🚨 NEWS: AI per le PMI Italiane: la guida pratica per adottare l’intelligenza artificiale senza sprecare budget
Ecco i punti chiave in breve:
💡 Hai sentito parlare di AI, ma non sai da dove partire per la tua azienda? Un forno, un negozio di abbigliamento, uno studio commercialista: come si applica davvero l’intelligenza artificiale senza but...
"The AI Omnibus weakens the AI Act before key safeguards have even started to apply. It delays accountability, reduces transparency, fragments the AI Act’s horizontal logic and gives industry lobbyists a clear signal that implementation can be used to reopen obligations they dislike.
This matters beyond AI. The same deregulatory logic is visible in the Data Omnibus and the Digital Fitness Check, as well as in other areas far beyond digital rights. If this model becomes normal, the EU digital rulebook will remain permanently open to pressure whenever safeguards become inconvenient.
In our accompanying analysis, we explain the main changes in more detail. The conclusion is clear: the European Parliament should reject the AI Omnibus deal. Policymakers who care about fundamental rights, rule of law, and meaningful accountability must resist the normalisation of deregulation, whether through Omnibus files or any other rushed procedure used to weaken hard-won safeguards."
https://edri.org/our-work/ai-omnibus-deal-eu-lawmakers-should-reject-a-rollback-of-ai-safeguards/
EU institutions have reached a final deal on the AI Omnibus, a file presented as technical simplification of the EU AI Act. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU should reject it.
New post — The European Commission has published the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content, supporting the Article 50 AI Act obligations applicable from 2 August 2026. Structure, EU icons, adequacy assessment, and the chain of conditions behind a code that is voluntary de iure, benchmark de facto.
🔗 https://www.nicfab.eu/en/posts/code-of-practice-transparency-ai-content/
The European Commission publishes the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling of AI-generated content: structure, EU icons, adequacy assessment, and the deadlines leading to 2 August 2026.
Dlaczego o tym piszemy? Dziś Sejm przyjął ustawę o systemach sztucznej inteligencji. To pierwszy krok na drodze wdrażania przez Polskę unijnego #AIAct.
Polecamy nasz materiał o tym, jak AI Act reguluje działanie systemów profilujących: https://panoptykon.org/ai-act-3-systemy-profilujace
⚠️ profilowanie młodzieży „wysokiego ryzyka”
⚠️ system do oceny ryzyka ekstremizmu.
⚠️ tajna lista „podejrzanych” narodowości służąca do odrzucania wniosków o wizę.
Takie systemy działają w różnych krajach UE. Tymczasem ocenianie ludzi pod kątem ich wiarygodności, przydatności, wypłacalności i ryzyka popełnienia przestępstwa to jedno z bardziej ryzykownych zastosowań sztucznej inteligencji. Ich użycie reguluje unijny #AIAct.
1/
🚨 The #AIOmnibus should never have happened.
The file was presented as "technical" simplifications of the arduously negotiated #AIAct, but it delays key protections, weakens transparency and creates a dangerous precedent for the EU's digital rules. It's just another vehicle for the EU's #deregulation agenda serving industry lobbies at the expense of our rights.
🚫 Civil society calls on the EU Parliament and Council to reject the AI Omnibus deal.
Read our analysis ➡️ https://edri.org/our-work/ai-omnibus-deal-eu-lawmakers-should-reject-a-rollback-of-ai-safeguards/
EU institutions have reached a final deal on the AI Omnibus, a file presented as technical simplification of the EU AI Act. The European Parliament and the Council of the EU should reject it.
Italy moves on #AIAct implementation: the Council of Ministers gave preliminary approval to two draft decrees implementing Law 132/2025 — governance, policing, liability, AI literacy.
My analysis: the parameters to watch, from Art. 70 and 74(8) on authorities and the DPA's role, to training as the condition for the effectiveness of the whole framework.
On 10 June 2026, the Italian Council of Ministers gave preliminary approval to two draft legislative decrees implementing Law no. 132/2025 on artificial intelligence. Analysis of the delegation framework, the relationship with the AI Act and the national governance architecture.
"DISPOSIZIONI ATTUATIVE IN MATERIA DI INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE": il decreto per l'accoglimento del #AIAct
«La scelta di fondo è promuovere l’innovazione, ma governarla dentro una cornice antropocentrica: l’IA può sostenere decisioni, servizi, formazione e competitività, ma non sostituire la responsabilità umana né comprimere i diritti fondamentali»
https://www.governo.it/it/articolo/comunicato-stampa-del-consiglio-dei-ministri-n-177/32050
Meteora Web
Miguel Afonso Caetano
Marcel SIneM(S)US
Nicola Fabiano
Panoptykon
EDRi
informapirata ⁂ 
Adrian Morales