https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2G9rereDQg
#belief #epistemicjustification #burdenofproof #bop #justification #rationality #rationalbelief #boj #burdenofjustification #epistemologytopic #epistemology #knowledge #truth #sciphishortz
One of the problems with contemporary social media discourse is jumping around and ahead in the conversation, misusing terms, axioms, and similar and not taking the time to actually have a discussion and understand what the other person is saying. We are too quick to judge people based on the group we think they belong
I often hear my fellow atheists say things like 'You can't prove a negative!' in a debate. This is often in response to either a theist trying to shift the burden of proof, or a misunderstanding of epistemic justification (aka burden of rationality or burden of proof on a belief position). I often respond to
I've had the "Burden of Proof" discussion many times recently, and a lot of it comes down to semantic issues with definitions of claim & belief, as well as the logic around propositions. I hope to clear up some of the confusion with this article.
Knowledge, is it just things you know? What do we mean by know and knowledge? Why does there seem to be muddiness in its application? For the most part, when I discuss knowledge I am talking about epistemic or propositional knowledge, but what does that mean? What are other uses of knowledge? Is there a
Evidentially Evident Evidence - SciPhi Shortz by Answers In Reasonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M9sJike5ZA#evidence #sciphi #sciphishortz #misconceptions
visuals #belief #epistemicjustification #burdenofproof #bop #justification #rationality #rationalbelief #boj #burdenofjustification #faith #music #logic #art #book #reading