https://anthropocene-working-group.org
(so far, the old ICS/SQS page is still there, but only accessible via direct link, no idea how long ICS will keep it there: https://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/working-groups/anthropocene ) #AWG
#Investitionsprüfung nach #AWG / #AWV bei #Klöckner-Übernahme durch #Worthington Steel (#USA)?
Mögliche relevante Rechtsnormen:
§55 AWG: Sektorübergreifende Prüfung (ab 25% Anteil)
§60 AWG: Sektorspezifische Prüfung (#Verteidigungsbezug)
EU-VO 2019/452: Screening ausländischer Direktinvestitionen
#Stahlverarbeitung für #Rüstungsindustrie = versorgungskritisch im Kontext Zeitenwende
Das #BMWE hat 2 Monate Prüffrist.
Politischer Wille zur Durchsetzung strategischer Autonomie feels NULL
I would argue circular mils (also used in measuring wire) is even worse than AWG. At least "gauge" measures have a reasonable physical basis - for wire, it's the number of times a given ingot of copper was drawn through a die to make it longer and thinner. That's why the number goes up as the size goes down.
Split over 2 pairs, it's 2.5A per conductor. Assuming 75C-rated insulation, you need ~25 AWG - call it 24 gauge for a little safety margin. That's a conductor with cross-sectional area of 0.2mm^2, diameter a touch over half a millimeter.
It's not a human hair - but it does intuitively feel like too much.
We'll probably get used to it. And only see houses go up in flames once in a while because some cheap non-UL-rated cable got purchased from a shady dealer...
(I know Matt doesn't need to be told any of this, it's just for the thread...)