Conflating "Responsible Metrics" with "Responsible Assessment" is a common strategic error in research management.

Responsible Metrics focus on data sources and quantification (the technical side). Responsible Assessment focuses on institutional processes, ethics, and people (the political/governance side).

Adopting better data tools (like OpenAlex) without reforming decision-making cultures is not a solution. It is often just a way to make the same mistakes using better data.

My latest analysis on why this distinction is critical for policy design: https://copdeb.com/2025/12/22/diferencia-metricas-responsable-evaluacion-responsable/

#ResearchAssessment #OpenScience #CoARA #Bibliometrics #SciPol #ResearchManagement

La diferencia entre métricas responsable y evaluación responsable - Copdeb

Las métricas responsables y la evaluación responsable son temas de mayor discusión en as tendencias globales de evaluación de la investigación

Copdeb

#Scientometrics & #Bibliometrics researchers!
#DidYouKnow the #OpenAIREGraph dataset is publicly accessible on #GoogleCloud #BigQuery with full tutorials & use-cases available?
Ready for you to explore, analyze, and discover insights!
✅ Query millions of publications, datasets, software, projects & their relationships
✅ Build custom analytics
✅ Track research impact & collaboration networks
 
🔗 Learn more https://graph.openaire.eu/docs/cloud-access/

#OpenScience #OpenData #BigQuery #ScholarlyComms #ResearchMetrics

New research in Journal of Informetrics asked 2,300+ social scientists from 42 countries: what are your top-3 publications?

 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101757

Only ~40% of self-identified “top” works also ranked in the author’s top-3 by citations. Even tripling citation counts wouldn’t push nearly a third of them into the bibliometric top. And 17% of “best” works don’t even appear in Scopus - especially in sociology and political science.

#Metrics #Bibliometrics #ResearchAssessment #Citations

The many I’s in Bibliometrics: Seeing ourselves in the collective

Following the first post in this series on the realities of bibliometric practice and the isolation of practitioners, LIS-Bibliometrics Committee member Naomi Richards reflects on her personal expe…

The Bibliomagician
How to juice your Google Scholar h-index, preprint by preprint

A screenshot of Yousaf’s Google Scholar profile before it was removed. Muhammad Zain Yousaf, a postdoc at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China, became a scholar of note overnight. Or so it …

Retraction Watch
Do you have experience with VOSviewer (or similar) and are you interested in helping us visualize citation networks as part of our systematic review? Please get in touch with Sebastiaan via bol@cowboycatranch.org. Co-authorship is possible. #VOSviewer #citationnetworks #bibliometrics

The preprint went through open peer review on @MetaROR and was later published, after additional blind review rounds, in the partner Journal of Data and Information Science #JDIS – a demanding but very useful experience.

 https://doi.org/10.70744/MetaROR.179.2.ea

#OpenAccess #publishing #Ukraine #bibliometrics #GoldOA

APC waivers and Ukraine’s publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers - MetaROR

MetaROR

My new paper on Ukrainian researchers’ publishing activity in Gold Open Access journals during the war has just been published. I focused on five major publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, and SAGE):

 https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-0059

Ukrainian papers in fully Gold OA journals of these publishers grew by more than 50% in 2023, with further growth in 2024.

#OpenAccess #publishing #Ukraine #bibliometrics #GoldOA

This is genuinely terrifying. Google Scholar is pushing "AI Powered Scholar Search."

What's scariest about this is that it will almost certainly turn up results that feel *right* -- they'll mention relevant topics and let a researcher craft a perfectly unassailable reference list.

But what it will prevent the researcher from doing is the actual research of finding relevant publications: discovering connections, framing questions, identifying contrasts…

#AI #GenAI #bibliometrics #science

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) now accepts HTML-based submissions for interactive research articles: https://tmlr-beyond-pdf.org/about

The format uses Markdown with supplementary HTML files and a .bib citation file. The final articles are similar to distill.pub publications with embedded widgets, videos, and GIFs.

It’s great to have more interactivity in articles, but I think it would make sense to consider bundling JavaScript dependencies locally. The example article currently relies on CDNs, which could cause reliability issues.
Interestingly, metadata currently includes only title, abstract, authors with affiliations, and table of contents. Keywords are not included.

#bibliometrics #academicpublishing

About | TMLR Beyond PDF

TMLR Beyond PDFs