Testosterone shifts political preferences in weakly affiliated Democratic men, study finds

What if the key to swaying a swing voter lies in their biology? New research found giving testosterone to weakly affiliated Democratic men made them less loyal to their party and more open to Republicans, revealing a potential hormonal link to political persuasion.

PsyPost Psychology News

The contemporary American sociopolitical landscape remains significantly informed by the ideological frameworks established during the Cold War era.

"Understanding Today’s American Worldview: Cold War Legacy." For those interested in historiography, political psychology, and international relations, this is an excellent resource.

Full article here:
🔗 https://www.djoinerbooks.com/understanding-todays-american-worldview/

#Historiography #DennisJoiner #ColdWarHistory #PoliticalScience #PublicInterest #AmericanStudies #InternationalRelations

Understanding Today’s American Worldview: Cold War Legacy - Dennis Joiner

Understanding today’s American worldview through the Cold War legacy, tracing power, fear, culture, and politics that shape U.S. thinking.

Dennis Joiner

Going to Tehran Co-authors Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett Predicted the Iran War Back in 2013.


Posted by Jerry Alatalo | April 16, 2026

Iranian Professor Seyed Marandi has become well-known in America and worldwide after appearing numerous times on independent and traditional media programs. Professor Marandi has made it a point to (repeatedly) recommend that viewers read the book “Going to Tehran”, co-authored by American academics Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett.

“Going to Tehran” is a book by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, published in 2013, arguing that the United States must develop a strategic partnership with Iran similar to its relationship with China in the 1970s. The authors contend that engaging with Iran is essential to stabilize the Middle East and avoid conflict.

After listening closely to an in-depth March 2013 interview of the Leveretts to talk about their (subsequent -increasingly) important 2013 book (interview below), it becomes crystal clear as to why Professor Marandi recommends reading the book time and again during his many public appearances.

Amazon review by Dave: 5.0 out of 5 stars A Must-Read for Anti-War Activists

Reviewed in the United States on 18 June 2013

Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase

“The dogs of war in the U.S. media bark and, in true Don Quixote fashion, it’s a sign that authors Hillary and Flynt Leverett are on the move. In their electrifying new book, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the former National Security Council experts – who were forced out of their positions for their opposition to Washington’s war-mongering and occupation – take on the growing myths told by the U.S. government about Iran.

Liberals, conservatives and centrists in the U.S. media hysterically attacked Going to Tehran as soon as it came out. The Wall Street Journal derided the Leveretts as “Washington’s most outspoken defenders of the mullahs,” in a particularly nasty hit-piece called “I Heart Khomenei.” Laura Secor of the New York Times called the book “one-sided” and a “mirror image” of the anti-Iran propaganda churned out by the U.S. government. Foreign Affairs claims they “overargue” their case for ending U.S. hostilities. The Weekly Standard accused them of “paranoid dogmatism,” and The New Republic called the book “an act of ventriloquism,” presumably with the Iranian government as the puppet master.

When I see a book receive universal condemnation from the corporate-owned media, I take it as a sign that I need to read it. And ultimately every anti-war activist in the U.S. owes it to the people of Iran to check out this well-researched, persuasive and highly readable case against war with Iran. After all, we live in a country where Argo, a ludicrous xenophobic hit-piece on the Iranian Revolution, wins the Academy Award for Best Picture at the 2012 Oscars. As the Leveretts show in their book, the U.S. government and the corporate media work hand-in-glove to dominate the narrative on Iran, telling and repeating all sorts of myths and falsehoods to build the case for war against a large, independent, oil-producing country in the Middle East. Going to Tehran sets the record straight.

The book focuses on dispelling three elements of the U.S. mythology around Iran, breaking each into three-chapter parts. First, it challenges the myth that Iran is an irrational state “incapable of thinking about its foreign policy interests,” arguing instead that the Islamic Republic is incredibly rational in its fight for survival as a revolutionary state in a region historically dominated by U.S. imperialism and Israeli militarism. Second, it unravels the myth of Iran as an illegitimate state, by showing the overwhelming popularity of the Iranian government and refuting the unsubstantiated claims of electoral fraud in 2009. Finally, it challenges the myth that the U.S. can – or should – topple Iran through sanctions, diplomatic isolation and the threat of war.

Going to Tehran is written primarily to persuade policy-makers to abandon the current U.S. strategy of toppling the government of Iran. Throughout the whole book, the Leveretts seem frustrated at the very likely possibility that their well-researched case against war with Iran will go unread by politicians. However, the primary audience that will benefit from Going to Tehran is not lawmakers, but rather anti-war activists. Anti-war organizers could use the book as a starting point for reading groups and teach-ins about the nature of U.S. aggression.

The disorganized response by the U.S. anti-war movement to NATO’s attack on Libya proves the need for a unified, principled, anti-imperialist opposition to war that seeks to build meaningful international solidarity. And in 2013, Going to Tehran is an important contribution to that struggle.”

*

(Screenshot: Amazon.com)

Please share this information far and wide. Please feel free to share your response(s) in the comments. Thank you very much. Peace.

https://youtu.be/8Mlk7sXRsPc?si=_yEb2i6mPru5VP5q

Description of discussion: 6,469 views May 24, 2013 Foreign Policy and International Politics (Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/) Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett for a discussion of their new book, Going to Tehran. In the conversation, the Leveretts analyze the Islamic Republic of Iran’s strategic goals and domestic politics. After analyzing the biases embedded in U.S. perceptions of Iran, they conclude with a proposal for changing U.S. relations with Iran by emulating Nixon’s breakthrough with China Series: “Conversations with History” [5/2013] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 25083]

*

Amazon: About the Author

Flynt Leverett served at the National Security Council, State Department, and CIA, and is currently a professor of international affairs and law at Penn State.Hillary Mann Leverett served at the National Security Council and State Department and negotiated for the U.S. government with Iranian officials; she is now senior professorial lecturer at American University.Their writing has also appeared in the New York Times, Politico, Foreign Policy, and Washington Monthly, among other publications. They live in Northern Virginia.

#Books #DonaldTrump #History #Iran #Philosophy #PoliticalScience #Religion

“Where liberty dwells, there is my country”*…

Ah, but where might that be? Amos Miller (using tools from the good folks at Mapbox) shares a handy site with the answers…

The Civic Atlas is a project which marries leading civic data sets with information on governance types and physical capitals.

This project is an exploration of physical governance. As international relations enter another era of rocky uncertainty, it’s important to have the opportunity to look at a world which is not flat or equal. Many countries are on the march away from freedom and democracy towards autocracy. Many are already there.

Explore this project by selecting various freedom and democracy indices in the dropdown menu. Click a state to see where its legislative authority is housed, more information about the country, its governance system, and its governance scores. To learn more about each index, click on its link in the nav bar while selected.

This is our globe.
We all live here.

A visualization of governance around the globe: “The Civic Atlas.”

* Latin phrase of unknown origin; the motto of Algernon Sydney and James Otis

###

As we compare and contrast, we might spare a thought for Alexis de Tocqueville; he died on this date in 1859. A French diplomat, political philosopher, and historian, he is best known for his works Democracy in America (appearing in two volumes, 1835 and 1840) and The Old Regime and the Revolution (1856). In both, he analyzed the living standards and social conditions of individuals as well as their relationship to the market and state in Western societies.  Democracy in America was published after Tocqueville’s travels in the United States (on a mission to examine prisons and penitentiaries here) and is today considered an immensely important early work of sociology and political science.

“The surface of American society is covered with a layer of democracy, from beneath which the old aristocratic colors sometimes peep” – from Democracy in America

source

#AlexisDeTocqueville #civicAtlas #culture #dataVisulaization #deTocqueville #DemocracyInAmerica #design #governance #governanceSystems #history #infographics #politicalScience #politics #sociology
Perceived inequality is a breeding ground for populism, say researchers

In recent decades, income and wealth disparities have widened significantly in many European countries. At the same time, support for populist parties has grown. Previous studies have already pointed out that rising inequality may be contributing to the growth of populist movements. But how can this correlation be explained? Why are more and more people turning to populist parties?

Phys.org

The phenomenon of public protest functions as a critical sociopolitical semiotic, translating the grievances of marginalized populations into a visible, actionable discourse. 🏛️📜

"The Language of the Unheard: How Protests Move the World." For those interested in political science, sociology, and the evolution of civil liberties, this is an excellent resource.

Full article here:
https://www.djoinerbooks.com/language-of-the-unheard-protests-move-world/

#Sociology #PoliticalScience #SocialMovements #CivilLiberties #PublicInterest #History

The Language of the Unheard: How Protests Move the World - Dennis Joiner

Discover how the language of the unheard drives protest movements and why ordinary voices reshape America in this look at social change.

Dennis Joiner

#rewatch 📲 Laith Marouf is joined by Ali Jezzini, al-Mayadeen’s Military Analyst, Dimitri Lascaris, Canadian Greek lawyer and journalist, and Dr Jamal Wakim, professor of #politicalscience at the Lebanese University, to discuss the “ceasefire” in between #iran and the #US, and the situation in #lebanon -

#geopolitics
#debate
#internationallaw
#war

Video: FPTV (recorded on APR-12)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc_f5pYiZAc

Iran War Special Coverage - Roundtable: Jamal Wakim, Dimitri Lascaris & Ali Jezzini

YouTube

🇺🇸 📖 About Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship

"Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship presents a story of constitutional development that traces the confluence of the logics of slavery and settler colonialism in historical legal rulings and public policy about migration and citizenship."

🔗 https://www.annaolaw.com/book-migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship

#PoliticalScience #Politics #USPol #Civics #USA #US #UnitedStates #America #Migration #Immigration #Citizenship #Nonfiction #Books #Bookstodon

Book - Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship — Anna O. Law

Anna O. Law

I may have discovered a word that is apparently missing from the English language.

Pleonexia is the condition of being greedy, based on an ancient Greek word. (Apparently greed is not new.)

Pleonectic is the adjective.

But what about the one exhibiting this characteristic? What do we can him, her, or it?

Pleonect seems like the obvious choice, but even Google has no prior awareness of the word. The Lumo chatbot thought it was a reasonable form, but had no evidence of its use.

Used in a sentence: Pleonects are enemies of humanity

Everyone already knows that greed is the main problem with human beings. But somehow they don't seem to register that the richest among us are, basically by definition, the worst cases.

Oligarchs, plutocrats, broligarchs, all of them, the pleonects, they should be ashamed of themselves.

There is no other way to say it. They take more than their fair share, and it is not taken from nothing.

Real zero-sum "games" do exist, in case anyone may be thinking that it is possible for the poorest to live, while the rich are partying. That the wealthy fly around in jets DOES make it more expensive for others to simply get to work.

No, those who take more than their share, take it from somewhere, from someone, and it is not right. There is a reason that we dislike pleonexia when we see it. It is odious.

It is shameful. We must point that out. Announce it to the world. Shine our lights on it.

That pleonects exist at all, tells us about our base nature, not about our humanity.

That they would rise in a society, is an index on the justice of the society.

That they inhabit the realms of social and political power, should set off all of the alarms.
#sociology #politics #politicalscience #pleonexia #vampires

If your "Christian" politics requires a new enemy every election cycle to stay relevant, maybe it’s time to admit it’s just populism in a cheap Sunday suit. ⛪️🚫

#GOP #PoliticalScience #Ushistory

https://www.1bluebass.com/2026/04/01/weaponization-of-christianity/

The Weaponization of Christianity

How Charlie Kirk used Christianity to divide America In the landscape of American political discourse, few figures embody the marriage of Christian identity and partisan warfare quite like Charlie Kirk.  The founder of Turning Point USA has become a fixture in Republican circles, his influence extending from college campuses to the highest levels of GOP

1bluebass » Mathius Einai