
I've noticed that when "pro-AI" academics—and by that I mean academics who don't reject AI out of hand for all purposes and are willing to experiment with the technology—write about AI, they generally feel the need to start with a disclaimer. The disclaimer establishes our bona fides as
RE: https://mastodon.chrisclark.net/@rssbot/116549223466601184
I hear about the M-B test all the time and it is included in many dating services as a way to "match" people together.
A lot of people are not surprised by the #Dawkins stuff, he has a long history of dismissing, excusing and dehumanizing women, minorities, lgbtq, etc. But what I don't see is many people applying the lessons learned from the Dawkins #skeptic community to the modern inheritors.
Recently seeing posts by people like Cory #Doctorow as an obvious example demonstrates the same dismissiveness of other voices, excuses for his own choices and lack of inclusion but few are recognizing the pattern.
"Alien Echoes"
Kickstarter project for a skeptical science documentary about alien visitation, featuring all the leading scientists in the field.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/skeptoid/alien-echoes?ref=project_link
"Alien Echoes"
Kickstarter project for a skeptical science documentary about alien visitation, featuring all the leading scientists in the field.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/skeptoid/alien-echoes?ref=project_link
Best way to fact-check news?
https://piefed.zip/c/asklemmy/p/1436747/best-way-to-fact-check-news