Americans Are Smashing Flock Cameras

https://stateofsurveillance.org/news/flock-cameras-destroyed-nationwide-ice-backlash-2026/

#HackerNews #Americans #Flock #Cameras #Surveillance #Activism #Backlash #2026

A Call to Action: A Historical Response to Backlash

Table of Contents

1. Introduction: The Myth of Ignorance

There has always been a convenient claim of ignorance, a collective posture of denial, whenever Black Americans pinpoint how we are targeted and discriminated against in this country. For generations, our systemic grievances against “the man” or “they” were met with defensive deflections: What man? Who is “they”? Why would Black people be targeted? It is an astonishing framing, posed as if slavery did not anchor this land for 250 years, followed by another century of apartheid under Jim Crow. While most will not deny the existence of the Ku Klux Klan or overt white supremacist groups, there remains a stubborn refusal to admit to a systemic, institutional assault against Black rights.

Truthfully, even we were not always able to pinpoint the exact mechanics of the machine. We felt the harassment of the police, we felt the sting of negative narratives, and we knew we were treated poorly with diminished rights—but in our youth, we still struggled with the systemic “why.”

Learning history changed everything for me. I have written before about the books my uncle—the first college graduate on my mother’s side of our family—placed in my hands: foundational works on Frederick Douglass, Marcus Garvey, Angela Davis, and Stokely Carmichael. In college, Black history courses opened my eyes to Africa and its great nations, universities, kings, and queens. After college, I joined the African Peoples Organization, where every week we sat at the feet of guest speakers, visionaries, and authors like Ivan Van Sertima, John Henrik Clarke, and Dr. Yosef Ben-Jochannan.

This is how I learned the true history of my ancestors. This is how I learned all of American history, not just the sanitized, selective narratives taught in public schools. When you learn all of history, the “who” and the “why” cease to be a mystery.

When asked, I have always been able to explain exactly what systemic racism is and give a rational answer as to why it persists. So, when I look at current events—the latest coordinated assault on the rights of African Americans—I am neither shocked nor surprised. The erosion of voting rights, aggressive gerrymandering, the aggressive dismantling of DEI initiatives in corporate America and universities, the state-sponsored censorship of Black history literature, and the deliberate defunding of the Fair Housing Act are not isolated incidents. I recognize them for what they are: the latest implementation of what scholars, civil rights organizations, and legal analysts describe as an intense, coordinated “backlash” designed to systematically dismantle policies established to advance racial equity.

The rollbacks use a synchronized strategy: a Supreme Court ruling alters a precedent, political groups instantly scale that ruling into sweeping legislative challenges against schools and corporations, while state houses concurrently redraw maps to suppress the political power of the very communities fighting back. The data confirms that the structural floor is actively being pulled back across multiple pillars of civic and cultural life. These are interconnected, structural rollbacks.

2. The Modern Frontline: A Direct Reaction to 2020

To understand the precision of the current rollbacks, we must trace them directly to their catalyst: the global racial justice uprisings of 2020 following the murder of George Floyd. In that cultural moment, the overall tone regarding civil rights shifted dramatically from passive acknowledgment to corporate and institutional action. Multibillion-dollar corporations pledged massive budgets to support diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Elite universities pledged fair access and holistic admissions. The nation experienced a profound, collective reckoning with systemic bias.

But history teaches us that an equal and opposite force always follows such progress. Today, that progress is being systematically undone, not through overt violence, but through sophisticated legal, cultural, and political defenses designed to sanitize the rollback under the guise of universal virtues.

The Legal Defenses: “Colorblindness” and True Merit

• The Rationale: Opponents argue that any corporate policy, fellowship, or admissions criteria that considers race—even to remedy centuries of documented disadvantage—is inherently discriminatory. They invoke a strict interpretation of “colorblindness,” weaponizing the civil rights era’s own language against it.
• The Language: Public directives and legal filings argue that DEI policies “deny, discredit, and undermine the traditional American values of hard work, excellence, and individual achievement… diminishing the importance of individual merit and aptitude.”
• The Pivot: By framing DEI as a direct threat to “merit,” opponents reframe themselves as protectors of qualified individuals (often highlighting white or Asian applicants) who are allegedly bypassed by “ideological box-checking.”
• The Reality / Impact: This strategy effectively removes critical pathways for minority advancement and professional development. By generating intense legal uncertainty, it creates a widespread chilling effect that pressures corporations and universities into quietly dismantling or sanitizing their diversity programs to avoid costly litigation.

The Cultural Defenses: “Parental Rights” and “Age Appropriateness”

• The Rationale: When removing Black-themed literature and censoring history curricula, the architecture avoids mentioning race entirely. Instead, the focus shifts to protecting children and defending parental authority over public education.
• The Language: Conservative school boards and advocacy groups assert that “refusing to stock a book in a school library—especially one that includes explicit scenes or heavy themes—is not the same as banning it… Parents have both the right and the responsibility to demand that schools protect children’s innocence.”
• The Pivot: By framing the removal of literature by authors like Toni Morrison or James Baldwin as a matter of “protecting innocence,” any resistance from educators or civil rights groups is spun as an attempt by the state to “indoctrinate” children behind parents’ backs.
• The Reality / Impact: The actual result is the systemic erasure of Black literature, culture, and structural context from public view. It isolates young readers from diverse perspectives and aggressively polices the classroom, leaving educators fearful of teaching verified historical facts regarding systemic racism and slavery.

The Institutional Defenses: “National Unity” vs. “Divisive Ideologies”

• The Rationale: The justification for targeting sacred cultural institutions like the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture centers on national cohesion, claiming that focusing heavily on slavery and segregation creates unnecessary societal fractures.
• The Language: Policy directives demand the prohibition of federal funding for programs that “degrade shared American values or divide Americans based on race,” calling instead for public spaces to exclusively reflect a “heritage of consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union.”
• The Pivot: Curatorial adjustments—such as erasing references to systemic white supremacy during Reconstruction or removing profiles of figures like Harriet Tubman from federal portals—are defended as “content corrections” meant to remove partisan bias and restore objective, patriotic historical accuracy.
• The Reality / Impact: This administrative overreach actively sanitizes public historical narratives of racial terror and structural oppression. By forcing top leadership out and imposing strict political oversight on exhibitions, it replaces authentic historical documentation with romanticized, nationalist propaganda.

The Political Defenses: Preventing “Partisan Distortions”

• The Rationale: When state legislatures redraw maps to split up historic Black communities and dilute their voting power, they exploit a major judicial loophole: partisan gerrymandering is legally permissible, while racial gerrymandering is not.
• The Language: Lawmakers defend these aggressively altered maps by stating they are “driven entirely by partisan goals—trying to maximize seats for our political party—and that any disruption to minority voting blocks is merely an incidental byproduct of political geography.”
• The Pivot: By labeling the surgical destruction of Black voting strength as simple, everyday partisan politics, lawmakers shield their maps from constitutional challenges in federal courts.
• The Reality / Impact: This legal shield directly dilutes minority voting strength and cripples the core protections of the Voting Rights Act. It allows politicians to surgically carve apart concentrated Black communities—such as the recent splitting of Memphis—and scatter their voting blocks into rural, predominantly white districts, effectively suppressing their ability to elect representatives of their choice.

The Rhetorical Shift at a Glance

3. The Historical Landscape of Reversal

This current moment is not an anomaly, nor is it a malfunction of American democracy. It is a continuation of a predictable cycle that has repeated since the founding of the republic. Every single peak of Black political, economic, or social progress has been met with a calculated, institutional valley of counter-mobilization—a “Redemption Cycle” designed to restore the racial status quo.

The Historical Ledger of Progress and Backlash

• Bacon’s Rebellion (1676) to the Slave Legislation of 1705
  • The Progress: Poor Black laborers and white indentured servants united in an interracial, populist uprising against the planter elite, demonstrating the terrifying power of cross-racial solidarity.
  • The Backlash: The elite responded by passing the Virginia Slave Codes of 1705, legally codifying hereditary chattel slavery, dividing laborers by race, and creating legal privileges for poor whites to break the multi-racial alliance.
• Reconstruction (1865–1877) to Jim Crow
  • The Progress: The passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments led to unprecedented Black political mobilization, establishing Black electoral majorities across the South and sending Black men to Congress.
  • The Backlash: The “Redemption” era brought the immediate removal of federal troops, the rise of the Ku Klux Klan’s terrorist campaign, and the codification of Jim Crow laws (poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses) to completely disenfranchise Black voters.
• The Great Migration & WWI to the Red Summer of 1919 and the Nadir
  • The Progress: Hundreds of thousands of Black Americans migrated to Northern cities for economic independence, while 350,000 Black soldiers served in Europe, returning home with money, mobility, and a refusal to submit to subjugation.
  • The Backlash: The Red Summer of 1919 saw white-led racial massacres detonate in over three dozen cities. Black veterans were targeted and lynched in their uniforms, coinciding with the rapid rebirth of the Second Ku Klux Klan to enforce labor dependency.
• Parallel Wealth Accumulation to the Destruction of Black Wall Streets (1920s)
  • The Progress: Blocked from the white economy, Black communities built thriving, self-sustaining parallel economies, amassing generational wealth in enclaves like Greenwood (Tulsa, OK), Rosewood, and Ocoee, Florida.
  • The Backlash: Coordinated white mobs, frequently deputized by local law enforcement, physically liquidated these towns through arson and mass murder, explicitly destroying Black capital to enforce absolute economic dependency.
• Brown v. Board of Education (1954) to Massive Resistance and School Closures (1950s–1960s)
  • The Progress: The Supreme Court struck down “separate but equal,” handing a monumental legal victory to the early civil rights movement and mandating public school integration.
  • The Backlash: Southern leaders organized “Massive Resistance.” Rather than integrate, entire counties (such as Prince Edward County, VA) defunded and completely shut down their public school systems for years, funneling white children into private, state-subsidized “segregation academies.”
• The Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts to Mass Incarceration
  • The Progress: The legal architecture of American apartheid was successfully dismantled by federal legislation, securing federal protection for voting, housing, and public accommodations.
  • The Backlash: The political system shifted toward the “War on Drugs” and hyper-policing. By utilizing racially disparate sentencing policies like mandatory minimums, the state constructed a system of mass incarceration that stripped millions of Black Americans of their liberty and voting rights.
• The Election of Barack Obama (2008) to the Election of Donald Trump
  • The Progress: A multi-racial coalition successfully elected the first Black president, representing a symbolic and political breakthrough that signaled a changing American demographic landscape.
  • The Backlash: The immediate rise of populist ethno-nationalism, birtherism, and a political movement explicitly centered on “taking our country back,” culminating in a complete capture of the federal judiciary.

The Historical Comparison Matrix

4. The Anatomy of Recovery

The history my uncle handed me, and the history I studied deeply, is not a chronicle of despair. It is a blueprint for survival. Black culture has never been passively crushed by these valleys; it has historically navigated them through a cyclical blueprint of recovery.

The Operational Mechanics of Resilience

• Institutional Repurposing (The Parallel State): When the state becomes hostile, the culture turns inward. Following Reconstruction, the Black Church expanded far beyond a spiritual sanctuary, functioning as a bank, mutual aid society, and insurer. Simultaneously, when public funds were withheld, Black communities established Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), creating a parallel pipeline of professionals who would eventually dismantle Jim Crow.
• Spatial and Geographic Re-anchoring: When localized terror becomes absolute, migration is used as a strategic relocation of leverage. The Great Migration was not just a flight from danger; it concentrated Black voting power into critical northern congressional districts and packed Black capital into dense urban centers like Harlem and Chicago’s South Side.
• Creative Resistance and Narrative Capture: Violent political suppression has routinely triggered an immediate explosion of artistic subversion. Following the Red Summer of 1919, the Harlem Renaissance rejected respectability politics to define an unapologetic Black aesthetic. Decades later, the Black Arts Movement established independent publishing houses and theaters, ensuring our history could not be erased by mainstream publishers.
• The Formalization of Underground Activism: When explicit resistance is criminalized, everyday spaces are converted into subversive networks. Just as spirituals once mapped the Underground Railroad, the post-civil rights era of municipal neglect birthed Hip-Hop culture—functioning as an independent journalistic medium that broadcasted structural realities to a global audience when mainstream media refused to look.

The Cyclical Blueprint of Recovery

Ultimately, Black culture recovers because its survival strategy has never relied on the permanence of American political goodwill. The recovery structure is built on a foundational understanding that when the external environment becomes hostile, the internal community must become completely self-reliant. By turning inward to fortify its institutions and outward through un-ignorable creative brilliance, the culture transforms the trauma of the backlash into the fuel for the next era of progress.

5. The Strategic Playbook for the Present

Because the modern 2025–2026 rollback relies heavily on federal defunding, judicial manipulation, and institutional capture mechanisms, trying to “repair” the broken federal guardrails in the current political climate is a losing battle. The path forward requires accepting that the floor has been pulled back, turning inward to build fortified parallel systems, and using state and local leverage points to wait out the crest of the wave—exactly as the culture has done in every generation prior.

Our strategy must shift immediately to three distinct fronts:

Deep Decoupling and Private Philanthropic Enclaves

We must intentionally decouple our cultural repositories and tracking systems from federal reliance. Following the administration’s threats to freeze federal funding for the NMAAHC, we must aggressively build independent, private endowments for Black museums and historical archives to insulate them entirely from shifting political administrations. Furthermore, as federal portals purge data on civil rights compliance, our legacy civil rights organizations must scale privately funded, independent data repositories to continue tracking systemic inequities.

The State-Level “Firewall” Strategy

With the Supreme Court effectively eviscerating the remaining core of the Voting Rights Act by permitting racial vote dilution under the guise of partisan maps, the federal courts are no longer our shield. The struggle has moved entirely to the state level. We must focus exclusively on passing state-level VRAs—modeled after New York and California—that outlaw minority vote dilution under state law, while pressuring state attorneys general to use state housing laws to aggressively fill the enforcement gap left by the 59% budget cuts to HUD.

The “Underground Library” and Corporate Counter-Risk

To defeat local book bans and anti-history curricula, we must render the physical classroom obsolete as the sole arbiter of education. We must deploy geofenced digital libraries to drop free, un-censored e-books directly to mobile devices inside censored zip codes, while resurrecting the 1964 Mississippi “Freedom School” model—establishing weekend, community-run cultural academies to teach our history directly to our youth. Concurrently, in the corporate arena, we must protect minority recruitment pipelines by shifting our language from race-conscious metrics to bulletproof socioeconomic and geographic indicators, preserving access while neutralizing legal liability.

Summary of the Recommended Recovery Playbook

6. A Call to Action: The Power of Selective Patronage

Defensive firewalls and parallel institutions are only half the battle. True resistance requires us to leverage our most potent, un-ignorable asset: our economic and cultural non-cooperation.

The American apparatus has always valued Black culture, entertainment, and labor immensely—but only when it is compliant, quiet, and highly profitable. It is time to strip away that compliance.

If a state participates in these structural rollbacks, it must no longer profit from our brilliance.

• To our elite Black collegiate athletes: Avoid attending or playing for universities in states that have aggressively shut down campus DEI offices and stripped minority scholarships. Your labor generates hundreds of millions of dollars in television revenue and merchandise for these institutions. Redirect your generational talents to fortify the infrastructure of our HBCUs or states that actively protect your humanity.
• To our prominent performers and artists: Avoid scheduling your national tours, concerts, and cultural events in Red States that are actively banning our books and censoring our history. Starve their local entertainment and tourism economies of your massive revenue.
• To our Black organizations, fraternities, sororities, and professional networks: Avoid hosting your national conventions, galas, and conferences in hotels, stadiums, or auditoriums within hostile states. Pull your millions of convention dollars out of their tax bases and intentionally inject those resources into municipalities that have passed protective civil rights firewalls.

I understand how difficult this is. We are engrained in this economy. It was not easy for those walking to work and school during the “Montgomery Boycott”. I know that this would be difficult for all of us but I believe we must pair this total withdrawal with an intentional “buy-cotting” movement, consciously contracting with independent, Black-owned vendors, security firms, and production companies to recirculate our capital internally. When we collectively withdraw our labor, our culture, and our dollars, we force local business owners and chambers of commerce to become the ones lobbying hostile legislatures to stop the rollbacks. History shows that the machine only pauses when its gears are choked by a lack of profitability. It is time to stop financing our own erasure.

7. Glossary of Key Terms

• Autarky (Economic): A state of economic self-sufficiency or independence where a community maintains parallel internal markets to survive external exclusion.
• Backlash Momentum: A structural, reactive counter-mobilization by dominant political or racial structures specifically designed to reverse civil rights advancements.
• Colorblind Legal Theory: A judicial philosophy asserting that all legal and corporate classifications based on race are inherently unconstitutional, intentionally disregarding historical disparities or remediation needs.
• Cracking (Gerrymandering): A redistricting technique where a concentrated minority voting population is divided (“cracked”) across multiple districts to dilute their voting power and prevent them from electing a preferred candidate.
• Institutional Decoupling: The deliberate process of separating community cultural, data, or financial assets from state and federal funding structures to shield them from shifting political control.
• Nadir (of American Race Relations): The period from the end of Reconstruction (1877) through the early 20th century when racism, segregation, and racial terrorism reached their peak in the United States.
• Redemption Era: The historical period following Reconstruction where white Southern Democrats (“Redeemers”) violently reclaimed political control of state houses and instituted Jim Crow legislation.
• Selective Patronage: The strategic, organized application of economic boycotts and intentional spending (“buy-cotts”) to enforce political or corporate accountability.

8. Bibliography

• Anderson, C. (2016). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Carter, K. (2026). Banned and buried: The color of censorship in American education. UIC Law Review, 59(3), 523–550.
• Draper, F. M. T. (2025, August 21). Defending the ‘Blacksonian’ is defending America’s truth. Word In Black.
• Franzese, P. A. (2026). Federalism and fair housing: State innovation amidst federal retrenchment. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 53(4), 971–1002.
• Gedeon, J. (2025, August 20). Trump administration’s anti-woke campaign targets Smithsonian museums. The Guardian.
• Grad, R. J. (2026). DEI under scrutiny: Doctrinal shifts, litigation risk, and emerging threats to civil rights law after SFFA. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 21(2), 145–182.
• Hoover, O. S. (2025). Let freedom read: Exploring Mississippi’s defiance of national book banning trends. University of San Francisco Honors College Repository, Article 1099.
• Moseley Braun, C. (2025). Moseley Braun calls Trump ‘insane’ after assault on National Black Museum. The Chicago Crusader.
• Pitts, M. (2026). Underruling voting rights. New Mexico Law Review, 56(1), 45–78.
• Sherman v. Black Voters Matter Fund, No. 3:26-cv-00424 (M.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026).
• Showkat, M. (2025). The backlash effect: How diversity, equity, and inclusion programs influence employee engagement and organizational commitment. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2598192.
• Southern Poverty Law Center. (2026, February 5). Erasing the past: The Trump administration’s attacks on history since 2025. Hatewatch.
• The Guardian. (2026, January 8). Trump’s assault on the Smithsonian: ‘The goal is to reframe the entire culture of the US’. The Guardian.
• Washington Post. (2026, May 15). The Smithsonian’s most contested exhibition is back on view, mostly intact. The Washington Post.

A Look Back at The Kindred #4 (1994)

Disclaimer: This is my original work with details sourced from reading the comic book and doing personal research. Anyone who wants to use this article, in part or in whole, needs to secure first my permission and agree to cite me as the source and author. Let it be known that any unauthorized use of this article will constrain the author to pursue the remedies under R.A. No. 8293, the Revised Penal Code, and/or all applicable legal actions under the laws of the Philippines.

Welcome back, superhero fans, 1990s arts and culture enthusiasts, Image Comics and comic book collectors! Today we go back to the mid-1990s to examine one of the many tales of the WildStorm universe through The Kindred mini-series.

After reading the first three issues of this WildStorm mini-series, Grifter and Backlash were well defined as two former teammates of Team 7 who are at great odds with each other. Adding more emphasis to the Team 7 legacy and the dirty history of International Operations (IO) was IO officer John Lynch (who became a captive in this mini-series) and the revealed leader of the Kindred. The stage is set for the conclusion of this mini-series.

With those details laid down, here is a look back at The Kindred #4, published by Image Comics in 1994 with a story written by Jim Lee, Brandon Choi, Sean Ruffner and the illustrator himself, Brett Booth.

Early story

The story begins some time after the leader of the Kindred revealed himself to Lynch, Grifter, Backlash and Alicia Turner. It has been former IO operative and Team 7 member Roberto Diaz all along and he blamed Backlash for leaving him for dead more than twenty years prior during a desperate situation in South America.

On the orders of Diaz, a few of the beastly Kindred servants carried the severely damaged body of Backlash to a waterfall and threw him down. Elsewhere, Grifter is naked and contained in a water container with oxygen and a communication device attached to him. Roberto Diaz watches and communicates with him. Diaz tells Grifter that the his old identity is no more and the only thing he requires from him are gen samples which are crucial to better understand the genesis drug.

Diaz reveals to him that duplicating the genesis drug is crucial for the Kindred to create more life and be able to overwhelm the world and force it to recognize the might of the Kindred society. Grifter tries to reason with his former teammate by telling him that the genesis serum is something that is not meant to be tampered as it will lead to destruction…

Quality

This early, I can say that Jim Lee, Brandon Choi, Sean Ruffner and Brett Booth gave their best effort to make this final chapter very intriguing, dramatic and explosive to read at the same time. Along the way, they expanded the lore of the original WildStorm universe while building up anticipation for the Team 7 original mini-series (released in the 4th quarter of 1994).

The writing got even stronger in this final issue in terms of storytelling and character development. Roberto Diaz is not a one-dimensional super villain. In fact, he strongly believes that he was betrayed not only by Team 7 and IO, but by humanity in general. As such, he found purpose with the Kindred during his survival days and injected himself with the genesis drug which enhanced him but also turned him into an addict (this alone added drug addiction as a key theme). As far as Roberto Diaz is concerned, he is on a path of no return and his obsession with vengeance against humanity justifies his leadership of the Kindred and the master plan to overwhelm humanity someday. In terms of geopolitics, this reminds me a lot about Islamic terrorists going up against Western civilization using violence while having their fellow Islamists migrate into different nations worldwide to overwhelm those societies from within. Of course, the concept of Diaz and the Kindred plotting against many billions of humans here is high fantasy mixed with unethical science, terrorism, infiltration and terrorism.

The creators managed to develop Grifter, Backlash and John Lynch even more. Lynch here is portrayed as very stressed and struggling with being responsible over the deaths of many men IO sent to rescue him. He even believed for a while that Backlash is dead and he knows fully well that the Kindred are not crazy but rather intelligent and are obsessed with seeking justice. In some ways, Lynch is also responsible for the Kindred and he reflects on what he did for decades for IO while serving as a Team 7 member with a leadership role.

Grifter and Backlash, who are often visually featured in the promos of this mini-series, also have their fair share of the spotlight. Both heroes are severely beaten and not even their special talents or powers were enough to overcome the violent opposition of the Kindred. I like the way the creators emphasized Grifter’s (civilian identity: Cole Cash) personality as he got into the same prison cell with Alicia Turner who turned out to be involved with him several years prior. Grifter here is uneasy about the past not only as member of Team 7 but also as a person. As for Backlash, I’ll say that he has the classic heroic comeback in this issue and things got really tense between him and Roberto Diaz.

When it comes to superhero spectacle, this one is really packed with action and Brett Booth delivered some dynamic artworks to make the story look entertaining. When he draws the Kindred – those animalistic loyalists of Roberto Diaz – he makes them look horrific and intimidating from time to time. When it comes to drawing Backlash and Grifter, Booth’s take has some rough edges as this mini-series was produced before the start of the Backlash series.

Conclusion

I can say that The Kindred #4 (1994) is a worthy end to the mini-series. By the time the plot concluded, the lore and the paramilitary concepts of the original WildStorm universe got expanded a lot with emphasis on the legacy left behind by Team 7 and IO. Grifter, Backlash and John Lynch – all former teammates of Team 7 – got nicely developed here and their significance within the WildStorm universe got stronger. This comic book delivered intrigue, surprises and a good amount of spectacle from start to finish. It also succeeded in setting the stage for the late-1994 launch of Team 7.

Overall, The Kindred #4 (1994) is recommended.

+++++

Thank you for reading. If you find this article engaging, please click the like button below and also please consider sharing this article to others. If you are looking for a copywriter to create content for your special project or business, check out my services and my portfolio. If you want to support my website, please consider making a donation. Feel free to contact me with a private message. Also please feel free to visit my Facebook page Author Carlo Carrasco and follow me on Twitter at @CarloCarrascoPH as well as on Tumblr at https://carlocarrasco.tumblr.com/ and on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/authorcarlocarrasco/.