuming that other people think they same way they do. Effectively, the results are the same in both cases. Although the second group can, if they work at it, learn to understand people better.
Another mistake that people make is assuming that because someone became extremely wealthy, they must be highly intelligent. That's a laughable assumption at best. Most of these people are not the ones responsible for the actual inventions or idea creations of their businesses.
@willoremus A very smart boss once told me "We're all stupid, just about different things."
Of course you could phrase it in reverse, that we're all smart about different things. But her point was that we need to remember that no matter how smart we are (or think we are) there will be people who know more than us about other things. We need to respect that in others and remember it to keep us humble... and to keep us from looking stupid by overestimating our own intelligence.
Idiocy is inevitable. Motorola, Blockbuster, Nokia, RIM, Kodak ... Twitter...
“Every smart company eventually does a stupid thing! It’s not too late to avoid your fate!”
...now this is smart 🙄