Today I’m at the BRIC conference in #Edmonton https://bric-conference.ca/.

I heard a question about Twitter and altmetrics. What could we do to capture altmetrics in the #fediverse? I didn’t have an answer.

Is there an answer? @evan

#scholcomm #altmetrics #bibliometrics

The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1751157726000337?via%3Dihub

It's a good overview with >150 articles covered.

#bibliometrics #openalex

📊 How do researchers actually use bibliographic databases today?

The Bibliometrics Service of the Université de Lorraine has published the results of its 2026 survey on Web of Science usage, conducted across the university community.

Based on 545 responses spanning a broad disciplinary spectrum, the survey explores current practices around Web of Science, Google Scholar, disciplinary databases, and the emerging open alternative #OpenAlex.

Key findings include:
đŸ”č Google Scholar is now the most consulted resource, ahead of Web of Science.
đŸ”č Web of Science remains mainly used for literature search, monitoring, bibliometric studies, and Journal Citation Reports.
đŸ”č OpenAlex, although still relatively new, is gaining attention for its broad coverage, accessibility, and open infrastructure.
đŸ”č The study suggests that many WoS uses could potentially transition toward OpenAlex, provided there is continued work on data quality and user support.

This work aligns with the UniversitĂ© de Lorraine’s commitment to open research information, in the broader context of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information @BarcelonaDORI and ongoing changes in institutional subscriptions to proprietary databases.

A key takeaway:
âžĄïž Open tools alone are not enough; their successful adoption also depends on training, mediation, and support from academic libraries.

📖 Read the full analysis:
đŸ‡«đŸ‡· French version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310514
📂 Raw data available on Recherche Data Gouv:
https://doi.org/10.57745/THDNY1
🇬🇧 English version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20312097

#OpenScience #Bibliometrics #ResearchInformation #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #OpenResearch

EnquĂȘte sur les usages du Web of Science Ă  l'UniversitĂ© de Lorraine : analyse

Afin d’étudier les fonctionnalitĂ©s de la base bibliographique et bibliomĂ©trique OpenAlex, alternative ouverte, gratuite et Ă©largie Ă  l’outil Web of Science, le service BibliomĂ©trie de l’UniversitĂ© de Lorraine a souhaitĂ© connaĂźtre les usages actuels du personnel du site universitaire lorrain du Web of Science. Ce travail s’inscrit dans la continuitĂ© des engagements pris par la PrĂ©sidence de l’UniversitĂ© de Lorraine dans le domaine, mais aussi plus largement dans le contexte d’ouverture des informations sur la recherche dĂ©taillĂ© dans la DĂ©claration de Barcelone que l’UniversitĂ© de Lorraine a signĂ©e en novembre 2024 ; dĂ©claration qui a notamment conduit Sorbonne UniversitĂ© Ă  ne plus s’abonner au Web of Science. Plus rĂ©cemment, c’est au tour du CNRS de se dĂ©sabonner du Web of Science, et ce dĂšs le 1er janvier 2026. Le rĂ©sultat de cette enquĂȘte avait pour objectif de permettre au service BibliomĂ©trie de remonter les besoins auprĂšs de l’équipe d’OpenAlex afin d’adapter au mieux ses fonctionnalitĂ©s et l’accompagnement mis en place. Les rĂ©ponses ont Ă©tĂ© acceptĂ©es du 12 janvier au 13 fĂ©vrier 2026.

Zenodo

Digital identity in science is not unified by default. Tools like ORCID and database checks can reveal mismatches and missing affiliations that affect visibility and credit.

🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04132-y

#ResearchIntegrity #ORCID #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #SciencePolicy

Researchers: here’s how to audit your fragmented digital identity

Services that track researcher profiles can splinter people’s online identities — but there are ways to keep them consistent.

You may not agree with this paper, but you should read it:

"Aging and the narrowing of scientific innovation", Cui et al. 2026 (James Evans lab)
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ady8732

"Analyzing more than 12.5 million scientists who published between 1960 and 2020, we find that novelty—the linking of previously unconnected ideas—increases with academic age, whereas disruption—the replacement of established ideas with new ones—declines."

#ScientificPublishing #science #bibliometrics

Translate Science invites you to our first PREreview Club live review! We'll be meeting online Tuesday, May 26, 2026 from 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM UTC. Participants who choose to be Review Authors will also collaborate asynch to finalize a constructive peer review.

We'll be reviewing Galip Kartal, Ali Karakaß. Mapping Research on Global Englishes: A Bibliometric Analysis, 14 April 2026, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9393872/v1]

RSVP on Mobilizon with your email:

https://mobilizon.picasoft.net/events/a6cff069-c166-4bb8-b0d4-c7e844a4e7ff

#OpenScience #PeerReview #translation #GlobalEnglish #bibliometrics

Mapping Research on Global Englishes: A Bibliometric Analysis

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the Global Englishes (GE) research landscape, mapping its thematic evolution, intellectual structure, and global scholarly contributions. Drawing on 191 peer-reviewed articles indexed in the Web of Science, we employed co-occurrence,...

Using neural embeddings of citation networks, researchers map scientific “disruption”: when future research stops following past directions and starts a new trajectory.

https://phys.org/news/2026-03-breakthroughs-science-large-scale-analysis.html

#Science #Innovation #Bibliometrics #MachineLearning #ResearchPolicy

A new way to detect breakthroughs in science: Large-scale analysis reveals 'disruptive' innovations in research history

The history of science and technology is marked by major breakthroughs—the theory of evolution, the splitting of the atom, the development of antibiotics—and a research team including faculty at Binghamton University, State University of New York, has developed a method to help pinpoint discoveries that reshaped the course of science.

Phys.org
Comparison of OpenAlex and Scopus coverage of German institutions’ publications in top-tier journals – InfoDoc MicroVeille

A força do OpenAlex: nesse diagrama de Venn estão agrupados todos os periódicos onde os pesquisadores brasileiros publicam que estão na Scopus, no Google Scholar e no OpenAlex.

Dos periĂłdicos que estĂŁo em alguma das 3 bases indexadoras, o OpenAlex tem 90% deles.

#bibliometrics #openalex #bibliometria

I’m glad to share my paper on publication activity and migration trends of Ukrainian SSH scholars during the first two years of the full-scale war.

👉 https://www.jscires.org/article/15/1/124

The key finding: the most productive researchers have largely remained in #Ukraine and many have maintained or even increased their publication activity, despite the challenges.

#Science #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #HigherEducation #Scientometrics #Research #Academia