Surgical Referral in LMICs Review:

📊 14 studies analyzed.
🔍 Multiple shortages in surgical resources.
🔗 Lack of referral protocols.
🔄 Improves coordination could enhance pathways.

#LMICs #SurgeryEfficiency #Healthcare #Research #Pub2Post

https://tnyp.me/Tj77mO7J/m

Review of surgical referral systems in LMICs highlights:

📊 Streamlined coordination improves system efficiency.

#HealthSystems #LMICs #Surgery #HealthcareReform #Pub2Post

https://tnyp.me/BQ4J2biE/m

Urban - or rural? The answer matters more than you may think. 🏙️🌾
Countries are learning to map it better than ever.
🚀📊 Our DEGURBA training is building skills that power smarter policies - now and for the future.

Read more: https://www.worldpop.org/blog/skills-for-smarter-planning-how-degurba-capacity-building-is-empowering-countries/

#LMICs #DEGURBA #CapacityBuilding #GeospatialData #Urbanisation #DataForDevelopment #SDGs #NationalStatistics #Cameroon #Zambia

Review of surgical referral systems in LMICs

🔍 Found gaps in infrastructure and skills
🛠️ Need comprehensive referral protocols
🏥 60% lack of local surgical capacity affects outcomes

#SurgicalCare #LMICs #HealthSystems #Pub2Post tnyp.me/BQ4J2biE

How can governments protect and promote mental health and well-being across sectors?

For decades, global health policy has approached mental illness primarily as a clinical challenge, a condition to be managed within the walls of hospitals and clinics by medical professionals. This biomedical focus, while essential, has often obscured the broader context in which mental health is shaped. A new publication from the World Health Organization, Guidance on policy and strategic actions to protect and promote mental health and well-being across government sectors, marks a significant shift in normative standards. It posits that mental health is not merely a health outcome but a structural one, determined as much by the fiscal policy, urban planning, and labor laws of governments as by psychiatric care.

A technical framework for cross-sectoral governance

The guidance emerges against a backdrop of escalating costs. The global economic burden of mental health conditions is projected to reach US$6 trillion by 2030. In response, the WHO outlines a “whole-of-government” approach, moving beyond general advocacy to provide specific policy directives for ministries that have historically operated independently of mental health considerations.

The document details an eight-step implementation cycle, requiring high-level political dialogue, rigorous situational analysis, and the drafting of sector-specific policies. It assigns distinct responsibilities to key government sectors:

• Finance and Treasury: The guidance suggests that fiscal policies – including tax rates and welfare allocations – must be evaluated for their impact on health equity, rather than viewing mental health funding solely as a healthcare expenditure.
• Interior and Justice: It recommends a shift in the role of police and prisons, advocating for the retraining of first responders to manage crises through de-escalation rather than coercion, and establishing independent mechanisms to report abuse.
• Education and Employment: The framework calls for schools to embed social-emotional learning into standard curricula and for labor ministries to enforce standards that mitigate psychosocial risks in the workplace, such as precarious contracts and unsafe working conditions.

This approach frames mental health as a shared liability across the state apparatus, requiring coordinated action to address the social and structural determinants such as poverty, discrimination, and violence that drive poor mental health outcomes.

The challenge of implementation in resource-constrained settings

While the normative framework is clear, the practical pathway to implementation remains complex, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The current development finance landscape is characterized by shrinking budgets and a fracturing of global health funding. Governments in LMICs face the dual challenge of executing complex, multi-sectoral strategies while managing severe fiscal constraints.

One critical question for policymakers is operational: How can a Ministry of Health in a resource-constrained setting effectively engage other sectors – such as finance or justice – to adopt these recommendations without significant new external funding? Moving from high-level policy documents to localized action requires a mechanism that can bridge the gap between statutory intent and the reality of service delivery.

So what are the options to do more with less?

Peer learning as a mechanism for structural change

The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) offers an operational model that addresses this implementation gap by utilizing the existing capacity of the health and social workforce. Rather than relying on traditional, resource-intensive capacity-building or technical assistance models, TGLF employs a “learning-to-action” methodology rooted in structured peer interaction. This approach connects thousands of frontline professionals – ranging from district administrators to social workers – into a structured digital network to learn from and support each other in actual implementation.

This model could support this WHO guidance in three specific ways:

• Generating actionable local data: In contexts where central data is scarce, the network functions as a distributed sensor. In a recent deployment in Nigeria, working with NPHCDA and UNICEF, 4,300 health workers generated over 400 root cause analyses within weeks. By identifying specific local barriers to service delivery the network produced the granular evidence needed to inform the cross-sectoral policies advocated by the WHO, and turn them into practice.
• Facilitating cross-sectoral integration: The WHO guidance necessitates collaboration between siloed professionals. TGLF’s model creates a forum where professionals from different sectors can share experience as they work to drive change, each in their own context. A school nurse can analyze crisis response strategies alongside a social worker from a different district, fostering the “collective intelligence” required to implement complex, multi-agency directives right down to the community level.
• Improving cost-efficiency: By digitizing the peer-learning process and utilizing peer accountability rather than external consultants, the model achieves a cost reduction of approximately 90 percent compared to conventional implementation methods. This efficiency could allow governments to begin operationalizing the WHO guidelines immediately using existing payroll structures, rather than waiting for external grants.

By validating local knowledge and structuring peer accountability, this innovative model provides a practical means to transform the WHO’s technical guidance into sustained administrative action. It demonstrates that the capacity to reform mental health governance lies not only in new financial instruments but in the structured coordination of the workforce already present on the ground.

Image: Crossing Into Clarity, The Geneva Learning Foundation Collection © 2025. A corridor built from carved, interlocking forms – half letters, half symbols – evokes the dense, overlapping pressures that shape mental health across societies. As the viewer steps through this textured passage, the individual ahead emerges into a space of light and openness, suggesting the possibility of coherence after complexity. The piece reflects a core truth of whole-of-government mental health action: when fragmented systems align, even imperfectly, they create pathways that help people move from burden toward balance, and from confusion toward care.

Reference

Michelle Funk, Dévora Kestel, Natalie Drew Bold, Celline Cole, Maria Francesca Moro, 2025. Guidance on policy and strategic actions to protect and promote mental health and well-being across government sectors. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240114388

#governmentSectors #implementationScience #lmics #mentalHealth #peerLearning #genevaLearningFoundation #wellBeing #workforce

While #OpenScience provides substantial opportunities for researchers in #LMICs, this paper highlights core global barriers and inequities
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/25152459251357565
It is also a good general introduction into OS!

It is important to recognise that current OS practices may not suit local contexts in #LMICs given how strongly they have been shaped (so far!) by researchers in #HICs. There is ample opportunity for #HICs to learn and improve practices from this dialogue!

#ECRs #ResearchDesign

One year after launch, the #OpenAccess edition of the International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease finds that "OA is helping us to achieve our goal of improving knowledge dissemination in #LMICs, where there is restricted access to subscription journals. Citation analysis of the first few issues of IJTLD OPEN also suggests that this higher level of downloads [higher than for the non-OA edition] is leading to articles being cited at an accelerated rate."
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iuatld/ijtldo/2025/00000002/00000001/art00001

#OACA #ScholComm