@tante I love free software and creative commons, but in this AI age there needs to be a way of protecting them from crawling and violating the reuse licenses. Otherwise #freesoftware is just #freelabor without #UBI

Anticipation.

Off to volunteer our help for a friend who owns the local bookstore. She needs some bookshelves and their contents moved.

You know you're old when you start taking aspirin in anticipation of the day you're about to have.

#OldPeopleOfMastodon
#FreeLabor

A very thoughtful post from Disroot [1] regarding the time we share.

> In the world we currently live in, the most common thing that all living beings have and share —time— has become a scarce, exchangeable, and marketable resource. We work, produce, consume, and rest within a system that measures, regulates, and captures that time, turning it into an economic unit. What was once a shared, vital flow is now managed like a commodity. And as everything seems to speed up, we find ourselves with less and less time of our own.

> We're surrounded by platforms that present themselves as spaces for connection, collaboration, or entertainment, but their real business is the time of the people who use them. They don't provide services: they extract attention, data, free labor, and creativity and turn it into profit. Every interaction, every click, every message generates economic value for someone else. In this unequal exchange, we as users don't just give information, we give hours of our lives. Meanwhile, those who manage these infrastructures have built a well-oiled system of time trafficking: a gigantic transfer of human energy to corporations that give back nothing but dependency and precariousness. In this context, self-hosted, self-managed, open, and community-driven projects don't just propose a different technological model but also a different relationship with time.

1. https://disroot.org/blog/disnews-25.12

#Attention #Time #Creativity #FreeLabor #CommunityDriven

DisNews 25.12 - The time we share | Disroot.org

Disroot is a platform providing online services based on principles of freedom, privacy, federation and decentralization.

@elettrona@poliversity.it

#CodeOfConducts do not exist to protect the weakest from harm, but to protect space's leaders from blame (and responsibility).

Without a #CoC, a community and its leaders are explicitly accountable for how they handle conflicts on a per case basis. With a CoC, leaders can exploit weak minorities to push their own agenda through a mostly uniform and conformist community.

Iow, CoC are designed to force a US-workspace like behaviour on people contributing for free, so that they are easier to manage (and exploit) as #FreeLabor.

But when you point this out, those same leaders will mount a rage mob against you.

That's why say #FOSDEM becomes a testimonial of companies that support a #genocide, like #Google or #Microsoft, %ak*n_ their money and let their employees to talk. And also why I'll never attend to one.
@jkanev@fediscience.org

Quite naive interpretation of #FreeSoftware history (and mitization of #OpenSource).

Unfortunately #RMS grow up during #ColdWar, so he couldn't really find a dynamic balance between the two value who defined the #history of '900.

Open Source has always been a capitalist attempt to marginalize #hackers while exploiting their #freelabor.

Free Software was a bit different, but still reduced the class struggle that the hacking movement was acting to a single etical value, #freedom.

https://encrypted.tesio.it/2020/09/03/not_all_hackers_are_americans.html

@programming@newsmast.community
Not all hackers are... Americans

Giacomo Tesio - Not all hackers are... Americans.

Giacomo Tesio
Still, #LLM are voiding the #GPL (and #AGPL) reciprocity.

That's why years ago I wrote the #HackingLicense https://encrypted.tesio.it/documents/HACK.txt

It was designed with automated corporate #exploitation of #FreeSoftware in mind: it's goal is to balance #freedom and #communion, and it share with those that accept it much more than permissions, while being a stromger #copyleft and an explicit shrink-wrap contract.

Unfortunately, it's not compatible with GPL, because GPL is much weaker.

The fundamental issue of Free Software, the one that let people create the #OpenSource narrative and permessive licenses to exploit programmer ideals and #freelabor, was that #RMS, as an American grown up during #ColdWar, was too fond of the freedom-vs-communism propaganda to understand how lack of rules means the rule of the rich.

The problem is not commercial use of free software but commercial exploitation of free labour, as @doctormo@floss.social correctly stated.

The Hacking License does not prohibit commercial use, but requires recipient to share their own #copyright with the users of any derivative or dependant work they create as a contractual binding.

It's modelled after the research of #ElinorOstrom about Commons governance and the #Hacker ethics based on the value of #curiosity.
The whole open source idea feels like a trick by companies to get free labor from idealistic programmers.
#opensource #foss #freesoftware #softwareengineering #programming #programmers #freelabor #unpaidwork #unpaidlabor #exploitation
AI isn’t a secret scheme—it’s an obvious scheme. Of course they want your corrections. You're the unpaid intern polishing the algorithm just to get a worse autocomplete. #AI #FreeLabor 💼🤖
@lynn@a.bloodyno.se
open source libraries aren't just free code you can gobble up without investment.
well, to be fair, the term #OpenSource was invented exactly to turn #FreeSoftware into #FreeLabor for corporations:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220119124901/https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-meme-hustler

Open source was born to marginalize #hackers as a cultural and political movement while turing their values as #marketing tools.

So, to me, it's refreshing to see more open source developers that realize how they have been used and manipulated for years and starting to fight back.

@filippo@abyssdomain.expert
The Meme Hustler

While the brightest minds of Silicon Valley are “disrupting” whatever industry is too crippled to fend off their advances, something odd is happening to our language. Old, trusted words no longer mean…

The Baffler

CREATING ON YOUTUBE MEANS PAYING TO WORK

YouTube is like Uber. Uber asks you to own, in your garage, a black sedan with less than 100,000 km on it—one you’re not using—and claims you can start making money from it. “It doesn’t cost you anything,” Uber says, since the car is just sitting there anyway. But in reality, it’s the most financially vulnerable people who see it as an opportunity. They take out a loan to buy a car. And when that car hits 100,000 km and the loan isn’t paid off, they get a second one—and now they’re stuck with two loans. Uber “earns” you €5/hour, but the cost of maintaining your setup is €7.50/hour. The more you work, the more your tool degrades. You earn 25% more, but spend 25% more. The vehicle is repurposed for an economic model that only benefits Uber.
¯

_
YOUTUBE IS NO DIFFERENT

When you become a YouTuber, they make you believe that “anyone can stream with a smartphone.” That all you need is an idea, a bit of courage, and some basic gear. That you can compete with MrBeast—who spends a million per video—on a shoestring budget. That’s a lie.
¯

_
THE REAL COST OF A SETUP

I spent five years, from 2018 to 2023, saving up to buy a €5,000 PC solely for production. Because streaming isn’t just “playing a game.” Your PC becomes a 4K broadcasting server. You need two graphics cards—or even two separate machines:

- One to run the software or the game

- The other to encode, stream, and record

You also need:

- A second monitor (for video return and replay)

- A replay buffer (to capture instant replays)

- A Stream Deck for seamless transitions

- A Wave XLR for professional audio quality

- Audio interfaces, mixers, USB cameras, XLR microphones

All these high-end peripherals constantly tax your system. You need two USB hubs capable of handling 15 devices at once with no signal loss. A single weak link can ruin everything. And that’s not all. To stream a Nintendo Switch, you need a capture card—and you can’t rely on your streaming software’s preview because of input lag. You have to play directly on the other screen already in place.
¯

_
ONGOING TECHNICAL LEARNING

Streaming requires broad technical expertise:

- Lighting, audio, capture devices, networking

- Compression, codecs, editing, formatting

- Live direction, visual/audio transitions, real-time coordination

And you’re doing all this with zero support from YouTube.
¯

_
STORAGE AND ENERGY COSTS

Your PC isn’t enough anymore. You’ll need a NAS—a network-attached storage system—cheaper than the cloud in the long run, but which demands:

- Two 20 TB drives (mirrored) → 40 TB

- A dedicated server, which adds another €1,000

It’s become a mini television studio. Which brings with it:

- Planned obsolescence

- Frequent breakdowns

- Hardware wear and tear

- Electricity costs of a 1,000-watt PC plus a 24/7 server

Altogether, the setup costs more than a car.
¯

_
AND YOUTUBE PAYS NOTHING

And yet, it’s YouTube that cashes in. It runs ads on your videos—even if you’re not monetized. It hijacks your gear, your energy, your skills. And if your content doesn’t “perform,” it simply ignores you. A PC, cameras, capture cards, hubs, microphones, lights—tens of thousands of euros invested just to exist. And the platform invests nothing in return. No visibility. No value sharing. Not even a word of encouragement.
¯

_
||#HSLdiary #HSLmichael

#InvisibleLabor #PlatformCapitalism #CreatorEconomy #DigitalPrecarity #FreeLabor #YouTubeProblems #Shadowban