https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/17/belfast-riots-palestine-action-protests-terrorism; https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/fundamental/counter-terror/; https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uEK_wsZLRhbgw2iO_zyyFojDYazJrBu2mxrqa5LLl9g/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0. "The #courtofappeal #judgment managed to cast #protest as #terrorism & terrorism as protest. #PalestineAction 'is not, as it claims, a #directaction #civil #disobedience protest group like the #suffragettes operating transparently in the open'... Did the suffragettes plan their #bombings, #arson & #assassination attempts... in open meetings in Parliament Square? The entire judgment seems to me to be based on fairytales."
The Belfast riots, Palestine Action protests. What is terrorism now – and why the hypocrisy?

The right is obsessed with ‘two-tier policing’. This is indeed a two-tier government – but the real victims are progressives, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot

The Guardian

UK #PalestineAction ban upheld by #CourtOfAppeal.

Full text at https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/721

Summary below by Banksy, drawn months before the judgment.

#ukpol #uklegal #genocide

British "Justice", 15 June. [2026] EWCA Civ 721

Genocide ✔️
Participation in genocide ✔️
Arming genocide ✔️
Funding genocide ✔️
Advocating genocide ✔️

Opposing genocide ❌️
Damaging weapons used in genocide ❌️
Holding cardboard signs ❌️

#CourtOfAppeal #PalestineAction #uklegal #ukpol

"And the courts gave them justice
as justice is given by well-mannered thugs"

Ban on Palestine Action was lawful, court of appeal rules

Judges overturn decision of high court that government proscription of group under Terrorism Act was wrong

The Guardian

CARDIFF AIRPORT: Bristol reported to be fighting on over £205m subsidy as Welsh rival hits a million passengers

Bristol Airport is reported to be seeking permission from the Court of Appeal to challenge the ruling that cleared the Welsh Government‘s £205m support for Cardiff Airport.

The move would be the latest round in a long-running fight over public money — and it comes at the very moment the support appears to be paying off for its Welsh rival.

It follows a decision last week by the Competition Appeal Tribunal to refuse Bristol permission to take its case to the Court of Appeal, finding that none of its six arguments stood up to scrutiny.

The tribunal accused the airport of adopting a “kitchen sink” approach — throwing every available argument at the case.

According to reports, Bristol now intends to apply to the Court of Appeal directly for permission to bring the challenge, rather than through the tribunal.

The dispute centres on the Welsh Government’s decision, in April 2025, to award Cardiff Airport a grant of £205.2m, earmarked for airline route incentives, a new hangar village and improved passenger facilities.

The Welsh Government has owned Cardiff Airport since 2013.

Bristol, which lies 27 miles from Cardiff Airport as the crow flies but more than 60 miles by road, argues its commercial interests are harmed by the public money flowing to its neighbour.

The renewed challenge comes as Cardiff passed a million passengers in a year, with official figures naming it the UK’s second fastest-growing airport.

Passenger numbers at the airport jumped 24% in the first three months of 2026 compared with the same period a year earlier, and were up 14% across the full financial year.

Much of that growth has been credited to a new transatlantic route, with Canadian airline WestJet now flying direct between Cardiff and Toronto — the first direct link between Wales and Canada in almost 20 years.

The airport says it supports thousands of jobs across south Wales and contributes more than £200m a year to the Welsh economy.

Those are the kinds of figures at the heart of the Welsh Government’s case for backing the airport in the first place.

When Bristol took the Welsh Government to the tribunal earlier this year, it branded the subsidy unlawful, disproportionate and anti-competitive.

A central plank of its case was that the Welsh Government had failed to treat Cardiff as an “ailing or insolvent” enterprise, which would have triggered extra legal requirements before support could be given.

The tribunal rejected that, ruling it was not irrational for the Welsh Government to treat the airport as a going concern — pointing in part to an earlier award, worth up to £33m, made between December 2023 and July 2024.

It also found that the rules on rescuing or restructuring failing businesses did not apply, because the purpose of the subsidy was a policy objective rather than a bailout.

The Welsh Government’s win was the fourth time a public authority has successfully defended a subsidy control case under the 2022 Act, with none yet lost.

Not everyone is convinced the airport is in the clear. Andrew RT Davies, the Welsh Conservative Senedd member for the Vale of Glamorgan and Bridgend, welcomed the million-passenger milestone but warned the airport still needed to attract major carriers such as Qatar Airways to become profitable.

Whether the long-running saga is finally over now rests with the Court of Appeal, and whether it agrees to hear Bristol’s challenge at all.

Related stories from Swansea Bay News

CARDIFF AIRPORT: A million passengers in a year as Welsh airport becomes UK’s second fastest-growing
How a record year and a new Toronto route fuelled the airport’s fastest growth in years.

Cardiff Airport: First direct WestJet flight from Toronto touches down
Wales’ first direct link to Canada in nearly two decades returns.

Bristol Airport drags Welsh ministers to tribunal over £205m Cardiff Airport bailout
The legal fight over the airport’s public funding lands in court.

Cardiff Airport appoints cargo expert in push to become regional freight hub
The airport’s drive to grow its freight business after its tribunal win.

#BristolAirport #CardiffAirport #CourtOfAppeal #flights #tourism #travel #WelshGovernment
I’ve been writing to Jeremy Bamber for years, but suddenly the prison has stopped me. Why? | Simon Hattenstone https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/14/jeremy-bamber-prison-media-jail-banned #JeremyBamber #PrisonsAndProbation #UkCriminalJustice #CourtOfAppeal #UkNews
I’ve been writing to Jeremy Bamber for years, but suddenly the prison has stopped me. Why?

Prisoners have a right to communicate with the media about their cases. Yet after 41 years in jail, Bamber has been banned, asks Guardian features writer Simon Hattenstone

The Guardian
Palestine Action trial lawyer wins appeal against contempt of court charge

Rajiv Menon KC was accused of breaching judge’s directions with his closing speech at trial of six activists

The Guardian
UK Court of Appeal rewrites consent rules for gambling marketing: The UK Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling on GDPR consent for gambling direct marketing, setting a new objective standard for data controllers. https://ppc.land/uk-court-of-appeal-rewrites-consent-rules-for-gambling-marketing/ #GamblingMarketing #GDPR #DataProtection #UKLaw #CourtOfAppeal
UK Court of Appeal rewrites consent rules for gambling marketing

The UK Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling on GDPR consent for gambling direct marketing, setting a new objective standard for data controllers.

PPC Land
Scholars, writers and artists defy ban on Palestine Action in letter to judges

Exclusive: Prominent figures risk arrest with message of support for proscribed group before next week’s appeal hearing

The Guardian
Indigenous identity researcher to appeal decision in defamation case
Darryl Leroux, an associate professor at the University of Ottawa who lost a defamation case against academic Michelle Coupal in March, filed a Notice of Appeal with the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/coupal-leroux-defamation-appeal-9.7170784?cmp=rss